Tag Archives: emc

Apple Earnings Quality Better Due To GAAP-Only Reporting, Says UBS

Apple ( AAPL ), IBM, and Cisco Systems ( CSCO ) have higher earnings quality than some 3D printer makers, based on their GAAP vs. non-GAAP accounting, says UBS. Tech companies, and some others, typically report both non-GAAP  earnings — which exclude stock options grants to employees and often other items — and earnings under GAAP (generally accepted accounted principles), which include everything. Financial analysts typically provide non-GAAP estimates for quarterly results, and those numbers frequently get more play in quarterly earnings stories in the business press. “Non-tech investors sometimes recoil at the liberal non-GAAP reporting by tech companies and its acceptance by investors,” noted UBS analyst Steven Milunovich in the research report. Milunovich says a large difference between GAAP and non-GAAP earnings should be taken into account in assessing a stock’s price-to-earnings, or P/E, ratios. “Apple’s financial statements embody the same user-friendly nature as its products in only reporting GAAP numbers,” he wrote. Milunovich also said the GAAP to non-GAAP EPS difference for  IBM ( IBM ) is just “modest,” and is a “relatively conservative” 12% for Cisco. IBM is slated to report its Q1 earnings on April 18, and Apple on April 25. IBM stock fell 0.3% to 152.07 on the stock market today. Apple rose 1% to 111.12, closing just below Apple’s 200-day line after the stock topped that key level intraday for the first time in 2016. Milunovich is the second tech analyst in a week to take a close look at GAAP vs. non-GAAP earnings. Citigroup analyst Mark May last week slashed his price target on LinkedIn ( LNKD )  and also lowered its targets on shares of  Amazon.com ( AMZN ),  Alphabet ( GOOGL ),  Facebook ( FB ) and  Netflix ( NFLX ) in a report that examined the earnings dilution from stock compensation grants . Milunovich says restructuring charges also impact GAAP vs. non-GAAP accounting. The UBS analysts flagged the leading makers of 3D printers. He said that in 2015 “both Stratasys ( SSYS ) and 3D Systems ( DDD ) had large impairments, especially Stratasys’ write-off of MakerBot, creating the biggest gaps (in GAAP vs. non-GAAP accounting)” among the companies he looked at. Storage vendors including Nimble ( NMBL ), NetApp ( NTAP ) and EMC ( EMC ) also had relatively large differences in GAAP vs. non-GAAP earnings, he wrote.

Pure Storage Remains Valiant In Fierce Battle With EMC, NetApp

Tectonic shifts to cloud computing and flash storage make the time ripe to build a new storage franchise, with Pure Storage ( PSTG ) seen as an industry disruptor. Pacific Crest Securities analyst Brent Bracelin, in a new research note, says that Pure Storage has been able to sustain solid growth and market share gains despite legacy vendors such as EMC ( EMC ) and NetApp ( NTAP ) putting Pure Storage in their cross hairs. Bracelin’s report came as Pure Storage introduced several new products on Monday that expand its portfolio of storage systems, including products that integrate more tightly with server gear from Cisco Systems ( CSCO ). Pure Storage provides the $24 billion enterprise storage market with technology using flash chips, similar to the chips that smartphones use. Flash-based storage arrays are much faster than disk-drive storage systems but come at a higher price, depending on how the technology is deployed. Flash is seen as the future of storage, with the transition well underway but still in the early stages. “We believe these new products, coupled with continued declines in flash pricing to less than $1 per GB, should give Pure Storage the ammunition to sustain share-gain momentum into 2016,” Bracelin wrote. EMC and NetApp lead in the disk-storage systems market and also have expanded into flash-chip storage systems. NetApp and EMC, which Dell is acquiring, are much larger than Pure Storage, but the smaller company is growing much faster. It has yet to turn a profit, however. Storage Ready For Revolutionary Changes Pure Storage revenue has zoomed from $6 million in 2013 to $440 million for its fiscal 2016 ended Jan. 31. But the company has posted big losses as it spends heavily on research and development and on marketing to grow market share. Pure Storage kept its string of triple-digit revenue growth alive on March 2, when it posted fourth-quarter earnings that beat Wall Street estimates, as did its Q1 outlook. Company CEO Scott Dietzen says that the data storage industry is on the cusp of a revolutionary change that Pure aims to lead. But a recent report from Summit Research said that while Pure Storage has cutting-edge data technology, it will face an  uphill battle trying to dislodge EMC and NetApp. Bracelin has an overweight rating on Pure Storage stock and a price target of 24. Pure Storage stock was near 12.50, in midday trading on the stock market today   — down 3% despite the bullish research note. Pure raised $425 million with its initial public offering on Oct. 7, pricing shares at 17. The stock peaked at 20.60 on Oct. 15 and hit a low of 11.05 on Feb 8. “While execution risks remain elevated as legacy vendors attempt to grab share by discounting storage pricing, a solid track record of execution since the October 2015 IPO increases our confidence that Pure Storage can sustain solid momentum and share gains,” Bracelin wrote. Image provided by Shutterstock .

