Tag Archives: earnings-center

Franklin Templeton Launches Flexible Alpha Bond Fund

By DailyAlts Staff Market pundits are nearly unanimous in their assessment that bonds are unlikely to deliver returns in the future that fixed-income investors became accustomed to in the past. For some, this means getting out of fixed income altogether – for others, a “flexible” approach holds promise. Investors in the latter camp have a new option as of August 3: the Franklin Flexible Alpha Bond Fund (MUTF: FABFX ). The new fund, which is managed by Franklin Templeton Investments, is designed to provide attractive risk-adjusted total returns over a full market cycle. The fund’s managers pursue this end by means of allocating the fund’s portfolio across a broad range of global fixed income sectors and risks, such as credit, currency, and duration. In pursuing this strategy, the fund’s managers have the flexibility to capitalize on opportunities across national borders, market sectors, credit grades, and bond maturities and durations, without reference to a benchmark index. “Given the recent concerns with respect to rising interest rates and the related desire for additional diversification in the fixed income markets, we believe Franklin Flexible Alpha Bond Fund should fulfill investors’ rapidly growing demands for an alternative to traditional core fixed income allocations,” said Michael Materasso, co-lead manager of the fund and senior VP of the Franklin Templeton Fixed Income Policy Committee. In a recent statement, Mr. Materasso also noted the fund’s diversification benefits: “The fund seeks to complement traditional fixed income asset classes by potentially providing low correlation to conventional holdings.” Mr. Materasso manages the Franklin Flexible Alpha Bond Fund alongside fellow co-manager David Yuen. Together, the pair employ their 68 years of combined industry experience in a “top down” analysis of macroeconomic trends and a “bottom up” fundamental analysis of individual opportunities. Positions may be held long or short to navigate market cycles and tactically manage risks from interest rate, credit, currency and country exposures. “We take an unconstrained investment approach with dynamic sector rotation, active currency management, security selection and relative value positioning, while aiming to manage various risks, such as duration,” said Mr. Yuen. Under normal circumstances, at least 80% of the fund’s net assets will be invested in bonds and other instruments that provide exposure to bonds. The fund’s weighted average portfolio duration may range from -2 to +5 years. Shares of the fund are available in A (FABFX), C (MUTF: FABDX ), R (MUTF: FABMX ), R6 (MUTF: FABNX ), and Advisor (MUTF: FZBAX ) classes, with net expense ratios ranging from a low of 0.71% for R6 shares to a high of 1.50% for C-class shares. For more information, download a pdf copy of the fund’s prospectus .

