Tag Archives: consumer

The iShares MSCI Denmark Capped ETF: Happy In EDEN

Denmark’s Krone is considered a ‘safe-haven’ currency. Although a small economy, Denmark is home to several world class companies. The well-established international companies have yet to reach full dividend return potential. Historians often classify long stretches of time as ‘an age’. For example, ‘Ice Age’, ‘Stone Age’, ‘Bronze Age’ and ‘Industrial Age’. Today, it’s as though we’re living in the ‘Information Age’. There seems to be no end to the collection and analyzation of data in every imaginable way. One such collation of data stands out: the World Happiness Report . It’s a landmark survey of the state of national happiness. On a scale of 0 to 10, four countries are virtually tied for first place with an average score between 7.5 and 7.6. They are Switzerland, Iceland, Denmark and Norway. So if your portfolio has you feeling a bit glum, it just so happens that there’s a way to share in the happiness. BlackRock’s iShares MSCI Denmark Capped ETF (BATS: EDEN ), just might cheer you up! Before getting a closer look at Denmark and the fund, it best to make clear why the fund is called ‘capped’. It’s simply means that the fund complies with specific IRS requirements which; …limits the weight of any single component to a maximum of 25% of the Underlying Index. Additionally, the sum of components that individually constitute more than 5% of the weight of the Underlying Index cannot exceed a maximum of 50% of the weight of the Underlying Index in the aggregate… Also, the fund is designed to emulate the Morgan Stanley Capital International [MSCI] Danish Stock Exchange Index, is 99.58% invested in Danish listed companies and is passively managed. (click to enlarge) According to the Official Website of Denmark , the northern European nation has some very unique characteristics. For instance, aside from the mainland peninsula (called Jutland ), Denmark includes 406 islands totaling over 4544 miles of coastline. Its geographic mainland is nearly flat, the highest point being a mere 558 feet above sea level. Surprisingly, the Kingdom of Denmark spans a bit further than one might expect. Greenland , although geographically a part of North America belongs to the Kingdom of Denmark, as well as the Faroe Islands midway between Scotland and Iceland. (These outlying regions of Denmark do have completely autonomous governments.) Closer to home, Denmark’s government is a constitutional monarchy, parliamentary in structure and almost always governed by minority consensus. In fact, no single party has held a majority in the Danish Parliament for well over 100 years! Denmark has been a member of the European Union since 1973. Although the Danes still use the traditional Krone, Denmark participates in the European Union’s ‘Exchange Rate Mechanism II’. ERMII requires that EU members who wish to transition to the Euro, maintain their legacy currency within a fixed band, ±15%, of a central rate. Danmark’s Nationalbank , the central bank of Denmark, has gone to great lengths to keep the Krone within an even narrower ±2.5% range. Because of Denmark’s well managed and stable economy the Danish Krone is considered one of the world’s ‘safe haven’ currencies. So much so, the central bank has kept its base deposit rates below zero to discourage ‘a flood’ of capital inflows which would strengthen the Krone and depress Denmark’s export economy. The point being is that Denmark’s reputation as a financial safe haven is on par with that of Switzerland, or the U.K. or even the U.S. However, if one were trying to think of a single global export product that would immediately bring Denmark to mind, nothing particularly stands out. So then, what makes the Danish economy special? Of the 28 nation European Union, Danes are 6th in per capita GDP; have a real GDP growth rate of 1.1%, below the EU-28 average of 1.4%; Government debt of about 45% of GDP, well below the EU-28 average; an inflation rate half of the EU-28 and a labor productivity well above the EU 28 average. It’s also important to note that although taxes are well above the EU-28 average, so too are government