Tag Archives: etfs

Weekly ETF Asset Round-Up: Equity Tops, Bonds Lag

Last week, the U.S. economy injected a fresh lease of life into the market, which has lately been troubled by Chinese hard landing fears, stretched equity valuations, oil price worries and some downbeat global economic data. The bulls have once again taken the center stage mainly because of an oil-rebound, though uncertainty is prevalent. Let’s take a look at the ETF asset flow of last week to understand the changing perception of investors. Improvement in the U.S. job scenario, inflation, manufacturing, construction spending, and housing and consumer spending data along with a spike in oil prices resulted in huge money inflows into the U.S. equity funds last week as per etf.com (as of March 3, 2016). Asset Gainers As a result, the SPDR S&P 500 Trust ETF (NYSEARCA: SPY ) , an ETF that resembles the S&P 500 index, saw inflows of nearly $1.76 billion last week. This took the fund’s asset base to around $176.7 billion. The return of risk-appetite was also validated by asset gains in the junk bond ETF space. The space has long been downtrodden. This was because that this segment has huge exposure in the energy market and includes debt issued when oil prices were at lofty levels. Oil prices slid in early 2016, putting energy companies on the verge of default and pressure on junk bonds. However, recent risk-on sentiments in the market and an oil price recovery pushed investors to pour more than $1.16 billion and $1.13 billion in the SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF (NYSEARCA: JNK ) and the iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (NYSEARCA: HYG ) last week. Investors’ interest in risky assets may be back, but probably not in a full-fledged way. As much as $1.31 billion asset inflows into the gold bullion ETF, the SPDR Gold Trust ETF (NYSEARCA: GLD ) , revealed this. Gold demand has been surging lately on a safety bid. Investors’ continued interest in the yellow metal tells us that not only is volatility still present, the recent rally may also lose momentum any time soon. Inflation-protected bond ETF the iShares TIPS Bond ETF (NYSEARCA: TIP ) also gathered about $529 million in assets as the U.S. inflation outlook brightened on a relatively subdued U.S. dollar and recuperating energy prices. Asset Losers The fixed income world saw outflows with the iShares Short Treasury Bond ETF (NYSEARCA: SHV ) topping the losers’ list, having shed about $1.22 billion in assets. Just as the U.S. economy started delivering upbeat data, talks over rate hikes were back on the table. This will surely hamper investors’ interest in short-term Treasury bond ETFs as further Fed hikes would have the worst impact on the short-end of the yield curve. Another short-term bond ETF, the iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF (NYSEARCA: SHY ) , saw a $330.9 million reduction in assets. Ultra short-term investment grade bond ETFs including the PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Strategy ETF (NYSEARCA: MINT ) and the SPDR SSgA Ultra Short Term Bond ETF (NYSEARCA: ULST ) also lost $422.4 million and $179.7 million in assets, respectively, last week. Apart from short-term bond ETFs, intermediate bonds products like the iShares 3-7 Year Treasury Bond ETF (NYSEARCA: IEI ) and the SPDR Barclays Intermediate Term Treasury ETF (NYSEARCA: ITE ) saw assets worth $374.8 million and $230.6 million, respectively, gushing out of the funds. Original Post

