Tag Archives: contests

Goldman Raises Yellow Flag On 2016: ETFs To Buy

While the investing world is busy celebrating expected gains coming their way in the three months from November through January – known as the most successful session of the stock market – Goldman Sachs’ latest prediction of a weak market next year, might be jarring to their ears. The sought-after investment broker expects weakness in the market next year with the S&P 500 predicted to close out 2016 at 2,100. The U.S. index presently trades at 2,088.87, meaning almost no change in gains in the coming 13 months. Considering dividends, Goldman estimates stocks to return merely 3% next year, which is a repetition of this year’s scenario. Notably, among the top ETFs, investors have seen the S&P 500-based SPY adding about 1.5%, Dow-based DIA being almost flat and Nasdaq-based QQQ advancing 10.6% so far this year (as of November 25, 2015). As per Goldman, higher interest rates post lift-off with their resultant strength in the greenback along with a soft profit outlook are behind this pessimism in the market. Plus, Goldman hints at the overvaluation of stocks at the current level. Added to this, Goldman indicated that P/E has a propensity to decline 10% in the six months after the first Fed lift-off, which is to take place in December, if macroeconomic conditions remain the same. While the tech sector has given a stellar performance lately, as per Goldman, ‘even tech sector profit margins have probably peaked at this point’. Finally, Goldman projects average EPS growth at around 10% in 2016 for the S&P 500 companies – perhaps with the help of stock buyback and not entirely through operating excellence. Still this expected increment indicates an improvement from this year. Goldman suggested investors to play the stocks of those companies which generate fewer revenues from outside of the U.S. border. This way investors can mitigate the negative currency fluctuations on a rising dollar. Goldman’s prescribed stocks are the likes of Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN ), Chipotle Mexican Grill (NYSE: CMG ), and Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC ). Though Goldman’s suggestions are for the worst case scenario, we also believe less exposure to the international market could be a way to win next year. We have profiled a few ETFs below to play Goldman’s stock pick in a basket manner as this is always a safer option than single stock selection. iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF (NYSEARCA: IYG ) Goldman’s favorite Wells Fargo takes the top spot of this $841-million financial ETF. After all, this is the right time to play the financial sector as this tends to outperformance in a rising rate environment. The fund charges 45 bps in fees and is up about 2.2% so far this year. It has a Zacks ETF Rank #2 (Buy). First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index (NYSEARCA: FDN ) Amazon gets the first place (11.7%) in this $4.78-billion Internet ETF. The fund charges 54 bps in fees per year. In total, the fund holds 41 stocks. The tech sector in any case is soaring now. From a sector look, Internet mobile applications account for 40% of the portfolio while Internet retail makes up for 22%. The ETF has a Zacks ETF Rank #2 and is up about 25%. The Restaurant ETF (NASDAQ: BITE ) U.S. restaurants are placed in the top 37% quartile of the Zacks Industry Rank system and are on the growth path as consumers are increasingly eating out. While the cost structure is low for these restaurateurs on falling agricultural commodity prices, many U.S. restaurants do not have much exposure to the foreign lands. This makes BITE a nice bet. No stock accounts for more than 3.09% weight in the 45-stock portfolio. Chipotle takes about 2.43% of the fund. BITE charges 75 bps in fees. Original Post

Duke Is Making All The Right Moves To Secure A Bright Future

Summary Company is taking correct strategic growth measures to ensure secure and sustainable earnings and cash flow growth. DUK can apply for strong rate cases in future due to its high growth investments. Long-term prospects of DUK seem bright due to accelerated growth investments. Company’s risk profile will improve given its measures to strengthen its regulated business. Duke Energy (NYSE: DUK ) is one of the leading electric utility companies in the U.S., which supplies energy to North America using an extensive portfolio of electricity generation assets. The company is regularly using a major portion of its growth investments on expanding its renewable regulated asset base by making regular acquisitions and by pursuing several appealing construction projects, under its attractive business strategy that focuses on having large regulated business mix. DUK’s ongoing capital expenditure will keep its rate base growing, above or in line with the management’s forecasted range, which will boost its long-term earnings and cash flow growth. Given the company’s on-track, strong long-term strategic growth measures, I think income-hunting investors should consider adding DUK to their dividend portfolios. Electricity consumption in the U.S. has been growing at a modest rate. The graph below reflects EIA projections for U.S. electricity consumption in 2016. Source: eia.gov To strengthen their electricity generation portfolio and to keep up with the changing environmental regulations, U.S. utility companies are trying to maximize opportunities of growth, while managing risk by intelligently shifting towards the regulated business side, which will provide stability to their cash flows and earnings. Speaking of DUK, the company has also followed industry norms by increasing its dependence on the regulated business side, which has been a very strong performer. DUK now expects regulated and commercial business to grow by 4%-6% . The company’s plan to have a larger regulated business mix through active acquisitions and through several construction-related projects, is working really well. DUK has built a strong portfolio of approximately 2000MW of owned and equity interest in both wind and solar projects. Speaking of the solar side of its renewable regulated business side, the company is systematically and strategically growing its solar energy-based electricity generation asset base. In North Carolina, where DUK already operates with 13 solar farms, the announcement for the construction of the biggest solar energy generation farm of 40MW , in collaboration with First Solar (NASDAQ: FSLR ), has been announced. Moreover, the company plans to complete the construction of 128MW utility-scaled solar operations in North Carolina. Additionally, DUK’s solar-based investments in South Carolina and Florida are advancing well with the plan. I think the company will benefit from its ongoing investments in the Carolinas by filing rate cases in upcoming years, which will bode well for its EPS and cash flow growth. The company is planning to make its renewable energy generation portfolio stronger, by agreeing on a $4.75 billion deal agreement with Piedmont Natural Gas (NYSE: PNY ). DUK’s management expects that the acquisition of PNY’s assets will be accretive to its earnings base in the first year, after the closure of the deal; the deal will add approximately 50bps to long-term EPS growth. The company is expecting benefit from robust rate base growth of around 9% from this acquisition, which will accelerate DUK’s sales and cash flow base and will ultimately increase its growth rate beyond the given guidance of 4%-to-6%. Moreover, the company has recently acquired a 50% stake in Mesquite Creek via Sumitomo joint venture, to acquire 211MW wind power project, upside of this deal rests in enhancing DUK’s energy generation capacity; also the deal has moved it a step towards achieving its goal of becoming carbon neutral by 2020. Taking another smart move towards achieving carbon neutrality goal, the company has announced the retirement of its Ashville coal plant in N.C. and its replacement with two 280MW CCGTs in 2020, with an expected investment of above $1 billion, the project might add as much as $0.05-to-$0.08 towards DUK’s EPS. Besides these acquisitions and constructions, there are a number of commercial wind and solar power projects planned by the company, which are likely to come in operation by the end of the year. In total, the company’s growth investments is expected to be $20 billion through 2019 and offer the base for strong earnings growth in the years ahead. Furthermore, DUK’s international business, which has been facing some challenges lately have stabilized in 2015. Given the fact that analysts are expecting lower market power crisis and higher energy demand from key international markets like Brazil, amid positive changes expected in the weather, I think the company’s international business will witness modest growth in 2016 and beyond. Furthermore, DUK has an attractive capital return plan, which is largely supported by its strong cash flows. The company has paid dividends for 89 consecutive years. Talking about DUK’s future dividend payments plans at the 3Q 2015 earnings conference call, its CEO said : We have made significant progress in advancing our strategic growth initiatives, both in our regulated and commercial businesses providing strong support for our long-term earnings growth objective. Our objective is to grow dividend annually at a rate consistent with our long-term’s earnings growth objectives. In the near term, our payout ratio will trend slightly above 70%. The company currently offers an attractive dividend yield of 4.85% . Moving ahead, as DUK’s strong growth prospect initiatives will positively affect its cash flows, I expect to see uninterrupted dividend payments for shareholders, which I believe will bode well for the stock valuation, as investor confidence will increase. Summation The company is taking the correct strategic growth measures to ensure secure and sustainable earnings and cash flow growth. DUK has won the ability to apply for strong rate cases in future due to its high growth investments to get an extended portfolio of regulated renewable energy generation asset base, which will have positive impact on its future financial performance and on the stock valuation. Given the accelerated growth investments, the long-term prospect of DUK seems bright. Also, the company’s risk profile will improve given its measures to strengthen its regulated business. Therefore, I think DUK is an attractive investment prospect for income-hunting investors.

