The Global X SuperDividend ETF Illustrates The Risks That Come With Yield Chasing
Summary The SuperDividend U.S. ETF has underperformed considerably this year posting a loss this year of 6.5% compared to a gain 0.6% for the S&P 500. The fund’s yield of over 7% may have been tempting for investors but the fund’s composition showed it took positions in riskier investments to achieve that yield. The fund increased its position in MLPs to around 15% of fund assets at the end of Q2 right around the time when losses in MLPs were accelerating. A heavier allocation to underperforming utility stocks also contributed to the fund’s poor performance. As Treasury yields remain near all time lows and bank products struggling to yield as much as 1%, investors often look to riskier products in search of higher yields. Corporate bonds sport modestly higher yields. That leaves a lot of people turning to much riskier equities for income. The SuperDividend family of ETFs from Global X was created to appeal to investors looking for a high yield product. The Global X SuperDividend ETF (NYSEARCA: DIV ) has been around since the beginning of 2014 tempting investors with yields as high as 6% and currently has a 30 day yield of over 7%. The fund has drawn nearly $300 million in total assets since its inception but some investors are now finding out the hard way that those high yields come with risks. High dividend equity ETFs like the Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (NYSEARCA: VYM ) and the iShares Core High Dividend ETF (NYSEARCA: HDV ) have performed roughly on par with the SPDR S&P 500 Trust ETF (NYSEARCA: SPY ) year-to-date but DIV has lagged considerably. DIV Total Return Price data by YCharts A big chunk of the blame could come from the composition of the fund itself. The Vanguard and iShares ETFs are well diversified broadly among the major sectors. DIV is much more concentrated. As of 10/23/15, utilities and real estate count for nearly half of the portfolio. Real estate has performed in line with the S&P 500 but utilities have lagged the index by about four percent. DIV Total Return Price data by YCharts The biggest offender however could be MLPs. MLPs have gotten hammered this year as the Alerian MLP Index is down 30% year-to-date. The index’s losses accelerated just as DIV begin piling in. DIV Total Return Price data by YCharts Consider some of the fund’s most recent quarterly fact sheets. The holdings as of the end of the first quarter indicate that about 8% of assets were committed to MLPs At the end of the second quarter, MLPs accounted for over 15% of fund assets. It’s right around this time that you can see losses in the ETF began to accelerate. Even now, taking a look at the fund’s current assets shows that about 12% of the fund is still in MLPs. The Alerian MLP Index’s total return is still sitting over 40% below its high reached in 2014 thanks to the fall in oil and other energy prices. The MLP Index rallied over 20% between the end of September and the middle of October but a chunk of that gain has been given back demonstrating again that some of these high yielding investments aren’t necessarily conservative. Conclusion The moral of the story here is pretty simple. Higher yields usually mean higher risk. As we’ve seen this year, risk isn’t always rewarded as there’s been a pretty sizeable shift out of riskier assets into more conservative investments. But maybe another reason is that the ETF has just plain old performed lousy. The relatively high exposure to MLPs at a time when their value was tanking doesn’t help the fact that year-to-date the ETF has lagged almost every sector that it has a reasonable exposure to. It’s understandable that income seeking investors are looking for ways to improve on the low yields that they’re seeing in just about every other corner of the market. But one of the primary principles of investing is that the chance at higher returns usually only comes when taking on additional risk. Sometimes that risk doesn’t pay off and some investors may be learning that rule the hard way.