Tag Archives: economics

No Pain, No Gain: The Only Cure For Low Bond Returns Is Rising Rates

Summary High on the list of investor fears heading into 2016 is a “rising rate” environment. Over longer-term time frames, it is the level of interest rates, not their direction, that is the most important driver of returns. The low yields of today portend lower long-term returns. The only way out of this situation is pain, with rising rates leading to short-term losses but the promise of higher. High on the list of investor fears heading into 2016 is a “rising rate” environment. Déjà vu indeed. This has been a concern among investors for years now. With the Federal Reserve increasing interest rates this month for the first time since 2006, these fears have only been exacerbated. When it comes to investing in bonds, are these fears warranted? At first blush, they would seem to be. As bond prices move in the opposite direction to interest rates, rising rates can be a short-term headwind for bond returns. As we will soon see, though, the key to this sentence is short-term. Over longer-term time frames, it is the level of interest rates, not their direction, that is the most important driver of returns. We have total return data on the Barclays Aggregate US Bond Index going back to 1976. Since then, bonds have experienced only 3 down years: 1994, 1999, and 2013. In each of these years interest rates rose: 239 basis points (2.39%) in 1994, 151 basis points in 1999, and 74 basis points in 2013. (Note: the worst year for bonds was -2.92%, incredible when you consider that the fear of bonds today exceeds the fear of stocks). While certainly a factor over a 1-year time frame, when we look at longer-term returns the direction of interest rates becomes less and less important. The most important driver of long-term bond returns is the beginning yield. Why? Simply stated: when bonds approach maturity, they move closer to their par value and the short-term gains or losses from interest rate moves disappear. What you are left with, then, is the compounded return from the starting yield and reinvestment of interest. The relationship is immediately clear when viewing the chart below which displays starting yields by decile (lowest decile = lowest starting yield) and actual forward returns. The higher the starting yield, the higher the forward return and vice versa. (click to enlarge) The close relationship between beginning yield and future return has persisted throughout time. While rising rates can be challenging for bond holders over short-term periods, they are a positive for investors over longer periods as interest payments and maturing bonds are reinvested at higher yields. (click to enlarge) From 1977 through 1981, the yield on the Barclays Aggregate Bond Index rose each and every year, moving from 6.99% at the beginning of 1977 to 14.64% at the end of 1981. Over this 5-year period, bonds were still positive every year though performance was subpar. How was this possible? Again, the starting yield of 6.99% provided a cushion for returns as did the reinvestment of interest/principal at higher yields. The short-term pain from the rise in yields from 1977-1981 would lead to long-term gains for bond investors. The next five years would witness the highest 5-year annualized return in history at nearly 20%. This was achieved due to high starting yields and a decline in rates over that subsequent period, with the beginning yield again being the most important factor. No Pain, No Gain As I wrote back in May (see “Bond Math and the Elephant in the Room”), bond investors today are faced with their most challenging environment in history. The low yields of today portend lower long-term returns. The only way out of this situation is pain, with rising rates leading to short-term losses but the promise of higher future returns. If investors were objective and rational, then, the greatest fear would not be “rising rates” but a continuation of the lowest yield environment in history. Or worse still, “falling rates” from here which would provide a short-term boost to returns only to guarantee even lower long-term performance. This writing is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell, a solicitation to buy, or a recommendation regarding any securities transaction, or as an offer to provide advisory or other services by Pension Partners, LLC in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation, purchase or sale would be unlawful under the securities laws of such jurisdiction. The information contained in this writing should not be construed as financial or investment advice on any subject matter. Pension Partners, LLC expressly disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken based on any or all of the information on this writing. CHARLIE BILELLO, CMT Charlie Bilello is the Director of Research at Pension Partners, LLC, an investment advisor that manages mutual funds and separate accounts. He is the co-author of three award-winning research papers on market anomalies and investing. Mr. Bilello is responsible for strategy development, investment research and communicating the firm’s investment themes and portfolio positioning to clients. Prior to joining Pension Partners, he was the Managing Member of Momentum Global Advisors previously held positions as an Equity and Hedge Fund Analyst at billion dollar alternative investment firms. Mr. Bilello holds a J.D. and M.B.A. in Finance and Accounting from Fordham University and a B.A. in Economics from Binghamton University. He is a Chartered Market Technician and a Member of the Market Technicians Association. Mr. Bilello also holds the Certified Public Accountant certificate.

