Tag Archives: enterprise

Invest In Utilities Since The Fed Remains Dovish

Summary Utility stocks are often discarded as boring but provide stable income through dividends. The Fed decided not to raise interest rates in their September meeting but indicate by the end of the year would be appropriate. Utilities should be held in a diversified portfolio as an alternative to long duration bonds. This was supposed to be the month. The first time since 2006 the Fed raised interest rates. It turned out to be another case of the Fed getting cold feet. After all, the rest of the world’s central banks continue with their easy monetary policy. The case has been made that 25 basis points won’t make a difference so why not raise rates? On the other side of the argument, if 25 basis points doesn’t make a difference, why risk blowing up the stock market over it? The Fed’s statement was dovish indicating that we could continue to see interest rates held near zero into next year. The market believes the Fed will not move this year as indicated by Bloomberg’s world interest rate probability monitor. Bloomberg currently shows the market indicating an 18% probability of a rate increase in October and 43% of an increase in December. These figures were at 44% and 64% respectively prior to the Fed meeting earlier this month. Yellen gave a speech last week stating she still believes it would be appropriate to raise rates by the end of the year. If the Fed is in fact data dependent, what will change in the next two and a half months in the data that will significantly change the Fed’s view that it’s time for liftoff? The answer is nothing. So investors continue on with no clarity from the Fed. The Fed presidents meet and decide not to raise rates and then the next week give speeches indicating that a rate increase would be appropriate. It makes no sense. Why utilities make sense now This confusion over the Fed lead me to the utility sector. The dividend yield of the S&P 500 Utilities index is currently 3.66% versus the 30 year treasury yield at 2.96%. That’s an extra 70 basis points in yield for holding utilities for just one year as compared to holding the treasury for 30 years. This is not a new trade as utility yields have been relatively attractive for some time. Utilities provide stable income for portfolios as they tend to trade more like bonds but I see less downside risk for utility stocks if the Fed were to raise rates. My thought is as rates increase, the cost of capital used for stock valuation will also increase which will lower stock prices. The safety of utilities will be a safe bet for stock investors as volatility increases around the rate increase. Stock investors will seek the stability of utilities which would increase the value of the sector and it should outperform. On the other side, if the Fed continues to keep rates low into next year, utilities provide a relatively decent yield as compared to bonds and much better than leaving money in the bank to lose value in real terms after factoring in inflation. Even if the Fed does raise rates, they have indicated the pace will be slow. Utility Index ETF’s provide better diversification An easy way to add utility exposure is to buy a utility index ETF such as (NYSEARCA: VPU ), (NYSEARCA: IDU ), or (NYSEARCA: XLU ). These funds provide exposure to the respective index the ETF tracks which pay around a 3.6% dividend yield (each fund yield is slightly different depending on holdings). Using an ETF is also an easy way to diversify your utility holdings so you don’t have concentrated exposure to one utility in case there are problems. There are many regulatory factors to consider with individual utility companies and the states they operate in. The capital structure of these companies and their subsidiaries can be pretty complicated as well. If you don’t have the time and patience to take a deep dive into an individual stock, then an ETF would be the way to go. PEG looks relatively attractive Looking at the relative value metrics of the utility sector and the stock that stands out to me is Public Service Enterprise Group (NYSE: PEG ). While PEG does not pay the highest dividend yield, the P/E and EV/EBITDA ratios are below the sector average. An important consideration for a utility is the dividend coverage ratio. PEG has a coverage ratio of 1.75x which is above the average of 1.42x. This is a direct result of the lower debt profile of PEG. With less income going towards interest payments and debt, this leaves more cash flow available for equity. The utility industry is characterized by high debt loads due to the considerable size of the capital expenditures required to maintain their plant assets. PEG has one of the most attractive debt profiles with just 26% total debt to assets and 69% debt to equity. Name Mkt Cap – USD EV/TTM EBITDA EV/EBITDA FY1 P/E Dividend Yield Average 26.02B 8.78 9.01 15.59 3.98% DUKE ENERGY CORP (NYSE: DUK ) 48.67 8.62 9.54 17.35 4.54% NEXTERA ENERGY INC (NYSE: NEE ) 45.41 9.27 10.13 17.96 3.08% DOMINION RESOURCES INC (NYSE: D ) 41.64 13.85 12.4 20.14 3.63% SOUTHERN CO/THE (NYSE: SO ) 40.09 10.97 9.88 16.22 4.84% AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER (NYSE: AEP ) 27.47 8.67 8.68 15.37 3.79% P G & E CORP (NYSE: PCG ) 25.89 8.74 8.25 13.46 3.44% EXELON CORP (NYSE: EXC ) 25.42 5.81 7.37 10.93 4.20% PUBLIC SERVICE ENTERPRI 20.69 6.33 7.23 14.19 3.77% Source: Data from Bloomberg Conclusion While the Fed keeps investors confused about the timing of the first interest rate increase, it makes sense to remain defensive with portfolios. Lower inflation due to cheap oil means the Fed will be slow with the interest rate hike. Dividend paying utilities seem to be a better play versus other stock sectors as the stable income provides some downside protection while being a more attractive option to long duration bonds.