expenditures on social services. In relation to the EU, Denmark has above average wealth, a productive workforce and a high standard of living underwritten by taxes supporting an extensive social services network, including tax supported healthcare and education. Almost 80% of Denmark’s total exports are destined for its top 20 export partners. Chief among those destinations are Denmark’s fellow European Union member nations. Data from Observatory of Economic Complexity It’s similar for import originations; the Lion’s share of imports originating from EU partners. Data from Observatory of Economic Complexity Hence, it seems that Denmark is an integral part of the European Union’s economy and on track towards becoming a Eurozone member. In order to best understand what drives the economy, it’s best to examine the holdings of the iShares Denmark Capped fund, starting with the way iShares allocates investment capital among the various market sectors. Data from iShares The non-cyclical sectors, Health Care and Consumer Staples, tally up to about 41%; the cyclicals, Financials, Materials and Consumer Discretionary compose about 31% and the cyclically sensitive sectors, Industrials, Telecom and IT comprise about 28% of the fund. Lastly, the cash holding are mostly U.S. Dollars and a small portion of Danish Krone. The fund itself is not large with a mere 39 holdings as of the end of October. Hence it isn’t too much trouble to take a look at the holdings of each sector, examining a few common metrics. The fund’s Health Care sector holds 9 companies, most notably the global pharmaceutical giant Novo Nordisk (NYSE: NVO ) tipping the scale at 22.0906% of the fund’s total holding. However, Coloplast ( CLPBY), a provider of specialized gastro-intestinal consumer and hospital products and biotech Genmab ( OTCPK:GMXAY ) are lesser known but top of the line as far as Health Care companies go. In general, the fund’s Health Care sector pulls together a respectable lineup, although the sector’s average dividend yield is a disappointing 0.639% with, however, a dependable average payout ratio of almost 25%. These are solid companies with good fundaments, with the potential for higher distributions. Health Care 34.80% Symbol Fund Weighting Market Cap ( USD Billions ) Yield Payout Ratio Price/ Earnings Price/ Book Beta Primary Business Novo Nordisk NVO 22.0906% $109.95 1.43% 41.30% 30.08 23.90 0.87 Pharmaceuticals Coloplast CLPBY 3.5638% $16.5403 2.44% 106.77% 32.90 17.92 0.50 Personal Health Care Products and Service Genmab GMXAY 2.7752% $5.870 0.00% 0.00% 84.98 14.20 0.99 Co-Development Biotech, Antibody Therapeutics with Glaxo (NYSE: GSK ), Roche (OTCQX: RHHBF ) GN Store Nord OTCPK:GNNDY 1.6894% $3.141 0.69% 21.76% 30.33 3.64 1.04 Hearing Aids, Hands Free Communications; Beltone and ReSound Brands Bavarian Nordic OTCPK:BVNRY 1.3398% $1.131 0.00% 0.00% 40.91 5.67 1.53 Biotech Vaccines for Cancer and Infectious Disease William Demant Holdings OTC:WILLF 1.2814% $4.823 0.00% 0.00% 24.03 5.53 0.74 Holding Company for Hearing Aid Device Manufactures; Diagnostic Instruments ALK-Abello OTCPK:AKABY 0.729% $1.019 0.67% 27.57% 39.86 2.92 0.32 Allergy Treatment, Prevention, Diagnosis Zealand Pharma OTCPK:ZLDPF 0.6916% $0.533 0.00 0.00% NA 21.64 1.01 Biopharmaceuticals Peptides and Cardio-Metabolic AMBU Copenhagen: AMBUb 0.6397% $1.101 0.52% 26.32% 51.58 8.85 0.05 Life Support Devices, Anesthesia Equipment, Monitoring Devices Data from Reuters The Financial Sector is in large part the international Danske Bank ( OTCPK:DNSKY ) at 7.8049% of the fund’s Financial sector and is by far Denmark’s largest bank with a respectable market cap of $27.785 billion in U.S. Dollars. The sector’s average dividend is a reasonable at 2.04% and the average payout ratio of the five dividend paying companies is well sustainable at approximately 43.87%. Financials 15.73% Symbol Fund Weighting Market Cap ( USD Billions ) Yield Payout Ratio Price/ Earnings Price/ Book Beta Primary Business Danske Bank DNSKY 7.8049% $27.785 2.95% 33.55% 30.37 1.24 1.22 International; Nordic Regional Jyske Bank OTC:JYSKY 1.8923% $4.648 0.00% 0.00% 18.33 1.08 1.09 