Tag Archives: enterprise
Digging Into The New InfraCap MLP ETF: Notes On My Conversation With Fund Management
Summary I was invited to interview the portfolio management of the newest, actively managed, MLP-focused ETF, trading under the symbol AMZA. My concern with the new fund was the level of visibility provided about fund holdings, compared to a traditional ETF, which must match a specified index. AMZA provides a new, enhanced packaged fund product for investors who want MLP exposure. The active management strategies should provide meaningful and measurable improvements on traditional MLP ETFs. After my overview article on the new InfraCap MLP ETF (NYSEARCA: AMZA ) , I was offered the opportunity for a phone interview with portfolio manager Jay Hatfield. CFO Ed Ryan also joined in on the call. After watching the AMZA share price and the comments on my previous article, I wanted to ask some questions that had come up. Overall, I was impressed with the willingness of Jay and Ed to provide detailed answers to my questions. The following are my takeaways from our discussion and not direct quotes. On the choice of going with the actively managed ETF structure rather than the more common closed-end fund, Hatfield said that ETFs typically trade closer to the per share net asset value – NAV. This avoids the sometimes large share price/NAV spread, which can distort and disrupt the returns MLP closed-end fund investors actually earn. The AMZA NAV is published daily on the InfraCapMLP.com website. Over the short couple of weeks I have been watching the ETF, the share price and NAV have tracked closely together. I was very much interested to ask about whether the InfraCap fund would provide a higher level of visibility on the portfolio holdings, as opposed to the MLP closed-end funds, which can be quite opaque to what they actually own. The AMZA holdings are updated daily on the website (More on the holdings below). I asked about the wide bid/ask spreads – something like 30 cents at the time – that I experienced while trying to buy shares. Hatfield and Ryan acknowledged the situation and said they were taking steps to remedy it. When I checked the price over the last couple of days the spread was down to a more acceptable 6 cents. On the topic of holdings, as one of the new breed of actively managed ETFs, the holdings are based on the widely-followed Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index – AMZI, which is basically a market cap weighted index of the 25 largest midstream MLPs. To actively manage the ETF portfolio compared to the index, Hatfield will use several strategies: The weighting of MLP holdings will be changed based on a proprietary model that values MLPs based on commodity prices, cash flow forecasts, and relative valuations. For example, in the AMZI, the top MLP is Enterprise Product Partners (NYSE: EPD ) with a 10.25% weight. The AMZA top holding is Williams Partners LP (NYSE: WPZ ) at 14.97%. WPZ is now the combined operations of Williams Partners and Access Midstream Partners. AMZA will own the corresponding MLP general partner companies instead of, or in addition to, the MLPs tracked by the AMZI index. As a result, AMZA currently lists 36 stock market traded holdings, including GP companies like Plains GP Holdings (NYSE: PAGP ), the GP of Plains All American Pipelines LP (NYSE: PAA ) – which is the 2nd largest weighting in the fund – both Targa Resources Partners LP (NYSE: NGLS ) and Targa Resources Corp. (NYSE: TRGP ), and Kinder Morgan Inc. (NYSE: KMI ), which I view as an MLP company dressed up in a corporate business suit. The fund will sell call options against holdings to boost portfolio income. AMZA can employ up to 33.3% leverage. The current holdings list shows a negative cash balance (the leverage) of 22.73% of the portfolio holdings. I was also told that the $0.50 per share dividend paid on January 15 is the planned initial quarterly distribution rate. It is expected that the quarterly dividend will grow as the MLPs in the portfolio increase their distribution rates. Based on today’s closing share price of $21.77, AMZA has a current yield of 9.2%. As of December 31, the AMZI index had a reported yield of 6.1%. MLP Sector Investment Potential With a managed portfolio based on the AMZI index, investors will be able to see if the active management enhancements provide over time a meaningful return boost. The largest MLP-focused ETF, the ALPS Alerian MLP ETF (NYSEARCA: AMLP ) , tracks the AMZI. I will be comparing total returns starting on January 1, 2015 as the quarters go buy. AMZI provides an enhanced product to get MLP exposure in any investment account where K-1 reported income is not a good idea or just not wanted. If the active management strategies work, this ETF provides an alternative that offsets the negatives of both MLP ETFs and closed-end funds. Final note: If you are not familiar with the tax ramifications of funds that own MLP units, my article: Pros And Cons Of MLP Investing Through Closed-End Funds , is an oldie, but goodie that explains why an MLP ETF will significantly underperform the selected index. Disclosure: The author is long AMZA, PAGP, KMI. (More…) The author wrote this article themselves, and it expresses their own opinions. The author is not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). The author has no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
How To Hunt For Deep Value Stocks With Bravery Over Patience
