Tag Archives: etf-hub

¡Viva España!

After getting off to a roaring start at the beginning of the year, Spanish equities hit a wall in May. A variety of factors affected them: a spike in interest rates, political upheaval and concern about “contagion” from Greece, as well as some renewed concern about some unchanging issues. Spanish stocks will have to climb a wall of worry, but conditions suggest that they could. Spain ought to outperform the rest of the Eurozone on a twelve-month view. The Spanish economy has grown steadily since Q2 2011, at an accelerating pace, and is on track to grow 3.2% this year, helped by an increase in tourism ─ the strong Pound, a wet summer and travelers’ difficulties with Greece’s cash-only economy boosted Spanish H1 tourist receipts by 7.4%. But tourism is not the only driver of Spain’s recovery, which is broadly-based, and is even beginning to be felt (tentatively) in construction. As this chart implies, growth has been driven by consumption rather than investment or exports, although both of the latter have been healthy. Spanish economic reforms have made the economy considerably more resilient than it was in the darkest days of the Euro Crisis, but there is still much more to be done, so Spaniards could not witness Greek developments with equanimity. The Spanish 10-year bond yield, which had fallen pretty steadily since July 2012, climbed from 1.15% in mid-March to 2.41% in mid-June on fears of “contagion.” It is currently 2.07%. Like consumer confidence, Spanish equities, which had been performing very strongly since the beginning of the year, reacted badly as well: While equities have recovered from the depth of the market’s fears on July 7 (the Tuesday before the crucial Greek parliamentary vote), they do not seem to have recovered their former brio . Several things that are worrying Spanish investors are not new ─ in fact they are perennials. However, Spain’s recent history has brought them once more very much to the fore. One is the structural defects of its labor market. It is indicative that something is very wrong that the Q2 report of 22.4% unemployment, years since the economic crisis, represents improvement. You have to go back to the 1970s to see a reading of less than 5%: even during the boom years it failed to breech 8%. The job creation that has brought it down from 26.9% in Q1 2013 has mostly involved temporary or rolling contract positions. The job protections created by early post-Franco governments are dying, but far too slowly to be helpful to the unemployed. In the meantime, unionized employers that cannot circumvent them simply do not hire, and their workforce just ages. Youth unemployment, while down from its peak, is a still-staggering 49.2%. Persistent unemployment has led to disaffection, amply illustrated by the defeat of traditional parties of government in May’s municipal elections. A significant victor was the Podemos (“We Can”) party, which advocates repudiating the national debt, etc ., but numerous new groups and special interests (civil servants, people who want mortgage forgiveness) won seats. Those who were happy to use their municipal votes for protest might hesitate to elect such groups to parliament; further, the treatment of Greece may cause Spaniards to reconsider support for them. But a national election must be held by December 20th, and it is doubtful whether the economic benefits that current government policy will continue to generate in the meantime will be so dramatic as to change many minds. Thoughtful citizens cannot help but be alarmed. Another perennial worry is separatism. Catalan independence is traditionally a leftist cause, but unlike the Scots, its advocates do not aspire to build Socialism on someone else’s dime. Catalonia is comparatively wealthy, with industrial traditions that are still intact rather than sentimental memories: it could probably be a viable state. Discontent that finds expression elsewhere as “Occupy”-type anarcho-populism, channels easily into separatism in Catalonia. Last November’s referendum saw 80.8% support for independence. Although there were reservations about the value of this exercise ─ some estimated turnout as low as a third, despite minors’ and non-citizens’ participation ─ it certainly does not suggest that support for Catalan independence has dimmed. There are also concerns about deflation. These have hovered over the entire Eurozone, but Spanish prices have contracted by a rather disturbing 6.2% over the last year: It is not surprising that business sentiment, as shown in the first chart, is lagging so noticeably behind consumer confidence. All of which amounts to quite a wall of worry for Spanish equities to surmount. However, if construction is in fact recovering, that will do much to cut into unemployment, as will continued strength in tourism. Both would help youth employment. Greece’s failure to persuade other Europeans to continue to prop up its grotesque economic policies must surely have discredited the more wild-eyed notions of how to escape austerity. Catalan independence will probably overshadow Spain indefinitely: last year’s poll indicates that the flame still burns, but it was too flawed to suggest that concerted efforts toward secession will materialize soon. While the refusal of Spanish prices to increase remains a concern, there is little evidence that they are still contracting (since January, almost all the reported price decline is due to energy). So the Spanish glass is half full as well as half empty: classic conditions under which equity prices can climb a wall of worry. Will they do so? The chances are pretty good. Interest rates can be expected to return to levels closer to those of March. The European Union’s fudge on Greece is sufficient to push those concerns to the back of many minds. Continued economic gains may not help the current government’s electoral chances much, but they cannot hurt. Friday’s report of June industrial production saw it drop 1.4% drop in Germany, 1.1% in Italy, and 0.1% in France, while gaining 0.4% in Spain, suggesting that the Spanish economy will continue to grow more strongly than those the Eurozone generally. Yet other Eurozone equity markets have not been as lackluster as Spain’s in the last week, improving Spain’s relative value in a context where its economy is clearly outperforming theirs. The fundamental attractions that drove the IBEX Index up 22% from trough to peak during its January to May rally are still in place, and in many cases have improved further. There are three Spain ETFs available in the U.S., but the iShares MSCI Spain Capped ETF (NYSEARCA: EWP ) is the only very usable one. The others, SPDR MSCI Spain Quality Mix ETF (NYSEARCA: QESP ) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Spain ETF (NYSEARCA: HEWP ), have AUM of only $2.5 million and $3.8 million respectively, making them essentially illiquid. EWP has AUM of $1.7 billion. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

