Tag Archives: construction

DTE Energy (DTE) Q3 2015 Results – Earnings Call Transcript

DTE Energy Company (NYSE: DTE ) Q3 2015 Earnings Conference Call October 23, 2015 9:00 am ET Executives Anastasia Minor – Executive Director, IR Peter Oleksiak – SVP and CFO Jeff Jewell – VP and Controller Mark Rolling – VP and Treasurer Analysts Julien DuMoulin Smith – UBS Dan Eggers – Credit Suisse Matt Tucker – KeyBanc Capital Markets Jonathan Arnold – Deutsche Bank Shar Pourreza – Guggenheim Partners Operator Good day and welcome to the DTE Energy Third Quarter 2015 Earnings Release Conference Call. Today’s conference is being recorded. At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Anastasia Minor. Please go ahead. Anastasia Minor Thank you, Kyle, and good morning everyone. Welcome to our third quarter 2015 earnings call. Before we get started, I’d like to remind you to read the Safe Harbor statement on Page 2, including the reference to forward-looking statements. Our presentation also includes reference to operating earnings, which is the non-GAAP financial measure. Please refer to the reconciliation of GAAP net income to operating earnings provided in the appendix of today’s presentation. We also are now including additional data in the appendix which we have historically provided in a supplemental document. With us this morning is Peter Oleksiak, our Senior Vice President and CFO; Jeff Jewell, our Vice President and Controller; and Mark Rolling, our Vice President and Treasurer. We also have members of our management team with us to call on during the Q&A session. I’d like to turn it over to Peter to start our call this morning. Peter Oleksiak Thanks, Anastasia, and good morning everyone and thank you for joining us today. Those of you who know me know that I always like to start off with a quick update on my Detroit Tigers. The Tigers looked towards the future at the July trade deadline this year, and [indiscernible] best pitcher, outfielder and closer. With that they slipped firmly into last place by the end of the season. I guess all I can say is, there’s always next year and our focus now is on the Red Wings making another playoff run, and I will not be mentioning the Lions or the Pistons on this call. DTE is continuing to have a successful year in 2015. As you know, we raised our operating earnings guidance a few weeks ago at our Analyst Day. I feel very confident that we will be able to comfortably achieve our guidance. We had a very successful third quarter and we expect a solid quarter to finish the year. We also provided a 2016 early outlook during our Analyst Day and I’m confident we can reach our 2016 EPS targets as well. Jeff and Mark will be going through third quarter results in more detail, but before we move on to that, I’d like to do a quick overview of our business strategy as well as some highlights of what’s happening at DTE. Turning to Slide 5, Slide 5 provides an overview of the business strategy and investment thesis. Our growth plans for next 10 years at both utilities are highly visible. Electric utility growth is driven by the renewal of our generation fleet and replacing and upgrading the electric distribution system. Our gas utility growth is driven by infrastructure investments, the mainline replacement, pipe replacement and a system expansion to accommodate the increased volumes for the Nexus pipeline into the rest of pipeline. Complementing our utility growth are meaningful growth opportunities in our non-utility businesses which provide diversity in earnings and geography. The structure of regulatory environment, engaged employees, continuous improvement and top-level customer satisfaction continue to be priorities that drive DTE success. The constructive regulatory environment is important as our two utilities are investing significant capital in the state of Michigan, and we know fostering this environment is a two-way street. I’ll be updating you on some of the regulatory proceedings our utilities are currently working through. Our highly engaged workforce continues to be a key to our success, and we have described our success throughout the year with the recognition we have received from the Gallup organization over the last three years. Our focus on continuous improvement is distinctive in the industry as the utilities continue to be leaders in maintaining costs. The combination of these two, employee engagement and continuous improvement, enables us to deliver both a sustainable COGS savings track record and to consistently earn authorized returns at both of our utilities. We’re also very focused on customer satisfaction, demonstrated by our gas utility currently rating highest by J.D. Power among our peers for business customer satisfaction. Both DTE Electric and DTE Gas are ranked second in satisfaction of residential customers. Rounding out our business strategy is our dividend growth and solid credit rating. Our dividend continues to grow as we grow earnings and our goal is to maintain a strong BBB credit rating. This strategy provides for consistent 5% to 6% annual EPS growth. Slide 6 provides some highlights of progress in 2015. As I mentioned earlier at our Analyst Day, we raised our 2015 operating EPS guidance and provided 2016 operating EPS early outlook. I’ll provide a more detailed overview of guidance in a few minutes. Today we are revising our cash flow and capital guidance for 2015, and Mark will provide more details on this in a few minutes. Regarding Michigan’s energy policy, there is positive momentum for constructive legislation by the end of the year. The governor and other energy leaders have called this a major priority. There is [indiscernible] legislation that has been developed in both the House and the Senate and the more extensive hearings have now been concluded. There have been a dozen hearings in the House on the proposed legislation and eight in the Senate, so this legislation is moving along nicely. Also want to give a quick update on the various rate proceedings for our two utilities. Our electric utility self implemented rates on July 1 for our ongoing generate rate proceeding. We expect to receive a final order by the end of the year. We also implemented the new cost of service rates which resulted in rate reductions for most of our business customers at the same time of self implementation. For DTE Gas, we expect to receive an order this year for an expanded infrastructure recovery mechanism that if approved will allow us to double the annual miles of our mainline replacement program. For next gas general rate case, we are looking to file in late 2015 or early 2016. We’re finalizing our plans. We feel this timeframe is optimal time to file. As you know, we haven’t filed a rate case at our gas utility in nearly four years. We continue to make significant progress in our non-utility businesses. Let me hit on a couple of developments in our Gas Storage and Pipelines business. Millennium is currently working on 200 Mcf/day expansion, which is expected to go on service in the fourth quarter of 2017. In addition, Millennium is constructing an 8-mile valley lateral to supply 130 Mcf to a new natural gas plant in Pennsylvania. This is expected to go in service in April of 2017. We have increased our ownership in the Nexus pipeline project from 33% to 50%, which increases our planned investment to approximately $1 billion. We have executed a number of key milestones, including the contracting for the major pipe materials earlier this month. Our next key milestone on the Nexus project is the FERC filing which will happen later this year. We have commitments. We need to move forward with the construction of the pipe. We have recently signed a number of Tampa interconnect agreements that could provide potential aggregate load across northern Ohio for up to 1.4 Bcf a day. This demonstrates strong market support for the project and also strengthens the longer term earnings potential for the play. And we continue to see increasing production forecast for the Appalachian region. So you can see we have a lot of positive things going on in both our utilities and non-utilities giving us confidence to reach our earnings goals in 2015. I can move on to provide more detail on Michigan’s energy legislation, but before I do that, let me give you a quick update on Michigan’s economy. The state economic indicators are looking very strong. We show some of the actual forecasts and metrics in the appendix but I’d like to highlight Michigan’s unemployment rate for September which was 5%. This is actually lower than the national rate of 5.1%, and it’s worth noting because it’s the first time in Michigan the unemployment rate is below the national average in 15 years. So things continue to move in the right direction in our state. So now let me move on to the state energy policy reform on Slide 7. Slide 7 is a slide you’ve seen before showing Michigan’s leaders who are helping to move the state’s energy policy reform to its completion. We are definitely fortunate to have these individuals who really understand what good energy policy looks like. The governor identified the need for energy policy reform as one of his top priorities and he has not wavered from that all year. He has taken time to study and understand our industry and land on what a good policy moving forward would be. His good advisors were John Quackenbush and Valerie Brader. And with Senator Nofs and Representative Nesbitt, we have two very competent energy leaders in the Senate and the House. So we have a situation where all three entities, the administration, the House and the Senate, are clear that Michigan does need to develop new policy to control its future. There is definitely progress happening. It gives us confidence of a timely resolution to the energy policy reform. Both the Senate and the House energy committee have concluded extensive hearings on the legislative package. Nofs and Nesbitt are working with committee members who would vote in the committee possibly by next month. So I’d like to turn to some specifics on legislation that is under development in the House and the Senate with Page 8, starting with the retail open access. Leadership in both the House and the Senate realized that the current system is broken, so both are proposing reforms. Both proposals as they stand now would cap the current program at 10% but with stricter and more fair provisions. Actually the House until recently had planned to eliminate retail open access altogether, but as part of the alignment process has been now proposing to stay at the 10% cap. But importantly, both the House and the Senate would require one-time election to return to the utility, which means there will be no longer a free option to move back and forth between the marketplace and our regulated rates. To make the cost of capacity more fair and to issue a reliable generation service in the state, the Senate is proposing a three-year capacity commitment, the house is targeting a five-year capacity commitment for those customers who would like to stay on retail open access. Integrated resource planning or IRP is the second key element of legislation. The proposals enable pre-approvals, so once it’s decided on what generation this should be, there will be a process for pre-approving investments and assuring that they are prudent, and similar to our current Certificate of Need process or CON process but on a portfolio basis. This new IRP process will fit nicely into the state’s implementation plan for the clean power plan. Then finally the legislation is going to deal with a number of regulatory reforms. Both the House and the Senate are proposing a move from our current 12 month cycle on rate approvals with a six month sub-implementation, to a simple 10 month cycle. There is also work on establishing a fair net metering policy which I think is important as we head towards building more renewables. Revenue decoupling is also being proposed for electric utilities. We would like to have this option to enable recovery of the impacts of energy efficiency in between rate proceedings. So I think the state of Michigan is well-positioned to have energy legislation by year-end. That’s important so that as a state we can move on in a constructive way to make the investments that we need to transform Michigan’s energy infrastructure. So on Slide 9, this slide shows our EPS history and our target of 5% to 6% growth. As