Tag Archives: etf-hub

CIBR Gives Investors Another Chance To Profit From Hot Growth Market

First Trust brings a new cybersecurity ETF to market to serve underserved sector. The First Trust Nasdaq CEA Cybersecurity ETF has a cheaper expense ratio and more frequent re-balancing, providing key differences to the PureFunds ISE Cyber Security ETF. The PureFunds Cybersecurity ETF is up more than 15% in 2015 and has shown the strength and growth of the sector. First Trust, a top ten fund management company, recently introduced the First Trust Nasdaq CEA Cybersecurity ETF (NASDAQ: CIBR ) to the public. The ETF gives investors a new way to invest in a basket of stocks in the hot growth cybersecurity market. After watching the strong growth of the PureFunds ISE Cybersecurity ETF (NYSEARCA: HACK ), which I profiled in December, investors will want to take a look at this new name. The new First Trust ETF will invest in stocks deemed to fit into the cybersecurity class by the Consumer Electronics Association. Other rules for inclusion are a minimum market capitalization of $250 million, average volume of $1 million over last 3 months, and a minimum free float of 20%. The First Trust fund holds 33 stocks. The companies selected range in market capitalization from $322 million to $139 billion. The average capitalization is $6.8 billion. Here is the current (7/7) top ten holdings for the First Trust ETF: Company Symbol Market Capitalization Weighting Qihoo 360 Tech QIHU $6.9 billion 6.8% FireEye FEYE $7.4 billion 6.2% Palo Alto Networks PANW $14.4 billion 6.1% Cisco Systems CSCO $137.3 billion 5.7% NXP Semiconductors NXPI $21.5 billion 5.2% Imperva IMPV $2.0 billion 3.2% Proofpoint PFPT $2.5 billion 3.2% Vasco Data VDSI $1.1 billion 3.1% Fortinet FTNT $6.9 billion 3.1% Splunk SPLK $8.5 billion 3.1% As of July 7th , there was an overlap of six companies between the two ETF’s top ten holdings. The stocks held by both in the top ten are (weighting in HACK): Proofpoint: 4.3% Imperva: 4.3% Fortinet: 4.2% Splunk: 4.2% Palo Alto Networks: 4.1% Cisco: 4.0% Along with the difference in the top ten holdings, a couple other differences are worth pointing out. The first and obvious one is expense ratio. PureFunds charges 0.75% on the ETF and First Trust will be charging 0.6%. While this isn’t a huge difference, it does mean you will pay more for PureFunds to manage your investment. The other big difference is re-balancing. PureFunds re-balances their holdings on a semi-annual basis. First Trust is planning on quarterly re-balancing. I have to side with First Trust on this one as it is the more active management and allows the company to make necessary changes more often. Since going public, shares of the PureFunds ETF have traded between $24.44 and $33.91. As of Wednesday, they were trading for $30.48 per share. The ETF is up 15.1% in 2015 to date. Shares have increased 17.9% over the last six months. Since my December article recommending the ETF, shares are up more than 11%. The ETF has also seen a large number of inflows since the start of 2015 as the sector heats up and the fact that investors had only one option. The ETF passed the $1 billion mark and as of June had more than $1.2 billion assets under management. Cybersecurity continues to be a hot growth market. Anytime there is a major security breach, the whole sector rises. Companies and major agencies continue to spend large amounts of money to protect themselves from future attacks. According to the First Trust prospectus , cybersecurity is expected to see compound annual growth of 10.3% to hit $155.7 billion by the year 2019. I pointed out the opportunity in cybersecurity back in December. At that time the hacks on Sony (NYSE: SNE ), Target (NYSE: TGT ), and Home Depot (NYSE: HD ), were still fresh in people’s minds. In June, the whole sector rose on the heels of a major government hack. The companies in this category get money when things go bad or for cleaning up messes, but ultimately get the majority of their revenue from prevention. The White House is also proposing to spend more than $14 billion in fiscal 2016 to help support cybersecurity measures. The market for cybersecurity is heating up and likely will see the projected double digit annual growth. Investors have the option to hand pick one or two stocks in the sector or buy one of these two ETFs to get invested in the sector. As far as a recommendation, I think both ETFs will outperform the market as this sector should stay hot for at least the next five year cycle. I think it would be wise to consider the new First Trust ETF with the lower expense ratio, and more frequent re-balancing. It’ll be interesting to see if First Trust gets new investor money or the assets under management on HACK takes a small hit from investors looking for greater newer investment options. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, but may initiate a long position in CIBR over the next 72 hours. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