Hewlett Packard Enterprise Rockets On Q1; Could It Reign In Cloud?

While investors applauded Hewlett Packard Enterprise ‘s first quarterly performance as an independent company — beating Wall Street estimates and driving its stock up more than 13% Friday — some analysts and owners are pushing CEO Meg Whitman to compete harder. That means more aggressively taking on cloud enterprise leaders Amazon ( AMZN ) and Microsoft ( MSFT ), and buying up software  rivals such as  Workday ( WDAY ) or Salesforce.com ( CRM ), rather than directing cash to shareholders. “I think we need to give Meg a chance to see if she can take advantage of the opportunities in servers with the cloud migration led by Amazon Web Services, Alphabet ‘s ( GOOGL ) Google and Microsoft on the service and software side,” said Daniel Morgan, vice president of Synovus Trust, which holds 251,971 shares of HPE, in a Friday interview with IBD. “Further, the 54% year-over-year growth in the Q1 2016 quarter in networking allows HPE to build more momentum in this space” vs. rivals Cisco Systems ( CSCO ) and Juniper Networks ( JNPR ), he said. “And finally as we discussed before, the huge opportunity to expand the software unit with its 17%-plus operating margins (enables) a large acquisition in the cloud space. Right now software is just 8%-10% of total HPE revenues.” Buying enterprise software rivals Salesforce or Workday specifically is “a chance to make that unit significant by bringing it up to 20%-25% of revenues,” he said. “Post-split, Hewlett Packard Enterprise was supposed to be the growth portion of the Hewlett-Packard Co., (creating) a reinvigorated growth company.” Nevertheless, happy with HPE’s earnings performance issued after Thursday’s market close, investors bid up its stock up 13.5% to close at 15.44 in the stock market today . That’s less than 3% below its Dec. 1 high since splitting from its parent Nov. 1. For now, HPE stockholders interested in growth of any kind will need patience because the company is still shrinking, despite the slight Q1 beat. Hewlett Packard Enterprise reported earnings of 41 cents per share in the fiscal Q1 ended Jan. 31, on sales down 3% to $12.72 billion vs. pro forma figures from a year earlier. The results slightly beat the average view of analysts polled by Thomson Reuters, which called for EPS of 40 cents on sales of $12.68 billion. The non-GAAP 41 cents EPS is down from 47 cents a year earlier. (However, if HPE had been a standalone company at the time, Q1 2015 adjusted EPS would have been 44 cents, the company said in a March 1 note.) That’s pretty much as planned, with HPE not projecting much growth until fiscal 2018. For Q2 ending in April, HPE expects EPS ex items of 39 cents to 43 cents.  Analysts polled by Thomson Reuters expected Q2 EPS ex items of 42 cents on sales of $12.297 billion before Thursday’s earnings release, but on Friday, the revenue consensus was revised up to $12.332 billion. For the entire fiscal 2016 ending Oct. 31,  analysts  polled by Thomson Reuters projected $1.87 EPS ex items for fiscal 2016 ending Oct. 31, on revenue revised up Friday to $50.805 billion. HPE earlier had modeled $50.81 billion in revenue in fiscal 2016, down 2.5% from a $52.12 billion pro forma in fiscal 2015. The slightly smaller half of the old Hewlett-Packard Co., now called HP Inc. ( HPQ ), kept the legacy PCs, printers and ticker. HP Inc. lifted 0.6% to 11.18 Friday. Hewlett Packard Enterprise kept the enterprise software, servers, networking and financial services businesses. “Backing Up The Truck” To Buy HPE Stock To encourage patience among Hewlett Packard Enterprise shareholders, CFO Tim Stonesifer said HPE will “return at least 100% of our free cash flow outlook to shareholders” in fiscal 2016, after devoting $1.3 billion to share repurchases and dividends in Q1. In “addition,” Stonesifer said, shareholders will receive a “majority” of proceeds from the sale of a 51% stake in its Chinese server and storage business to Tsinghua Holdings, valued at $2.3 billion at the time the deal was announced last May. The transaction was supposed to be done by February, but Whitman said regulatory delays have pushed back closing to May, after which the cash will flow to shareholders. To UBS analyst Steve Milunovich, who complained in the post-earnings-release conference call that HPE shares were priced too low, Whitman chuckled: “We appreciate that, which is why we’re backing up the truck” to buy back more shares, which helps boost the price. Avoiding “Frankenstein Of Architecture” Whitman advised analysts that by investing internally and encouraging organic growth “you don’t end up with a Frankenstein of architecture” as the company would risk doing by  growing through acquisitions. She cited HPE for pursuing both paths. “Our innovation engine is firing on all cylinders, and you’re going to see some amazing new introductions in the coming quarters in key areas of the portfolio, including servers, cloud, high-performance computing, IoT (Internet of Things), all-flash storage, Aruba and converged systems.” Aruba Networks is a networking leader in mobile enterprise that the old Hewlett-Packard agreed to buy last March for about $3 billion, strengthening the new HPE’s rivalry with Cisco Systems and Juniper Networks. As for “taking advantage of the disruption in the marketplace,” Whitman said, “we learned a lot about how to do this in the context of IBM’s ( IBM ) sale of their server business to Lenovo. … We have a big opportunity to go take (merging) Dell and EMC ( EMC ) business, much as we took a lot of the Lenovo business that would have gone to Lenovo.” She told CNBC on Friday that “in the last quarter, we had about 107 deals that we actually took from Dell/EMC.” She also told analysts that HPE has become the “leading infrastructure provider for SAP ( SAP ) HANA (application server) with nearly twice the number of shipments over the next competitor.” In the cloud, she said, “following a major wave of product releases across our HPE Helion portfolio in the second half of 2015, we are seeing strong customer traction. In fact, since separation, Helion has gained over 200 customer wins, including some of the world’s largest banks, service providers and industrials.” It just wasn’t enough for Needham analyst Richard Kugele, who chided the company in a research note issued Friday, arguing that the $2.3 billion windfall from Tsinghua should be spent on organic or M&A growth, not shareholders’ short-term benefit. “We had hoped that post-split, HPE would be able to focus on getting its house in order and leverage its cash and balance sheet to buy/invest in solutions that solve their product gaps,” Kugele said. “Instead, the company seems intent on continuing financial engineering by doubling its cash return to shareholders (including the pending Tsinghua cash). In our view, this creates no sustainable value for the company or its investors but merely provides a floor for the stock during a period of poor enterprise spending. “With no material growth, revenue improvement or product strategy to build a buy thesis around, we reiterate our hold rating on the stock.” Said Morgan, the Synovus Trust portfolio manager who wants to give Whitman time to execute: “I did hear HPE management touting its share repurchases and FCF (free cash-flow) generation capability on the call. And this is very reminiscent of when Mark Hurd was leading HPQ  (the former Hewlett-Packard Co.) and grew the share price through financial engineering and not new product growth.” Hurd is now co-CEO of Oracle ( ORCL ), one of HPE’s toughest software rivals, and another legacy giant growing slowly.