Tag Archives: earnings-center

Why Indexing Works [New Research]

It’s no secret that I think most investors should index. To be more precise, I’d call most “investors” savers. And if you’re treating your portfolio as if it’s your savings, then your financial goals are pretty simple: 1) outpace inflation and 2) reduce the risk of permanent loss. You don’t need to “beat the market” or just maximize returns. The best way to achieve these two goals is to implement a diversified, low fee and tax efficient portfolio. Given all that, indexing is the obvious way to achieve this given its inherent diversification, low fees and tax efficiencies. Of course, there are lots of ways to index and I personally prefer a countercyclical indexing approach (as opposed to a more traditional procyclical indexing approach), but that’s not what this is about. This post is just highlighting a nice new paper that was released yesterday further discussing why indexing works: “We develop a simple stock selection model to explain why active equity managers tend to underperform a benchmark index. We motivate our model with the empirical observation that the best performing stocks in a broad market index perform much better than the other stocks in the index. While randomly selecting a subset of securities from the index increases the chance of outperforming the index, it also increases the chance of underperforming the index, with the frequency of underperformance being larger than the frequency of overperformance. The relative likelihood of underperformance by investors choosing active management likely is much more important than the loss to those same investors of the higher fees for active management relative to passive index investing. Thus, the stakes for finding the best active managers may be larger than previously assumed.” [ Why Indexing Works ] This is consistent with something I posted not too long ago . One of the problems with stock picking is that the gains tend to be highly skewed. Your top performers produce most of the returns. The distribution is very uneven. So, it’s not like you’re just trying to pick the stocks that outperform the average. In order to create consistent market beating returns you basically have to know which stocks will be in the 20% of the outliers. Add on taxes and fees and you’re climbing a huge uphill battle. Anyway, go have a read. It’s a pretty good one and it even makes a slight case for stock picking in case you’re looking for it… Share this article with a colleague

Considerations For Building A Currency Hedged Strategy

By Jane Leung It’s been nearly impossible to ignore the news about the dollar, especially for those of us who are taking advantage of the upcoming vacation season to travel overseas. The greenback’s movement also has implications for investors. One of the things I’m hearing most from colleagues and clients is that investors know they need to have a view on the dollar – whether it will go up or down – and also be very aware of their investing time horizon. Unfortunately, they’re still unsure of how to implement a currency hedged strategy in their portfolio. Of course, predicting exact currency movements is impossible, especially in today’s environment. On one hand, you have the Federal Reserve angling to boost interest rates, while on the other, central banks in Europe and Japan continue efforts to lower rates, thus weakening their respective currencies. So let’s focus on the variable that’s easier to measure: time horizon. Why Time Matters Investors seeking to limit the effects of currency risk on their portfolios have a number of hedging strategies to consider, but what to do depends on the investment horizon. A quick review of the numbers shows that there is a big difference in the risk/return ratio of hedged and unhedged strategies depending on how long you remain invested. The chart below shows developed market return/risk ratios and reveals that results vary significantly over time. Of course, it’s important to remember that currency returns are generally viewed, over the long term, as a zero-sum game. And, as we can see, over a 15-year period, hedged and unhedged strategies, as measured by MSCI (daily index returns from April 1, 2005 to March 31, 2015) produced nearly the same results. However, applying some form of currency hedged strategy may help reduce volatility. In the example below, at 10 years, there was a higher return/risk ratio for a hedged v. unhedged index. The differences keep becoming more pronounced as you look at shorter time periods. Over a 1-year time period, a 100 percent hedged portfolio would have resulted in a 0.8 risk/return ratio while 100 percent unhedged would have resulted in a -0.6 risk/return ratio. EAFE HEDGING How to Build a Hedged Strategy When deciding how much of your portfolio should be hedged for currency risk, a good rule of thumb is to think about developing an asset allocation and hedging “policy” at the same time. To clarify my point, I’m including a simple risk-and-return illustration. Low risk/low return investments such as cash and U.S. bonds reside in the left corner and the potentially high risk/high return investments such as unhedged international equities in the upper right corner. The orange dot is where a hypothetical investor may indicate her risk tolerance. HYPOTHETICAL RISK TOLERANCE Considerations for Investing Overseas When you think about international investing, it is also important to recognize the distinct characteristics of each country that makes up a foreign region. Some of these features may or may not be correlated with the U.S., and this can affect the decision of whether or not to hedge and, if so, how much. Take a look at the annualized volatility over 10 years for a variety of single countries and international regions, as represented by MSCI: ANNUALIZED VOLATILITY: 10 YEARS We can see from the graph above that the annualized volatility over 10 years was consistently higher for unhedged positions than hedged positions and that different countries and regions had different levels of volatility relative to each other. In short, your asset allocation should depend on how much risk you’re willing to take on any given investment. If you have a portfolio that is heavily weighted toward international investments, has high currency volatility or high correlation between the currency and the underlying assets, a higher proportion of currency hedged investments might be appropriate. If you are more risk averse, and your portfolio is more heavily weighted towards U.S.-based investments, has lower currency volatility, or low correlation between the currency and the underlying asset return, you may consider having a lower proportion of currency hedged investments. Whatever your risk tolerance, you may want to consider a currency hedge as a way to help minimize the effects of volatility over the long term, regardless of short-term dollar movement. This post originally appeared on the BlackRock Blog.