How To Best Gauge Your Risk Tolerance

By Larry Cao, CFA Understanding an investor’s risk tolerance is arguably the single most important issue for an investor and their financial adviser to consider. And yet it never seems to get the attention it deserves. The Definition Risk tolerance refers to your ability and willingness to take on investment risk. Specifically, it indicates how big of a loss you can take in the market without changing course. We are all human and abandon ship when things go wrong. (And that’s why we are not fully invested in equities even when it comes to our long-term investments.) Risk tolerance is the threshold at which you’ll head for the exits. It’s important to measure your risk tolerance accurately. Otherwise all your financial plans are just sand castles and won’t withstand the test of time and market volatility. “I did not really understand my true risk tolerance.” This is one of the painful facts many investors came to appreciate following the global financial crisis. Financial institutions often offer their wealth management clients a risk tolerance questionnaire as a way to gauge their risk appetite and capacity to withstand loss. Investors are typically asked anywhere from a few to multiple sets of questions on their investment horizon, their reaction to different levels of market volatility, and sometimes other factors, such as their education, that regulators or financial institutions may deem relevant. The Issue There are two problems with the current risk tolerance questionnaires and how they are administered. First, is the question of what motivates a financial institution to administer such a questionnaire. Far too often, the questionnaire is the product of internal (compliance) and regulatory considerations. Therefore, the questions may not have been designed to accurately measure your risk tolerance. Second, financial advisers, whether fee- or non-fee-based, are directly rewarded for persuading clients to trade or invest with them. Risk tolerance questionnaires are often treated as a hindrance to profit rather than a tool to gain a client’s trust. I think it’s for these reasons that the single most important question for accurately gauging investor’s risk tolerance often does not get asked. That question is: How often do you check your investment performance? The Solution How frequently you look at a Bloomberg Terminal, check your stock performance on a smartphone, or, in a more old fashioned way, call your broker actually matters quite a bit in understanding your risk tolerance. Run-of-the-mill questionnaires generally give ranges of upside and downside related to investment strategies, in dollar amounts or percentages, and ask which one you’d invest in. The horizon is generally assumed to be a year – that’s how often financial advisers typically meet with clients to discuss financial plans. And yet, what these ranges mean to an investor very much depends on how frequently they check the market. As a service to readers of CFA Institute Financial NewsBrief , we asked them that question. (To avoid ambiguity and guesswork, the question was phrased differently in the poll.) And below are their responses. When did you last check your investment performance? Click to enlarge About 41% of the 558 respondents actually checked their performance within 24 hours (including 7% who checked within the hour?!). Imagine the constant pounding they’ll get in a bear market. In fact, if you are part of this group, just think back to how you felt this January. Experience shows that this group is more likely to overstate their risk tolerance on questionnaires and, hence, are most vulnerable to market volatility when it actually hits. When I was a professional money manager, I belonged to this group. It’s kind of a responsibility that comes with the job. But it is just as hard for professional investors to stomach market turmoil as anyone else. As I recall, in the midst of the financial crisis in 2008, when I asked a portfolio manager from a different firm how morale was in the office, he said, “It is really quiet.” By the way, I am not saying all portfolio managers have to monitor their performance this closely. It depends on how your investment strategy works. For example, value strategies tend to require longer investment horizons, so it’s generally okay if a manager does not check portfolio performance every day. The largest group of our survey respondents (40%) check on their portfolios every month. For most investment strategies and most investors, I think that’s probably the optimum. Still, in terms of gauging one’s risk tolerance, that’s a frequency higher than implied in the risk tolerance questionnaire. So this group suffers from the same problem as those noted above. That adds up to about 80% of investors who are probably overestimating their risk tolerance. How frequently you make your investment decisions has direct impact on your risk tolerance. If you invest you own money, make sure you ask yourself that question. If you are a financial adviser, consider asking your clients that question today. Disclaimer: Please note that the content of this site should not be construed as investment advice, nor do the opinions expressed necessarily reflect the views of CFA Institute.

Advisors May Need To Make Changes To Win HNW Business

High-net worth (“HNW”) investors, which are defined as households with investable assets between $5 million and $25 million, accounted for one-quarter of the nearly $64 trillion U.S. investable asset share in 2015. Obviously, HNW investors are highly prized by most financial advisory firms, but aspiring advisors often underestimate the breadth of business changes that are required in order to properly serve these customers, according to a recent white paper published by BNY Mellon’s Pershing: What Wealth Wants: Refining Your Firm’s Approach to the High-Net-Worth Market . Some of the required business changes may include: Addition of new services Expanded set of financial planning products and solutions Higher service standards Ability to scale More staff Increased spending on operations and technology Pricing adjustments “Serving this segment successfully is not just a matter of identifying prospects and converting them,” said Katie Swain, director of financial solutions at Pershing, in a statement. “It requires a substantial evolution and transformation of a firm’s approach to service and infrastructure to ensure that HNW clients can be profitably and sufficiently served over the long term.” Wirehouses and private banks were the types of firms that traditionally served the HNW market. More recently, however, independent advisory firms have been expanding their capabilities in pursuit of HNW business — and they’ve been successful, thanks in part to their ability to generate greater customer satisfaction by providing more individualized service. “HNW clients’ expectations for customized solutions are driven by the complex and unique circumstances they experience in their lives,” said Gabriel Garcia, director of relationship management at Pershing Advisor Solutions. “They seek solutions for leveraging existing intangible assets in a way that minimizes interest costs and tax consequences, and advisors need to deliver these services in a seamless way.” For the independent advisors that succeed in winning HNW investor business, the rewards are lucrative. The average client size for an advisor serving HNW investors is more than 30 times that of an advisor serving clients with less than $1 million in assets under management. For more information, download a pdf copy of the white paper .