What The $2.1 Billion Transaction Means For NextEra Energy Partners

Summary The company only holds renewal energy assets right now. Pipelines are backed by long-term contracts that should provide sustainable cash flow. However, when we look at the entire company as a whole, this acquisition adds little value. NextEra Energy Partners (NYSE: NEP ) is a company formed by NextEra Energy (NYSE: NEE ) to acquire and manage contracted clean energy projects with long-term cash flows. Through a controlling general partnership interest and a 22.2% limited partnership interest in the operating company, NEP OpCo., the company owns a portfolio of solar and wind power generating assets. Given the existing assets, it may come as a surprise to you that the company recently announced a $2.1 billion acquisition, consisting of solely natural gas pipelines. Let’s learn a bit more about this transaction. The Transaction The acquisition includes seven natural gas pipelines located in Texas. The pipelines currently have capacity of 4 Bcf per day with 3 Bcf already contracted with ship-or-pay contracts. So right off the bat we can see that there is growth potential without additional capital spending. While utilization seldom reaches 100%, the current rate of 75% clearly has additional room for improvement. The management also mentioned that is already an expansion project underway and would be providing an additional 1 Bcf of volume per day. This brings the total growth organic growth potential of these pipelines to 67%. The locations connected by the major pipelines are also interesting, let’s take a closer look. The two largest pipelines are the NET Mexico Pipeline and the Eagle Ford Pipeline. Both of them deliver gas from the Eagle Ford Shale to Mexico. What is the significance of the Eagle Ford Shale? It is one of the most prolific unconventional plays in the U.S. Despite the recent commodity crash, we did not see a significant decline (see following chart from the EIA). Source: eia.gov As long as production does not stop, the company can keep its utilization rate up. To make things better, the pipeline is also under a 20 year ship-or-pay contract meaning that the company would receive payments even if production falls. To put the cherry on top, it is also the lowest-tariff transmission pipeline from Eagle Ford to Mexico. The Eagle Ford Pipeline is similar to the NET Mexico Pipeline. They both provide a cost advantageous way for production companies to transport gas to Mexico. Synergy? Although I feel that the pipelines are great and will deliver long-term cash flows to the company. I do not think that there is any synergy between this acquisition and any of the current renewal energy assets held. Now the management would have to deal with another source of risk (i.e. commodity risk). Despite the long term nature of the pipelines, ultimately their profitability will be dependent on the success of producers. No contract can protect the company if producers start to go bankrupt left and right. Although this is not an immediate concern (yet), it is still another drawback. Conclusion The assets acquired are excellent when you look them by themselves. They provide a source of long-term cash flow through decades long contracts and attractive locations. However, when you look at the entire company as a whole, there seems to be little benefit to the existing renewable portfolio. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. Share this article with a colleague