FXG Vs. RHS: To Weigh Or Not To Weigh

Both funds have excellent returns. Both funds are defensively structured. However, each favors a different bias within the Consumer Staple sector. Successful investors redirect funds according to economic conditions. During the lean times, the object is to get defensive. During the prosperous times, the investor can take more risks. One of the defensive sectors is Consumer Staples . According to Investopedia : Consumer staples are goods that people are unable or unwilling to cut out of their budgets regardless of their financial situation. Consumer staples stocks are considered non-cyclical, meaning that they are always in demand, no matter how well the economy is performing. Naturally, the investor may ‘pick and choose’ their favorite defensive holdings or may save a lot of time and effort by investing in an appropriate ETF. Two good examples are the First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX ETF (NYSEARCA: FXG ) and the Guggenheim S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (NYSEARCA: RHS ). Fund 1-Month 3-Months Year-to-Date 1-Year 3-Year 5-Year Inception Inception Date Expense Ratio FXG -4.38% -1.16% 4.45% 12.26% 23.60% 21.60% 11.61% 5/8/2007 0.67% RHS -4.97% -1.34% 2.70% 10.50% 18.05% 18.09% 11.60% 11/1/2006 0.40% (Data from First Trust and Guggenheim) The above table indicates that in the short term, the First Trust fund slightly outperforms the Guggenheim fund and in the 1 to 5 year range First Trust fund outperforms Guggenheim fund by a respectable margin, however, returns since inception (only six months apart) are nearly identical. What makes this interesting is that the Guggenheim fund is an equally weighted fund; in particular, the Guggenheim fund tracks the S&P 500® Equal Weight Index which weights each of its component holdings at 0.2% of the index, rebalancing quarterly. On the other hand, the First Trust fund tracks the NYSE StrataQuant® Consumer Staples Index [STRQC] . The First Trust methodology is a little complex, but in essence, it is weighted by growth. It’s interesting to note the similarity between the two in a price history chart. (click to enlarge) Since one fund is performance weighted and the other equally weight it would make more sense to compare holdings; similarities and differences. First, where do they differ, if at all? The Guggenheim fund has 37 holdings; the First Trust has 39. Two of the First Trust holdings are “rights”, that is to say that the fund has the ‘right’ to “… purchase additional shares directly from the company in proportion to their existing holdings…—Investopedia “. Hence, aside from the ‘rights’ the funds have the same number of holdings. The following table lists the identical holdings but the weighting refers only to the First Trust fund, since in theory, the Guggenheim fund is equally weighted. Companies in Common FXG Weighting (RHS holdings are all equally weighted) Tyson Foods (NYSE: TSN ) 4.86% ConAgra Foods (NYSE: CAG ) 4.61% CVS Health (NYSE: CVS ) 4.59% Archer-Daniels-Midland (NYSE: ADM ) 4.35% Constellation Brands (NYSE: STZ ) 4.29% Walgreens Boots (NASDAQ: WBA ) 4.09% Reynolds American (NYSE: RAI ) 3.24% Hormel Foods (NYSE: HRL ) 3.17% Monster Beverage (NASDAQ: MNST ) 2.85% Whole Foods (NASDAQ: WFM ) 2.40% Sysco (NYSE: SYY ) 2.08% Campbell Soup (NYSE: CPB ) 2.05% Dr Pepper Snapple (NYSE: DPS ) 2.01% McCormick (NYSE: MKC ) 1.95% Brown-Forman (NYSE: BF.B ) 1.84% Procter & Gamble (NYSE: PG ) 1.70% Molson Coors (NYSE: TAP ) 0.99% Altria Group (NYSE: MO ) 0.94% J.M. Smucker (NYSE: SJM ) 0.90% General Mills (NYSE: GIS ) 0.85% Philip Morris (NYSE: PM ) 0.85% Average 2.60% (Data from First Trust and Guggenheim) Hence, the above table demonstrates that the well-known, well established, large cap consumer non-cyclicals as one would expect, are in both funds. However, there’s a divergence in those holdings not shared by the funds and it may be clearly observed in the following comparison tables. First Trust FXG Market Cap (Billions) Dividend Beta Weighting Guggenheim RHS Equally Weighted Market Cap (Billions) Dividend Beta Bunge (NYSE: BG ) $10.26 2.12% 0.93 2.32% Coca-Cola Enterprise (NYSE: CCE ) $11.3300 2.26% 1.04 Church & Dwight (NYSE: CHD ) $11.06 1.59% 0.33 0.86% Colgate-Palmolive (NYSE: CL ) $56.7710 2.41% 0.5 Edgewell (NYSE: EPC ) $5.31 2.34% 0.87 4.15% Clorox (NYSE: CLX ) $14.6110 2.71% 