Tag Archives: debt

The V20 Portfolio: Introduction

Summary The V20 Portfolio aims to generate annual returns of over 20% over the long term. This portfolio is highly volatile due to concentration. If you have a long-term horizon, the V20 portfolio may be for you. After multiple requests from readers and much deliberation, I’ve decided to reveal a portion of my portfolio which I’ve dubbed “V20.” A rather uncreative name, but I’ll get to that later. This sub-portfolio represents the core holdings (~70%) of my entire portfolio. If you are interested in the performance of my entire portfolio, you can view it at any time using the link beside my name. The main reason why I hesitated to disclose my holdings was because I do not want readers to blindly follow them without understanding the associated risks and goals. But with the recent market downturn, I believe that analyzing my portfolio right now could provide a lot of value. That being said, I must reiterate that you must understand the goals and risks of this portfolio and judge them yourself before taking any positions. Thus far I’ve been analyzing specific companies. With this series, I hope to shine a light on my portfolio construction strategies, as well as analyzing performance from a top-down perspective (looking at the portfolio as a whole). The weekly updates will identify whether there have been any significant events that could have impacted the portfolio and whether our original thesis remains intact. New or closed positions (if any) will also be announced. What Is The V20 Portfolio? The V20 Portfolio consists of stocks that I believe to have asymmetrical returns. In aggregate, the goal of the portfolio is to generate 20%+ return per year over the long term. The V stands for value, the style of investing that I abide by personally. What’s so special about the V20 portfolio? How does it differentiate itself from many other funds/portfolios that you see out there? I would say that one of the major differences is the return expectation. I am not aware of any mutual fund that aims for a return of 20% per year. These type of returns are typically only expected of alternative investment vehicles such as hedge funds and private equity funds. However, I believe that this performance goal is very achievable as a retail investor, if you can stomach the following risks. Risks First there is the volatility. To maximize expected returns of the portfolio, the holdings are not diversified (in the traditional sense anyways). There are typically 5 to 15 stocks at any given time, with skewed weights. Stocks with the largest upside will typically get the biggest share of the portfolio. Because of this set-up, volatility (defined as standard deviation of returns) will likely be much higher than an index such as the S&P 500 over any period of time. You must also accept price risk in the short and medium term. Price risk is the risk that holdings may be undervalued for an extended period of time even though there is still substantial upside. Because the portfolio holds many stocks that are out of favor, you must be willing to grit your teeth while the stock awaits a recovery. Risk In Action (click to enlarge) Here we have a graph illustrating the performance of the S&P 500 and the V20 Portfolio. As you can see, the portfolio has significantly outperformed the index this year. However, it wasn’t rosy all the time. At the beginning of the year, you can see that the portfolio drastically underperformed the index, almost losing 20% in a matter of weeks. To tie this back to the aforementioned risks, had you sold the portfolio then, you would’ve missed out on all of the subsequent gains. This is why I cannot stress enough that you must hold a long-term view if you want to invest in this portfolio. Who Is This Portfolio Suitable For? That answer to that question is ultimately for you to decide, but I do have a few suggestions. There are two general categories: investors who are building towards retirement and retirees who wish to pass on assets to family members. They may look different to you, but they are united by a common factor: a long-term investment horizon. In my mind, this is the critical success factor. By holding a long-term view, the aforementioned risks become irrelevant. To be invested in this portfolio, you must have no plans to withdraw the funds over the next five years at a minimum. This means that if you want to turn $40,000 into $50,000 by next year for a down payment on a house, this portfolio is not for you. If your child is going to college next year and needs tuition, then this portfolio is not for you. On the other hand, if you have excess income every month that you stow away at the bank earning 1% a year, then this portfolio may be suitable for you to create wealth over the long term. Portfolio Overview (click to enlarge) ACCO Brands (NYSE: ACCO ) You can read my previous analysis here . This company makes office supplies. Although there has been a shift away from paper-based products due to technological advancement and green initiatives, the company has delivered good results over the past couple of quarters. I admit that society is becoming increasingly reliant on electronics, however, I believe that things like binders (one of the products that the company makes) will remain prevalent in school and offices. To protect myself from a potential secular decline, I’ve allocated only a modest portion of the total portfolio to this stock. magicJack (NASDAQ: CALL ) As you can see, magicJack constitutes a significant portion of the current portfolio. You can read my analysis on the company here . Since I wrote the article in April, the stock has appreciated by around 25%. I think most people would be happy with a 25% return in less than six months, and may even sell the stock after a nice run. However, I believe that there remains substantial upside to this company, so I will keep the current allocation until fair value is reached or close to being reached. Due to the large amount of cash on the company’s balance sheet (which cushions its downside), I believe that the stock is relatively safe; hence, I’ve allocated a significant portion of assets to this