I mentioned before, we expect to grow our dividend with earnings, evidenced by our recent increase which was at the high end of our earnings growth target. The chart shows a revised 2015 guidance midpoint of $4.78 as well as the EPS guidance midpoint of $4.69 for our growth segments. The 5% to 6% future growth I mentioned is off our new 2016 early outlook midpoint of $4.93 per share. The $4.93 midpoint represents a 7% increase from the 2015 original guidance. So let me get into a little more detail on Page 10. Slide 10 shows our current 2015 EPS guidance and our 2016 EPS early outlook. I want to focus on our 2015 guidance. Our current EPS guidance range is $4.65 to $4.91 for total DTE Energy and $4.59 to $4.79 for our growth segments. You can see next to the guidance numbers arrows indicating where we think the year might play out for each segment. We have green arrows up next to all of our non-utility businesses. If these businesses have a repeat of the strong performance in the fourth quarter similar to what we’ve experienced in the first three quarters this year, then we are seeing earnings fall in the upper end of these ranges. For Gas Storage and Pipelines, we are seeing strong performance in both pipeline and gathering earnings. Our Power and Industrial Projects segment is seeing solid performance in our REF business. And we are seeing strong economic performance at our Energy Trading operations. Our Corporate and Other segment is trending towards the lower end of guidance driven by taxes. I mentioned the strong financial performance we have seen this year, so I’d like to turn the call over to Jeff Jewell to provide more details on the earnings results. Jeff Jewell Thanks, Peter, and good morning everyone. I’ll be going over quarter-over-quarter earnings results on Page 12, and on Page 13 I will provide more detail into DTE Electric’s quarter-over-quarter operating earnings variance. Now turning to Page 12, for the quarter DTE Energy’s operating earnings were $252 million or $1.40 per share, and for reference, our reported earnings were $1.47 per share. You can find the reconciliation of the third quarter reported to operating earnings on Page 27. For the quarter, our growth segments operating earnings in 2015 were $75 million or $0.40 per share higher than 2014. The Electric segment was higher by $79 million. This favorability was due to warmer weather, self implemented rates and lower storm expenses in 2015. I’ll provide more detail on Page 13. DTE Gas was higher by $5 million. This was primarily driven by reinvestment spend in 2014 and increased revenue associated with the infrastructure recovery mechanism surcharge. Gas Storage and Pipelines earnings were $7 million favorable to the prior year. This increase was primarily due to increased volumes on the Bluestone pipeline and increased investments in our gathering assets. Our Power and Industrial Projects segment was lower by $6 million versus 2014, due primarily to timing of major coke battery maintenance project expenses and a steel related installment sale contract that ended in the second quarter of 2015. Our Corporate and Other segment came in unfavorable by $10 million versus last year. This variance was mainly due to timing of federal and state tax accruals. These items were considered in our year-end guidance. Again, the overall growth segment results for the quarter were $253 million or $1.40 per share. Energy Trading posted a $1 million operating loss for the quarter and economic net income of $14 million. Both the power and gas business lines contributed to these results. Please refer to Page 25 of the appendix to review the Energy Trading standard reconciliation page which shows both economic and accounting performance. Overall, DTE Energy’s operating earnings were $252 million or $1.40 per share for the quarter. Now let’s turn to Page 13 to discuss our Electric performance. Electric segment earnings were $79 million higher quarter over quarter. The variance was driven by three major contributors, increased rates, return to near normal weather, and lower storm O&M. DTE Electric self implemented a rate increase on July 1 as part of its ongoing rate case. This was partially offset by increased rate base growth due to investment in the generation and distribution operations. The next major contributor was weather. If you recall, summer weather in 2014 was much cooler than normal while this summer was near-normal. This resulted in increased sales of approximately 700 gigawatt-hours when compared to the same period last year. Please refer to Page 24 of the appendix for sales variance detail. Finally, we experienced lower storm activity in the third quarter of 2015. This is a significant decrease when compared to 2014 where we saw multiple storms including the storm in September of 2014 that impacted more than 400,000 or 20% of our customers. In conclusion, for the quarter, DTE Electric’s operating earnings were $79 million higher than 2014. That concludes the update for our earnings for the quarter. I’d like to now turn the discussion over to Mark who will cover cash flow and balance sheet metrics. Mark Rolling Thanks, Jeff, and good morning everyone. In addition to the solid earnings results, our cash flow and balance sheet are strong and continue to support our long-term growth plan. Slide 15 lays out our cash flow and CapEx through the third quarter. Cash from operations is $1.5 billion and we saw strong performance across all business units, putting us a little ahead of our plan for the year. We invested $1.7 billion of CapEx through the third quarter, and on the right side of the page you can see the breakout by business unit. DTE Electric is up due to higher operational investments and higher new generation spend with the acquisition of a gas [indiscernible] back in the first quarter, partially offset by the timing of some wind investments between years. And year to date, the non-utilities are on pace with last year. To fund this CapEx program and the refinance maturing debt, we issued $1 billion in long-term debt this year. Let me turn now to Slide 16 and the revised cash flow and CapEx guidance that Peter touched on. As I mentioned a moment ago, we are seeing strong cash flow this year and therefore we are increasing our cash from operations guidance by $100 million. We’re also making a small change to our CapEx guidance, and on the right side of the page you can see the breakout of capital spending by business unit. We still expect to spend a little over $1.8 billion at DTE Electric and $280 million at DTE Gas, and we expect our non-utility businesses to invest $350 million for the year or about $100 million lower than the low point of the original guidance. Now this change captures the timing of some of the growth progress upon industrial and will have no effect on the growth plan that we provided at our Investor Day last month. This brings our total CapEx to nearly $2.5 billion for the year, which is up more than 15% over last year. And back on the left side of the page, we have reduced our debt financing needs to correspond with this $200 million increase in free cash flow. Now I’ll move to Slide 17 with a look at our balance sheet metrics. Our balance sheet remained strong and we project ending the year within our targeted range for both leverage and FFO to debt. We issued $200 million of equity back in the first quarter and that fulfilled our equity needs for this year. At our investor event last month, we disclosed modest equity needs of $800 million from 2016 through 2018. Earlier this year we renewed our credit facility through 2020 and we ended the quarter with $1.8 billion of available liquidity. As we outlined at our Investor Day, we have a financial planning approach that will continue to rely on the strength of our balance sheet to fuel our long-term growth plans. And now I’ll hand the discussion back over to Peter to wrap up. Peter Oleksiak Thanks Mark. Let me finish the presentation with a quick summary on Slide 19, and then we can open the line for questions. We had three solid quarters so far this year and we are confident that this year’s performance will allow us to achieve our 2015 EPS guidance. We also anticipate constructive outcomes this year in both utility regulatory filings as well as the Michigan’s energy policy reform. Our balance sheet and cash flow metrics remain strong and our investments in our utility and non-utility businesses support our target 5% to 6% EPS growth going forward. I thank you all for joining our call this morning and I hope to see many of you at the EEI conference in a couple of weeks. Gerry Anderson will be giving a formal presentation on November 10th that will be Webcasted on our Investor Relations Web-site. So we hope you all can join us. Now I’d like to open up for questions that you have, so Kyle, you can open up the line for questions. Question-and-Answer Session Operator [Operator Instructions] We’ll take our first question from Michael Weinstein with UBS. Julien DuMoulinSmith It’s actually Julien here. So quick first question, perhaps obvious, given the trailing 12 months, what are you thinking here in terms of the fourth quarter and implied results, it seems perhaps it could even be potentially down year-over-year, is there something about reinvestment, [indiscernible] et cetera, you might imagine? Peter Oleksiak I’d like to reiterate that we are kind of confident with the earnings guidance that we’ve put out there. The electric utility in particular last year was in a lean mode. That’s really, if you’re looking quarter over quarter, kind of a fourth to fourth, that’s what you’re seeing emptying there. Julien DuMoulin Smith Got it. So does that actually mean that there is added strength or more of a tailwind that you are reinvesting in fourth quarter into 2016, or perhaps as you just alluded, was in more of a 4Q 2014 phenomenon such that this is more of a normalized pace in 4Q 2015? Peter Oleksiak It’s more the latter, the last year’s fourth quarter phenomenon. Julien DuMoulin Smith Got it, excellent. And then perhaps secondly, just of late any developments on the gathering front with Southwestern? Peter Oleksiak Our gathering business is going very well, and as you know, our raising of guidance in that segment in particular was with the volumes associated with the gathering with the Southwestern Energy. So the well performance is great, the drilling program continues to be strong in that region and our gathering earnings are flowing nicely there. Julien DuMoulin Smith Great. All right, I’ll leave it there. Thank you. Operator We’ll take our next question from Daniel Eggers with Credit Suisse. Dan Eggers Just on the legislation in Michigan with the hearings done, do you guys have a read in when something can get formalized or resolved between the House and the Senate and vote where this finally gets cauterized, is there something that we can look forward or a schedule that you guys see right now? Peter Oleksiak It is not a firm schedule, but as I mentioned, the extensive hearing process is done, and as you know, you mentioned that as well. There’s some finalization of language that will happen both in the committee and the House and then they’ll move it, both the Senate and the House, and from there there’ll be reconciliation. We are anticipating that will start happening as early as next month, early next month, but going more likely into the month of December. Dan Eggers So a conference next month between the House and the Senate and a vote in December seems realistic at this point? Peter Oleksiak Right, yes, that’s a possibility. Dan Eggers Okay. And then I guess your second question, when you think about the – it looks like you’re going to the idea that Choice has to get a firm capacity kind of somewhere between three and five years, is that something that you guys would look at providing or are you not going to be in the business of offering capacity to those customers? Peter Oleksiak No, we are not in the business of offering capacity to those customers. We’ll offer to our customers. Dan Eggers Okay. What is the year to date weather benefit on that after the good third quarter? Peter Oleksiak Jeff, if you have that? Jeff Jewell Ask that one more time, just make sure we’re answering what you’re looking for. Dan Eggers How much year-to-date weather benefit have you guys gotten? You gave the quarter, I don’t know if you have the year handy. Jeff