Tag Archives: datetime-local

Stock Selection: The Top-Down And Bottom-Up Approaches

So, you want to trade a stock. Well, you’re not going to trade any stock, of course. So the question is: what stock are you going to trade? There are a lot of stocks out there and you’re going to need a way to narrow down your search. For this, there are two approaches you could take: bottom-up, or top-down. Click to enlarge TOP-DOWN In the top-down approach, you go from big to small. First, you take a look at the prevailing market trends in terms of what industries are experiencing favorable trends. Within those industries, you take a look at the sectors that are trending well. And finally, within those favorable sectors, you look at the specific stocks that are performing well. Some of the reasons that stock traders prefer this method of stock selection is because it allows them to approach the market with an open mind. Rather than trying to formulate a trading plan on the basis of liking a particular stock, it starts traders out on a path that lets them discover a stock that may work for them. Also, the practice of identifying strong sectors in and of itself can be useful for traders looking to get a good sense of the overall market. Some traders also favor this approach because it may help them discover opportunities for diversification . Again, instead of you saying, “I know lots of things about tech, so I’ll focus on tech,” it allows you to consider all sectors, as long as they’re favorably trending. On the other hand, some traders feel the top-down approach is not the best way of selecting stocks. This method forces the trader to be aware of the entire market, which can be challenging and requires a greater amount of research. But also, by ruling out entire sectors, some traders feel that they are missing out on many trading opportunities. BOTTOM-UP As you might have guessed, the bottom-up process is pretty much the opposite of the top-down approach. Here, you consider particular stocks that you believe are poised for growth, and then confirm that the sectors they are in are trending favorably, and that the industries that those sectors are in are also trending well. Some traders like this, as it allows them to investigate stocks one-by-one, rather than having to research the market as a whole. It may also allow traders to select stocks that they might have otherwise passed up in a bear market, when the top-down approach could make most sectors look unattractive. But mostly, it’s a stylistic choice: some traders are interested in a certain set of stocks, and it allows them to use those stocks as starting points. Of course, some traders eschew this method, as it may play too well into pre-conceived notions (if you’re already “rooting for” a stock, you may only find good things when you’re researching it). And, of course, by focusing on the individual stock, a trader could miss larger, macroeconomic trends and shifts, which could impact their trade down the line. Ultimately, no particular way is better than the other. But what both of these approaches allow you to do is be thoughtful and prepared as you formulate your trading plan. And that thoughtfulness and preparedness should not only give you an idea about what stocks to buy, but also at what point you should sell the stock. In other words, as you look at trends and the viability of a stock, don’t just think about buying stock; think about when the time comes to sell it, and what level you expect that will be at. After all, it’s all part of the plan. Important Disclosures Schwab Trading Services (formerly known as Active Trader or Active Trading services) includes access to StreetSmart® trading platforms, the Schwab Trading Community, and priority access to Schwab trading specialists. Schwab reserves the right to restrict or modify access at any time. Access to electronic services may be limited or unavailable during periods of peak demand, market volatility, systems upgrades or maintenance, or for other reasons. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Investing involves risk, including loss of principal. Diversification and asset allocation strategies do not ensure a profit and cannot protect against losses in a declining market. The information provided here is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered an individualized recommendation or personalized investment advice. The investment strategies mentioned here may not be suitable for everyone. Each investor needs to review an investment strategy for his or her own particular situation before making any investment decision. Examples are not intended to be reflective of results you can expect to achieve. All expressions of opinion are subject to change without notice in reaction to shifting market conditions. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Best And Worst Q1’16: Mid Cap Blend ETFs, Mutual Funds And Key Holdings