The O’Shares FTSE U.S. Quality Dividend ETF: You’re Dead To Me

Summary Mr. Wonderful Kevin O’Leary recently launched a dividend focused ETF. OUSA is a smart beta ETF with screening parameters focused on Quality, Value, and Yield. Is there merit in this fund, or should Kevin go take a hike? As a frequent watcher of Shark Tank, I was intrigued to find out that dirty-rich Kevin O’Leary, self anointed “Mr. Wonderful,” had developed a dividend ETF, the O’Shares FTSE U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (NYSEARCA: OUSA ). The fund is less than a month old, with onset of trading July 14. I wanted to determine if there was merit to the fund, or whether O’Leary is just throwing chum into the water to attract some attention. Kevin O’Leary OUSA’s online materials state that the fund is correlated to the FTSE U.S. Qual/Vol/5% Capped Factor Index, which focuses on “Quality, Low Volatility, and Dividend Yield.” OUSA’s tearsheet refers us to the FTSE web site for additional information relative to how index constituent are selected and weighted within the portfolio. There one can read all about the ground rules as well as a methodology overview . There is also a fact sheet summary available, for those interested in statistical gibberish. I was unable to find a complete list of current constituents. Portfolio The fund (as of July 14) is invested in 142 companies, both large- and mid-cap, with weighted average market cap of $152 billion. The average dividend yield is 3.2 percent. Here is a list of top 10 holdings as disseminated on July 14, complete with the common misspelling of Proct”o”r and Gamble: (click to enlarge) Images sourced from Oshares.com There was also a breakdown of industry exposure: (click to enlarge) Let’s compare the holdings to the SPDR S&P 500 Trust ETF (NYSEARCA: SPY ) ….and sector weightings…. Source: spdrs.com OUSA vs. SPY The funds share 6 of their top 10 holdings with one another. The main difference is in concentration. OUSA concentrates 38% of assets in the top 10 while SPY has about 17% of assets in the top 10. O’Leary’s fund is considered “smart beta” since it screens on basis of “Quality, Value, & Yield.” SPY is a plain passive index that we generally know the constituents of at all times. And while there is sector diversification, I don’t think I would characterize OUSA’s as “index hugging” in nature. For instance, SPY contains 17% exposure to financials. Presumably, according to graphs above, OUSA has less than 4% exposure. Generally when ETFs have somewhat similar allocations, the trump card could be the fee. Currently SPY charges .0945% annually while OUSA’s net expense is .48%, with a waiver in place until July of 2018. Since O’Leary is advertising a 3.2% yield on the underlying holdings, we can probably guess that it will actually pay out somewhere between 2.5 and 2.7% on a full year run rate. SPY sits somewhere around 2.1 percent. Let’s Make A Deal! If I were able to switch positions and grill O’Leary like he does the entrepreneurs that stand in front of his majesty, I’d hit him hard on the fee, because like him, I’m not overpaying and want good ROI. I’d inquire as to what makes this FTSE methodology so superior to a passive index like SPY. He’d probably respond that investors should only own stocks that pay dividends, which his fund does. About 1 in 5 S&P 500 stocks don’t. He’d probably also bring up the point that his fund concentrates in quality and low volatility, providing opportunity to not only realize a yield in excess of SPY, but perhaps total return as well. Plus one could also sleep better at night with OUSA than SPY. Maybe he’d have a point. Since I wouldn’t characterize this fund as index hugging in nature, maybe it has a good shot of providing portfolio alpha. But I’d remind him 75% of active fund managers can’t beat an index. Further, OUSA has no track record of success and doesn’t appear to be pulling in assets by the boatload as of yet. Perusing the top 10 holdings once again, I’d remind him that many of them have really stunk up the joint ( Exxon Mobil Corporation (NYSE: XOM ), Chevron Corporation (NYSE: CVX ), The Procter & Gamble Company ( PG), Apple Inc. ( AAPL)) over the less than a month the fund has been public. Of course he’d then remind me that the fund hasn’t fared any worse than SPY over the same time – which is basically true. But, I tell him I’d want a better deal to be a buyer. “You’re no better than SPY,” I’d tell him. Then I’d tell Mr. Wonderful to drop his fee, at which point he’d say, “You’re no better than an Italian hit man, Aloisi” and turn down the offer. As he turns his back to me I’d utter, “O’Leary, you and your OUSA are dead to me!” Disclosure: I am/we are long AAPL,XOM. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. Additional disclosure: Disclaimer: The above should not be considered or construed as individualized or specific investment advice. Do your own research and consult a professional, if necessary, before making investment decisions.

¡Viva España!