Jewell So for the full year, if you go back to Page 24 in the pack, I think that’s what you’re asking, so I’ll just guide you back there. So the first is – I’m on the left-hand side there in the middle, DTE Electric 2015, you can see what that was for the quarter and we talked about that. And for the year to date, you can see it’s at $12 million. Dan Eggers Got it, thank you. I should’ve [looked it up] [ph] myself. Jeff Jewell [Indiscernible] was down negative $17 million for the year. Dan Eggers Okay. And my last question just on the pipeline tap-ins now that you’re 1.4 Bcf of potential customers, when do those start converting either into contracts or something more substantial and what should we be tracking other than just kind of these quarterly updates? Peter Oleksiak That will happen over time as the pipe gets built. That 1.4 Bcf is non-binding but we do anticipate that a number of that will potentially turn into nice investments for us, lateral or gathering couple of opportunities. They are more likely – that will happen once we are done with the construction of the pipe. Dan Eggers Okay. Thank you, guys. Operator We’ll take our next question from Matt Tucker with KeyBanc Capital Markets. Matt Tucker Just wanted to follow-up on the guidance and the full year guidance kind of implying that the fourth quarter would be down year-over-year, you already commented on some reinvestment at Electric. It looks like the non-utility segments, the guidance also implies earnings would be lower year-over-year. Could you talk about what might be driving that or should we kind of expect that the Electric reinvestment could offset some of the earnings there? Peter Oleksiak The electric utility, I mentioned I’m feeling comfortable with the guidance range we have out there. There was a phenomenon last year fourth quarter around lean. We’re in a normal investment cycle this year in the fourth quarter. But our non-utility businesses are performing strong. On a year to date basis, there is strong performance, and if that strong performance continues in the fourth quarter, those businesses will more likely end up in the upper end of those ranges. Matt Tucker Great, thanks. And just hoping you could provide a little more color on the change in timing in the CapEx at Power and Industrial Projects. Peter Oleksiak Mark, you want to take that one? Mark Rolling Sure. So that as you mentioned is timing related. When we did our original guidance for the year and we provided a range this year on the non-utility businesses, recognizing that those businesses and the timing of the project show-up has some variability. As we are close to the year-end, we have better visibility as to what’s going to occur here in late 2015 versus what may occur early in 2016. So it’s a timing related item at Power and Industrial. Specifically, if you step back and look at our early outlook for 2016 and our growth plan that we provided at our Investor Day, this has no impact on any of that, it’s really the timing item. Matt Tucker Got it. And is there any specific projects that you did highlight there? Peter Oleksiak I’ll add just a little commentary to Mark’s comments. Power and Industrial Projects in particular, we do have an acquisition strategy there where if opportunistic we’ll acquire small on-site related projects, and they have the tendency to be kind of lumpy in terms of when they show up, and when they do show up – we had one back a few years ago with the Duke project on the on-site project. So there, I don’t want to be too concerned. When they do show up, sometimes they show up and they are relatively sizable. We like to have a placeholder in with a capital for that business unit in particular. So it’s really just timing related to these small acquisitions related to in the Power and Industrial segment. Matt Tucker Understood. Thanks guys. Operator [Operator Instructions] We’ll take our next question from Jonathan Arnold from Deutsche Bank. Jonathan Arnold I just wanted to revisit just timing of the legislature. I know you’ll lay that when you know the steps, you see it. Are there some deadlines that we need to hit in order for this to be all accomplished in calendar 2015, when do the session end and at what point would we need to see it out of conference, how much wiggle room is there I guess? Peter Oleksiak It is not a firm schedule. The augment deadline was before they moved to the holiday break and which would be the back half of December, but the momentum we are seeing right now with the hearings being concluded, they said there’ll be some tweaking of the language in both the House and the Senate, and then at that point a reconciliation. The good thing is both the House and the Senate, essentially with Aric Nesbitt’s move to move a bit closer to where Mike Nofs is at, I see that process hopefully happening relatively quick once it starts. Jonathan Arnold Okay. Thank you, Peter. That was it. Operator We’ll take our next question from Shar Pourreza with Guggenheim Partners. Shar Pourreza Just one question on the decoupler, I know it’s a little bit preliminary, but Peter, are you looking for a full decoupler which takes any kind of load out of your earnings mix or sort of more of a partial decoupler that accounts for energy efficiency in DSM? Peter Oleksiak We’ll explore all the options. First is to kind of get that option for the electric utility to have a decoupler in legislation. That’s being proposed right now. So we like that to give us that option of flexibility. As we are thinking about it, we really would want it fully focused on the energy efficiency, that’s our early thinking at this moment. Shar Pourreza Got it. Okay, so you have some potential leverage to macro probably, okay. And then just on the pipe, 1.4 is non-binding, it’s a little bit preliminary, but is there any indication that you could reach that to laterals and compressors from a demand side or it’s too early? Peter Oleksiak The overall pipe we are putting in is 1.5 B, that’s expandable to 2 B with compression. The major market when this pipe first was put in was Dawn, and Michigan is Michigan, goes from a coal plant to gas plant conversion. So it’s really nice. Actually this Ohio market is actually showing up as well that wasn’t originally anticipated. We kind of knew that when we placed this pipe, we deliberately placed it in the Northeast Ohio around these industrial centers. So we are hoping that this 1.4 B, a portion of that gets converted over to this industrial load, which then once we [indiscernible] to get a lateral in gathering, but we feel comfortable right now that we’ll be able to expand the pipe to meet that. It will be a nice problem to have. Shar Pourreza Yes, exactly. Thanks Peter. Operator We have no further questions in queue at this time. I would now like to turn the call back over to management for any additional or closing remarks. Peter Oleksiak I’d like to just thank everybody for this morning joining us on the call, and once again we’re going to be at EEI and hope to see many of you there. Have a great day. Operator This does conclude today’s conference call. Thank you all for your participation. You may now disconnect.

Norsk Hydro’s (NHYDY) CEO Svein Richard Brandtzaeg on Q3 2015 Results – Earnings Call Transcript

Executives Pal Kildemo – Head, IR Svein Richard Brandtzaeg – CEO Eivind Kallevik – CFO Analysts Dominic O’Kane – JP Morgan Cazenove Jatinder Goel – Citigroup Menno Sanderse – Morgan Stanley Hjalmar Ahlberg – Kepler Cheuvreux Christian Kopfer – Nordea Markets Norsk Hydro ASA ADR ( OTCQX:NHYDY ) Q3 2015 Earnings Conference Call October 21, 2015 10:00 AM ET Operator Good day. And welcome to the Norsk Hydro ASA Third Quarter conference call. Today’s conference is being recorded. At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Pal Kildemo. Please go ahead, sir. Pal Kildemo Thank you. Good afternoon. And welcome to Hydro’s third quarter 2015 conference call. We will start today with a short introduction by President and CEO, Svein Richard Brandtzaeg followed by a Q&A session where also CFO, Eivind Kallevik will join. For those that did not see this morning’s webcast of the results presentation this is available on hydro.com. And with that, I leave the word to you Svein Richard. Svein Richard Brandtzaeg Thank you, Pal, and good afternoon everybody. Underlying EBIT for the third quarter of this year was NOK 2.2 billion which is down NOK 0.5 billion from second quarter and up NOK 0.7 billion from the third quarter last year. If we start with the bauxite and alumina, I’m happy to recall a historical low and [provide] alumina cost of [$217] on the back of [indiscernible] as well as increased alumina production at Alunorte and record high production of bauxite at Paragominas which is now at level of 10.9 million tones annualized. This effect was somewhat offset by lower realized alumina prices. In Primary Metal, the falling all-in prices continue of the following — influencing the earnings negatively, but also here a weakening knock at the [isle] against US dollar, US dollar benefit us. Last quarter, we talked about the record downstream results and also the third quarter is seasonally weaker in the downstream segments. The results actually increased in the rolled products area which is a strong development. In Energy, we saw an increase in results due to high production as the delayed [soft] snowmelt came [indiscernible] effect in the third quarter. This was roughly offset by lower energy prices. I am also pleased to announce that we have signed a Letter of Intent with Vale for their 40% stake in the first quarter MRN bauxite mine. We will now take due diligence and see if we will follow through with the construction. [indiscernible] comes to the market, the increasing supply in China and the weakening demand growth in and outside China continues resulting and as stated on [indiscernible] this is in global primary outlet from around 5% to 4%. An increasing [expects] or supply to around 1 billion tonnes this year. The Chinese oversupply continues increasing while the undersupply outside China remains stable. And Chinese exports of semis has declined significantly and are now at levels 10% below the levels we saw last year positively reflecting with the used arbitrage opportunities for export in semis where we have been focused. As we end the final quarter this year, our improvement focus remains high on the agenda. Through the third quarter, we have demonstrated that we are in control of the [indiscernible]. Like for example, bauxite production which is running at close to 11 million tonnes in annualized speed at Paragominas. As we said last quarter, we have managed to lift production at Alunorte but with 5.5 million tonnes, we still have some left to get to nameplate of Alunorte. We are stabilizing and continuing with this production. At the same time, we are delivering operational and commercial improvements. We saw the leasing operating capital and other items would be placed high on agenda they lost to [indiscernible] after the buildup in the first quarter. The lease of 2.1 billion is of course largely related to falling prices, but also [soft inventory] release. We are continuing to deliver some very interesting downstream growth projects, including the automotive body in white line in Grevenbroich, as well as the UBC recycling facility in Rheinwerk, which will be delivered on time and on budget. At the same time, we announced the divestment of a non-core lower margin operation in Italy and a combination of these efforts contributes towards the high grading of portfolio in the current markets which can be described as challenging. Pal Kildemo Thank you Svein Richard. Operator, we are now ready for questions. Question-and-Answer Session Operator [Operator Instructions]. We will now take our first question from Dominic O’Kane from JP Morgan. Please go ahead, your line is open. Dominic O’Kane Hello all. Two questions from me. Just firstly on CapEx, the CapEx reduction that we’ve seen so far in 2015, could you maybe give a bit more details on where and what those optimizations are? And then should we expect a deferral of that NOK 1 billion into next year or will some of that come out of the post — you’ve simply said that not be spent. And my second question is on, again just on the timing of the LME versus index alumina contracts. Could you maybe just help us with a modeling for the next say four