Tag Archives: datetime-local

Dual ETF Momentum March Update

Scott’s Investments provides a free “Dual ETF Momentum” spreadsheet which was originally created in February 2013. The strategy was inspired by a paper written by Gary Antonacci and available on Optimal Momentum. Antonacci’s book, Dual Momentum Investing: An Innovative Strategy for Higher Returns with Lower Risk , also details Dual Momentum as a total portfolio strategy. My Dual ETF Momentum spreadsheet is available here and the objective is to track four pairs of ETFs and provide an “Invested” signal for the ETF in each pair with the highest relative momentum. Invested signals also require positive absolute momentum, hence the term “Dual Momentum”. Relative momentum is gauged by the 12 month total returns of each ETF. The 12 month total returns of each ETF is also compared to a short-term Treasury ETF (a “cash” filter) in the form of the iShares Barclays 1-3 Treasury Bond ETF (NYSEARCA: SHY ). In order to have an “Invested” signal the ETF with the highest relative strength must also have 12-month total returns greater than the 12-month total returns of SHY. This is the absolute momentum filter which is detailed in depth by Antonacci, and has historically helped increase risk-adjusted returns. An “average” return signal for each ETF is also available on the spreadsheet. The concept is the same as the 12-month relative momentum. However, the “average” return signal uses the average of the past 3, 6, and 12 (“3/6/12″) month total returns for each ETF. The “invested” signal is based on the ETF with the highest relative momentum for the past 3, 6 and 12 months. The ETF with the highest average relative strength must also have an average 3/6/12 total returns greater than the 3/6/12 total returns of the cash ETF. Portfolio123 was used to test a similar strategy using the same portfolios and combined momentum score (“3/6/12″). The test results were posted in the 2013 Year in Review and the January 2015 Update . Below are the four portfolios along with current signals: Return Data Provided by Finviz Click to enlarge As an added bonus, the spreadsheet also has four additional sheets using a dual momentum strategy with broker specific commission-free ETFs for TD Ameritrade, Charles Schwab, Fidelity, and Vanguard. It is important to note that each broker may have additional trade restrictions and the terms of their commission-free ETFs could change in the future. Disclosures: None

Best And Worst Q1’16: Small Cap Growth ETFs, Mutual Funds And Key Holdings

The Small Cap Growth style ranks last out of the twelve fund styles as detailed in our Q1’16 Style Ratings for ETFs and Mutual Funds report. Last quarter , the Small Cap Growth style ranked eleventh. It gets our Dangerous rating, which is based on aggregation of ratings of 12 ETFs and 451 mutual funds in the Small Cap Growth style. See a recap of our Q4’15 Style Ratings here. Figures 1 and 2 show the five best and worst-rated ETFs and mutual funds in the style. Not all Small Cap Growth style ETFs and mutual funds are created the same. The number of holdings varies widely (from 28 to 1873). This variation creates drastically different investment implications and, therefore, ratings. Investors seeking exposure to the Small Cap Growth style should buy one of the Attractive-or-better rated mutual funds from Figure 2. Figure 1: ETFs with the Best & Worst Ratings – Top 5 Click to enlarge * Best ETFs exclude ETFs with TNAs less than $100 million for inadequate liquidity. Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings The AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF (NASDAQ: SMCP ) and the First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (NYSEARCA: FYC ) are excluded from Figure 1 because their total net assets are below $100 million and do not meet our liquidity minimums. Figure 2: Mutual Funds with the Best & Worst Ratings – Top 5 Click to enlarge * Best mutual funds exclude funds with TNAs less than $100 million for inadequate liquidity. Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings The Smith Group Small Cap Focused Growth Fund (MUTF: SGSNX ) (MUTF: SGSVX ) and the World Funds Trust: Toreador Explorer Fund (MUTF: TMRZX ) (MUTF: TMRLX ) are excluded from Figure 2 because their total net assets are below $100 million and do not meet our liquidity minimums. The SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (NYSEARCA: SLYG ) is the top-rated Small Cap Growth ETF and the PNC Small Cap Fund (MUTF: PPCIX ) is the top-rated Small Cap Growth mutual fund. SLYG earns a Neutral rating and PPCIX earns an Attractive rating. The iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (NYSEARCA: IWO ) is the worst-rated Small Cap Growth ETF and the PACE Small/Medium Co Growth Equity Investments (MUTF: PQUAX ) is the worst-rated Small Cap Growth mutual fund. IWO earns a Neutral rating and PQUAX earns a Very Dangerous rating. Credit Acceptance Corp (NASDAQ: CACC ) is one of our favorite stocks held by PPCIX and earns a Very Attractive rating. Over the past decade, Credit Acceptance Corp has grown its after-tax profit ( NOPAT ) by 19% compounded annually. Over this same time, Credit Acceptance has improved its return on invested capital ( ROIC ) from 11% to a top quintile 26%. Despite the improvement in business fundamentals, CACC remains undervalued. At its current price of $210/share, CACC has a price-to-economic book value ( PEBV ) ratio of 0.8. This ratio means that the market expects Credit Acceptance Corp’s NOPAT to permanently decline by 20%. If CACC can grow NOPAT by just 9% compounded annually for the next decade , the stock is worth $437/share today – a 108% upside. Beacon Roofing Supply (NASDAQ: BECN ) is one of our least favorite stocks held by PQUAX and earns a Very Dangerous rating. Over the past decade, Beacon’s economic earnings have declined from $8 million to -$11 million and have been negative for each of the past three years. Beacon’s ROIC has fallen from 12% in 2005 to a bottom quintile 4% over the last twelve months. Given the business struggles at Beacon, its stock price looks significantly overvalued. To justify its current price of $38/share, BECN must grow NOPAT by 15% compounded annually for the next 16 years . Those expectations look awfully high compared to the company’s recent declines in profits. Figures 3 and 4 show the rating landscape of all Small Cap Growth ETFs and mutual funds. Figure 3: Separating the Best ETFs From the Worst Funds Click to enlarge Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings Figure 4: Separating the Best Mutual Funds From the Worst Funds Click to enlarge Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings D isclosure: David Trainer and Kyle Guske II receive no compensation to write about any specific stock, style, or theme. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Can You Deal With A Stock Market Downturn?