Interested In A Stock? Have A Look At What The Options Market Says About It First

Summary Because options are risky and complicated, we tend to purely and simply ignore them. But they carry information. Let us try to reach this information. An effective instrument of observation of the options market should replace the endless series of figures by graphical representations. As soon as we have defined the main charts of our tool, we are able to distinguish some basic patterns. Using these basic patterns, special situations and complete stories can be deciphered: example of the Kraft-Heinz merger. Conclusion: For a stock investor, it’s worth observing the options market. Why try to observe the options market? You can’t trade options if you don’t know anything about the underlying stock. In actual fact, the option trader and the stock investor have exactly the same basic need: they first must gather quality information about the (underlying) stock they are interested in, then they must, in one way or another, get an idea of its future prospects. But there is a very big difference: the option trader runs a much higher risk. One can easily guess that most of the options traders dedicate to the preparation of their decisions much more means than the individual investors. They undergo specific training and often are professionals employed by large firms (more resources, more time, more contacts). It should be added that option trading can be the royal road to take the best profit from insider information. So, we can say that there exists a population of option traders whose operations may bring valuable information to the average stock investor. How can we observe them? The following article tries to answer that question. A few words about options If you are not familiar with the matter, it is strongly recommended that you first read Investopedia or Wikipedia. You must know what the words contract, call, expiration date, in-the-money, LEAPS, open interest, premium, put, strike price, underlying asset, mean. You can leave aside the technical stuff (Black-Scholes model, Cox-Ross-Rubenstein model, greeks, …) After this first reading, there is one aspect that has to be explored a little farther: Options are perishable securities (they are born, they live, and they die), and their cycle of life is an integral part of the exchange system. The following points merit consideration: Types of orders When you give an order on the options market, you must specify if you intend “to open” a new position – which will be added to your portfolio, or if you intend “to close” a position – an existing position which is already part of your portfolio. So there are four types of orders… sell to open sell to close buy to open buy to close … which combine into three types of trades, which in turn can be denominated as follows: trade to open: a sell-to-open associated with a buy-to-open trade to transfer: a sell-to-open associated with a buy-to-close (transfer of the obligation), or a sell-to-close associated with a buy-to-open (transfer of the right) trade to close: a sell-to-close associated with a buy-to-close Open interest, volume, exercises, and expirations Options are created by one single event: trade-to-open. They are (in part) transferred by one event: trade-to-transfer. They are destroyed by three events: trade-to-close or exercise or expiry. Accordingly, we can say that the open interest at the end of a trading session is equal to the open interest at the beginning plus trades-to-open minus trades-to-close minus exercises minus expirations. This is rather theoretical because the available statistics don’t provide this level of detail. Nevertheless, this has to be kept in mind in order to avoid a misleading interpretation of the relationship between volume and open interest. Durations of life When we consider the possible durations of life of options, we distinguish three categories: Weekly options: they have a maximum duration of a few weeks, and they expire at the end of any Friday other than the third one in the month. Monthly options: they have a maximum duration of a few months, and they expire each month at the end of the third Friday. LEAPS (Long-term Equity Anticipation Securities): they have a maximum duration of at least two years, and they expire at the end of the third Friday of January. Building an instrument of observation P rinciples If we leave aside the idea of putting microphones in the offices of some selected options traders, we have little choice: we’ll use the daily market data. For each optionable stock, we group together all its options (around 200 on average) into a small number (around 10) of ” equivalent options,” each having most of the attributes of an option. These equivalent options are … global equivalent call: all the calls global equivalent put: all the puts monthly equivalent call: all the calls expiring during a given month monthly equivalent put: all the puts expiring during a given month … and their attributes are : open interest volume weighted average strike price (abbreviated in “wasp”) weighted average expiration date (abbreviated in “waed”) weighted average premium (abbreviated in “walp”) (all the weighted averages are calculated using the open interest) After calculation of the corresponding aggregated data, we can draw charts. Main charts You easily imagine that many charts can be defined. For the purpose of this article, we’ll focus on three of them: “the ribbon,” “generations at a glance,” “life of a generation.” Main charts – The ribbon: This chart compares the global equivalent call “wasp” (as defined above) and the global equivalent put “wasp” to the price of the underlying stock. Below, we see SPDR S&P 500 ETF (NYSEARCA: SPY ): (click to enlarge) We call “ribbon” the area bounded by the two curves representing the “wasps.” In the case above, the ribbon enfolds the curve of the underlying price. This has something satisfactory, because we have the spontaneous feeling that the rightful place of the call “wasp” is above the underlying price, since a call is linked to an anticipation of increase of the underlying, and the opposite feeling about the puts. This feeling corresponds rather well to the reality when the expiry of the global equivalent occurs in the near future. But in the case of iShares MSCI Brazil Capped (NYSEARCA: EWZ ) … (click to enlarge) … the ribbon doesn’t enfold the price of the underlying. This reveals the existence in the distant future of huge open positions having “wasps” largely disconnected from the current underlying price, as we’ll shortly see. At last, the chart is usefully supplemented by the indication of the weights used in the calculation of the “wasps,” namely the open interests: (click to enlarge) (click to enlarge) Main charts – Generations at a glance This chart shows the distribution of the global equivalent call and put into the monthly equivalents. Let’s have a look at SPY: (click to enlarge) We’ll call “generation” the set of a monthly equivalent call and a monthly equivalent put. On October 30, we count 14 generations for SPY. Their open interest (call + put) ranges from 12 152 contracts in Sept. 17 up to 6 550 619 contracts in Nov. 15. 68% of the global open interest (20 947 910 contracts) is concentrated before the end of 2015. Now, EWZ: (click to enlarge) We count 7 generations, and 27% only of the total open position is set before the end of 2015. Obviously, traders here look at the distant future much more than for SPY. Main charts – Life of a generation The definition of this chart refers to definitions already made: it is the ribbon drawn exclusively with the data of one given generation. Here is the July 2015 generation of SPY: (click to enlarge) This generation is born on March 24 and ceases to exist on July 31. Note that the edges of the ribbon enfold the underlying price during the whole life of the generation. As for the open interests, they steadily gain in number between March 24 and the beginning of July. During July, in accordance with the definition of what is a generation, expiry dates follow one another on every Friday. Thus, we can see 5 tips corresponding to the five Fridays of the month: Thursday 2 (Friday 3 being an exchange holiday), Friday 10, Friday 17, Friday 24 and Friday 31. The biggest decline, as always, occurs at the end of the third Friday. And now, EWZ. We have seen for this symbol that: the global equivalent ribbon doesn’t enfold the underlying price, and we have suspected that such a thing could be caused by huge open positions in the (relatively) distant future. the heaviest generation is Jan. 2016 Accordingly, let’s have a look at this Jan. 2016 generation, from its birth in November 2012 until October 30, 2015: (click to enlarge) The long duration of this generation is due to the fact that it contains a LEAPS, which was initiated on Nov. 12, 2013. We can see that, after some hesitation at the very beginning, the setting up of the ribbon enfolds the price of the underlying. But afterwards, the latter declines sharply, and the ribbon doesn’t completely follow – because the traders have a good lapse of time in front of them. How does such a situation come to an end? To answer