International; North Europe TopDanmark OTCPK:TPDKY 1.5684% $2.801 0.00% 0.00% 15.19 3.62 0.25 Insurance and Pension Funds Sydbank OTCPK:SYANY 1.5644% $2.447 3.17% 47.12% of cash flow 15.28 1.46 0.77 Denmark and Germany TRYG OTC:TGVSF 1.3619% $5.218 4.43% 93.57% 18.77 3.76 0.19 Nordic region Insurance ALM Brand Copenhagen: ALMB 0.836 $0.986 1.30% 22.14 16.61 1.30 1.25 Insurance and Financial Services Spar Nord Bank Copenhagen: SPNO 0.6974% $1.205 2.46% 22.96% of cash flow 10.08 1.13 0.84 Retail and Small Business Data from Reuters The fund’s Industrial Sector accounts for 11 of the fund’s holdings, led by the well know Vestas Wind Systems ( OTCPK:VWSYF ) at almost 5% of the fund. It’s worth noting here that Denmark has an average wind speed of nearly 17 miles per hour; well suited for wind energy generation. Second to Vestas in fund industrial weightings is the shipping giant Moller-Maersk [Copenhagen: MAERSKb] at 4.4241% of B shares and 2.451% of the [Copenhagen: MAERSKa] of class A shares. The sector’s average return, when including the oversized Moller-Maersk 19% class A share dividend, is just over 3% and without it, its 1.43%. Denmark has ample access to the sea and as one might expect, four of its industrial holdings are international freight shipping and transportation companies. Industrials 24.24% Symbol Fund Weighting Market Cap ( USD Billions ) Yield Payout Ratio Price/ Earnings Price/ Book Beta Primary Business Vestas Wind Systems VWSYF 4.9908% $13.130 0.98% 24.32% 24.75 4.56 1.03 Wind Energy Systems, Service and Finance A P Moller Maersk B shares Copenhagen: MAERSKb 4.4241% $31.31 3.00% 16.65% of Cash Flow per Share 19.15 1.04 NA Marine Shipping DSV OTCPK:DSDVY 3.8309% $7.238 0.57% 15.18% 25.75 7.41 0.67 Air, Sea, Land Freight Transportation ISS OTCPK:ISSJY 2.4673% $6.541 2.05 0.00% 19.48 3.26 NA Building/ Factory Maintenance A P Moller Maersk A shares Copenhagen: MAERSKa 2.451% $31.31 19.71% 25.50% 7.57 0.84 1.13 Marine Shipping DFDS Copenhagen: DFDS 1.3245% $1.871 1.75% 38.08% 21.19 2.05 0.32 Shipping and Logistics Flsmidth & CO OTCPK:FLIDY 1.0991% $1.923 3.54% 56.70% 15.30 1.52 1.36 Cement & Mineral Processing Machinery NKT Holdings OTC:NRKBF 1.0559% $1.325 1.08% 311.73% 285.23 1.50 1.53 Industrial Power Cables Rockwool International OTC:RKWBF 0.955% $3.424 1.07% 27.46% 28.09 2.25 0.92 Manufacturer of Stone Wool Insulation Per Aarsleff Copenhagen: PAALB 0.6813% $0.708 0.67% 9.02% 13.35 2.13 0.56 Construction, Pilings and Pipe Solar Copenhagen: SOLARb 0.5605% $0.423 1.72% NA NA 1.78 0.87 HVAC Equipment and Supplies Norden OTC:DPBSF 0.3984% $0.843 0.00% 0.00% NA 0.66 0.69 Shipping Dry Cargo/ Tankers Data from Reuters Denmark’s economy seems to lean towards Health Care, Biotech, Chemicals and Pharmaceuticals in general. So it’s no surprise to find to that the two holdings in the materials sector are ‘bio-materials’ manufacturers. It’s worth a quick mention since they are interesting companies. Novozymes ( OTCPK:NVZMY ) manufactures industrial enzymes, microorganisms ingredients and biopharmaceutical ingredients. The applications range from household cleaning products, food and beverage ingredients, agriculture, feed products, and aquaculture feed products. Chr Hansen ( OTCPK:CRTSF ) is a holding company for its ‘Cultures and Enzymes’, Health and Nutrition and Natural Colors divisions. The sector average dividend yield is 1.855% with an average payout ratio of 40.25%. Materials 7.67% Symbol Fund Weighting Market Cap ( USD Billions ) Yield Payout Ratio Price/ Earnings Price/ Book Beta Primary Business Novozymes NVZMY 4.7194% $12.043 0.95% 33.83 35.71 8.63 0.63 Biotech Chemicals, Enzymes Hansen Holdings CRTSF 2.9513% $7.939 2.76% 50.46 44.79 11.85 0.36 Bioscience: Food, Ag and Pharma The Consumer Discretionary has what might be expected, with one exception: the world renowned speaker and sound reproduction equipment manufacture Bang & Olufsen ( OTCPK:BGOUF ) . Bang and Olufsen sound system and components have long been ‘top-of-the-line’ equipment for home, auto and professional entertainment consumers. For example, these are the sound systems used by Mercedes-Benz ( OTCPK:DDAIY ) , Aston Martin (owned