quarters? Svein Richard Brandtzaeg Okay, Dominic. On CapEx, firstly the billing has split in two, so roughly NOK 200 million driven by [price retention] where we hope whether it would be around $1, all the facility [indiscernible], and that’s partially offset by the euro development, in fact maybe the investments that we did in Germany. Of the NOK 800 million which we [then named] CapEx optimization performance, a bit part of that comes from the Brazilian operations and it has to do with, I would think it’s the timing of the [indiscernible] that we’re doing at Alunorte and the new [indiscernible] we’re doing at [over the investment] to a large extent we’ll respond into 2016 and partly after 2017. Smaller parts will probably disappear and we kind of fix it, but the bigger part is more [tiniest] than anything else. And then LME to index contracts, we are at roughly [1730] this year and then that will continue to increase in the next couple of years and then in 2018 we will get more to 1820 rule. And in ’16/’17 roughly 60% to 70% will be towards index and then it’s hard to guide you on quarterly basis because it all depends on shipping [province] and so on, [but we are sure we’ll have this one] from an annual perspective. Dominic O’Kane Okay. So for 2016, 60% to 70% will be LME-linked? Svein Richard Brandtzaeg It will be, yeah. Dominic O’Kane Second? Svein Richard Brandtzaeg It will be on the index. And I’m sure about 80%. Dominic O’Kane Thank you. Operator We will now take our next question from Jatinder Goel from Citigroup. Please go ahead, your line is open. Jatinder Goel Good afternoon. A couple of questions, firstly on MRN, what happens if you don’t buy it out, is there a mandate because it doesn’t appear that there is any put option in the hands of Vale as they had for Paragominas, so do you have an option not to buy it and continue with the volumes or is there CapEx which needs to be spend in the mine for which you need to actually get involved as an owner rather than on [stake] partner? And secondly, just on the rolled product divestment, what kind of unit profitability uptake do you see after the divestment and are there any other assets within rolled products or anywhere else in the portfolio which you think are non-core or low margin which you probably want to divest going forward? Thank you. Svein Richard Brandtzaeg Okay, thank you, Jatinder. With regards to MRN, not the buyout, it’s first of all an option depending on what comes out on the due diligence, but the reason why we want — and are looking at acquiring this mine is, the fact that we have got 5% ownership today. We have the stake of 45% in total. So we will have [indiscernible] stronger voice of course with 45% ownership. We will take care more actions with regard to improvements, development of the mine, of course also taking responsibility of possessing any CapEx going forward, but also we will benefit from the income flow which has been the difference between the sales price of bauxite and the cost and production of bauxite. So all in all, we feel that this will be a good fit with us. And this is the first quarter from a [cost scale]. A very efficient mine, it has a very good [strip] ratio and with high quality bauxite, so I think it fits very well with our strategy and oil prices in Brazil. The fact that we also have 2.5 billion to 3.5 billion tonnes surplus of [indiscernible] market, it’s one point there, but also the fact that the majority of this bauxite goes into the [rolled biggest refinery] not there which also needs [sourcing from hammer]. With regard to [Slim], this is, I would say, a commodity standard rolling mill which has been operating in Italy in a low margin market for [indiscernible] with utilization of capacity, the capacity is 92,000 tonnes and the production has been between 50,000 and 70,000 tonnes during the last year. So this is defined as non-core and we’re now divesting it. There are no other rolling mills that are defined as non-core, of course, there are different market segments that we’re serving probably different rolling mills, but we continue to [high grade] the product portfolio in the rolling mills that we have still step up at level of strategic development for rolled products going forward. Jatinder Goel Okay. So if I could just quickly follow-up on the rolling side, would you say, your overall EBIT in absolute terms doesn’t change post the divestment, and just on MRN, is the amount you paid for Paragominas for the remaining 40%, 20% you have already paid and 20% you’re supposed to pay, a good guide for the valuation of MRN, or you think these are two very different assets and need to be looked independently under the light of current market conditions for valuation? Eivind Kallevik Hi, Jatinder, it’s Eivind Kallevik, here. On the rolling side, we don’t have specifics on the margin side and [individual parts], but as Svein has indicated, a rolling part has been operating [indiscernible] capacity and it’s also developed in these kind of products, so it’s fair to assume that it’s been below the average margin as we like in rolled products, and rolled products are fine, and I don’t expect this to have a significant impact on the EBIT performance [with the material] going forward. Svein Richard Brandtzaeg Then it comes to the acquisition part of MRN, I don’t think we will give any further comment and guidance on the acquisition part. We have completed the due diligence and we see the results of that and we’ve probably reviewed it up in a normal fashion. Jatinder Goel Okay, great. Look forward to CMD then if you might have more comments, and thank you. Svein Richard Brandtzaeg Okay, see you there. Operator [Operator Instructions]. We will now take our next question from Menno Sanderse from Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead, your line is open. Menno Sanderse Yeah, thank you. Two questions, please. The first is on rolling and on downstream clearly there may be a [indiscernible] position to make in that area in the next couple of quarters. Has anything changed in terms of your views on that business, that clearly had a decent quarter, but that just could be cyclical, so just interested to hear where you see that business and its lifecycle, I don’t know if you have altered your views fundamentally? And then second and third a few smaller ones, the €40 million to €50 million of costs that the company highlights related to the Slim assets, is that all non-cash or are there some cash related losses in that. And finally, the working cap, is the company confident it can hold on through this working capital inflow in the fourth quarter, so should we assume that that really helps to reduce net debt for the year? Svein Richard Brandtzaeg Thank you, Menno. I’ll take the first question related to the rolling and downstream. I would say that, it is encouraging that we are approving the results in rolled products, but that hasn’t changed the view because we are continuing as [indiscernible] company and we see the benefit of managing the total value chain, and that’s also customers are really appreciating that what we do as a company for downstream products and we have the control of the full value chain. So we are not [sure on] all mines particularly, of course, encouraging to see the record results in the second quarter and [indiscernible] in the third quarter. Eivind, you can answer the other questions. Eivind Kallevik Okay. Let me go through the €45 million to €55 million amount of the EBIT loss or impact on the sale of Slim [top], better than non-cash on metal. And on the net debt, in terms of net operating capital, I think there is a large [level] that we will be able to keep that towards the end of the year. And also like I said optimizing working capital is [filing] the agenda for the management, so we continue to work to [file] more than as we saw this quarter. So we can read as being quite closer to that that we will be able keep that and now we’d be able to do more. Menno Sanderse Okay. And the [2.1] was largely you said price related, so am I fair to assume 80% or so? Eivind Kallevik It’s a split that’s partly fiscal and that’s how it is probably coming down and it’s probably [positive]. Menno Sanderse Okay. Thanks a lot. Operator We will now take our next question from Hjalmar Ahlberg from Kepler Cheuvreux. Please go ahead. Your line is open. Hjalmar Ahlberg So you had quite high bauxite [trips] in this quarter, and I guess you’re selling more of this on the split market. Can you say something on the development on the prices on bauxite that you’re selling [on spot]? Svein Richard Brandtzaeg Hey, Hjalmar. We did not file bauxite production, but of course, we have some of the MRN volumes that we produced and it’ll be exported out for sale to our bauxite customers. I think on average for a year, we have about 3 million tonnes, that would be half of the [position] that we sell, and that of course will [swing] for us from quarter-to-quarter depending on the production levels. Hjalmar Ahlberg Did it have any material impact on the [indiscernible] this quarter in earnings? Eivind Kallevik Not really, no. Not so much to find any significant barriers in the future to give you the difference. Hjalmar Ahlberg And just on the question on CapEx, you said you deferred onto [2016], could you say some new guidance on what kind of levels we should expect for the fixed [income] higher at which 2016 or in line or so? Eivind Kallevik I think we’ve guided in the past, you all know that, also 2016 and also 2017, there is still — that’s an investment that we’ve done and it’ll have quite modern effect on areas in [indiscernible] and then of course it also depends on how we decide on that [file option]. Svein Richard Brandtzaeg So I think we will, in terms of specific guidance of that we will come back on Capital Markets Day, but the guidance will have relative effect on CapEx levels in 2016. Hjalmar Ahlberg And then lastly, have you made the last payment for the Paragominas mine now or is that still to be made? Svein Richard Brandtzaeg This is still be made, the put call option is really a 2016 discussion, and then of course there is a put call between the two parties in 2016. Eivind Kallevik From a CapEx perspective, you will not see that on the [indiscernible] because that’s already been booked as investment, but of course you will see the [cash head backhaul], all the cash development. Hjalmar Ahlberg Yeah, alright. Thank you. Operator [Operator Instructions]. We will now take our next question from Christian Kopfer from Nordea Markets. Please go ahead. Your line is open. Christian Kopfer Okay, thanks operator. Good afternoon. Just a follow-up on the market pricing dynamics, I mean, looking at the LME price [churn] in that premium prices are basically at the same level at the beginning of the century, and obviously you showed the graph today, showing some 20 million out of 60 million tonnes and the market is running at losses, that you have seen this rescaling for some actions and I mean rationally the Chinese — I mean from my perspective at least they are dumping material on the global market, I mean, what is your reasoning on possible anti-dumping measures in Europe? Thanks. Svein Richard Brandtzaeg Well, thank you for the question, Christian. In this call we deal with market pricing dynamics, as I said, this is all about a supply demand game and it’s right, Chinese overall production is [whatnot] we’ll have issues related to this. At the same time as we see that [50%] capacity in the world, as it now below 60% to 70%, but this is in China. So why doesn’t China react which would be quite logical anticipation or that’s the case in Europe, that is two criteria that has to be fulfilled. One is that, some [indiscernible] that are selling below cost of production, and that is a possible period, but we know that the Chinese companies, what we’re seeing out there, they are still excellent. The second criteria that has to be fulfilled is related to that this is a [damage] for the industry. And also [closures] during the last year, obviously no is that it would be difficult for the moment to prove that this is [damaging] industry. It is of course using the prices but that is not enough, we have to prove that this is also really damaging [indiscernible] eventually, so again it could be more difficult in Europe than in US. It goes with US after dry fall [duties] against China, so we remain to be same, but of course the main price signal and the fact that companies are losing money every day. We should call for some action, but we don’t have any control of this, of course and we have to [leave] that to our competitors. Christian Kopfer Okay, thanks. Operator No further questions in the phone queue at this time. Pal Kildemo Okay, as there seems to be no further questions, I suggest we end this quarter’s call. From all of us in Oslo, I would like to thank you for your attention today. If you have any follow-up questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. Have a nice evening and hopefully we’ll see you at our Capital Markets Day on the start of December at the London Stock Exchange. Thank you. Operator That will conclude today’s conference call. Thank you ladies and gentlemen. You may now disconnect. Copyright policy: All transcripts on this site are the copyright of Seeking Alpha. However, we view them as an important resource for bloggers and journalists, and are excited to contribute to the democratization of financial information on the Internet. (Until now investors have had to pay thousands of dollars in subscription fees for transcripts.) So our reproduction policy is as follows: You may quote up to 400 words of any transcript on the condition that you attribute the transcript to Seeking Alpha and either link to the original transcript or to www.SeekingAlpha.com. All other use is prohibited. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HERE IS A TEXTUAL REPRESENTATION OF THE APPLICABLE COMPANY’S CONFERENCE CALL, CONFERENCE PRESENTATION OR OTHER AUDIO PRESENTATION, AND WHILE EFFORTS ARE MADE TO PROVIDE AN ACCURATE TRANSCRIPTION, THERE MAY BE MATERIAL ERRORS, OMISSIONS, OR INACCURACIES IN THE REPORTING OF THE SUBSTANCE OF THE AUDIO PRESENTATIONS. IN NO WAY DOES SEEKING ALPHA ASSUME ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY INVESTMENT OR OTHER DECISIONS MADE BASED UPON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WEB SITE OR IN ANY TRANSCRIPT. USERS ARE ADVISED TO REVIEW THE APPLICABLE COMPANY’S AUDIO PRESENTATION ITSELF AND THE APPLICABLE COMPANY’S SEC FILINGS BEFORE MAKING ANY INVESTMENT OR OTHER DECISIONS. If you have any additional questions about our online transcripts, please contact us at: transcripts@seekingalpha.com . Thank you!

Iberdrola’s (IBDRY) CEO Ignacio Galan on Q3 2015 Results – Earnings Call Transcript

Executives Ignacio Galan – Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Jose Sainz – Chief Financial Officer Francisco Martinez Corcoles – Business Chief Executive Officer Iberdrola S.A. ( OTCPK:IBDRY ) Q3 2015 Earnings Conference Call October 21, 2015 3:30 AM ET Operator Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. First of all we would like to offer a warm welcome to all of you who have joined us this morning. We’re delighted that you are able to be with us for the presentation of our 2015 nine months results. Welcome to the future. The presentation will as usual follow our customary format. Firstly, we will begin with an overview of the results and the main developments during the period given by the two management that usually we have with us. Our Chairman and CEO, Mr. Ignacio Galan; the CFO, Mr. Jose Sainz; and finally Mr. Francisco Martinez Corcoles, our Business CEO. Afterwards we will move on to the Q&A session. We would also like to point out that we are only to take questions submitted via the web. So please ask your question only through our webpage www.iberdrola.es. We expect that the event will last no more than 60 minutes, hoping that you find the presentation both useful and informative. Now, without further ado, I will hand over to our Chairman and CEO, Mr. Ignacio Galan. Thank you very much again. Please, Mr. Chairman. Ignacio Galan Good morning everyone and thank you very much for attending the usual presentation we are holding today through our webcast. Our businesses have continued showing a strong performance along the first month of the year, especially in networks and renewables. Gross margin is up 7.3% up to €9.5 billion driven by 12.1% increase in networks and 19.3% growth in renewables. More over we’ve controlled net operating expenses, which are only 0.2% lower excluding if takes the impact. As a consequence, EBITDA has grown 5.8% to €5.4 billion. Operating cash flow totals €4.3 billion, growing 9.1%, while investments are increased by 6.7% to €2.1 billion of which 61% are litigated to growth. Bottom line recurring net profit has increased 8.5% to €1.7 billion and net profit reaches €1.9 billion, growing 7.8%. EBITDA increase is mainly due to the solid performance of all our regulated activities, which has grown 15.5% and accounts for 75% of total EBITDA to the positive evolution of our international activity, which a 16.2% increase versus 2.1% decline in Spain country in which still we have not reach the result prior of the crisis in 2008. By businesses, network recorded 10.5% growth showing a positive evolution in all regions, thanks to higher asset base, which increased 10% in our UK transmission and distribution activity, 3% in the United States and 6% in Brazil driven by our investment. These higher up will lead to further improvement results in the future. The renewable businesses continued to show a very good performance with EBITDA have been increased by almost 23%. Thanks, to a strong output especially in United Kingdom, which our West of Duddon Sands offshore windfarm, excellent availability and resource expectation. However, in United States wind output was lower than usual due to the impact of that [manual]. On the other hand our regulated generation in Mexico is growing is strongly with the 38.5% greater in EBITDA due to our increased activity within private customers. Finally, liberalised activities in Spain and UK reflect a negative evolution, with a decrease in EBITDA 14.3%. The reason behind Spain reduction is a lower production and higher cost and taxes compared to the last year history in our results. Meanwhile the situation in UK is affected by three main factors. The increase in government obligation the raise of carbon tax in the production implementation to all our new financial integration system reach us require extraordinary cost to successfully maintain our client base and even increasing despite the problem detected during this phase. For the present situation we have established the system and we are not expecting new extra cost in 2016. The result had improved our cash flow generation capacity to almost double-digit growth, operating cash flow has increased 9.1% to €4.3 billion and exceeding investment of growth all businesses. These investments had increased by 6.7% to €2.1 billion, on which 61% are allocated to grow project and massively to regulated activities. I will now proceed to describe the main growth project underway. In offshore we have beginning – under construction in Germany, which is plan investment of €1.35 billion and we expect the commissioning for 2017. We are also starting the construction of East Anglia with a CapEx of €3.6 billion to recommission in 2019. Finally we are progressing on the development of Saint-Brieuc in France which I plan investment of €2.6 million and unexpected commission date by 2022. These three projects together with West of Duddon Sands already in operation 1,800 megawatts of offshore installed capacity in our group. Onshore we will also follows a positive trend with two new projects to be started in UK, which are to the four already under construction. United State we are currently building four windfarm, which have 100% of future production covered under PPA’s, decided to our Brazil and Mexico windfarm under construction result in overall additional onshore capacity or more than 1,200 megawatts. To be commissioning between 2016 and 2017. In Spain after there was a memorandum that Royal Decree published last week established new auction for the wind power that we are analyzing. In Mexico, during this last quarter we have awarded two new projects we regulated our long-term contracts. One combined cycle, and one co-generation plant to be added to the four plants already under construction. Altogether, they will add up to 1,600 megawatt to the operation before the end of 2018. Altogether our installed power in this country will reach more than 7,000 megawatts are the update. The increasing generation through intermittent renewable sources to require a storage capacity to stock energy surplus and supply heat to the system when is needed Iberdrola approach to these needs east to invest in a storage technology in which pumping is a much more efficient and larger scale solution in other more fashionable and highly advertised technologies. We have just finished the construction of Portugal and in Spain the largest of these kind in Europe with 1,800 megawatt of the stories capacity and now in Portugal we had a starting the construction of a new pumping and storage plant on the Támega river with 1,200 megawatt capacity expected to be commissioned in 2023. Altogether, will amount to close 6,000 megawatts of pumping capacity in between Spain, UK and Portugal providing efficient energy supply at peak hours for several million or households. In networks as a result of our agreement with Ofgem in the United Kingdom realty running transmission RIIO-ED1 in distribution are in progress. With a combined topics of nearly €9 billion for the next 6 years to 8 years. In United State we are negotiating several growth opportunities in transmission network in Maine and New York. This project will address reliability and congestion issues and we will provide additional transmission capacity for renewables. In a Spain also we have launched the set of new product to cover the potential demand self-consumption and benefit from our markets. For instance is Smart Solar is a full for self-consumption solar instillation for wholesale holds and companies are plans to A tu medida Taylor made plans these another product had resulted an increase of our customer base. Also in Iberdrola we are aware or the difficulties encountered by some low income household and we are working to offer them our support ensuring power supply to their homes in collaboration with different local and regional public administration. In relation to the merger of UIL Holdings and Iberdrola U.S.A we have received all the federal approvals. The remaining state authorization are in progress after making all the corresponding filings both Massachusetts and Connecticut we have already reached a settlement with the corresponding authorities. The process for the list in New York stock exchange is also on track and we expect to close the transaction before the year end after the approval of real General Assembly. With respect to our financial position we continue improving our main financial ratios. Regarding the FFO our retained cash flow to net debt ratios we achieved 2016 target define or our last U.S. Investor Day in 2014. And our leverage has been reduced also to 41.1%. To benefit from lower internal rate we have continued our active liability management with a positive impact in our net financial expense is down by 8.4%. These results allow us to reiterate our commitment to maintain our annual shareholder remuneration of at least open $0.20 per year. The Board of Directors approved yesterday the implementation of a new edition of the scrip dividend program corresponding to the interim shareholder remuneration for the fiscal year 2015. The warranty purchase price for the free allocation rights will be of at least €0.125 payable in January 2016. Additionally, as usual we expect to distributed complementary dividend in July suggest the approval of annual meeting in April. Also we will continue making share buybacks to compensate the negative effect of our scrip program maintaining the number of shares at 6.24 billion shares. Finally, I would like to reaffirm our guidance for 2015. The growth in networks and renewables together with our operational efficiency and positive financial performance will lead to an increase in EBITDA and recorded net profit compared with 2014. All in all we expect to reach a year in advance. The outlook set for 2016 during our February 2014 Investor Day. Therefore, these results before our strong track record or value creation for our shareholders, driven by three main pillars Growth, Financial Strength and Sustainable Dividend. Thank