The V20 Portfolio Week #1: Market Tailwind

Summary The V20 portfolio climbed 6% vs. 3% for the index. Poor news hit a major holding, causing a selloff. Discussion about volatility. The V20 portfolio is an actively managed portfolio that seeks to achieve annualized return of 20% over the long-term. If you are a long-term investor then this portfolio may be for you. You can read more about how the portfolio works and the associated risks here . Always do your own research before making an investment. Week In Review It was a great week for the U.S. market, in fact it was the best week this year . With averages up around 3%, it shouldn’t be surprising that the V20 portfolio had a great time as well. You can see from my first article that almost all of the funds in the V20 portfolio was committed, except a 6% cash stake. With a net long exposure of 94%, the V20 portfolio was able to achieve a return of 6.09% over the past week. Not too shabby if I say so myself. This level of performance was achieved despite some “negative” news coming from one of the major holdings, Conn’s (NASDAQ: CONN ). On October 8th, the company released September sales and delinquency data. The sales performance was satisfactory with comparable sales increasing by a modest 1.8%. The “negative” news mainly involved the delinquency rate, which has troubled the company for a while now. After investors learned of the increasing delinquency rate, a selloff began. After the press release, the stock declined 8% from $26.60 to $24.48 where it closed on Friday. Should we be worried? Absolutely not. You can read a bit more about the mechanics behind the delinquency rate here . Its impact is a lot less than you think. Another thing that solidified my confidence in Conn’s is the CEO’s stock transaction. After Norman Miller took over as CEO, he bought half a million dollars worth of stock at an average price of $24.89 per share. Not too often do you see a CEO sink that much money voluntarily right after he or she takes over the helm. Portfolio Beta I touched on the idea of volatility in the introduction. Today I would like to go a bit into the details. I’ve compiled the data since the beginning of the year, and the beta of the portfolio against the S&P 500 thus far is 1.06. In other words, conventional wisdom would suggest that this portfolio should fluctuate roughly in line with the index. Of course, the actual result was very different. The actual performance of the portfolio significantly deviated from the expected return. I posted this chart during the introduction but I’ll use it here again to point out some of the anomalies. (click to enlarge) From January 15th to February 5th, the V20 portfolio suffered a loss of 11% while the index rose by 3%. But from April 30th to May 15th, the V20 portfolio increased by 26% while the index grew a measly 2%. As you can see, the actual volatility of the portfolio was much much higher than what was predicted by the portfolio beta. What does this mean? If you’ve been diligently tweaking your portfolio according to the beta of your individual holdings, do not add this portfolio for its “low” beta! As I mentioned in the previous article, the portfolio may be highly volatile, always keep that in mind when you invest. The Week Ahead There isn’t any scheduled announcements from any of the holdings. However there are a couple of things that I would pay attention to. On Wednesday, the Department of Commerce will release retail sales for September. While we know how Conn’s fared in September, poor industry data could foreshadow problems in the future. Another thing that I would look out for is any announcement coming from Dex Media (NASDAQ: DXM ). Since the company stopped paying interest two weeks ago, shareholders have been left in the dark as to the progress of the ongoing negotiation. The reorganization will significantly influence the future of the equity holders. If maturities are extended, then I think the equity holders will get a lot of value since bankruptcy can be delayed as the CEO tries to turn the company around.