Tag Archives: contests

Rate Hike Leads To Bond Funds’ Biggest Withdrawals: 3 Funds To Sell

Time and again we at the Zacks Mutual Fund Commentary section warned investors about the possibility of bond fund exodus once the U.S. Federal Reserve pulls the trigger on rate hike. This turned out to be true last week when bond mutual funds and exchange-traded funds saw a record wave of withdrawals. Bond market funds saw the largest redemptions since 1992, when Lipper started tracking the flows. Remember, a low interest rate environment is favorable for investments in bond funds. This stems from the fact that the market value of a bond is inversely proportional to interest rates. Thus, the rush to pull out money from bond funds was pretty obvious. The U.S. corporate bond market is particularly at risk, as the central bank’s rate hike will lead to significantly higher borrowing costs for the lowest-rated companies. Corporate bond prices have also seen significant volatility, as investors find trading in and out of big positions next to impossible without affecting their prices. The Exodus from Bond Markets Apprehensions over the stability of the bond market compelled investors to pull out $15.4 billion from taxable bond funds for the week ending Dec 16. High-yield junk bond funds saw an outflow of $3.8 billion during the week. This was the largest outflow since Aug 2014. Another record wave of redemptions left investment-grade bond funds lose out $5.1 billion. This was the biggest outflow since Lipper started recording data in 1992. Alongside, yields on investment grade and junk bonds shot up to their highest level since 2012, according to data from Bank of America Merrill Lynch. Tom Roseen, head of research services for Lipper, said: “They were getting out of the way of the Fed.” He also acknowledged the recent closure of bond mutual funds and picked on the Third Avenue fund. He commented: “People are focused on the Third Avenue fund taking it on the chin.” New York-based Third Avenue Management had announced that it was closing the high-yield bond mutual fund Third Avenue Focused Credit Fund (MUTF: TFCVX ), but its investors will not get their money for “up to a year or more.” The move to block redemptions from a Stone Lion credit fund was also playing on investors’ minds. According to Morningstar data, high-yield bond funds were the biggest losers over the last one week among other Taxable Bond Funds. The high-yield bond funds lost 3.5% in the one-week period and its year-to-date loss is now at 4.8%. Corporate bond funds lost 0.5% over the one-week period and the year-to-date loss stands at 1.2%. Corporate Bond Funds in Trouble According to UBS, an astounding $1 trillion of U.S. corporate bonds and loans that are rated below investment grade may be in danger. A UBS strategist commented: “It is our humble belief that the consensus at the Fed does not fully understand the magnitude of the problems in corporate credit markets and the unintended consequences of their policy actions.” According to Bank of America Merrill Lynch indices, price of U.S. company debts rated “CCC” had dropped to the lowest level since 2013. Subsequently, the average yield soared to a six-year high. Meanwhile, Moody’s noted that the list of companies rated B3 or lower with a negative outlook increased 5% in November to 239. This was a 37% year-on-year increase. What Increases the Risk for Bond Funds? A rise in rates may lead to bond exodus; consequently, the lack of liquidity may compel investors to sell the asset class at a significant discount. There is a growing concern that a massive exit from bonds may freeze the markets, as the number of sellers may not match the number of buyers. Redemption of bonds would increase the sell-off and fund managers would then have to sell the less liquid assets to match investors’ cash demands. However, if a mutual fund or an ETF holds illiquid bonds, the price swings will be rapid and would create a vicious cycle as price drops will again intensify selling pressure. The liquidity risk is of high concern. For bonds, sovereign government bonds are said to be the most liquid. On the other hand, corporate bonds are to suffer the most. New regulations and capital requirements have compelled Wall Street banks to cut their inventories. This has made the buy-and-sell activity of corporate bonds in the secondary market more difficult. The drop in inventories following fresh regulations has created a gap in the number of buyers and sellers. Thus, bond fund managers are now less prone to holding a large chunk of bonds in fear of any possible rout. The Securities and Exchange Commission had proposed a rule earlier this year that mutual fund companies must disclose how vulnerable their bond portfolios are to rate hikes. This was among SEC’s first moves to address concerns that the first rate hike in about seven years may spark a rapid sell-off in bond funds, resulting in steep losses. 3 High-Yield Bond Funds to Avoid Increasing concerns over bond funds will only intensify as the central bank opts for a gradual hike in rates. Thus, investors looking for safer avenues should exit from certain high-risk high-yield bond mutual funds. Below we highlight 3 mutual funds from the High Yield bond fund category that carry a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #4 (Sell) or Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #5 (Strong Sell), as we expect the funds to underperform their peers in the future. Remember, the goal of the Zacks Mutual Fund Rank is to guide investors to identify potential winners and losers. Unlike most of the fund-rating systems, the Zacks Mutual Fund Rank is not just focused on past performance, but the likely future success of the fund. These funds have negative returns year-to-date and over the last 1-year period. The 3-year annualized return is also in the red. The minimum initial investment is within $5000. Northeast Investors Trust (MUTF: NTHEX ) focuses on investing in marketable securities of prominent firms. NTHEX primarily purchases debt securities rated below investment grade by any of the two major ratings firms. Northeast Investors Trust currently carries a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #5. Over year-to-date and 1-year periods, NTHEX has lost 17.8% and 17.7%, respectively, and has a negative 3-year annualized return of 4.2%. Annual expense ratio of 1.09% is higher than the category average of 1.06%. NTHEX’s 85.59% of assets is allocated to bonds. Franklin High Income A (MUTF: FHAIX ) invests mostly in lower-rated debt securities that provide high yield. These lower-rated securities include bonds, debentures, convertible securities and other debt securities. The fund seeks a high level of current income. Franklin High Income A currently carries a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #5. Over year-to-date and 1-year periods, FHAIX has lost 11.8% and 10.9%, respectively, and has a negative 3-year annualized return of 1.9%. Annual expense ratio of 0.76% is lower than the category average of 1.06%. Consulting Group High Yield Investments (MUTF: THYUX ) seeks a high level of current income by investing in below investment grade debt securities. THYUX focuses on investing most of its assets in domestic junk bonds. THYUX may utilize 20% of its assets to purchase high yield bonds of issuers located in emerging or developed economies. Average portfolio duration of THYUX is from two to six years. Consulting Group High Yield Investments currently carries a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #4. Over year-to-date and 1-year periods, THYUX has lost 8.4% and 7.6%, respectively, and has a negative 3-year annualized return of 0.4%. Annual expense ratio of 0.74% is lower than the category average of 1.06%. Original post