you very much for the attention and I will [indiscernible] the call to Pepe Sainz, who will present the Group financial results with further detail. Thank you very much. Jose Sainz Thank you, Chairman. And good morning to everybody. As already commented in previous quarters as of January IFRIC 21 and 30 effects changing the timing of the recognition of certain payment of Levies during the year. Nine months 2014 figures have been restated for comparison purposes as you can see in the slide. These does not affect the annual financial statements only the quarterly results. Nine-month results as a stated by the Chairman continued to show a strong operating performance. EBITDA grew 5.8% and recorded net profit 8.5%, while operating cash flow was up 9.1% to €4.3 billion. Average FX rates helped with €1 representing 17.8% and the bond 10.4% more than compensating the real evaluation of 13.1% on an average terms. Revenues grew 6.7% to €23.7 billion while procurements rose 6.3% to €14.2 billion due to higher costs in a worse production mix and price of sale to rising especially in the UK. Gross margin increased 7.3% to €9.5 billion as revenues grew more than procurements. Net operating expenses excluding negative FX impact fell 0.2%, but including it they were up 7.6% to €2.7 billion. Personal expenses grew 9.1% and 2.5% excluding the FX impact. Net external services were up 6.1% decreasing 3% excluding the FX impact affected by non-recurring impacts including €104 million positive non-recurring impact due to favorable legal rulings in Spain. Partially offset by almost €60 million derived from higher non-recurring IT system costs in the UK and costs related to the UIL deal. Levies grew by 13.2% to €1,372 million mainly affected by the FX impact €83 million and €111 favorable Court ruling accounted in 2014. Partially mitigated by a €48 million positive Court ruling accounted for in the first half of 2015 and lower ECO costs in the UK. Analyzing the different businesses and starting by networks it’s reported EBITDA was up 10.5% to €2,684 million with gross margin growing in all countries. Net operating expenses rose 13.9% including non-recurring items and accounting reclassifications in the U.S., Spain accounts for 41% of the networks EBITDA, the UK 31%, the U.S. 21%, and Brazil 7%, by the way Brazil accounts for around 3% of the total EBITDA of the group. In Spain networks EBITDA grew 1.4% to €1,113 million including the negative impact of €40 million positive settlements accounted for in Q3 2014 related to 2012 and 2013 investments. In the UK EBITDA was up 1.1% to £597 million as a result of 0.8% increase in the gross margin due to a higher asset based but decreasing versus previous quarters affected by the profiling of the RIIO-ED1 applicable from April 1. There is 0.2% decrease in net operating expenses. In the U.S. EBITDA by 10.7% down to US$642 million affected by net operating expenses increase related to accounting reclassifications that increase expenses versus the precision but does not have an impact in the final P&L and an additional maintenance cost. As we said in June on favorable IFRS versus U.S. GAAP impacts are decreasing, but still lower the EBITDA in IFRS by US$94 million of which more than US$80 million our taxes to be partially compensated in Q4. Finally Elektro grew 163% to R$614 million us the first nine months in 2015 have not recorded any negative drought impacts. While in the first months of 2014 we included R$298 million of negative impact. These differences will be reversed in Q4 as last year with had a R$441 million positive impact recognizing in [indiscernible] drought impacts. EBITDA growth in Elektro is also helped by the tariff reviews now we had in almost 2014 and 2015. Generation and supply EBITDA fell 7.4% to €1,735 million driven by lower results in Spain, in the UK, and in the U.S. that recorded extraordinary positive gas impacts in last year. While Mexico increase its contribution. Levies also added to the worst performance of the Syria by increasing 9.1%. In Spain EBITDA reach €1,180 million with a 6.8 decreasing gross margin due to the 10% lower output an increased procurement costs due to increased thermal weight of the production mix. Also gas business had a non-recurrent negative comparison versus 2014. Levies are up net €64 million basically due to the already mentioned CO2 allowances accounted for in 2014 compensated by the positive Court ruling in 2015. In the UK EBITDA rates £182 million, wholesale and generation business gross margin decreased by 22% due to higher costs with the carbon tax growing from £9 to £18 from April 1 onwards. Retail business gross margin decreased by 2%, higher volumes in gas with 10% increase in the month do not compensate the 17% lower gross margin in retail power due first to the increase in non-related energy costs play the rocks under transmission and distribution charges. And in addition to that the difficulties in the deployment of a new retail IT system that increased net operating expenses by £32 million. Despite this we have been able to maintain a relatively stable number of customers. In Mexico EBITDA grew 11.5% to $379 million due to the renegotiation of all contracts with the negative impact last year of $66 million. Renewables EBITDA increased by 22.7% to €1,126 million driven by the recovery in Spain and the positive performance in the UK. The U.S. and Spain have been the largest EBITDA contributors in renewables with 32% and 31% followed by the UK with new offshore capacity in operation with 27% share. Gross margin increased 19.3% and net operating expresses rose by 12.7%, 6.6 percentage points below. In Spain, the EBITDA reached €353 million, 13.9% more with a 5.5% lower output compensated by the recovery in prices. In the UK, EBITDA reached £219 million up 60% with 30% higher output due to weather conditions on West of Duddon Sands for windfarm on positive contribution. In the U.S., EBITDA was $396 million, 16% down with a 7% decrease in output due to climate conditions in the west, but in windfarm 200 megawatt in Texas in operation since Q2 will help us to improve our performance in the next months. Latin American EBITDA was €45 million with higher output in Mexico and Brazil offset by the evaluation of the real and lower prices in Mexico. In the rest of the world, EBITDA reached €70 million underpinned by a better load factor that increased production by 13%. EBITDA grew 1.1% to €3,027 million, amortizations rose €234 million driven by the exchange rate impact of €161 million. The new operating capacity and renewable business and the new retail IT systems in the UK. Provisions grew €32 million also affected by FX and non-recurring bad provisions in the UK related to the difficulties in the implementation of the above-mentioned retail system. Problems that we expect will disappear in 2016 as the Chairman has stated. Net financial expenses fell 8.4% to €748 million thanks to the €82 million improvement in debt related costs driven by our cost improvement of 38 basis points from 4.48% to 4.10%. The €96 million gross capital gains from the sale of our stake in EdP accounted for in 2014 has been almost mitigated by several non-recurring positive impacts including the proceeds of the sale of Euskaltel, reversal of several contingencies and interest of legal claims and the favorable evolution on FX hedges especially due to the real. Recurring net profit increased 8.5% to €1,673 million and reported net profit 7.8% to €1,919 million. Corporate tax rate decreased to 18.1% mainly as a consequence of the reversal of a tax provision in Spain accounted for in Q2, 2015 to added €220 million and also due to a lower corporate tax in Spain from 30% to 28% which is sustainable. Those partially compensating the €251 million of lower contribution due to non-recurring results and extraordinary positive equity contribution accounted for in 2014. Passing to the financing, our leverage ratio continue to improve reaching 41% at the end of September 2015 versus 42.2% at the same time last year as our equity continue to increase while our debt decreased slightly. The €939 million FX impact, negative impact on our debt is more than compensated by the €1 billion positive impact due to the stronger cash flow generation and tariff deficit securitization. Our equity increased €1.6 billion with a €1.1 billion positive FX impact and also fell by the €500 million of retained earnings less treasury stock. As a consequence all our financial ratios continued to strengthen as our net debt fall slightly while our EBITDA and cash flows are growing at high single-digit rates. Our net debt to EBITDA reaches 3.6 times. Our FFO net debt is at 22.2% over our 2016 target of 22%. And our retained cash flow net debt improved to 19.7% also above the 18.5% 2016 target. So we have already reached out two out of the three financial ratio targets set for December 2016. The Group while maintaining a very comfortable liquidity position continues to adapt to the new financing scenario, improving financial costs and extending the maturity of our debt. This year we have already negotiated €8.9 billion of debt and credit line as the Chairman has pointed out. At September 30, Iberdrola had available liquidity of €8.2 billion covering 27 months of financing needs, but we will continue monitoring the market, trying to take advantage of possible opportunities that help us to continue reducing our cost of debt and extending our average debt maturity. This is in line with the philosophy of the Group to build a long-term solid financial profile assuring a sustainable low financial cost for the future. And to end this presentation just to tell you that in the Annex you have the calendar for the script dividend in January. Thank you very much. Question-and-Answer Session A – Francisco Martinez Corcoles The first question has to do with the operation with EU – EA. Unidentified Analyst In Connecticut from the regulatory point of view when we expect the timing of the operation and if the counterparts or the addition of things given in this agreements are going to impact it in the profitability of the deal. Ignacio Galan So as I already mentioned I think the things are going on truck. So we have already got all the authorization of the federal authorities and now we have already reached settlement with authorities of Connecticut and Massachusetts. The filing has been presented in both states so here this has already happened and that’s in the defensive now is on progress I think in the last few days even the local authority has already made positive comments about the transaction. So we are expecting as I mentioned once will be completed all the New York Stock Exchange listed to complete the deal before the year end. So there are no changes in our expectation in the respect and related to the profitability of operation I think it continued being quite attractive for those parts. So I think is nothing changing in a major manner in this transaction. Unidentified Analyst Another additional question from Martin Young, Royal Bank of Canada is related in global basis to the United States, we can explain what our ambitions in the U.S. regulated activities as for as the closure of UIL deal and we are hungry for more acquisitions. Ignacio Galan Well, I think our philosophy always [indiscernible] country the main thing when we make a transaction, the main driver now is to integrate. I think we made the transaction of energies few years ago. I think we’ve been already integrating this company, now I can say is almost integrated I think the operation we had before on renewables and now it’s integrated fully with Iberdrola U.S.A. So Iberdrola U.S.A gets its storage and network is really integrated under a single unit which is Iberdrola U.S.A. And now we have already in this process of integration with UIL so I think in the next periods our main drivers should be to integrate, integrate, integrate the existing companies with the new one. So I think it’s a big thing to be done. And nevertheless I think we continue growing this country, I think we have ready, I have already announced this four windfarms we have in construction there are seven and more which are on the byline is expecting them to PTC’s extension and yes we have just completed transmission lining in Maine and we call them MPRP and they are another one we are starting another one announced as well Transco and