Monitoring Your Portfolio’s Dollar Sensitivity

By Tripp Zimmerman At WisdomTree, we continue to believe one of the most important themes impacting the global markets has been the strengthening U.S. dollar-and this is a trend we expect to continue for some time. As a result of the recent dollar strength, many U.S. multinationals with global revenue streams have reported currency headwinds as part of their earnings statements over the past year. This has hurt their performance compared to European and Japanese exporters, who have benefited from the weakening of the yen and the euro, respectively, against the U.S. dollar. This relative performance advantage is no surprise to us, because our research shows that these foreign markets actually performed better when their home currencies depreciated than when they appreciated. 1 Given this historical relationship and relative valuations, we continue to advocate for Japanese and eurozone exporters. But how should investors position their U.S. allocations? U.S. Corporations Continue to Warn about Dollar Strength “Sales by U.S. companies were $26.4 billion in the fiscal nine months of 2015, which represented an increase of 0.8% as compared to the prior year,” Johnson & Johnson (NYSE: JNJ ) reported. “Sales by international companies were $25.9 billion, a decline of 13.5%, including operational growth of 1.1%, offset by a negative currency impact of 14.6% as compared to the fiscal nine months sales of 2014.” 2 The Coca-Cola Company (NYSE: KO ) reported that over the most recent three months “fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates decreased our consolidated net operating revenues by 8 percent. This unfavorable impact was primarily due to a stronger U.S. dollar compared to certain foreign currencies, including the South African rand, euro, U.K. pound sterling, Brazilian real, Mexican peso, Australian dollar and Japanese yen, which had an unfavorable impact on our Eurasia and Africa, Europe, Latin America, Asia Pacific and Bottling Investments operating segments.” 3 Determining Your Dollar Sensitivity WisdomTree believes currency sensitivity is an important factor that will continue to impact returns going forward, so to monitor the performance of this new factor, WisdomTree has created two new rules-based Indexes: The WisdomTree Strong Dollar U.S. Equity Index (WTUSSD) – This Index selects companies that generate more than 80% of their revenue from within the U.S. and then tilts its weight toward stocks whose returns have a higher correlation to the returns of the U.S. dollar. The WisdomTree Weak Dollar U.S. Equity Index (WTUSWD) – This Index selects companies that generate more than 40% of their revenue from outside the U.S. and then tilts its weight toward stocks whose returns have a lower correlation to the returns of the U.S. dollar. Since the inception of these Indexes, the U.S. dollar has strengthened 2.95% against a diversified basket of developed and emerging market currencies, leading to a performance advantage of 1.72% for WTUSSD compared to WTUSWD. 4 To try to understand what is behind this performance difference, we chart the median earnings and sales growth for the most recent quarter compared to the same reporting quarter one year ago, for both Indexes and the median for the entire universe. Year-over-Year Median Earnings and Sales Growth (click to enlarge) Strong Dollar Companies Displayed Higher Growth- The median earnings and sales growth for constituents of WTUSSD was more than 6% and 7% higher, respectively, compared to constituents of WTUSWD. We believe constituents of WTUSSD, or companies that generate more than 80% of their revenue domestically, tend to be less impacted by a strong-dollar environment-they aren’t focused on selling their goods and services abroad, and their import costs decrease with the rising purchasing power of the dollar. How Long Can This Persist? We have recently published a research paper, What a Rising U.S. Dollar Means for U.S. Equities White Paper , in which we illustrated the declining competitiveness of U.S. exports by graphing a ratio of exports of the U.S. economy over imports. As the U.S. dollar strengthened, the ratio of exports over imports weakened. Historically, we found that the impact can have a lag of around 36 months, so if history is any guide, we may not have seen the worst impact on exporters yet. At WisdomTree, our base case is still for a strengthening U.S. dollar, which may provide a continued headwind to U.S. multinationals with global revenue, but, depending on investors’ views, they can use the above Indexes to track the performance of either basket. Sources WisdomTree, Bloomberg. Johnson & Johnson quarterly earnings report, 10/30/15. Johnson & Johnson had a 1.21% weight in the WisdomTree Weak Dollar U.S. Equity Index as of 11/13/15. The Coca-Cola Company quarterly earnings report, 10/28/15. The Coca-Cola Company had a 0.71% weight in the WisdomTree Weak Dollar U.S. Equity Index as of 11/13/15. WisdomTree, Bloomberg, 5/29/15-11/13/15. U.S. dollar performance against a diversified basket of developed and emerging currencies is represented by the Bloomberg Dollar Total Return Index. Important Risks Related to this Article Investments in currency involve additional special risks, such as credit risk and interest rate fluctuations. Tripp Zimmerman, Research Analyst Tripp Zimmerman began at WisdomTree as a Research Analyst in February 2013. He is involved in creating and communicating WisdomTree’s thoughts on the markets, as well as analyzing existing strategies and developing new approaches. Prior to joining WisdomTree, Tripp worked for TD Ameritrade as a fixed income specialist. Tripp also worked for Wells Fargo Advisors, TIAA-CREF and Evergreen Investments in various investment related roles. Tripp graduated from The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill with a dual degree in Economics and Philosophy. Tripp is a holder of the Chartered Financial Analyst designation.

