Tag Archives: chinese

Investing In A Turbulent Market

Summary In turbulent times, investors need a plan and stick with a few basic rules. Assess macro conditions to guide investment decisions. Recognize the fact that danger and opportunities usually go hand in hand. Actively tweak winning odds to our favor as frequently as we can. It’s been two months since I left my role as a systematic global macro manager to focus on a few equity strategies I have been developing over the past few years. The timing was not great as world equities have been in a tailspin. Many blame China, the US Federal Reserve, and anemic world economic growth as the causes of the selloff. To me, they are just excuses. The real culprit of the market downturn is the investor jitters. Disciplined investors should follow some basic principles for investing in a turbulent environment. Here are some rules I follow: 1. Assess macro conditions to guide investment decisions 2. Recognize the fact that danger and opportunities usually go hand in hand 3. Actively tweak winning odds to our favor as frequently as we can. Assessing Macro Conditions to Guide Investment Decisions An old saying “rising tide lifts all boats” has found new meaning in stocks since 2009. Central banks around the world injected trillions of dollars into the world financial system. Ample money supply is undeniably one of the most important reasons for the current equity bull market. An equity investor should have done well if he recognized this simple macro factor. Therefore, accurately assessing the global macro environment is instrumental in performance. Differing opinions of economic conditions are the root cause of investor anxiety. So where are we now? China, as the world economic growth engine for the last decade, is facing some headwinds. It needs to absorb the excess from multi-decade economic expansion, rein in speculation, transition its economy from low-cost manufacturing to service and consumption, and steady investments and long-term growth to a sustainable level. Such a transition is not going to be easy and painless at all times. As someone who grew up in China before the reform began in earnest, I often found investors not giving enough credit to the success of China’s economic policies that has elevated a poor country with food rationing to a world economic powerhouse. Over the past 20 years, there were many calls of hard landing in China by market “gurus,” but none materialized. There is a certain arrogance to those calls. Is China facing hard landing again this time? I doubt that! Just as we like to say in the West “quiet water runs deep,” people in the East like to say, “narrow water runs far.” Publicizing policies has never been a strong suit of running things in China. Nevertheless, I believe China has economic means and a deep bench of highly skilled policy makers to navigate choppy waters. Everyone can make mistakes, but so far, there is no indication that China won’t be successful again in turning the ship around this time. In my view, they are proactively using policy tools to minimize the negative impact in a changing world. Investors are fickle. Before the two-day US Federal Reserve policy meeting last week, futures market implied a 30% chance of an interest rate hike in September. The market was right, the Federal Reserve did not hike interest rates. At the same time, investors reacted poorly to the decision as the US dollar sold off and interest rates dropped immediately after the announcement. Was the decision a surprise or was it expected? Investors cannot make up their mind. In my view, the timing of the Fed rate hike is not that important. There is no urgency to a rate hike in the absence of inflationary pressures. Nevertheless, barring significant economic deterioration, we will get a rate hike in December. Otherwise, Chairman Yellen’s credibility will be at risk as she previously indicated a hike this year. Given that outlook, I suspect both US dollar and interest rates will trade higher in the next two months. Moreover, according to some studies, a 25 basis points hike will only roughly translate into a 0.1% decline in GDP growth. There is simply no reason to be fixated on that. Accurate macro assessments can not only help us achieve long-term profitability, but also guide our short-term trading. A number of recent selloffs in global equity markets were in sympathy to selloffs in the Chinese equity market. Given the Chinese National Day is coming on October 1, an imminent meltdown in China is almost impossible. Therefore, any significant selloff could create short-term buying opportunities. Recognize the Fact that Danger and Opportunities Usually Go Hand in Hand Novice investors tend to chase markets and hang on to losers too long. It is much better to pick up quality names in a down market when everyone else is selling. In addition, losers tend to go down less than quality names precisely because some investors cannot psychologically part with losers, and instead sell stocks with gains to raise funds during a market downturn. Do not be afraid of selling losers! Better yet, pick up some winners in a down drift by selling losers for harvesting capital losses to reduce realized capital gains. Furthermore, global economic conditions are getting better, not worse – Europe is finally getting ahead of its sovereign debt crisis, the US economic growth is intact, China is working out short-term pains for long-term gains, the weak energy price should largely be stimulative to growth, and global monetary policies will remain accommodative for the foreseeable future. Therefore, there are opportunities to be had in the current passing danger. Actively Tweak Winning Odds to Our Favor as Frequently as We Can I consider myself as a long-term investor as I look to profit from fundamental research and typically hold stocks for an extended period of time. Fundamentals never play out overnight. However, I question the effectiveness of the “buy, hold and do nothing” strategy in the current market environment where information is so readily available through the internet, media, and social networks, affecting investor psyche constantly, and generating market volatility. Because of daily marks to market, professional hedge fund managers cannot sit idle and do nothing during market turbulence. I would argue that individual investors who look after their own portfolios should also be actively looking for ways to increase winning odds by using available tools such as listed equity options. Here are a few suggestions: a. If one wants to buy 100 shares of stock XYZ, he can sell one contract of put option at a strike price lower than or close to the current stock price. At maturity, if the stock price is higher than the strike price, one gets to keep the put option premium; otherwise, one acquires the stock at a price lower than the current price. b. When a stock in a portfolio has appreciated significantly, one should consider selling some covered calls to lighten up the load. At maturity, if the stock price is higher than the strike price, one effectively sells the stock at the strike price plus option premium; otherwise, he gets to keep the option premium. c. In fact, instead of following the red-hot “dividend investing” strategy, a) and b) can be viewed as a “create-your-own-dividend” strategy on any stock. With weekly options, one can aim to generate 10% annual yield by selling options. That’s 10% income and/or cushion one doesn’t have if he does nothing. d. During a market downturn, instead of buying quality stocks outright, one can buy calendar spreads, i.e. buying long-term calls against selling short-term calls at appropriate strikes to further reduce risk. e. Shorting high beta, richly valued stocks can be a more effective hedge than shorting index futures in the portfolio. There are many strategies that can be deployed day in and day out to generate consistent returns or opportunistically in turbulence when everything is out of whack. But one should always have a plan to deal with different market conditions and follow a set of rules so that he is not caught off guard. Let me know what you think. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