there are another several ones, which are on the way. So I think we have a lot of organic things to be done together with – so I think should be the main driver for the near future. Unidentified Analyst The next question is related to dividends and is coming from Stefano Bezzato, Credit Suisse. Considering the 8% growth in net earnings reported in the first nine months of the year. Could you consider starting to raise a dividend from this 0.27 level already in relation to the 2015 results? Ignacio Galan So what I can announce now is what has been approved yesterday by the Board is we are going to pay a €0.125 per share in January 2016. We are already taking to pay the complement up to 0.27 in the shareholders meeting approved in July next year and that is our plan. If we have any changes on that one, we will have the opportunity to present to you all our vision and our target and our plan in our outlooks for the future in our Investor Day in February next year in London. So I think if there are any changes I am sure that you will be the first one in knowing that long run, yes we’ll complete the plans and we are working at present and we’ll present to you later, in the beginning of next year. So I think for the time being is 0.215, which is going to be paid in January and a complementary, which is going to be paid in July up to 0.27 that is what the Board has already approved yesterday. Unidentified Analyst A question in Spanish from Alejandro related to the same question asking for a clarification to a statement. Alejandro said with these results could we give some visibility for the close of 2015, 2016 we relating to the guidance for 2015, 2016 if you can clarify what where you mean, when we say we are going to reach the perspective of 2016 one-year ahead of time. So in 2015 if you are going to reach an EBITDA €7.5 billion in net profit this comes from Javier Suarez from Mediobanca, Javier Garrido from JPMorgan and Carolina from Morgan Stanley. Ignacio Galan Well, I will answer this in Spanish and if you want I will translate into English, but what we can say at this point in time is that the profits we have for the first nine months has grown to 8% and this has been due basically to international growth. In the case of Spain we still have a drop of about 2% and this is something that I mentioned before because of higher costs, because of lower production and higher Levies. And the results in Spain do not yet reached those that we had before the crisis, but what I could also state is that in these months we have made investments have totaling more than €2 billion and investments in excess of €2 billion which is about 7% more than what we did last year and we’ve more than 1000 new contracts with our workforce and we’ve given training courses to more than 600 graduate students and we’ve been – and nearly 4,000 Spanish suppliers we spent nearly €3.5 billion on them and this is the investment that the Group is making. What does this growth mean? It means that our prospects for what we delivered on in 2014 is something we’re bringing forward – because at that point in time if I’ve not mistaken we’re talking about EBITDA of about €6.6 billion and we said that we are expecting an average growth of about 4%. And if I multiply these figures this gives me a figure of about €7.1 billion of EBITDA for 2016. As I said before is that this figure be exceeded in this fiscal year in 2015 and the same thing applies to the ratios as the CFO just pointed out, because we are talking about ratios that – we are talking about the different ratios and different impediments and we can say that some of them have already been reached in Q3 and we hope that the third one will also be reached in the fourth quarter and this is what can be said about that. Unidentified Company Representative Like to say in English for everybody is that our expectation is that in year 2014 when we present our plans for the next three years, we had already an EBIT underwriter €6.6 billion and we were saying that we will – a growth in average range of 4%, €6.6 billion and 4% growth increase and [indiscernible] roughly €7.1 billion and that is what we are expecting in EBITDA. Internal ratios what we can say is that as I mentioned already the ratios of cash flow and the ratio has been already achieved in the third quarter. So I think we expect to continue these two and third one as we will to be achieved by the end of the year and with one year in advance. I think our numbers is what we promise we are delivering with one-year in advance. Due of the investment we are already making during this period which is starting providing result as well. Yes, yes, well I think the financial as you are saying the number is 6.6 by 4% increase is 7,100 so what we are expecting is more than that, but I think is the number is more than 7,100 which is the number. So I think we are expecting to overpass this number clearly so it is a good point. Unidentified Analyst Okay, we are now moving to a set of questions to the Spanish generation business coming from Stefano Bezzato, Credit Suisse, Carolina Dores, Morgan Stanley, Javier Suarez, Mediobanca. The first one is how do you justify the €17 per megawatts hour gap between Spain and German power prices considered in that €10 megawatts hour of the gap can be explained with generation taxes what price the rest of the gap. The second question is regarding the regulatory in Spain is covering to revise in the ratio market, when do you expect to review – these reviews going to be completed? And finally, if we are considering the shutdown of the closure of several plants, our several power plants or asset qualities of the economic recovery of the Spain [indiscernible] standby? Ignacio Galan So I think you’ll reply the first one related to prices. Jose Sainz Well, we track continuously the market prices and what I can say is that the actual ones are – do not differ two months from the one that we get from our simulation models. So I must – probably it’s not so simple us to say that we can justify 10 and there is a gap of seven because the German system is a thermal one with a high level of penetration of renewables, the Spanish one is a hydrothermal system with a lot of renewables to so the simulation of all these things are not so easier to just calculate the taxes. So if you use such a type of simulation models and calculate the price is exposed, exactly for sure, but exposed. We find that the differences are no more than 1% and sometimes less or usually less than 1%. What does it mean? Probably that the wholesale markets are working properly in all the countries we are United Kingdom, Germany and Spain. And I think this basically will respond to the question of the prices. Ignacio Galan So I think related to this review of the regulator concerning the generation market, I think that didn’t work. So I think is normal then the regulator revise and all kind of activities in the countries that we are present. I think we’ve to get review of this one in – in Britain is normal to be making in all the country where we are present. So I think that we have to be seen as a normal thing we have to be done. Is there a litigation to revise you know all the rules are already being keep and maintained according with the best practice. So I think we are already absolutely fully collaborate with any doing their job because I think that’s good for their – if transparency is good for the market performance is good for an economy which is already open like a Spanish economy. So I think it will calm this analysis and who would collaborate when as we are doing already with returning the analysis they are making. Related to generation and closing of plants. Ignacio Galan Yes, as you know we asked for the closure permit for Caspian Sea and we finally we didn’t close Caspian. This is because of several reasons. The first one was that the extremely short period or spun that the government gave us for the recognition of the plant. The second and main important is that the energy situation is changing. On Laguna, we have seen a light increase in the CCGT performance in some for instance, on the other hand we have potential regulation for [indiscernible] and this is not yet in place, but these can come in – in coming weeks or I would say months. And on the fair hand we are seeing movements from the CO2. All the commodities are going down with a section of CO2 I mean the carbon is going up slightly, but it’s going up. So what is going to happen if finally after COP21 conference, carbon takes a more role, more foot on itsrole on the markets. In these case probably all the CCGT’s that we have seen in this summer in the Spain will be needed. So it makes no sense at this time to go ahead and try to close our plant that can be, that is going to be needed for sure and that can be needed from the system stability in the coming months. So that’s the reason why we decided not to do with [Caspian Sea] and that’s the reason why we are not proceeding with our plants. Jose Sainz Nevertheless, we have already closed six plants in the last four, five years. I think we closed few coal power plants and a few oil power plants as well. I think six all together. So I think we are not really not active in the sense I think those one which we consider then one not to be needed for the future. We are closing I think we did the same thing as well in Britain. So I think we are active, analyzing which is their needs in each – in real time which are the needs for the market in terms of our power generation. Unidentified Analyst Next question is coming from Carolina Dores, Morgan Stanley and is related to the distribution business in the Spain. Last summer the Ministry of Industry in Spain sent to the regulatory cost for distribution. When do you expect this process to be finalized? Can this still be approved this year and how do the standard look versus your expectation? Ignacio Galan Well, I think as far as I know all the things are has been completed, all this analysis for all part in both has been already announced and finished. And I think we’re just expecting the final document from the Ministry to publish. So as far as we know I think that our expectationis that will consolidate the current remuneration of our activity. So I think we are not expecting surprises in this respect. So has been making a very professional manner on all theanalysis and we are not expecting any surprise on these respect. Unidentified Analyst Next set of questions is regarding the generation business in the UK. These questions are coming from José Javier Ruiz, Macquarie, Javier Suárez, Mediobanca, Pablo Cuadrado, HSBC. The first one is during Q3 you have recorded an EBITDA loss in the UK generation and supply businesses. Could you provide more details on what is driving the weak performance and the perspectives that you have for these businesses in the following quarter. The second one is on December 8 th ; the second capacity auctions in the UK will take place, do you expect any increasing prices as considered in all the coal plant closure announcement in the UK? Ignacio Galan So you reply the first one and I’ll reply the second one. Jose Sainz You’ll reply one of the auctions? Ignacio Galan Auction I’ll reply now. The weak performance of the third quarter towards the previous one. Francisco Martinez Corcoles Yes, I think we should consider – the key point has been the retail business and is not so because the results of this year, but also because the classification or the accounting reclassification that we did last year as a one off. So the standing points are the incremental external service on cost on – put in place and all of our complaint providence with the new IT system for customer that fits the integrated system. This is the standing point and this has been all over the year affecting us this quarter and two previous one. And it’s going to getting down the next quarter and probably will disappear the next year. So this is their standing or they continue to base load let’s say problem or difference in terms of result that we have got. And together with these we got all our things specially affecting retail margin that comes more from accounting activities or accounting decisions on the previous year than to the let say their main business and I’ll say that the main business has nothing special. On the other hand all you know that the two intermediate quarters of the year Q2 