stock. Conn’s (NASDAQ: CONN ) You can read my latest analysis here . Conn’s is one of my high conviction ideas. The company is a consumer retail company with a spin. Its primary customers are credit constrained (i.e. low credit) consumers. I think after the last financial crisis, investors have become automatically fearful when credit-related companies report increasing delinquencies. What they miss is that this is something that the management can easily control. Over the past couple of quarters, the management has significantly tightened credit policy in an attempt to decrease bad debt expense, all the while increasing sales. After the recent decline, I believe that there is once again significant upside for this stock, which is why I’ve put a large chunk of the portfolio in Conn’s. Dex Media (NASDAQ: DXM ) This is one of my more interesting holdings. There is a big chance that the company may go bankrupt. So why am I holding this you ask? Despite a declining business, the company is still generating a significant amount of cash ($136 million of cash form operation in H1). Given the low capex requirement ($4 million in H1), it is literally a cash cow. The only problem is that the company is saddled with debt, which stood at $2.2 billion at the end of the second quarter. Almost all of it will be due by the end of next year. There is absolutely no way that the company can afford to pay all of it out of pocket, so its future depends on whether the lenders will refinance. At the current price, the market is essentially betting that the equity holders will be completely wiped out. I, on the other hand, remain hopeful that the restructuring process will extend the bond maturities. Of course, this is a highly risky investment, as I could lose everything. For that reason, I’ve allocated only an extremely small portion of my portfolio to this stock. Intelsat (NYSE: I ) This is a satellite company. Similar to Dex Media, the company has a significant amount of debt. The difference is that the company remains profitable. There are significant barriers to entry, so I believe that the company can maintain its profitability. The problem is that it is fairly sensitive to rate increases. If the Fed raises interest rates, then it would cost more for the company to roll over its bonds. As it stands, however, I see substantial upside for this stock given the current financial profile. Nevertheless, the debt is a concern, so I’ve allocated only a modest portion of the portfolio to the stock. Perion Network (NASDAQ: PERI ) Perion Network is a technology company. Through its products, the company provides ways for software publishers to earn revenue by linking search results from major search providers such as Google and Microsoft. The products themselves are a bit dubious, with some critics calling them adwares. While the company is profitable, the stock was hit hard when Google decided to upgrade Chrome to enhance security, which prevented many of Perion’s products from being installed. However, I believe that the company’s products will continue to provide its partners (e.g. Microsoft) with search volume and are still a unique way for software publishers to monetize their content. Similar to magicJack, the company also has a large cash balance, which will protect losses in the short term. For the above reasons, I’ve decided to make it my third largest holding. How The Holdings Fit Together There is always systematic risk. This is the type of risk that I have no control over (e.g. a sector decline). However, I’ve tried to minimize this risk by diversifying my holdings into uncorrelated sectors. I believe that none of my holdings are tied to a single common factor that could influence their values. ACCO Brands manufactures office supplies, magicJack is a niche communication company, Conn’s is a sub-prime retailer, Dex Media is an advertising company, Intelsat is a satellite company, and Perion Network is a niche technology company. As you can see, none of the holdings have a clear overlap. However, I must admit that every stock will be influenced by an economic downturn. This goes back to the idea of systematic risk. Unfortunately, pretty much everything is tied to the economy, so I’ve decided to accept this risk for now. The second risk I want to talk about is a bit more elusive. I’m talking about the idea of permanent capital loss. Buffett supposedly said the following words: Over the years, a number of very smart people have learned the hard way that a long stream of impressive numbers multiplied by a single zero always equals zero. How do I apply this to my portfolio? Well, I believe that there are stocks whose potential upside is exceeding large; however, they are highly risky in the sense that it would be possible to lose everything. One such example in my portfolio is Dex Media. As mentioned earlier, there is no doubt in my mind that the company may go bankrupt over the next couple of years, which is why the company is trading at a depressed valuation in the first place. Nevertheless, I believe that the upside is extremely attractive should restructuring yield favorable results. There are a variety of factors in play here, but I will save those for another time. The bottom line is that I may lose the entire invested amount in Dex Media. Going back to Buffett’s quote, an easy way to get “impressive numbers” would be to invest your entire portfolio, so that should events transpire in your favor, you could achieve returns that would be out of this world. However, by doing so, you would be setting yourself up for the possibility of permanent capital loss if things don’t turn out the way you expect them to, and this is what I strive to eliminate from my portfolio. In the V20 Portfolio, you can see that DXM only constitutes a very minute (1.1%) portion. This means that I’ve limited my upside, but the portfolio will still enjoy a nice boost should the stock appreciate significantly, and I can sleep soundly even if the company goes bust. Editor’s Note: This article covers one or more stocks trading at less than $1 per share and/or with less than a $100 million market cap. Please be aware of the risks associated with these stocks.