The Future Of Seeking Alpha, From One Contributor’s Perspective (Part II)

Summary SA has new leadership and a bright future. Here is what that future may hold for you. Many questions have been answered since Part I. Much has changed at Seeking Alpha since Part I . Here is an update from Seeking Alpha’s opinion leaders on big changes that impact you. New Leadership As announced by Seeking Alpha’s founder, the company is newly led by my friend Eli Hoffmann . Eli is the perfect person to lead Seeking Alpha. In April, he announced the launch of the SA contributor marketplace. While Eli was always the best successor to founder David Jackson , his success at leading the launch of this new business really catapulted him to the top. We have stayed in close touch during the launch including discussions of its progress here and here . New Marketplace The contributor marketplace is comprised of value-added investment services from top SA contributors, according to Seeking Alpha. Under Eli’s leadership, the contributor marketplace exploded to over fifty writers on over twenty five specialized topics. New Ideas from Seeking Alpha Opinion Leaders I reached out to each of the top ranked opinion leaders from every category for their thoughts on Seeking Alpha’s future and their role in it. What is the future of SA? My hope is that the future of SA is to provide both professional and retail investors with a forum to provide interactive discussion over the analysis of a large number of securities, as well as the general macroeconomic picture. Seeking Alpha has already established a large moat as the leader in ‘crowd-sourced’ investing information, and I also hope that they can grow the entire market for crowd-sourced financial information. – Michael Munro , SA’s real estate opinion leader What is your edgiest prospective idea from today’s market prices? I like the Chinese solar companies such as JinkoSolar (NYSE: JKS ), Trina Solar (NYSE: TSL ), and JA Solar (NASDAQ: JASO ) because of their valuation, the prospects for solar power as it becomes more competitive in electricity generation, the near-term sold out capacity for solar, the companies’ technological/cost competitiveness, the trend towards higher earnings estimates in spite of their very low valuation and the existence of further catalysts for further increases in earnings estimates. – Paulo Santos , SA’s opinion leader in short ideas What is the single most unappreciated article on the site by someone other than you? That’s a pretty good question, I’d say Spear Point Calls for CEO of TheStreet to Resign Requests Board Seats to be the most underappreciated article on Seeking Alpha. In the comment section, there were only two comments, and the content inside of the article was simply phenomenal. I wrote an extensive article on TheStreet in the beginning of 2015 highlighting why it was such a poorly run business. Soon enough, the biggest shareholders, i.e. Spear Point wrote a public letter on Seeking Alpha to TST’s management team stating that the CEO is both incompetent and that the board should be more fairly represented by the shareholders. This is a classic example of how Seeking Alpha’s platform could transition to become more accommodative towards activist funds, while also exemplifying the strengths of the buy-side community as a whole. People mistake Seeking Alpha for a group of wannabe analysts, or amateurs. But it’s simply not the case. Some of the most brilliant people in the world share their ideas here, and as such, I think this specific article is not only one of the most underappreciated article on this website, it also speaks to the direction in which Seeking Alpha could go. – Alex Cho , SA’s opinion leader in long ideas What article have you written on SA that best exemplifies the depth of your research and your ability to uncover information that is not already in the press/in the price? I’m not sure how “deep” my research was, but I thought this idea was unique compared to most things I had read about how DGIs weight their portfolios. The vast majority seems to weight them equally or close to it and that simply didn’t make sense to me. Why would I want to rely upon some speculative 10%-yielder for more income than a proven blue-chipper? That’s exactly what happens for somebody who invests equal amounts of money in both equities. So I went to the numbers and “proved” myself correct – at least in my own mind. And this thesis of mine did go on to form the basis on how I invest today. I weight my positions not only based upon my conviction towards each company. And I do the weighting by annual dividends more than dollar value. – Mike Nadel , SA’s dividend investing strategy leader How does your view of a given securities’ value tend to differ from the market’s view? My view on value is evidence-based and totally dispassionate. A surprising number of investors seem to lose their analytical focus if they are long a stock of a company whose products they love (say, Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL )) – no matter how expensive the stock gets, they reject any information source that presents evidence of over valuation. – Donald van Deventer , opinion leader on bonds To quote Peter Thiel’s favorite question, could you please tell me something that’s true that nobody agrees with? In an investing environment where there are unlimited numbers of brilliant mathematicians, statisticians and physicists all seeking to dissect the tiniest component of what creates opportunity and coming up with diametrically opposing answers, it is not possible to have any degree of confidence in any investing decision without information that is otherwise unavailable to others. – George Acs , income investing strategy leader Sifting the World In March, I wrote that, I am 100% committed to this new endeavor even if it results in only one reader (me) and writer (me). Since then, hundreds of members joined Sifting the World . Many have discussed their experience in their own words . It is both a collegial environment and a forum for vigorous debate. My ideas are supplemented by investment ideas presented by fellow hedge fund managers and by fellow StW members. Online discussion is supplemented by in person meet ups in New York City and Connecticut. You can join us, too, or shoot me any questions that you might have about becoming a member. What do you think? Please use the comment section below or the Seeking Alpha Readers Forum to weigh in. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. Additional disclosure: Chris DeMuth Jr is a portfolio manager at Rangeley Capital. Rangeley invests with a margin of safety by buying securities at deep discounts to their intrinsic value and unlocking that value through corporate events. In order to maximize total returns for our investors, we reserve the right to make investment decisions regarding any security without further notification except where such notification is required by law.