Managements Leading Companies Off A Cliff

By Tim Maverick The quickest and surest way for investors to lose money is to invest in companies where the management is, to put it politely, incompetent. Numerous instances exist throughout history. But we’re perhaps seeing the worst example ever, and it’s from the global mining industry . The level of incompetence being displayed is simply astonishing. Chinese Steel Collapse China has the world’s biggest steel industry, producing half of all steel. Crude steel output there soared more than 12-fold between 1990 and 2014. But now, thanks to overcapacity, the Chinese steel industry has shifted into reverse in a big way. Prices have fallen by nearly 30%. Steel rebar prices in China on the Shanghai Futures Exchange are at all-time record lows. Rebar prices are down 30% this year alone. As losses continue to mount for the industry, even Xu Lejiang, Chairman of giant steelmaker Shanghai Baosteel, said that the industry’s output will collapse by a fifth in the not-too-distant future. Forecasts are for a drop in production of at least 23 million metric tons (mmt) over the next year. The China Iron and Steel Association is in general agreement. It says that output probably permanently peaked in 2014 at 823 mmt. In effect, we’ve seen peak steel. Iron Ore Dreams That’s bad news for the major iron ore miners – Vale S.A. (NYSE: VALE ), Rio Tinto PLC (NYSE: RIO ), and BHP Billiton (NYSE: BHP ). China will cut back on its imports of iron ore, a key ingredient in steelmaking. The evidence is already there. The Baltic Dry Index, which includes ships that carry ore, hit its all-time low on November 20 at 498. Iron ore itself hit an all-time low – spot pricing began in 2008 – about a week ago at $43.40 per metric ton. Logic would dictate the miners cut back production. So does Economics 101. But the managements at the big three continue to live in a fairy tale. They continue clinging to their forecast – that Chinese steel output will rise 20% over the next decade – like drowning men to a life preserver. In fact, Rio Tinto still forecasts that annual Chinese steel production will hit a billion tons by the end of the decade. So the three blind mice (iron ore miners) continue raising output, using a scorched earth policy to eliminate the competition. In fact, next year, Vale will open the world’s largest iron ore mine (Serra Sul in Brazil). And the iron ore sector isn’t alone. Other mining segments – including copper, zinc, and nickel – continue to produce as if there’s no tomorrow. How to Spot the Bottom Eventually, the long nightmare for shareholders in mining companies will end. So how do you spot the signs that a bottom is coming and brighter days are ahead? Output cuts will help. But if Company A cuts its production, the dreamers at one of the big three miners will simply raise their output even more. A true signal will be the removal of one of these totally incompetent management teams. That should start the ball rolling towards real change. I then expect the big miner that made the change to finally say “uncle.” And I don’t mean just deciding to finally cut back on output. I mean throwing in the towel completely, walking away from a segment like iron ore, and permanently shutting down production. If a permanent shutdown doesn’t occur, miners will be in the same boat as shale oil producers. As soon as the price blips up a few dollars, a flood of supply hits the market. A commodities version of Sisyphus, if you will. That may happen sooner rather than later. In iron ore, for example, the price is quickly approaching the break-even level for some of the big miners. This is despite falling freight, oil, and currencies helping to lower miners’ costs. Until the permanent shuttering of mines occurs, the sector will remain in its downward spiral. Original Post