Duke Energy Corporation: Growing Debt Should Trouble Investors

Summary Duke Energy consistently runs cash flow deficits to fund the large dividend yield. The company will have added $14B in debt from 2010-2017 using management guidance. Management may be tempted to add on risk by scaling up potentially higher margin international operations to grow cash flow, but 2015 shows how volatile these earnings can be. Duke Energy Corporation (NYSE: DUK ) is the largest utility in the United States, with a heavy concentration of its revenues coming from its regulated businesses in the Midwest, the Carolinas, and Florida. As the largest publicly-traded utility with a consistent dividend-paying history, Duke Energy has become a staple of retail investors seeking safety and reliable income in what has been a volatile market. But below the surface, Duke Energy appears to have some issues driven by its size – the 2012 merger with Progress Energy has created a massive entity with over 50 GW of energy generation in the United States alone. With so many assets, can Duke Energy maintain competitiveness and efficiency to remain on par with smaller, more nimble peers? And has the debt load of the company, now around $40B, become too much of a burden? Burgeoning Debt Load Utilities have just a handful of uses for the stable cash flow they generate. Outside of upgrading and maintaining their property and equipment (capital expenditures), most operational cash flow is used to either acquire new businesses, pay down debt, or give back to shareholders (dividends/share repurchases). (click to enlarge) Both pre- and post-merger, Duke Energy has consistently outspent what it earns from its operations. Cash from operations has not been able to cover the cost of capital expenditures and dividends over the past six years, with this deficit always exceeding one billion dollars or more a year. To fund these consistent shortfalls, Duke Energy has issued more than $8B in debt over this time. Because of this, the company now spends over $1.6B each year on interest expense, or more than 30% of its annual operating income. These levels aren’t unreasonable provided that deficit spending ends. (click to enlarge) * Duke Energy 2014 Form 10-K, projected future cash flows However, per management’s guidance above, this is unlikely to change in the short term. Duke Energy projects it will add another $6B of long-term debt in 2016/2017, a roughly 15% increase which will lead to around $200M in additional annual interest expense. While operational cash flow is slated to increase over time as these capital expenditures are recovered through rate increases, further continuation of this trend is still simply unsustainable. Net debt/EBITDA stood at 3.2x at the end of 2010; in 2014, the number reached 4.9x, with similar numbers likely in 2015. The decision to repatriate $1.2B in cash generated by the International Operations segment (incurring nearly $400M in taxes) was likely driven, at least in part, by the need for funds to pay for obligations like dividend payments. We aren’t the first to notice this as these negatives haven’t slipped by the big three debt agencies. Duke Energy has seen the firm’s ratings consistently fall below the credit quality ratings of other large utilities like Dominion Resources (NYSE: D ) or better capitalized firms in other industries like Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT ). Trends regarding debt should be concerning to investors, and I think it is a question both shareholders and the analyst community alike must begin taking a firm stance on with management. Asset Retirement Obligations (click to enlarge) As a further headwind, asset retirement obligations are costs associated with the cleanup and remediation of Duke Energy’s long-lived assets. As an example of these costs, when Duke Energy closes down a nuclear power plant, there are costs associated with decontamination and property restoration that the company must bear. Asset retirement obligations are a fuzzy area of accounting, in my opinion, where management has a lot of discretion in calculation costs. What we see with Duke Energy is that these obligation costs have ballooned, according to management estimates, from $12B in 2012 to $21B in 2014. These increased costs primarily relate to the Coal Ash Act, which occurred as a direct result of the Dan River spill and other coal ash basin failures. Duke Energy’s management notes a significant risk associated with these new obligations: “An order from regulatory authorities disallowing recovery of costs related to closure of ash basins could have an adverse impact to the Regulated Utilities’ financial position, results of operations and cash flows.” – Duke Energy, 2014 Form 10-K At best, these additional liabilities will increase depreciation expenses for Duke Energy, which will impact earnings per share. At worst, public outcry and regulators will force Duke Energy to bear some or all of these coal ash cleanup costs on its own rather than recover the costs through rate increases on customers, either directly or indirectly, through more harsh rate case approvals. Compounding, Don’t Forget It (click to enlarge) Duke Energy likely draws in quite a few income investors based on the current yield. At an approximate 4.65% yield as of this writing, shares pay a handsome premium to many other utilities. However, investors need to remember the impact of their investing time horizon and do their best to anticipate the value of their investments decades from now. Based on our look at Duke Energy’s debt and recent dividend increase history, it is safe to assume big bumps in the dividend are not on the table. 2.0-2.5% annual raises, in line with recent historical averages, may actually be optimistic, in my opinion. As shown above, for a dividend-payer that pays 4.65% today and grows its dividend at 2.0%/year (not far off Duke Energy’s 2.2% average for the past five years), the yield-on-cost of this investment will be 5.13% at the end of year six. Dividend B, with a 3.5% yield today and 8% annual dividend growth, would actually have a higher yield-on-cost in just a mere six years. Conclusion Duke Energy trades cheaply on most valuation measures, but that appears to be within good reason. Yearly cash flow obligations consistently exceed operational cash flow, which has led to a growing debt burden that will approach $50B in just a few short years. Without cuts to spending (freezing the dividend, cutting operational costs) or raising additional revenue somehow (through risky expansion in non-regulated businesses), there doesn’t seem to be a clear path for Duke Energy to grow and deleverage its balance sheet. I believe investors would be much better served looking at smaller utilities as a means of gaining exposure to the sector, such as through Southwest Gas Corporation (NYSE: SWX ).