After getting off to a roaring start at the beginning of the year, Spanish equities hit a wall in May. A variety of factors affected them: a spike in interest rates, political upheaval and concern about “contagion” from Greece, as well as some renewed concern about some unchanging issues. Spanish stocks will have to climb a wall of worry, but conditions suggest that they could. Spain ought to outperform the rest of the Eurozone on a twelve-month view. The Spanish economy has grown steadily since Q2 2011, at an accelerating pace, and is on track to grow 3.2% this year, helped by an increase in tourism ─ the strong Pound, a wet summer and travelers’ difficulties with Greece’s cash-only economy boosted Spanish H1 tourist receipts by 7.4%. But tourism is not the only driver of Spain’s recovery, which is broadly-based, and is even beginning to be felt (tentatively) in construction. As this chart implies, growth has been driven by consumption rather than investment or exports, although both of the latter have been healthy. Spanish economic reforms have made the economy considerably more resilient than it was in the darkest days of the Euro Crisis, but there is still much more to be done, so Spaniards could not witness Greek developments with equanimity. The Spanish 10-year bond yield, which had fallen pretty steadily since July 2012, climbed from 1.15% in mid-March to 2.41% in mid-June on fears of “contagion.” It is currently 2.07%. Like consumer confidence, Spanish equities, which had been performing very strongly since the beginning of the year, reacted badly as well: While equities have recovered from the depth of the market’s fears on July 7 (the Tuesday before the crucial Greek parliamentary vote), they do not seem to have recovered their former brio . Several things that are worrying Spanish investors are not new ─ in fact they are perennials. However, Spain’s recent history has brought them once more very much to the fore. One is the structural defects of its labor market. It is indicative that something is very wrong that the Q2 report of 22.4% unemployment, years since the economic crisis, represents improvement. You have to go back to the 1970s to see a reading of less than 5%: even during the boom years it failed to breech 8%. The job creation that has brought it down from 26.9% in Q1 2013 has mostly involved temporary or rolling contract positions. The job protections created by early post-Franco governments are dying, but far too slowly to be helpful to the unemployed. In the meantime, unionized employers that cannot circumvent them simply do not hire, and their workforce just ages. Youth unemployment, while down from its peak, is a still-staggering 49.2%. Persistent unemployment has led to disaffection, amply illustrated by the defeat of traditional parties of government in May’s municipal elections. A significant victor was the Podemos (“We Can”) party, which advocates repudiating the national debt, etc ., but numerous new groups and special interests (civil servants, people who want mortgage forgiveness) won seats. Those who were happy to use their municipal votes for protest might hesitate to elect such groups to parliament; further, the treatment of Greece may cause Spaniards to reconsider support for them. But a national election must be held by December 20th, and it is doubtful whether the economic benefits that current government policy will continue to generate in the meantime will be so dramatic as to change many minds. Thoughtful citizens cannot help but be alarmed. Another perennial worry is separatism. Catalan independence is traditionally a leftist cause, but unlike the Scots, its advocates do not aspire to build Socialism on someone else’s dime. Catalonia is comparatively wealthy, with industrial traditions that are still intact rather than sentimental memories: it could probably be a viable state. Discontent that finds expression elsewhere as “Occupy”-type anarcho-populism, channels easily into separatism in Catalonia. Last November’s referendum saw 80.8% support for independence. Although there were reservations about the value of this exercise ─ some estimated turnout as low as a third, despite minors’ and non-citizens’ participation ─ it certainly does not suggest that support for Catalan independence has dimmed. There are also concerns about deflation. These have hovered over the entire Eurozone, but Spanish prices have contracted by a rather disturbing 6.2% over the last year: It is not surprising that business sentiment, as shown in the first chart, is lagging so noticeably behind consumer confidence. All of which amounts to quite a wall of worry for Spanish equities to surmount. However, if construction is in fact recovering, that will do much to cut into unemployment, as will continued strength in tourism. Both would help youth employment. Greece’s failure to persuade other Europeans to continue to prop up its grotesque economic policies must surely have discredited the more wild-eyed notions of how to escape austerity. Catalan independence will probably overshadow Spain indefinitely: last year’s poll indicates that the flame still burns, but it was too flawed to suggest that concerted efforts toward secession will materialize soon. While the refusal of Spanish prices to increase remains a concern, there is little evidence that they are still contracting (since January, almost all the reported price decline is due to energy). So the Spanish glass is half full as well as half empty: classic conditions under which equity prices can climb a wall of worry. Will they do so? The chances are pretty good. Interest rates can be expected to return to levels closer to those of March. The European Union’s fudge on Greece is sufficient to push those concerns to the back of many minds. Continued economic gains may not help the current government’s electoral chances much, but they cannot hurt. Friday’s report of June industrial production saw it drop 1.4% drop in Germany, 1.1% in Italy, and 0.1% in France, while gaining 0.4% in Spain, suggesting that the Spanish economy will continue to grow more strongly than those the Eurozone generally. Yet other Eurozone equity markets have not been as lackluster as Spain’s in the last week, improving Spain’s relative value in a context where its economy is clearly outperforming theirs. The fundamental attractions that drove the IBEX Index up 22% from trough to peak during its January to May rally are still in place, and in many cases have improved further. There are three Spain ETFs available in the U.S., but the iShares MSCI Spain Capped ETF (NYSEARCA: EWP ) is the only very usable one. The others, SPDR MSCI Spain Quality Mix ETF (NYSEARCA: QESP ) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Spain ETF (NYSEARCA: HEWP ), have AUM of only $2.5 million and $3.8 million respectively, making them essentially illiquid. EWP has AUM of $1.7 billion. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.