Everyone loves a bargain but choosing a strategy for finding mispriced shares isn’t as simple as it seems. Eighty years after Ben Graham and David Dodd laid the groundwork for what’s known as value investing , some of the brightest minds in finance are still working on the best ways of capturing deep value. Given that research has long shown that cheap beats expensive over the long run, honing a value strategy is clearly worth exploring. So where do you start? When Graham and Dodd wrote Security Analysis in 1934, they changed the rules on how investors should think about stocks. Chastened by catastrophic stock market losses a few years earlier, they urged investors to stop chasing expensive “glamor” and obsessing about earnings growth. Instead, they showed that it was mispriced and undervalued stocks that offered the best chance of outperformance. Ever since, investors have deployed an armory of metrics to help them find shares that don’t reflect the expected value of the companies behind them. Usually, they compare a company’s share price against what it earns — such as the price to earnings ratio — or against what it owns — such as the price to book ratio . One value ratio is never enough When it comes to these value ratios, investors often stick to their favourites. Just take a look at the the guru strategies we track at Stockopedia — many of them use just one valuation metric. But others think it’s too simplistic to use a single ratio to find and compare value stocks. In 2014 the equity research team at investment bank Societe Generale tackled this head on. Led by quant strategist Andrew Lapthorne, they’d already been tracking one value strategy called Quality Income . As the name suggests, it looks for good quality, dividend paying companies. But the focus on relatively high dividend yield is also a signpost to shares that might be cheaply priced. Quality Income was devised for what SocGen call “patient” value investors. These are the ones who are happy to let dividends compound over time in return for less volatility than you see in other types of value strategies. But Quality Income doesn’t get its hands dirty with another major source of value in the market. This is the one that most of us think of when it comes to deep value — buying beaten up, distressed, unloved and ignored stocks. Some of these laggards will never recover but others will bounce back and then some. So SocGen created an alternative strategy for the “brave” investor. Rather than rely on one single ratio, it combines five well known value factors to find stocks that are cheap relative to their sectors. Bravery is needed because these could well be companies with problems. And that means there can be sharp initial losses before the value in them eventually “outs.” The factors include: Book to Price Earnings to Price One Year forward Earnings to Price EBITDA to Enterprise Value Free Cash Flow to Price In 2014, its SG Value Beta index of the 200 cheapest companies globally returned 18.7%, which was broadly in line with other value-based indices. Since 2002, based mainly on back testing, it has consistently outperformed those benchmarks. (click to enlarge) Screening for “brave” deep value stocks Of course on reading the research it became very clear to us that the SocGen team had chosen a strikingly similar set of value ratios to Stockopedia.com’s own ValueRank — with which we already score over 18,000 European and US Stocks. Out in the cold… It’s pretty clear which sectors are currently out in the cold. Oil & gas producers like Ophir Energy ( OTC:OPHRY ) and oilfield services businesses like Petrofac ( OTCPK:POFCY ) and Hunting ( OTCPK:HNTIY ) have been beaten down of late. Likewise, there is a handful of industrials like Serco ( OTCPK:SECCY ), which slumped after issuing a series of profit warnings last year. Troubled cyclicals like pub groups Punch Taverns ( OTCPK:PCTVD ) and Enterprise Inns ( OTCPK:ETINY ) make the list, as does retailer Debenhams ( OTCPK:DBHSY ). Interestingly Debenhams had a ValueRank of 94 back in October 2014, but a gradual edging up in price has trimmed that back to 90. Financial stocks also feature heavily, with Standard Chartered ( OTCPK:SCBFF ) easily the largest by market cap. TSB Banking ( OTCPK:TSBBY ) is also there, as are insurance groups Friends Life ( OTC:RSLLF ) and Phoenix ( OTC:IPHXF ). Name Mkt Cap £m Value Rank Sector Standard Chartered 22,625 93 Financials Petrofac 2,627 91 Energy Phoenix 1,884 97 Financials Indivior 1,276 95 Healthcare Vedanta Resources 1,212 94 Basic Materials Serco 942.5 90 Industrials Debenhams 933.4 90 Consumer Cyclicals MHP SA 637.5 96 Consumer Defensives Deep Value is not for the faint hearted… It’s important to remember that digging around among the cheapest stocks in the market isn’t for the faint hearted. Often these companies come with uncertainty surrounding their financial strength or business viability. It was for that reason that Graham and Dodd encouraged wide diversification — a portfolio approach should harvest the deep value premium and absorb the inevitable losses. In the decades since they introduced the concept of buying undervalued stocks, numerous financial ratios have been used as a measure of what’s cheap. But rather than relying on a single measure, a value composite using several of those value factors is proving to be an effective way of navigating one of the trickiest parts of the market. Editor’s Note: This article discusses one or more securities that do not trade on a major exchange. Please be aware of the risks associated with these stocks.