Invest Like Henry Kissinger

By Carlton Delfeld “I’ve always acted alone. Americans like that immensely.” – Henry Kissinger Have you seen Henry Kissinger lately? At 92, he’s as fluent as ever on foreign affairs. It makes you wonder whether, even at this advanced stage of life, he could do a better job managing American foreign policy than our current leaders. This brings me to Ukraine, Russia, and China. They look like a beautiful mess right now – but within a reasonable period, American foreign policy will gravitate back to a Kissinger dictum: America can only afford one big power adversary at a time. At this time, the one adversary is clearly China. In short, the whole Ukraine-Crimea-Russia fiasco could’ve and should’ve been avoided. Unfortunately, Ukraine is a prisoner of geography and history. It’s a bridge between East and West – a classic buffer state. The country will always need to balance closer ties to Europe with good relations with Russia, and this practical consideration should be reflected in American diplomacy. Pushing Russia closer to China is certainly not in American interests. Lord Palmerston once said, “Nations have no permanent friends or allies – they only have permanent interests.” Thus, the probability is on the side of U.S.-Russia relations improving in the long run. The stakes are simply too large and the logic of some sort of rapprochement too clear and convincing. In fact, while headlines have created a perception of a crisis in U.S.-Russia relations, the reality is that diplomats on both sides are working hard on “alliance management.” As an emerging bond trader active in Russia put it to me, “A lot of this is elaborate political theatre.” I believe that the gap between perception and reality is where fortunes are made, and Russia is the perfect example. Despite the country’s reputation as being a non-competitive, monopolistic economy, there were over 21,300 foreign capital enterprises operating in Russia by the end of the second quarter. And American companies invested $1.18 billion in Russia in 2014, nearly double the $667.2 million recorded in 2013. What’s more, Russia’s stock market is trading at astoundingly cheap valuation multiples right now. We know the reasons: economic sanctions imposed by Western democracies, falling energy prices, and, finally, the falling ruble, which is down sharply against the dollar this year. The stocks in the Market Vectors Russia ETF (NYSEARCA: RSX ) are trading at an 80% discount to the S&P 500 Index and at less than 65% of break-up value. Howard Marks of Oaktree Capital puts price and value at the center of his book, The Most Important Thing: For a value investor, price has to be the starting point. It has been demonstrated time and time again that no asset is so good that it can’t become a bad investment if bought at too high a price. And there are few assets so bad that they can’t be a good investment when bought cheap enough. Plus, we don’t need a miracle to profit from the situation, either. An American hedge fund trader active in Russian markets put it to me this way: “Things don’t have to turn around in Russia for me to make money. They just have to get a little bit better.” This is the key. If energy prices stabilize or rise, if the situation in Ukraine improves, if the ruble bounces back – any one of these catalysts could spark a sharp rally. RSX is down 32% over the past year and has pulled back 16% from its recent peak in mid-May. So it’s a good time to get ready to pull the trigger on one of the largest oil and gas companies in the world, Lukoil ( OTCPK:LUKOY ). Lukoil exceeds even Exxon Mobil (NYSE: XOM ) in total proven oil reserves. Even more impressive, the company has remained free cash flow positive during the entire past decade. The company also has a very low risk of government intervention, with a professional board and management at the helm. Despite this, Lukoil is trading at 37% of break-up value and 4.4 times trailing earnings. Right now, I’d nibble on a position and take a more sizable stake when a clear uptrend develops in the stock. Like Kissinger, don’t fear acting alone. Investing in undervalued – even hated – stocks when they turn is the most consistent way to build substantial wealth. Original Post Editor’s Note: This article discusses one or more securities that do not trade on a major U.S. exchange. Please be aware of the risks associated with these stocks.