Sometimes we’re late to interesting polls, but hey, they’re still interesting. Back in November, Gallup and Wells Fargo polled people to ask them how well they could stomach a “significant” market downturn, publishing the results on January 22nd . Or note, they defined significant as 5-10%. The results were quite confident: Gallup/Wells Fargo Downturn Poll Some wacky lines there – 87% of stockholders were at least moderately confident in their portfolios, and 82% of investors overall. People in a better position to actually handle downturns with smaller returns – those who don’t hold stocks – were only 61% moderately or better confident. Should We Trust Our Peers at their Word? In a word, no. These are interesting results, for sure, but I see lots of problems here – not just the fact that a significant downturn is defined as only 5-10%. The most recent recession saw drops an order of magnitude larger – in percentage terms (!) – of over 50% in major indices. We lost major financial institutions over a hundred years old, investors panicked, and maybe 10% of people (that’s a stretch) were confidently buying at any opportune time, let alone not panic-selling everything they owned. (We played around with what a “significant” drop might actually be in the past, but found you can be more than a few years early with your calls in some circumstances and still weather a downturn.) So let’s concentrate on our peers’ answers themselves. Do you really think this poll accurately reflects how people would react in a downturn? No, neither do I. You’ve got something of a Lake Wobegon effect going on here – you know, the “fictional” town where everyone was above average. In reality, stock markets have a tendency to over-correct – markets historically oscillate somewhere between ridiculously overpriced and a bargain (of course, identifying those periods is, perhaps, impossibly hard except in retrospect). That’s because previously confident people are selling into a downturn – “locking in losses” – and buying only when the stock market has come back “buying the highs!”. In fact, identifying actual investor results backs up those statements to a degree you’d almost think impossible. Dalbar releases studies on actual investor performance in the markets versus price (or dividend reinvested price) returns, and the results are crazily disconnected: through November 2015, in the order of earning 5.5% on S&P 500 funds in the last 20 years, versus stated returns around 9.85% . (We have a calculator so you can see dividend reinvested returns for the S&P 500 and the Dow Jones Industrial Average). Okay Smart Guy, What Then? For the average investor – and, Wobegon aside, we’re all probably closer to average than we tell ourselves – the best move is to set it and forget it. Consistently, when we do have market downturns, it turns out that many investors have actually overestimated their intestinal fortitude. For a typical person, the best move is to set your portfolio during market doldrums , with a mind to setting in up in such a way that you won’t mind too much if there is a massive move to either the upside or downside. As for re-balancing, it’s best if you go in with a plan, and openly rebalance at a standard time – and, if you can, avoid doing it that often. Believing in your portfolio is one thing, but investing during mania or a crash is no formula for a successful long-time plan. So, make the case. Would you be prepared for a significant downturn without selling most of your portfolio? Why, or why not?