by Ford (NYSE: F )) , Audi ( OTCPK:AUDVF ) and BMW ( OTCPK:BAMXY ) . Perhaps a secret to their success is quality over quantity. The company’s market cap is less than one-quarter billion U.S. Dollars and there’s no dividend. The entire sector’s average dividend is a bit over 2.00% and average payout ratio for the three other holdings is a bit over a well sustainable 48%. Consumer Discretionary 7.38% Symbol Fund Weighting Market Cap ( USD Billions ) Yield Payout Ratio Price/ Earnings Price/ Book Beta Primary Business Pandora OTCPK:PNDZF 5.7066% $14.135 1.15% 35.97 31.91 16.05 2.10 Accessories and Jewelry Matas OTC:MAASF 0.6221% $0.731 4.72% 65.86 14.87 1.99 NA Personal Care, Cosmetics, Vitamins IC GROUP Copenhagen: IC 0.5752% $0.470 2.14% 44.16 20.00 3.51 0.90 Clothing and Sportswear Bang & Olufsen BGOUF 0.4804 $0.285 0.00 0.00 NA 1.05 1.00 Multimedia, Sound Systems Data from Reuters According the official website of Denmark , beer has been part of Danish culture for more than 5000 years. Denmark is proud of its brewing industry. The first brewing guild was established in the 16 century. It is estimated that there are over 200 ‘microbreweries’ as well as world renowned brands such as Tuborg and Carlsberg ( CAGBY) . So again, it’s no surprise that two of the three Consumer Staples are breweries, Carlsberg and Royal Unibrew [Copenhagen: RBREW] both having a global reach for beer as well as soft drinks. The third holding is Schouw ( OTC:SUWCF ) , manufacturer of casual and active wear. The average dividend for Consumer Staples is 2.13% with an approximate payout ratio of 37%. Consumer Staples 6.15% Symbol Fund Weighting Market Cap ( USD Billions ) Yield Payout Ratio Price/ Earnings Price/ Book Beta Primary Business Carlsberg CAGBY 3.8326% $12.738 1.62% 15.98% of Cash Flow 22.53 1.49 1.16 Beer & Soft Drinks Royal Unibrew Copenhagen: RBREW 1.4151 $2.2 2.53% 55.48 21.93 5.40 0.59 Beer & Soft Drinks Schouw & Co. SUWCF 0.9048% $1.337 2.25% 39.42 16.28 1.32 0.70 Diversified Consumer Non-Cyclical Data from Reuters The two remaining sectors include Telecom holding TDC ( OTC:TDCAY ) , a diversified communications and content provider and IT holding Simcorp ( OTC:SICRY ) , specializing in financial industry software solutions. Telecom 2.00% and IT 1.61% Symbol Fund Weighting Market Cap ( USD Billions ) Yield Payout Ratio Price/ Earnings Price/ Book Beta Primary Business TDC (Telecom) TDCAY 2.0068% $4.264 5.63% 11.14% of Cash Flow 12.98 1.12 0.51 Communications and Entertainment Simcorp (IT) SICRY 1.605% $2.038 1.35% 53.84 40.11 27.85 0.57 Financial Industry Software Data from Reuters As for the fund itself, it has been listed since January 2012 and currently trades at a discount of -0.20% to NAV. The fund has a P/E of 23.47 and a price to book multiple of 2.89. The annualized distribution is 3.09% and the trailing 12 month yield is 1.54%. The shares are lightly traded with a 20 day average volume of just over 17,000 shares per day. Since inception the fund has returned 22.64% and over the past 52 weeks 8.83%. (click to enlarge) Denmark is a small country with a relatively small industry. The country is currently ranked 139th by the U.S. EIA and does have a small but active refining industry, hence the potential for Denmark to expand its industrial base sometime in the future. Also note that with untapped oil reserves together with its expanding reliance on wind energy and a decades long national energy conservation program makes Denmark virtually energy independent. Lastly, Danmark’s National Bank has gone to extraordinary efforts to keep its currency on track for Euro adoption. For a nation as small and productive as Denmark, being an integral part of the larger Eurozone economy will be very beneficial. The ETF has had a nice run since inception. The investor might expect some kind of retracement should the European economy slow further. That would be a buying opportunity. For investors with a fair amount of patience, who seek capital appreciation as well as the high potential for increasing sustainable dividend returns and single country focus should make the investors who invest in ‘EDEN’, happy in the long run.