0.41 Flowers Foods (NYSE: FLO ) $5.11 2.38% 0.62 2.19% Costco (NASDAQ: COST ) $63.1140 1.11% 0.5 GNC (NYSE: GNC ) $3.81 1.60% 1.21 0.84% Estee Lauder (NYSE: EL ) $29.1270 1.23% 1.19 Hain Celestial (NASDAQ: HAIN ) $5.96 0.00% 0.068 4.81% Keurig-Green Mountain (NASDAQ: GMCR ) $9.2660 1.91% 0.83 Herbalife (NYSE: HLF ) $5.37 0.00% 1.44 2.97% Hershey (NYSE: HSY ) $14.8820 2.49% 0.35 Ingredion (NYSE: INGR ) $6.29 1.91% 1.37 4.19% Kellogg (NYSE: K ) $24.1810 2.92% 0.55 Pinnacle Foods (NYSE: PF ) $5.33 2.23% 0.1 0.83% Kimberly Clark (NYSE: KMB ) $39.0720 3.28% 0.3 Pilgrim’s Pride (NASDAQ: PPC ) $5.60 0.00% 0.57 3.56% Coca Cola (NYSE: KO ) $170.3020 3.37% 0.52 Rite Aid (NYSE: RAD ) $8.72 0.00% 1.56 3.91% Mondelez (NASDAQ: MDLZ ) $69.3500 1.58% 0.81 Spectrum Brands (SFB) $5.83 1.35% 0.82 3.65% Mead Johnson Nutrition (NYSE: MJN ) $15.1660 2.21% 0.86 WhiteWave Foods (NYSE: WWAV ) $8.11 0.00% 1.72 4.48% PepsiCo Inc. (NYSE: PEP ) 136.7190 3.02% 0.43 Averages $6.67 1.19% 0.893 2.98% Averages $50.2310 2.35% 0.63 (Data From Reuters, Yahoo!Finance) The difference is outstanding. The First Trust growth weighted fund is taking more risk with companies having smaller market capitalizations, a higher beta, (although still less than 1), and much smaller dividends. On the other hand, the Guggenheim Equally Weighted fund contains a real home run hitting line-up. The average market capitalization of the non-overlapping companies of the Guggenheim fund is a whopping $50.2310 billion compared with the First Trust fund’s non-overlapping companies $6.67 billion; that’s over 7.5 times! Even when excluding Coca-Cola and PepsiCo whose combined market cap is $346.87 billion, the average market cap of the non-overlapping Guggenheim companies is $31.533 billion, almost 5 times the market cap of the non-overlapping First Trust funds. The average dividend yield of the non-overlapping Guggenheim companies is nearly twice that of the First Trust non-overlapping companies and lastly the average beta of the Guggenheim non-overlapping companies is 29.45% less than average non-overlapping companies’ beta; 0.893 vs 0.63. The First Trust fund is tracking an index containing slightly more volatile stocks with smaller market caps and lower yields. They are consumer staple companies to be sure, but towards the more volatile end of the consumer staple spectrum. The Guggenheim fund, on the other hand, tracks an index which equally weights the crème de la crème of consumer staple companies. Since inception, the Guggenheim fund has returned $11.41 in dividends but the First Trust fund has returned $2.77 per share. (Please note that for the sake of compactness, the above comparison price/dividend history chart begin from the end of 2010). Lastly, some ETF metrics of both funds are summarized in the table below. Fund Total Net Assets (Billions) Daily Volume Shares Outstanding Rebalance Frequency Price/Earnings Price/Book Beta Sharpe Ratio Dividend Yield (TTM) FXG $2.712996 364,741 61,550,000 Quarterly 17.21 3.34 0.95 1.71 1.58% RHS $0.336326 59,471 3,100,000 Quarterly 23.83 4.47 0.98 1.77 1.82% (Data From Reuters, Yahoo!Finance) It’s fair to say that both funds are excellent representations of the Consumer Staple sector. One slightly outperforms the other in terms of market price and the other having a relatively good regular dividend, particularly important for disciplined dividend reinvesting. The deciding factor depends on the individual investor’s outlook. The First Trust Fund has a slight bias towards the risky end of consumer staples having more volatile components, whereas the Guggenheim Fund evenly weights with the sector best and stable companies, hence very much towards defense. Hence an investor with an optimistic outlook would obviously desire capital appreciation whereas an investor with a less optimistic outlook would obviously desire a solid defense. However, either one seems suitable for the investor with a long term savings outlook. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. Additional disclosure: CFDs, spreadbetting and FX can result in losses exceeding your initial deposit. They are not suitable for everyone, so please ensure you understand the risks. Seek independent financial advice if necessary. Nothing in this article should be considered a personal recommendation. It does not account for your personal circumstances or appetite for risk.