The Mid Cap Blend style ranks sixth out of the twelve fund styles as detailed in our Q1’16 Style Ratings for ETFs and Mutual Funds report. Last quarter , the Mid Cap Blend style ranked eighth. It gets our Neutral rating, which is based on aggregation of ratings of 18 ETFs and 319 mutual funds in the Mid Cap Blend style. See a recap of our Q4’15 Style Ratings here. Figures 1 and 2 show the five best and worst-rated ETFs and mutual funds in the style. Not all Mid Cap Blend style ETFs and mutual funds are created the same. The number of holdings varies widely (from 19 to 3336). This variation creates drastically different investment implications and, therefore, ratings. Investors seeking exposure to the Mid Cap Blend style should buy one of the Attractive-or-better rated ETFs or mutual funds from Figures 1 and 2. Figure 1: ETFs with the Best & Worst Ratings – Top 5 Click to enlarge * Best ETFs exclude ETFs with TNAs less than $100 million for inadequate liquidity. Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings Four ETFs are excluded from Figure 1 because their total net assets are below $100 million and do not meet our liquidity minimums. Figure 2: Mutual Funds with the Best & Worst Ratings – Top 5 Click to enlarge * Best mutual funds exclude funds with TNAs less than $100 million for inadequate liquidity. Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings Five mutual funds are excluded from Figure 2 because their total net assets are below $100 million and do not meet our liquidity minimums. The PowerShares S&P MidCap Low Volatility Portfolio (NYSEARCA: XMLV ) is the top-rated Mid Cap Blend ETF and the ClearBridge Mid Cap Fund (MUTF: LSIRX ) is the top-rated Mid Cap Blend mutual fund. XMLV earns an Attractive rating and LSIRX earns a Very Attractive rating. The Guggenheim Raymond James SB-1 Equity ETF (NYSEARCA: RYJ ) is the worst-rated Mid Cap Blend ETF and the RBC Mid Cap Value Fund (MUTF: RBMAX ) is the worst-rated Mid Cap Blend mutual fund. RYJ earns a Neutral rating and RBMAX earns a Very Dangerous rating. Amdocs (NASDAQ: DOX ) remains one of our favorite stocks held by LSIRX and earns a Very Attractive rating. Since 1998, Amdocs has grown after-tax profit ( NOPAT ) by 16% compounded annually. The company has earned a double-digit return on invested capital ( ROIC ) every year for the past decade and currently earns a 12% ROIC. The impressive profit growth achieved by Amdocs has not gone unnoticed, as the stock is up 90% over the past five years. However, shares remain undervalued. At its current price of $55/share, Amdocs has a price-to-economic-book value ( PEBV ) ratio of 1.0. This ratio means the market expects Amdoc’s NOPAT to never meaningfully grow from current levels. If Amdocs can grow NOPAT by just 6% compounded annually for the next decade , the stock is worth $72/share today – a 29% upside. Zayo Group (NYSE: ZAYO ) is one of our least favorite stocks held by Mid Cap Blend ETFs and mutual funds. Zayo earns a Dangerous rating. Since Zayo’s IPO, the company’s economic earnings have not only remained negative, but also declined from -$137 million in 2013 to -$165 million over the last twelve months. Over this same time, Zayo’s ROIC has consistently ranked in the bottom quintile and is currently a bottom quintile 4%. Despite the deterioration of the business, ZAYO remains overvalued. To justify its current price of $24/share, Zayo must grow NOPAT by 13% compounded annually for the next 13 years . The expectations embedded in the stock price provide no room for error and only large downside risk. Figures 3 and 4 show the rating landscape of all Mid Cap Blend ETFs and mutual funds. Figure 3: Separating the Best ETFs From the Worst Funds Click to enlarge Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings Figure 4: Separating the Best Mutual Funds From the Worst Funds Click to enlarge Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings D isclosure: David Trainer and Kyle Guske II receive no compensation to write about any specific stock, style, or theme. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Underrated Small-Cap In Renewables

We sent this piece to subscribers of our new free underrated small-caps newsletter last week . Renewable energy is sexy right now. As sexy as energy can be. However, when it comes to investing in renewables, it’s tricky business. Case in point. US Geothermal (NYSE: HTM ) is a small-cap stock, to say the least, trading at less than a $1 per share and $60 million market cap. Trading at a 55 cent handle, it checks a number of boxes on our Six Small-cap Laws . Often overlooked and orphaned because there isn’t enough money in covering and reporting on small-caps, US Geothermal is still an exciting stock, yet misunderstood, as so many renewable plays are. US Geothermal operates three geothermal plants in the U.S. Part of what adds to the obscurity of US Geothermal, if the fact that it trades at a $60 million market cap, is that it’s in the geothermal business. Now, geothermal is a form of energy that demands some of the highest pay rates from utilities. You’ve got long-term contracts and inherent value in the plants that underpin the valuation. Growth is the big story for US Geothermal, however, with the potential to increase its geothermal output. Its current output of 50 megawatts is a fraction of what US Geothermal could manage in just a few years and it has the management bandwidth to get it done – with Dennis Giles as CEO. Giles managed an 800-megawatt portfolio for Calpine in the past. It’s already hired an investment bank to advise on strategic alternatives, with a go-private deal a possibility. One small hedge fund, Artko Capital , has 10% of its funds invested in US Geothermal. Naturally bullish, Artko is encouraged by the strategic review, with the private equity interest offering some “downside protection.” Activist Investor Now Involved Now, Artko Capital has some company. JCP Investment Management, the small activist hedge fund, revealed a 5% stake in US Geothermal earlier this month. They are invested at an average cost of $0.58 a share. Industrials, utilities and the likes are JCP’s sweet spot. JCP took on Gas Natural a couple years ago, as well as Smith-Midland in 2012, where the fund saw annualized returns of 100% and 200% on over the campaign holding period. JCP believes that US Geothermal shares are cheap and may engage with management about capitalization, ownership structure, board structure or operations. The End Game There are risks here, with US Geothermal needing cash to fund the various projects and cash isn’t always readily available. This could mean diluting shareholders with equity capital raises. US Geothermal operates in a niche business, which is good and bad. The bad actually working for them in this market. The company needs a lot of cash to support its projects, making tapping the equity and debt markets increasingly challenging. Rather, a private equity buyer can inject cash and operate the tremendous business model outside the guise of the public markets. Editor’s Note: This article covers one or more stocks trading at less than $1 per share and/or with less than a $100 million market cap. Please be aware of the risks associated with these stocks.