PDP: Gutsy Momentum Investing For People Braver Than Me

Summary This ETF has a high expense ratio but they are running an aggressive momentum strategy that requires higher costs. The sector allocation combined with a momentum strategy would be enough to put me on edge when I wanted to sleep. If an investor wants to follow momentum investing, this seems like a fine choice. For that investor, I would suggest grabbing some utilities to get a better balance. Investors should be seeking to improve their risk adjusted returns. I’m a big fan of using ETFs to achieve the risk adjusted returns relative to the portfolios that a normal investor can generate for themselves after trading costs. One of the funds that I’m researching is the PowerShares DWA Momentum Portfolio ETF (NYSEARCA: PDP ). I’ll be performing a substantial portion of my analysis along the lines of modern portfolio theory, so my goal is to find ways to minimize costs while achieving diversification to reduce my risk level. Expense Ratio The expense ratio is .63%. I tend to be very frugal with my expense ratios, so I’m less than thrilled with the expense ratio. Of course, portfolios that require more active involvement from managers are going to generally have higher ratios. The question becomes whether the managers will be able to regularly deliver enough performance to justify that higher ratio. Largest Holdings The following chart shows the largest holdings for the fund: The allocations here are fairly interesting, but you expect that momentum portfolios are going to end up having a very strange allocation. It’ll be interesting to see how the various momentum ETFs perform over a sample size of several years during which investors are well aware of the strategy. The presence of ETFs buying stocks based on the stock price having already appreciated seems like it could end up distorting the performance. If the strategy was highly successful, then I would expect whichever ETFs designed their systems to move first to be the winners in the game since their purchases would further drive up prices and encourage other ETFs to buy into the same funds. All around momentum investing is strange beast to me. I’m just a fundamental analysts at heart with a focus on finding the intrinsic value of a company and figure out which factors will be headwinds or tailwinds. Sectors The following chart breaks down the allocation by sector: The consumer discretionary sector has a fairly massive 31.8% weighting. My first thought here is that I would be scared to hold this ETF if this prolonged bull market turned into a bear market. I’m not convinced that we will see that kind of huge drop off in the economy in the next few years because low interest rates can do a great deal to keep market prices high, but I don’t think I have the risk tolerance for this sector allocation. Utilities That utility allocation is credibly low. For an investor opting to use momentum investing and an ETF like PDP for a major position in their portfolio, I would suggest looking to a low fee utility index to add some diversification to the portfolio as a whole. That is, of course, unless you prefer having more volatility in your portfolio. I know some investors are going to be thinking: “Utilities are sensitive to interest rate movements so I don’t want to hold them when interest rates are clearly moving higher.” There is certainly a correlation there. The utilities may suffer if rates increase, but I think they’ll stay low much longer than some investors believe. The macroeconomic environment just doesn’t provide the situation necessary for a sustained increase in rates. I’ve been positioning my portfolio to hold plenty of instruments that are sensitive to interest rates because I really don’t see any high probability paths for interest rates to move higher. An Interesting Option It would be interesting to see a momentum investing strategy that placed caps on sector weightings so that the portfolio wouldn’t end up this heavy on one sector. I have nothing against the consumer discretionary sector; I just prefer the consumer staples for my portfolio. I feel the sector is substantially stronger at resisting a sell off when the market is crashing. All sectors would be likely to fall, but I would expect fewer losses in consumer staples. Conclusion For investors that are interested in momentum investing, this is one option to get that technique into your portfolio. In my opinion the risk of using this strategy is compounded by the aggressive consumer discretionary allocation. In a prolonged bull market this fund should be a solid choice. I’m not predicting a bear market in the near future, but I’m also not willing to make a play that is this aggressive. I just don’t think I’d sleep as well with such an aggressive allocation. If investors opt to use this ETF, I’d suggest checking at least monthly on the sector allocations so the investor can modify their portfolio weights as desired. If investors don’t adjust their portfolio in response they may find themselves going massively overweight on individual sectors.