that question, we can look at the January 2015 generation, which closely resembles the January 2016 generation. It ended as follows: (click to enlarge) Between August 13, 2014 (beginning of the chart) and December 19 after a short increase, the underlying price plunges: the ribbon doesn’t evolve very much, the open interests continue to grow until December 19, 2014. After December 19: between Dec. 19 and Jan. 16 (third Friday of January): given the previous big plunge of the underlying price, on one hand, the call contracts are all worthless and their open interest remains constant (the green dotted curve shows a flat plateau), on the other hand, a number of put contracts are profitable, they are sold to-close or exercised and consequently the open interest decreases (the red dotted curve). on Jan. 16 (the big drop): there is a very little volume (puts as well as calls), and the major part of the remaining contracts expire worthless at the end of the session. between Jan. 20 and Jan. 30: there exists very little activity – and we are satisfied to see that the ribbon now encloses the underlying price. Some basic patterns Once the charts are defined, feeding them with the market data allows us to observe some patterns. I’d like to show you four of them : “saw tooth profile,” “profit taking session,” “call cliff, put cliff,” “straddle peak.” Basic patterns – Saw tooth profile Let’s consider the following symbol : AAPL150821P00125000 It identifies an option contract having the following attributes: the underlying asset is Apple Inc. (NASDAQ: AAPL ) , the expiration date is August 21, 2015 , it is a Put, the strike price is $125.00 Besides, we know that: the contract was created on April 20, 2015. from the contract birth to its expiration on August 21, the share price of Apple declined from $127.60 to $106.05. Here is the chart drawn with the historical volume and open interest of that precise contract: (click to enlarge) There are 3 periods: first, a period of growth: the trades are mainly trades-to-open, and the open interest grows to just under 80 000 contracts. then, a period of stabilization: not very pronounced here, it can be reduced in some cases to a single sharp summit or, on the contrary, extended to a long flat plateau. at last, a period of decline: trades are now mainly concluded to-close, some contracts are exercised (here something like 40 000 one day before the expiry), and the remaining ones expire worthless (here a little less than 20 000 at the end of Aug. 21). This fundamental pattern exercises an influence on a good number of our charts, as we are going to see immediately. Let’s go now to the highest level, the market as a whole. Here is the chart drawn with the total open interests, calls and puts, of the market (stocks only) over a period of 750 trading sessions (approximately 3 years): (click to enlarge) Each of these contracts have in time a profile similar to the AAPL150821P00125000 one that we saw above, and they combine into a saw tooth profile which is absolutely characteristic of the option market. We can see very clearly the three rhythms of expiration: weekly, monthly, and yearly (each year the tip on the third Friday of January is followed by the biggest decline in the year). We must be aware of these scheduled drops of the market in order to correctly identify the actual falls. Basic patterns – Profit taking session Between mid-October 2014 and December 29, the Cisco Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CSCO ) share climbed from $22.82 up to $28.46. After such an increase, no wonder if there is some profit taking. We can see here in the white window a remarkably synchronized profit taking session (immediately after the top of the underlying price): more than 200000 call contracts are sold to-close on December 31 (the drop from 800k to 600k of the dotted green curve). The contracts which are sold are those having the lowest strike price (the most profitable), consequently the average strike price of the remaining ones increases (continuous green curve). (click to enlarge) This pattern – on the same day a decrease of the call open interest and an increase of the call “wasp” – is characteristic of a call profit-taking session. Now let’s look at a put profit-taking session. It occurs on September 29, 2015 after the impressive drop of the underlying Sunesis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ: SNSS ) on July 23. A little more than 5000 contracts are sold to-close (the drop of the dotted red curve). The contracts which are sold are those having the highest strike price (the most