The Right Municipal Bond ETF Right Now

Summary Puerto Rico problems raises concerns in municipal bond space. Take a look at a more conservative muni ETF that targets debt from dedicated revenue streams. Highlight of the Deutsche X-trackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF. By Todd Shriber & Tom Lydon Chicago. Detroit. Puerto Rico. Increasingly precarious financial positions in those cities and territories and others across the U.S. have cast a pall over the municipal bond market. The cases of Chicago, Detroit and other cities across the U.S., including several mid-sized cities in California, underscore the pressure public pensions and post-employment benefits, such as healthcare for public workers, are putting on state and municipal finances. Those weakening financial positions are prompting advisors and investors to consider alternatives to general obligation bonds when building out the municipal section of fixed income portfolios. There is an exchange traded fund for that and that fund is the Deutsche X-Trackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond Fund (NYSEArca: RVNU ) . RVNU seeks to limit or reduce exposure to public pension risk, not avoid or eliminate it, by focusing solely on bonds that fund, state and local infrastructure projects such as water and sewer systems, public power systems, toll roads, bridges, tunnels, and many other public use projects where the interest and principal repayments are generated from dedicated revenue sources. Toll roads, tunnels and water systems may not sound like the sexiest investment themes, but with public pension issues afflicting states from New Jersey to Pennsylvania to California, revenue bonds, including those held by RVNU, can be seen as the “new black” of the municipal bond market. “RVNU allows us to offer a product that focuses on investment-grade revenue bonds,” said Deutsche Asset & Wealth Management (Deutsche AWM) Portfolio Manager Blair Ridley in an interview with ETF Trends. “We focus on revenue issuers that by that heir nature usually carry less pension risk as compared to general obligation issuers. We’re trying to follow those issues with dedicated revenue streams, or ‘essential purpose bonds. In any economic environment, people will pay their electric bill and their water bill.” RVNU’s index is intended to track federal tax-exempt municipal bonds that have been issued with the intention of funding, state and local infrastructure projects such as water and sewer systems, public power systems, toll roads, bridges, tunnels, and many other public use projects. The index will attempt to only hold those bonds issued by state and local municipalities where the interest and principal repayments are generated from dedicated revenue sources. A succinct way of highlighting RVNU’s utility in the current municipal bond market environment comes courtesy of Deutsche AWM portfolio manager Ashton Goodfield. She said, “RVNU has less exposure to headline risk. The revenue streams are more stable in up and down economic environments. These revenue streams are what pays back principal and interest on the bonds.” RVNU is just over two years old holds 44 bonds. The ETF’s underlying index, the DBIQ Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond Index, holds over 800 bonds. As Ridley notes, RVNU has “a lot of room to add holdings.” RVNU employs a representative sampling methodology in order to match the traits and returns of its underlying index. RVNU has the flexibility to go as far down the ratings spectrum as BBB, but bonds rated either AA or A currently comprise over 86% of RVNU’s index, according to issuer data. At a time of heightened concerns regarding bond liquidity, RVNU ensures liquidity by tilting more than 75% of the fund’s lineup to issues with $100 million or more outstanding. Another obvious concern is rising interest rates and how higher rates will affect longer duration bond funds. RVNU’s index has a modified duration of 6.53 years. That longer duration has been something of a hurdle for RVNU, but one the ETF can easily overcome. “Our focus is on finding the most attractive part of the yield curve,” adds Ridley. “RVNU finds bonds with 10-year calls because those have the same sensitivity as bonds with 10-year maturities.” Since coming to market, RVNU has taken its lumps. The ETF debuted in the midst of the 2013 taper tantrum and the Detroit bankruptcy, but at a time when some of the largest U.S. states, including California and Illinois, are awash in massively under-funded public employee pension obligations, some investors are looking to diversify away from GO bonds while still keeping exposure to munis. “Clients are asking about GOs and pensions,” said Goodfield. “There are some municipalities that aren’t managing these issues well. While true, we think it’s important to say many general obligation issuers are managing these issues well Some investors have a negative outlook and want to be solely in revenue bonds.” As Goodfield notes, awareness of public pension issues is on the rise. That could prove to be good for RVNU over the long-term. Deutsche X-Trackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond Fund (click to enlarge) Tom Lydon’s clients own shares of RVNU. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Flurry Of New Currency Hedged ETFs Fuels Price War