and Q3 are extremely lower in compression with Q1 and Q3 and Q4 excuse me in the United Kingdom, because of the temperatures and all the movements of the markets. So Q4 is going to be completely different in terms of compression of the business with Q3 and all these one-off things that we have got are more or less [indiscernible] of the differences. Ignacio Galan All of it all I think as Francisco mentioning our expectation is in the result in generation retail in UK in 2015 will be slightly in terms of euros, is slightly better than it was previously. So I think we are expecting the certain of the negative impact we’ve been affected during these three quarters and most of them as he mentioned is going to disappear almost disappear. So we have more customers and I think they are struggling because we are already suffering less consequence of the IT system is already been established and that will reduce and our expectation is that we’ll in euros improve our result compared to previous year. And related to the second question of the auctions so I think we are seeing the British system is very good in many, many fields. So I think they are concerned about the need to distinguish between power and energy so which is one of my favorite things now to convince everybody. So they are really making this one for this capacity auction, but they are putting together new and old power plants and nothing in the last ones I think it has been affected for certain ones that Dave says and they are going to make a new one, but that they are saying now is that they are going to make a new one where the production has been already been achieved in the auction. So I don’t what this going to do, but what is clear is that the model for the new have to be different and the model for the existing one. So an action can be affected by someone else which is already dreaming to make by last year what is not made so they are going to sell the product and supplying the country. So that’s why we’ll see what is in terms of that one when I guess is that probably they will use different approach for their old one and for the new one and I think that should be already as always a transparent upturn is which everybody will put their better prices. I cannot say what this is going to be because if I should know that one I should be more clever to do it so I think – but my feeling is and they are going to be a different treatment for building new ones then for the existing power plants. Unidentified Analyst Next question is related to Brazil and it’s given by Javier Suárez in Mediobanca. He likes to know an update on the CO2 recurring these three situation of the distribution companies in Brazil either possibility to pass through the higher cost and the higher rates to the final customer this final higher cost in generation? Ignacio Galan Well, on Brazil I mentioned the CFO represented 3% of our total EBITDA so I think is we are already of course interested in this country, this country as I used to say is not as bad as sometime and some people is saying no it’s not the with us I know the people were saying a few years ago about it. I think our total EBITDA is representing 3% so saying that many, many things has been done in the country, they are truly and suffering a drop is true then they are already passing a crises which is already conducting then the growth of the country has declined tremendously is true then the situation is not as good as it was and already seen this is affected, but in our global account is not much affected in particularly because last year we suffer in our account because of the drop has been fully compensated across this year. So I think our account now is already positive affected because they are already compensating the effect of the problem we suffer at the previous one. So I think in the government they have the mentality then they need then the companies have a good and bad performance, they need to continue already providing the service and providing the service and providing that in the country they are doing the necessary for improving the thing. So I think they are increased heavily their rates and their tariff in most – in all our distribution companies and they are already looking solutions for compensating the power generation companies we have been suffered for the drop of the difference between the entities they have committed and then they are able to reply because of these lack of rain. So now they continue these on the respect, but I think is we are already seeing then the things are moving, but in our case I think they are moving positively that’s fine, they are moving negatively so we are going to change dramatically our result in the company. Unidentified Analyst Next question is Pablo Cuadrado, HSBC and it’s related to Mexico business. Recently you announced that you won an auction to build a new 850 megawatts facility project in Mexico, could you provide more details about the respect IRR that you are willing to making that project and common on value creation is Latin America project against increasing the competitive environment? Ignacio Galan So I don’t know that particular project this one, but I think all together I can say as I mentioned before in this moment we have something like 5,500 megawatts in operation and there is another 1,600 in construction correct me the numbers if not precise. So all together roughly 7,000 megawatts and roughly that in mind is the return we have for really in that one is on the range of one plus 300 basis points. I think it’s a good business and healthy. Our position in the country is very positive, we are well known, we are already – we have made some various solidity and uncertainty so we are really committing what we are delivering what we are committing and the expectation in this country and the things is going to continue and positive. They have already made a reform and the reform which is lower we sell especially for those who present in the countries in the last 15, 16 years that certain opportunities for making already project for private people. So I think we are in this moment completing one in Monterrey so which is complete, all the power is already stored for the next 15 years. So I think I know the two or three we face already as well in the same position so I think for new market has been already opened apart to their market traditional what we have already facing with this regulation with CFE. Unidentified Analyst Next question is coming as well from Pablo Cuadrado and it’s related to debt. The cost of debt has increased almost 40 basis points in the last 12 months to 4.1%, where do you see that cost of debt performing taken into account your future and financial needs and do you think that sustain improvements is a still possible for the next 12 months? Jose Sainz Yes, we think so. We expect to close the year with net cost of around very close to 4% and hopefully by next year we will be below the 4%. As I mentioned we are looking for opportunities to reduce our debt cost and I think that we will be able to maintain our lower cost of debt for the future. Unidentified Analyst And the final question is related to Fashion Technology Laboratories and it’s even from Andrew Moulder of Creditsights. Mr. Galan just said that hydro pump at the storage was a more favorable option than other more fashionable and highly publicized technologies, which I take to refer to the type of batteries being developed by companies like [Tesla]. What is your view on these battery technology? It is a sustainable technology and is it something Iberdrola will be investing in? Ignacio Galan So, well perhaps and already yes something I probably didn’t know then I spent 16 years of my life as engineer, designing, manufacturing and selling batteries, industrial batteries particularly. So I think long-time ago when I was already a battery engineer and battery manufacture, and battery marketing, but I still have some reminds of that time. So I think batteries can be solution, no doubt, it can be a solution for system which isolated. So for areas where they are not to really connection, interconnection grids, no doubt. So I think in certain the new technology is already helping. I think they are longer life, they are already less weight, they are more costly technologies, but this one particularly you all mentioned, but the thing is it can be solution and no doubt and this in certain areas can already represent already an advantage to where another system which can already imply like oil generators or whatever thing which is already in certain remote areas of Africa or America. So saying that I think in the Western world what we have already very interconnected system. We are already putting massive as we are putting intermittent technologies for production of energy. So they are moments, which they are already in excess of offer I think we are already been in windy condition or very rainy condition or very sun condition in the demand is not such which cannot sort all this one, there are two ways for doing these. One is increase interconnection, which I think European commission is in this moment, already promoting just to use these energy producing in one part of Europe to be – in all the part of the Europe, which I think that the solution another one is to store this energy and the third one is to stop the production. I think is when they are already floats, they are already in tremendous range traditionally well two years they open the doors of the dams for not – probably because the system is not able to absorb all the energy what the system can already make. I think they are very windy condition. So an option is to stop, not to continue to produce. So I think why it was stopped, why not produce these resource that the god is already providing to us in this particular moment. So I think the way is to start and to start how in a most efficient manner. In a massy, most efficient manner, when I said massy. So I finis we are talking in pumping storage which we are talking about 1000 megawatt hours, 1000 megawatts we can produce billions of kilowatt hours. So I think the another solution is required millions of batteries to be already located in millions of houses which I already for us – which I think is much more inefficient economically and as well to maintaining to sustain all those one. So saying that I fully, I think I cannot be against my principal, which I was already battery engineer in my beginning of my professional career. So but I think that can be used for certain things in a very good manner same which is already happening with cars, so car is certain rechargeable cars with plugging systems and with battery I think clearly has already clear future and all the car makers already now making those ones, no doubt. So from there all each of us a battery in our kitchen is that to have a fridge I think – is a lot different. So I think if the – another solution that should be fine in IRS what they are not already capabilities of interconnected, but there are areas with this fully interconnected. So let use the most, the cheapest and most massive efficient technology for making so and that is what we are asking making for one-time I think we completed last year with 1,100 megawatt represent equivalent or something less 600,000 batteries in the houses. So I think we are talking about numbers which are absolutely huge. So and that’s the point I think we make that one because it’s four to ten times cheaper system then another alternatives and in country by that one which is fully interconnected saying that I think you have already a remote house in a place which is not already in a kind of interconnection I think that is a great solution is that to put in already yes and generator old generator for the covering the moments in nights when they are not already signed they are not already win and they are no win. Unidentified Company Representative Okay this has been the last one for the time being. If there are more questions to come I would say that from the investor relation department will be delighted to answer all of them as usual. Now Mr. Chairman you can close when you wish it. Ignacio Galan So thank you very much for attending this one. We will be more than delighted to your [indiscernible] all you in our meeting in London for presenting the annual result and the outlook for the next future. Thank you very much for this meeting. Thank you.