profitable), consequently the average strike price of the remaining ones decreases (continuous red curve). (click to enlarge) This pattern – on the same day a decrease of the put open interest and a decrease of the put “wasp” – is characteristic of a put profit-taking session. We can close this point by noticing that profit taking is one of the mechanisms by which the ribbon tend to follow the moves of the underlying. Basic patterns – Call cliff, put cliff A “cliff” is a brutal and strong increase of either calls or puts, for the purpose of taking advantage of an anticipated increase or decrease of the underlying price. Here is a recent call cliff on Comerica Incorporated (NYSE: CMA ). (click to enlarge) The “Generations at a glance” chart shows that it is concentrated on the January 2016 generation: (click to enlarge) What happens later? On November 25, it seems that the owner(s) of the position took the good decision, at least partly … (click to enlarge) … and for the moment (end of the story in January 2016). Here is an example of put cliff on October 29: It concerns LifeLock, Inc. (NYSE: LOCK ) at a moment when there is some uncertainty around the agreement announced as reached between LOCK and the FTC. Apparently, the buyer of this put position thinks that the increase of the underlying price will not last long. (click to enlarge) A quick verification … (click to enlarge) … shows that the option bet is concentrated in the immediate future. A few days later, after the expiry of the November generation … (click to enlarge) … the bet appeared as lost. Basic patterns – Straddle peak A straddle peak reveals the implementation of a straddle strategy linked to an announced event having an announced time-table: someone thinks that the event will cause moves of the underlying price. As you know, a straddle strategy implies the same number of calls and puts at the same strike price and the same expiration date. In other words, things go by pairs (open interests on one hand, “wasps” on the other hand) at the same pace in the same direction. Here is the beautiful straddle peak observed on the occasion of the July 2014 CBS Corporation (NYSE: CBS ) divestment. (peak on July 10, 2014): (click to enlarge) And below, as seen on November 25, 2015, the General Electric Company (NYSE: GE ) – Synchrony Financial (NYSE: SYF ) spinoff: the GE side: (click to enlarge) and the SYF side: (click to enlarge) A complete story: the Kraft-Heinz merger A call cliff appeared in the Kraft Foods Group, Inc. (KRFT) ribbon chart between mid-January and mid-March 2015: someone thought it was a good idea to buy 60000 call contracts. (click to enlarge) The chart “generations at a glance” suggests that two generations are used: March and June 2015 (click to enlarge) The point is confirmed by the examination of the stories of these two generations. March 2015 generation: (click to enlarge) June 2015 generation: (click to enlarge) Then, on Wednesday, March 25, the announcement of the merger of Kraft-Heinz occurred. As a result, the price of KRFT surged more than 35 % : (click to enlarge) It was too late for the bet invested in the March equivalent call, which had expired worthless a few days before on March 20: (click to enlarge) But the bet invested in the June equivalent call was certainly highly profitable. We recognize the profit-taking pattern in the white window below. The interpretation is a little disturbed because the profit-taking session, which occurs on April 7 (the decrease of the dotted green curve associated with the increase of the continuous green curve), is immediately followed the next day April 8 by an opposite movement – but there is no doubt, the profit-taking pattern is here. (click to enlarge) Conclusion You work hard, you save for your retirement, and your savings are precious. You take a thousand precautions before acting – or not acting. You read papers, blogs, financial newsletters. You are subscribed to various financial websites and often participate in forum discussions. Fundamentally, in most cases, you listen to what people say . We just saw that options data can reveal what people do – on the options market. Observing them can bring you valuable complementary information, and also stimulate your own thoughts. November 26, 2015 Postscript: I don’t have any position, and don’t plan to give any order, in any of the stocks (and their derivatives) mentioned in the article. Editor’s Note: This article covers one or more stocks trading at less than $1 per share and/or with less than a $100 million market cap. Please be aware of the risks associated with these stocks.