If You Like Inner Beauty, This Is Your Dividend ETF

Summary DVY offers a solid dividend yield of 3.27%, but the real beauty goes much deeper. The holdings in the top 10 look excellent and reflect a great portfolio. The sector allocations are even better and include high allocations to sectors that are often ignored in high dividend yield ETFs. The iShares Select Dividend ETF (NYSEARCA: DVY ) looks great. After readers suggested I take a look at the portfolio, I decided it was time to dive inside and see what I could find. This is a great ETF. Investors may quibble on whether the allocations are perfect or merely good, but there is far more to like than to hold against the fund. Expense Ratio The expense ratio is .39%. That is by far the biggest challenge for the fund because the rest of the fund is simply great. Holdings Investors should always look to the holdings as part of the process in making the decisions. Who doesn’t like this allocation? We have Philip Morris International (NYSE: PM ) at the number 2 slot. That looks like a good dividend bet to me. I’m not a fan of their products, but I am I fan of the revenue and earnings they can generate with those products. That can be a tricky situation, but in the investment mindset I just can’t toss away the opportunity to have companies with highly addictive products. We see McDonald’s (NYSE: MCD ) at the number 4 slot. The case for McDonald’s is fairly similar. I don’t love the product that they were creating over the last several years, but I do love the way the restaurant leverages their real estate and enormous size to generate great economies of scale. We also have Kimberly Clark Corp (NYSE: KMB ) and Clorox (NYSE: CLX ) in the top ten. While I don’t cover these companies on an individual basis, it is encouraging to see three entries for consumer staples in the top holdings of the ETF. You look a little further down the list and you see Nextera Energy Inc. (NYSE: NEE ) leading a batch of three utilities. For comparison sake, I’ve often looked into defensive ETFs or high dividend yield ETFs and seen utilities only composing 0% to 5% of the portfolio. Since I like dividend ETFs to be stuffed with companies that can sell their product regardless of the economic environment, the utility sector is a great fit. Sector Allocations The next chart breaks down the sector allocations across the entire ETF and the choices are beautiful. I looked at this chart and knew I was going to like the ETF right away. Assuming proper diversification across individual companies, this is just a wonderful sector allocation. The utility sector comes in very heavy at 33% of the portfolio which is great for investors that care about getting strong sustainable dividends. I assume that is the only reason anyone is interested in this ETF. The dividend yield is currently running 3.27% and I’d be fairly confident in that dividend being maintained and growing over time. Consumer Staples Besides utilities, I’m very fond of the consumer staples sector since these are companies that are designed to whether the downturn in the economy. The products they sell can hold up remarkably well during down economies and it is the presence of reliable sales that helps a company survive the hard times. Between the consumer staples and utilities sector we have almost 45% of the portfolio. Information Technology This is a really shocking one for me. The allocation here is only 1.51%. For many dividend focused ETFs an allocation that larger or larger is given to Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT ) alone. On the other hand, MSFT currently only yields around 2.67% so I can see the smaller allocations. Broad market ETFs tend to be fairly heavy on information technology, so I’m just fine with seeing a lower weight for a dividend focused ETF. Investors using the iShares Select Dividend ETF as one part of their portfolio should be able to benefit from the diversification advantages of the different sector weights. What to Add I don’t like to be heavily overweight on information technology, but if an investor is using this as the core of the portfolio then I think it would be wise to use a small allocation to a broad market ETF or a very small allocation specifically to the information technology sector. The other place that I would consider adding a bit is the health care industry. There is plenty of demand for their goods and services from the baby boomer population. If an investor happens to be a baby boomer and plan to retire on the dividends, it would be nice to own part of the company that makes the medication they will want. If prices go up and profits soar, those investors should see higher dividends to offset the higher costs they are facing in their daily lives. I wouldn’t mind adding a little bit more exposure on consumer staples either, but that can be considered a personal preference thing. I would love to see this allocation running closer to 20% which would lead to utilities and consumer staples exceeding 50% of the portfolio when combined. That sounds like a nice secure dividend to me. Conclusion The expense ratio is a bit high for my taste, but the portfolio is beautiful. From the individual companies selected to the sector allocations, there is far more to like about this portfolio than to dislike. I think some investors putting in new money might seek ways to replicate the portfolio through a combination of lower fee ETFs, but it is a testament to the design of the ETF that it would be worth looking into those strategies. If the expense ratio dropped down to around .10% to .14%, it would come in as a solid 10/10.