Tag Archives: contests

CEMIG: What’s The Weather Like?

Summary CEMIG seems very cheap, but faces several easy-to-spot problems. One of those problems is clearly cyclical and temporary. It’s the weather. Beyond a general overview of the issues CEMIG faces and offering a long-term opinion, this article also considers the importance of the weather in trying to establish a CEMIG position. On paper, CEMIG – Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais (NYSE: CIG ) is an extremely appealing equity. Here’s a utility that has a current dividend yield of 10.6% and trades for 4.4x its 2016 EPS consensus. Sure, CEMIG is in Brazil. And Brazil is in the dumper due to an implosion in commodity pricing (namely crude and iron ore), on which its exports long relied. Also, Brazil’s government budget is slowly turning into a deficit, on account of both the economy and higher social spending: (click to enlarge) Source: Tradingeconomics.com, government budget Plus, of course, CEMIG faces its own travails, having lost 3 hydroelectric concessions which are likely to drive its earnings down by ~50% . And then there’s the fact that CIG is an ADR, reflecting the behavior of CEMIG as quoted in São Paulo … in Brazilian Reais. You see, the real has been doing its best impersonation of a banana republic currency – both on account of the commodity implosion, the resulting economic slowdown and the slowly-eroding budget balance: (click to enlarge) Source: Xe.com There is, thus, a lot of trouble to go around. I could however say there’s one bright spot here on the currency front. While the commodity implosion had a very negative impact on exports, the Real implosion made sure that imports fell hard as well. The end result is that Brazil is still holding on to a positive balance of trade: (click to enlarge) Source: Tradingeconomics.com, balance of trade The main economic risk is thus reduced to the chance that the budget deficit deteriorates so much that Brazil resorts to money printing and turns this manageable situation into a Venezuela . Barring that, we could argue that the Real is fairly valued or even undervalued (if some of the commodity weakness in oil and iron ore goes away). At this point, we could thus argue that taking into account the economic outlook, Real, valuation (EPS consensus) and the loss of concessions, CIG should be at an attractive long-term level. And that would probably be right. But there’s yet another factor. The Weather You see, Brazil is supposedly in the midst of its worst drought in the last 80 years ( I , II ). A drought which was made worse by the weak 2014 rain season (starting in November 2014). Now, a drought here is a serious matter, because Brazil relies heavily on hydroelectric power – and CEMIG relies even more on it (though that will now be reduced by the loss of 3 hydro concessions): (click to enlarge) Source: CEMIG Presentation The drought, as I said, was made worse by a weak 2014 rain season. A drought is clearly a temporary factor, so buying stock affected by it could make sense long-term. But usually, you wouldn’t want to necessarily be doing so right away if you thought that there was still significant pain ahead. In that regard, it pays to check how this rain season is going, as it will affect hydroelectric power generation throughout 2016. We do have a way of monitoring how it’s been doing: Source: NOAA, National Weather Service As it were, the answer about the weather is “not so good”. The most important state for CEMIG is Minas Gerais and the adjoining smaller states, and those are clearly seeing under-average rainfall during this rain season as well. Source: Company Presentation So, for timing purposes, we do know that more fundamental deterioration likely still lies ahead for CEMIG even if the present share levels already look attractive for the longer-term. On The Other Hand CEMIG does get a lot of its profits from generation. But it also gets 1/3rd of EBITDA from transmission, and that ought to be defensible: (click to enlarge) Source: Company Presentation This is yet another factor telling us that, longer-term, CEMIG should be attractive – though it probably won’t mitigate further short-term fundamental weakness coming from the weather. Conclusion Some of the problems CEMIG faces are structural, like the loss of 3 important concessions. Others seem discounted, like the massive Real plunge (unless the government goes all Venezuela on us). Taking into account these problems and the earnings impact, it would look like CEMIG is already at an interesting level for longer-term investments (the 2016 EPS consensus puts the company at 4.4x earnings, and should already account for the concession losses – but not for further fundamental deterioration). However, to further refine the timing of buying CEMIG shares, one of the largest problems with CEMIG remains, though it’s clearly cyclical and temporary. I’m talking about the weather. On that front, it looks likely that the fundamental newsflow over the next 3-9 months will remain rather negative – since if it’s not raining a lot right now, it will be hard to compensate for most of 2016. On this account, it might also happen that CEMIG will further cut its dividend or entirely eliminate it (temporarily) – which is another possible “ugly newsflow” event. Putting it all together, CEMIG is trading at an interesting long-term level given the depressed valuation. Weather considerations are mainly for trying to establish the best possible entry point, in spite of the stock already looking attractive long-term.

