Tag Archives: datetime-local

What To Do When You Miss The Move In An ETF

Every correction in the stock or bond market unfolds in a different manner. While our natural inclination is to try and make comparisons to prior events or rationalize statistical probabilities for a turn, there is no easy way to know when an investable bottom has truly materialized. From a valuation perspective, cheap can always get cheaper until it goes to zero. Similarly, from a technical perspective, lines of support can always be broken by new trends or forces that materialize in the midst of a decline. In recent years, it has become commonplace for sharp rallies or “V-bottoms” to form with very little notice to those who aren’t quick on the trigger. These are generally caused by capitulation near the low as sentiment reaches extreme negative readings. This fear ultimately leads to a snapback in price as an unforeseen catalyst sparks a rubber band effect. The problem is that it isn’t easy to time these events. Let me give you an example. Last year I wrote about the downtrend in junk bonds as risk averse investors were jumping ship at a breakneck pace. I prophesized that I would be a buyer of high yield in 2016 for my clients to take advantage of the widening spreads and relative valuation metrics. That type of premise looks prescient when you are sitting on the sidelines watching the iShares iBoxx High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (NYSEARCA: HYG ) crater with cash to deploy. However, it becomes much more difficult to execute in real life prior to a sharp 10% rally that unfolds in a matter of just three weeks. I fully admit that we missed this opportunity. It may have been the result of being overly cautious or simply remaining skeptical that such a voracious move could materialize so quickly. Fortunately, we still have other risk assets in the portfolio that are able to meaningfully contribute to this recovery in the stock and credit markets. The conservative nature of our investment mandate dictates that I would rather look back with regret on a potential missed opportunity than suffer the consequences of an overly aggressive stab in the dark. We only know in hindsight how this picture unfolded and of course have yet to determine what the ultimate resolution will be. The question now becomes: was this an intermediate-term low or simply the result of an oversold asset demonstrating a sharp ramp that will ultimately fall apart over the coming months? There is no way to know with certainty what the outcome will be in the future. However, you do have a few options to consider when you’ve missed the boat on a big move: Buy anyways. It may seem silly to buy after a big run, but there is no law saying that a fund like HYG can’t move all the way back to its prior highs near $87. There is still another 8% of overhead space between its current price and that level. I’m not saying that event will occur with a high conviction, but you can’t rule it out either. Break up your allocation in pieces. Another way to play this opportunity is to break up your trade in smaller pieces. If you were planning on a 5-10% allocation, you may be able to break that into two or three parts in order to allocate equally over time. That gives you the flexibility to participate if the new trend continues without the all-in risk that you face in a single trade. Of course, the drawback is that you will wish you had just gone with the whole allocation if this succeeds. Transaction-free ETFs make for a very effective tool to accomplish this task. Have patience. There is nothing wrong with sitting and watching either. Time is on your side if you have been carefully managing your exposure and have other risk assets that are participating in the upside move. You may want to wait and see if some of the momentum gets worked off and this sector retraces a portion of its recent strength. Watching for a higher low to develop may be a potential entry opportunity that is waiting in the wings. Move on. My grandfather was early to the trend following philosophy four decades ago and used to tell me that “lost opportunity is better than lost money”. There is no doubt that both are equally frustrating. However, history has proven that there will always be fresh opportunities in the market that are simply waiting to be sniffed out. Putting one in the rear view mirror allows you to focus on new themes that may just be peaking over the horizon. Spending too much time on “shoulda, coulda, woulda” criticism is a drain on your time and resources. Those with the longest time horizons are typically best served by using weakness to their advantage in order to buy at lower prices and reap the rewards of long-term growth. Conversely, those with short-term time horizons are often jumpy to try and sidestep every drop or driven to leap at new possibilities before they have adequately proven themselves. I am optimistic that we will still get our shot to re-allocate more direct exposure to high yield credit at a time and price that suits our philosophy . A little patience now will likely pay off in spades as we continue to navigate our way through these choppy markets. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. Additional disclosure: David Fabian, FMD Capital Management, and/or clients may hold positions in the ETFs and mutual funds mentioned above. The commentary does not constitute individualized investment advice. The opinions offered herein are not personalized recommendations to buy, sell, or hold securities.