3 Top-Rated Allianz Mutual Funds To Invest In

Allianz Global Investors – a segment of Allianz SE ( OTCQX:ALIZF ) ( OTCQX:AZSEY ) – seeks to provide financial services throughout the globe, including the U.S., Europe and Asia-Pacific, by following their philosophy: Understand. Act. According to Morningstar, the company currently has $29.7 billion of assets under management (excluding money market assets) invested in a wide range of mutual fund categories, including equity and fixed-income funds. The company offers financial services to both institutional and retail clients. Meanwhile, founded in 1890, the parent company of Allianz Global Investors, Allianz SE, currently has a nearly $73 billion market capitalization. Below we share with you 3 top-rated Allianz mutual funds. Each has earned a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #1 (Strong Buy) and is expected to outperform its peers in the future. To view the Zacks Rank and past performance of all Allianz mutual funds, investors can click here to see the complete list of Allianz mutual funds . AllianzGI International Small-Cap Fund A (MUTF: AOPAX ) seeks capital growth over the long run. AOPAX primarily invests in securities of companies having market capitalizations similar to those included in the MSCI World Small-Cap Index. AOPAX is expected to have a weighted-average market capitalization of 50-200% of the same index. The AllianzGI International Small-Cap A fund returned 12.7% in the past one-year period. AOPAX has an expense ratio of 1.45% compared to the category average of 1.53%. AllianzGI Structured Return Fund A (MUTF: AZIAX ) uses an in-the-money short call overlay strategy to gain long equity exposure. AZIAX primarily invests in ETFs that have significant exposure to securities included in the S&P 500 Index. AZIAX may also invest in ETFs with exposure to real estate investment trusts (REITs). The AllianzGI Structured Return Fund A returned 5.6% in the past one-year period. Greg P. Tournant is one of the fund managers of AZIAX since 2012. AllianzGI International Managed Volatility Fund A (MUTF: PNIAX ) seeks to maximize growth of capital over the long term. PNIAX invests a lion’s share of its assets in securities of companies located in foreign lands. PNIAX invests not more than half of its assets issued in any particular country. PNIAX invests in securities of companies from a wide range of countries, including those from the MSCI EAFE Index. PNIAX seeks to manage overall portfolio volatility by investing in these securities. Though PNIAX focuses on acquiring securities issued in developed nations, the fund may also invest in emerging market securities. The AllianzGI International Managed Volatility Fund A returned 3.2% in the past one-year period. As of October 2015, PNIAX held 153 issues, with 3.06% of its assets invested in Lawson Inc. ( OTC:LWSOF ). Original Post