Closing The Books On 2015

Summary So 2015, how’d you do? Did you beat the market? An advisor, among other things, needs to prevent clients from doing themselves in out of emotion or any other unintentionally self-destructive behavior. An individual investor needs to manage this for themselves, which is doable with a whole lot of self-awareness. By Roger Nusbaum, AdvisorShares ETF Strategist The transition from the old year into the new is always busy for tax reasons, reviewing the old year and game planning for the future. So 2015, how’d you do? Did you beat the market? Those are common questions for this time of year and while those may seem to be important they are less important than the humbler “did you screw anything up beyond repair?” An advisor, among other things needs to prevent clients from doing themselves in out of emotion or any other unintentionally self-destructive behavior. An individual investor needs to manage this for themselves, which is doable with a whole lot of self-awareness. The reason not screwing up is arguably more important than anything else is that the stock market averages 7-8% annualized over long periods of time, but year to year it is a guess as to what the market will do. Seven or 8% can be a sufficient growth rate over long periods of time and of course 7-8% includes all the great years and the terrible years. If nothing else, if an investor doesn’t panic and just holds on to capture most of that 7-8% then they have a good chance of having enough money when they need it. This is essentially the argument for the stock market being less risky over longer periods versus shorter periods which then places more importance on savings rate and lifestyle than market performance… unless there is a major screw-up. In 2015, a major screw-up could have come from chasing yield with too much exposure to MLPs. The space has obviously been decimated in 2015. Someone who had 3-5% in MLPs all the way down had a meaningful portfolio drag but with a properly diversified portfolio could easily be pretty close to the market and pretty close can get the job done. The person who heeded one of the countless articles from a couple of years ago suggesting 15-25% in MLPs has a much bigger problem. In most years, there are market niches that blow up, this year it was MLPs and in the future there will be others. From the advisor’s perspective, explaining why there was an MLP in the portfolio is infinitely easier than explaining why 20% was in MLPs. From the perspective of the individual investor, it becomes an inconvenience as opposed to a now what do I do situation. The idea of not screwing up might seem boring and like a low bar but for most investors boring is exactly what they want even if they don’t realize it and what good is beating the market (huge assumption there by the way) with an inadequate savings rate? Relying on the market to bail out an investment plan is to rely on what is out of the investor’s control and that is a bad bet.

The York Water Company: 200 Years Of Dividends, But Shares Are Expensive

York continues to be an excellent dividend payer with a great history. It recently raised its dividend by 4%. The shares look fairly expensive at these levels. In January of 2015, I originally wrote about The York Water Company (NASDAQ: YORW ). In that article, I highlighted its record setting dividend paying history as well as its more recent dividend growth history. While the company continues to be an extremely strong and reliable dividend payer, its shares are looking pricey right now. Before getting to the shares, let’s take a look at the dividend again. With its most recent raise of 4% in November, the dividend now stands at $0.622 annually. This makes the forward yield about 2.37%. This is extremely low for a utility in the first place. However, let’s give some credit where credit is due. This declaration was York’s 580th consecutive dividend declaration. Their consecutive streak of paying dividends has now hit 200 years. In the press release , the company also claims that this is believed to be the longest record of consecutive dividends in America. The streak is just downright impressive. On the other hand, “consecutive years” is a lot different than “consecutive years of growth.” But… the company has one of these streaks as well. This most recent increase bumps its current dividend growth streak to 19 years. YORW Dividend data by YCharts While the dividend growth rate has not been necessarily stellar over the past few years, it has been a lot better than nothing. The 5-year DGR is roughly 3.6%. While it has maintained this growth, it is also keeping a relatively safe payout ratio. With trailing earnings of 98 cents, the current payout ratio is about 63%. I believe considering the majority of its business is regulated and extremely defensive in nature that this is a prudent payout. While the dividend is looking solid as ever, the shares are not. Shares are up almost 35% from 52-week lows. This run up has obviously pushed the yield to a very low level historically. Its 5-year average yield is 2.84%. The point here is that while the dividend is attractive there is not a particular reason for the yield to be so low. YORW PS Ratio (TTM) data by YCharts Fundamentally, shares haven’t seen these high levels since 2006-2007. And as I said, there just doesn’t seem to be a good reason for it. Sales for 2015 are supposed to finish up 2.8% higher than last year. Next year’s sales are expected to be 3.5% higher. Earnings are expected to be up 6.4%. These aren’t bad numbers. They just aren’t all that great and certainly don’t justify such high fundamentals. Trading at roughly a little more than 26 times both trailing earnings as well as forward earnings things don’t look any better when we look at the shares from an earnings basis. This P/E is actually higher than comparable peers such as Middlesex (NASDAQ: MSEX ) and Aqua America (NYSE: WTR ) as well. Don’t get me wrong, I do believe that these water utilities should trade with a nice premium. The name of the game here is consistency. These businesses don’t falter much, even in bad times, and there are massive barriers to entry. However, I strongly believe the market has priced in too much of a premium currently and pushed these shares into overvalued territory. YORW data by YCharts In conclusion, York has been a solid dividend payer for 200 years now. It is immensely impressive that not only has the company never broken that streak but also tagged along a dividend growth streak of 19 years. With the most recent raise, the dividend is looking very good, but the shares are not. These levels are fundamentally way too high and have no real forward catalysts to justify it. The shares are far too expensive to be a buyer at these levels in my opinion.