U.S. Fund Flows: Equity Funds Get Back In The Game

By Patrick Keon Thomson Reuters Lipper’s fund macro-groups (including both mutual funds and exchange-traded funds [ETFs]) took in over $13.2 billion of net new money during the fund-flows week ended Wednesday, March 9. All four of the fund macro-groups experienced positive net flows for the week; taxable bond funds were at the head of the table with net inflows of $5.8 billion, followed by equity funds (+$4.6 billion), money market funds (+$2.4 billion), and municipal bond funds (+$518 million). The positive flows into equity funds reversed a nine-week trend of investors pulling money out of the group. The equity markets continued their comeback during the week. After losing over 11.4% during the first six weeks of the year the S&P 500 Index recorded its fourth straight week of positive returns. The index gained back over 7.2% during this four-week timeframe, including this past week’s 0.1% appreciation. The market took strength during the week from a rally in oil prices. U.S. crude hit a three-month high ($38.51) during the week and experienced increases in seven of the last eight trading sessions. An increased demand for gas overpowered the record-high crude oil stockpiles to drive the price of oil higher. Another positive for the market was a strong jobs report as nonfarm payrolls grew by 242,000 jobs. The jobs report reinforced the belief that a recession was not in the cards for the near term and also opened the door to the possibility of more interest rate hikes by the Federal Reserve in 2016. The majority of the net inflows for taxable bond funds belonged to mutual funds (+$3.4 billion), while ETFs contributed $2.4 billion to the total. On the mutual fund side the largest net inflows belonged to funds in Lipper’s High Yield Funds classification (+$1.6 billion), while investment-grade debt categories Lipper Core Plus Bond Funds and Lipper Core Bond Funds took in $735 million and $657 million of net new money, respectively. The two largest individual net inflows for ETFs belonged to the iShares Core US Aggregate Bond (NYSEARCA: AGG ) (+$687 million) and the iShares JPMorgan USD Emerging Market Bond (NYSEARCA: EMB ) (+$528 million). ETFs (+$4.2 billion) accounted for the majority of the net inflows for equity funds for the week, while mutual funds pitched in $400 million of net new money. The largest net inflows among individual ETFs belonged to the iShares MSCI Emerging Markets (NYSEARCA: EEM ) (+$853 million) and the iShares Russell 2000 (NYSEARCA: IWM ) (+$535 million), while for mutual funds nondomestic equity funds had positive flows of $416 million and domestic equity funds suffered slight net outflows of $16 million. The week’s net inflows for municipal bond mutual funds (+$450 million) were the twenty-third consecutive weekly gains for the group. Funds in the Intermediate Muni Debt Funds (+$166 million) and General Muni Debt Funds (+$117 million) categories posted the largest net inflows for the week. The net inflows into money market funds (+$2.4 billion) marked the fourth consecutive week in which the group experienced positive flows. The group grew its coffers by over $13.3 billion during this four-week run. The largest contributors to this past week’s gains were Institutional U.S. Money Market Funds (+$7.5 billion) and Institutional U.S. Government Money Market Funds (+$2.8 billion), while Institutional U.S. Treasury Money Market Funds had net outflows of over $4.7 billion.

Don’t Be Fooled By The Short Squeeze

By Alan Gula, CFA On November 18, 2015, KaloBios Pharmaceuticals Inc. ( OTCPK:KBIOQ ) announced that Martin Shkreli and a consortium of investors had acquired more than 50% of its outstanding shares. The stock, which had closed at $2.07 that day, traded above $10 the day after the announcement. The next day, shares rose above $23 and closed at $18.45. The following Monday, the stock miraculously traded for over $45 per share. In just six trading days, the market cap of KaloBios had risen from under $4 million to over $160 million. It was a blatant example of market inefficiency. But what could cause such an irrational spike? The answer is an acute “short squeeze.” A sharp rally in the price of a stock puts pressure on short sellers, who are betting the stock will fall. They may feel the need (or be forced) to close out their short sales by buying the stock. The buying pressure from this short covering causes the stock to move higher, compelling even more traders to cover their shorts. Over the past month, we’ve seen a bevy of short squeezes as the U.S. stock market has bounced along with the price of crude oil. These squeezes haven’t been as spectacular as the above example, but judging by how heavily shorted some of these stocks are, they’ve been very painful for the short sellers, nonetheless. The following table shows a few of the largest squeezes: The short interest ratio (SIR) is the number of shares sold short divided by the average daily trading volume. The average SIR for S&P 500 constituents is 3.3 times. At 9.5 times, the average SIR for these stocks is much higher – and for good reason. The risk of bankruptcy is very high for the companies on this list. Thus, they all have Standard & Poor’s credit ratings of CCC+ or lower. Two of the companies are already in selective default (SD). Others will eventually join them. Many of the stocks on this list will end up worthless. Risks notwithstanding, the short squeezes have been eye watering. Chesapeake Energy Corp. (NYSE: CHK ) shot up 208%. Linn Energy LLC (NASDAQ: LINE ) annihilated the shorts with a 398% maximum gain over the past month. In spite of these equity gains, though, many of these companies won’t have fairy tale endings. For example, the 6% bonds due 11/15/2018 for Peabody Energy Corp. (NYSE: BTU ) have rallied, but they’re still trading around $7 ($100 par). The bond market is saying that there won’t be much recovery for senior unsecured creditors, which means that equity shareholders will be left with approximately zero. The equity shareholders of the companies listed above are deluding themselves if they think the market cap reflects underlying fundamentals. It’s important to recognize that a sharp rally in a stock doesn’t necessarily signal all is well. In most cases, these stocks aren’t rising from the ashes. In fact, many of the companies with the most violent short squeezes will end up filing for bankruptcy, just as KaloBios had to do on December 30, 2015. Safe (and high-yield) investing. Original Post Editor’s Note: This article covers one or more stocks trading at less than $1 per share and/or with less than a $100 million market cap. Please be aware of the risks associated with these stocks.