Be Careful Holding ETFs Long Term

Friday happy hour conversation in the Village reminds us why holding levered ETFs more than a day isn’t a good idea. Leveraged ETFs can suffer from disproportionate downside. Risks are added from levered ETFs taking on derivatives and exposure to debt markets.. Always consult your personal financial advisor before holding ETFs over the course of the long term. By Parke Shall Today we wanted to go over a topic that we were asked about on Friday at happy hour. Thom and I were having a conversation with someone who was talking about their portfolio to us. This person commented that they had been holding several leveraged ETFs over the course of months, and he did not understand why the moves that the ETFs were making did not seem congruent with the moves in the individual sectors that they represented. This brings us to a topic that we don’t think enough people know about or understand. Not all ETFs are created equal. Some ETFs are designed specifically to be held over the course of the long term. Good examples of these are ETFs like the iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (NYSEARCA: TLT ) or the iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF (NASDAQ: IBB ), two different style unlevered ETFs that we have talked about in our last four or five articles. TLT tracks the yield on treasuries, and IBB is an unlevered ETF that tracks the biotech sector. Each sector has an ETF, or several ETFs, similar to IBB for biotech. We have heard a lot about IBB over the last month because biotech has crashed, so we’re using that as an example. ETFs like IBB are helpful in showing sector moves proportionate to the broader market, like you can see in the below chart. IBB data by YCharts TLT tracks 20 year treasuries and provides a dividend according to their yield. TLT joins a host of other ETFs, like the Vanguards High Dividend Yield ETF (NYSEARCA: VYM ) which are meant to and designed to be hold for the longer-term, and have minimal fees. They take a small management fee, but they can be good to hold for conservative investors over the course of long-term. Any type of ETF for bonds especially makes bond investing a little bit easier, as sometimes buying individual bonds can be too costly for retail investors. So let’s look at what makes leveraged ETFs difficult to hold for more than a day or two, and why they should not be traded over the course of weeks or months. A simple example is this. If you buy a $50 2x levered ETF that goes up 10% you’re going to see a return of 20%, and that ETF will be priced at $60. The next day, the ETF falls back from $60-$50, you would expect the underlying to be the same as it was prior to the first day. The problem is that the drop from 60 to 50 is only about a 17% drop, meaning the underlying would only need to fall about 8 1/2% for you to lose the same amount that you made when the market grew 10% in the day prior. This type of attrition makes these instruments difficult to hold over the course of weeks or months. This is why it is not uncommon to see splits of different natures, including reverse splits, take place in these instruments. Like the gentleman we were speaking to yesterday, one needs to be aware of the mechanics of how leveraged instruments work before making what we believe to be a terrible mistake in buying them and letting them sit in your portfolio unwatched. The same goes for ETNs (exchange traded notes) that have major risk to the debt that’s been issued by a bank (or other institution) that presents counterparty risk. Sometimes with ETFs or ETNs that have these characteristics, you wind up seeing charts like this. UWTI data by YCharts In addition a lot of levered instruments will rebalance or reset on a daily basis, meaning that if the markets are volatile and not moving in one set direction, you could wind up taking losses on a day where the sector or underlying appears neutral. Finally, one needs to realize that these type of instruments may achieve their leverage from utilizing derivatives like options and sometimes debt instruments. These types of risks are not suitable for those looking to buy and hold or those investing for the long term. Before picking up an ETF to hold for the long term, make sure to check with your personal financial advisor.