Currency hedging ETFs have been in vogue this year, given the ultra-loose monetary policy across the globe and a strong U.S. dollar against a basket of other currencies. The bullish trend in the dollar is likely to continue, as the Fed is primed to increase interest rates for the first time since 2006 later this year as the U.S. economy roars back to life. While cheap money flows are making international investment a compelling opportunity for U.S. investors this year, a strong dollar could wipe out the gains when repatriated in U.S. dollar terms, pushing international investment into the red, in spite of well-performing stocks. As a result, investors are flocking to currency-hedged ETFs. This has a double benefit. While these ETFs tap bullish international fundamentals, they dodge the effect of a strong greenback. So far, WisdomTree Investments (NASDAQ: WETF ) has been clearly leading the space with the WisdomTree Europe Hedged Equity ETF (NYSEARCA: HEDJ ) and the WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity ETF (NYSEARCA: DXJ ) having AUM of $20.7 billion and $18.7 billion, respectively, thanks to the first-mover advantage, liquidity, price and brand name. However, its dominance now seems to be challenged by a flurry of new currency-hedged ETFs that have fueled a price war in the space. This is especially true as some issuers such as PowerShares, ProShares, State Street (NYSE: STT ) and iShares have come up with low-cost products in recent months that are much cheaper than those offered by WisdomTree. These could provide stiff competition to the established ETFs in the space, dulling their appeal. Here, we have highlighted some of the low-cost currency-hedged ETFs, all launched on the market in the past couple of months. ProShares Hedged FTSE Japan ETF (HGJP) This ETF provides exposure to the Japanese equity market with no currency risk by tracking the FTSE Japan 100% Hedged to USD Index. It charges just 0.23% in annual fees, which is half the expense ratio for a similar exposure provided by other products. Expense ratios for the Deutsche X-trackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (NYSEARCA: DBJP ), the iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF (NYSEARCA: HEWJ ) and DXJ are 0.45%, 0.48% and 0.48%, respectively. ProShares Hedged FTSE Europe ETF (HGEU) This fund targets the European market and provides a hedge against six major European currencies. It follows the FTSE Developed Europe 100% Hedged to USD Index, charging investors 0.27%. Here again, the expense ratio of HGEU is half compared to that of 0.45% for the Deutsche X-trackers MSCI Europe Hedged Equity ETF (NYSEARCA: DBEU ), 0.51% for the iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EMU ETF (NYSEARCA: HEZU ) and 0.58% for the WisdomTree Europe Hedged Equity ETF ( HEDJ ). PowerShares Europe Currency Hedged Low Volatility Portfolio ETF (NYSEARCA: FXEU ) This ETF offers new ways to gain exposure to European stocks, and is perhaps the first product providing two popular ETF investing strategies – low volatility and currency hedging – at the same time. Despite the fact that its unique features and combo offer what the others lack, FXEU charges a low expense ratio of 0.25%. SPDR EURO STOXX 50 Currency Hedged ETF (NYSEARCA: HFEZ ) This ETF looks to track the performance of the EURO STOXX 50 Hedged USD Index. It is basically a holding of the SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (NYSEARCA: FEZ ), with currency hedge tacked onto it. The fund has an expense ratio of 0.32%, which is lower than that of many other products in the European currency-hedged space. iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (NYSEARCA: HAWX ) This fund offers exposure to stocks in the developed (excluding the U.S.) and emerging markets by tracking the MSCI ACWI ex USA 100% Hedged to USD Index, while at the same time providing a hedge against any fall in the currencies of the specified nation. It is basically a holding of its unhedged version, the iShares MSCI ACWI ex-U.S. Index ETF (NASDAQ: ACWX ), with currency hedge tacked onto it. The product charges 0.36%, which is cheaper by 4 bps compared to the Deutsche X-trackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (NYSEARCA: DBAW ) providing a similar exposure in the space. Given the lower expense ratios, these ETFs could see solid asset flows in the coming months if they succeed in outperforming or at least remain on par with the others in the space. The trends too should continue to favor international investing. Original Post