How Many Stocks Should You Own? Remember Warren Buffett’s Advice

Summary Diversification is trumpeted as a key point of proper portfolio design. Warren Buffett disagrees with diversification, with a single caveat. The return spread among stocks suggest that every new holding you add is more likely to be a loser than a winner. If you asked SeekingAlpha readers why investors should own more than one stock, the overwhelming response would easily be diversification. The idea is simple: the more holdings you have, the less exposure you have to unsystematic risk (risk associated with a particular company or industry). Now, if you asked a follow-up question, “How many stock holdings you should have?”, you would end up with a hotly debated topic. On page 129 of my copy of The Intelligent Investor , legendary money manager Benjamin Graham advocates holding 10 to 30 positions. Modern portfolio theory supported this advice, and many continue to follow its preachings religiously. According to this theory, if you own 20 well-diversified companies, each held in equal amounts, you’ve eliminated 70% of risk (as measured by standard deviation) and reduced volatility. Can’t argue with the math (or can you?), and diversification has been harped on by many as the foundation of any properly constructed portfolio. It is likely that anyone that has had a financial advisor or even discussed finances with a family friend has heard this advice before. Always spread your capital across multiple sectors and markets is in that person’s best interest. Makes sense right? Who doesn’t want less volatility and risk? Warren Buffett apparently. “Diversification is protection against ignorance. It makes very little sense for those who know what they’re doing.” – The Oracle of Omaha Himself So, Do You Know What You’re Doing? Of course, modern portfolio theory and its offshoots were theorized between the ’50s and ’70s. Volatility is up since then, and stocks have become increasingly uncorrelated with the underlying market. To more clearly illustrate this point, stocks increasingly don’t follow a normal distribution pattern: * Source: Investopedia The results of the above image have been repeated over and over in recent market studies. The key takeaway for an individual investor is that the odds of a stock you own outperforming the stock market is actually worse than 50/50 , contrary to what many investors might think off hand. The reason for this is because overall market returns have been boosted by just a handful of “superstar” stocks, like Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL ) or Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT ). If you don’t own something like the next Apple or Microsoft in your portfolio (roughly 1 in 16 odds), then well, you’re likely doomed to underperform. So if you have a portfolio of 16 stocks, what are the odds you have that one in sixteen superstar company included based on random chance? Just 38%. Let us say you get lucky and manage to stumble upon a superstar. Now the question is whether you will continue to hold it as it multiplies. Enter the disposition effect . Retail investors have a tendency to sell winners (realizing gains too early) and hold onto losers, following the thought process that today’s losers are tomorrow’s winners. How many investors held on to Apple from $7.00/share in the early 2000’s all the way up to more than $700.00/share (split-adjusted) today? The answer is likely very few. Retail investors took the profit from the double or triple (if they even held that long) and likely didn’t reinvest back in because they had sold in the past. None of this changes the fact that the more companies you own, the more you will inevitably track the index of the positions you hold. In order to generate alpha (abnormal return adjusted for risk), it is a fact that the more stocks you own, the less likely you will be able to generate that alpha. The more holdings you have, the more likely you will have just tracked the index that your holdings are a part of, but in an inefficient way. For all your trouble, you are out both your free time and likely higher trading costs. The question then is why bother with all the headaches of investing in numerous individual companies you buy individually, if you could simply just buy the index and take it easy? If you take a look at major hedge fund and money manager holdings, it is clear that concentrated holdings are used to drive alpha. Visiting the Oracle of Omaha’s portfolio, the man clearly practices what he says. The top five holdings of Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK.A ) (NYSE: BRK.B )[Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC ), Kraft Heinz (NASDAQ: KHC ), Coca Cola (NYSE: KO ), IBM (NYSE: IBM ), and American Express (NYSE: AXP )] constituted 67% of his portfolio as of September 30, 2015. 43 scattered holdings constituted the remaining 33%. As for diversifying across sectors versus buying what you know and understand, 37% of Buffett’s holdings fall in the Consumer Staples sector and 35% in Financials. The man clearly doesn’t buy utilities just because portfolio theory tells him he should in order to reduce his risk. Conclusion Thousands of people will read this article. Are you smarter than two thirds of them? If you don’t believe that, buy ETFs, sit back, and be content with market returns. If you think you’re smarter than two thirds of readers of this article (I suspect 95% of you believe that), then the takeaway is slightly different. Diversification, for the sake of diversification, is stupid. Buy what you know, can understand, and believe in the long-term potential of. Don’t understand bank stocks? Reading their SEC filings even gives me headaches, and I work at one. If you don’t understand the company, chances are you aren’t going to pick a winner other than by dumb luck. You shouldn’t lose sleep at night for not having exposure to an industry you can’t adequately review, and it is likely your portfolio returns will thank you for it. As far as how many positions to have, hold as few positions as you are comfortable with when it comes to risk and volatility in order to increase alpha on your high conviction positions. For most investors, that sweet spot still likely falls within modern portfolio theory guidance, around 15 to 25.