TAN Vs. YLCO: Which Is The Better Solar ETF?

With the recent update from the Obama administration regarding the allocation of more than $120 million for clean energy programs developing solar power and other renewable technology, ETFs focusing on top solar firms are definitely on our radar. The fund will be deployed across 24 states to help Americans gain access to cleaner and low-cost energy sources. Although solar stocks have got a beating due to plunging oil prices and the meltdown in the Chinese stock market, they hold greater promise. Surging demand for solar power, massive panel installations, advanced technologies, global warming issues and Obama’s ‘Climate Action Plan’ will ensure that the solar boom is not fizzling out anytime soon. The good news is that solar energy systems have increasingly become affordable, indicating its potential for wide acceptance among the masses. According to the White House report, solar energy is now cost-competitive with conventional energy, such as coal or natural gas, in 14 states. According to a report by GTM Research and Solar Energy Industries Association, solar photovoltaic installations are expected to go up to 7.7 gigawatts (“GW”) this year from 6.2 GW in 2014, where a GW represents 1 billion watts, enough to power roughly 164,000 homes. Here we will discuss two ETFs, Guggenheim Solar ETF (NYSEARCA: TAN ) and only a few months old Global X YieldCo ETF (NASDAQ: YLCO ). Both focus on the renewable energy sector expecting to ride on the bullish trend in solar space. Though TAN and YLCO have similar exposures, there are certain key differences between the products. Below, we have highlighted the products in greater details. TAN Launched in April 2008, this ETF follows the MAC Global Solar Energy Index, holding 27 stocks in the basket. First Solar Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLR ) and SolarCity Corp. (NASDAQ: SCTY ) take the first and second positions with a combined 15.3% share. The U.S. firms dominate the fund’s portfolio with 34%, followed by China (28%). The product has amassed over $264 million in its asset base and trades in solid volume of around 260,000 shares a day. It charges investors 70 bps in fees per year. The fund shed around 10.3% in the year-to-date time frame (as of Sep. 16, 2015) and has a Zacks ETF Rank of 3 or ‘Hold’ rating with a High risk outlook. YLCO Launched this May, the fund targets a unique segment of the market, namely the YieldCo. A Yieldco is a dividend growth-oriented public company that bundles renewable and/or conventional long-term contracted operating assets. It is often compared to MLPs as they are both energy-related assets, created by their parent company, in order to deliver stable cash flows to investors. To attain its objective, the fund tracks the Indxx Global YieldCo index. The ETF holds only 20 securities with Brookfield Renewable Energy Partners (NYSE: BEP ) and TerraForm Power Inc. (NASDAQ: TERP ) (formerly a SunEdison (NYSE: SUNE ) Yieldco) taking up the first and second spots. Both account for an 18.3% share in the basket. The fund has a global footprint as well with the U.S. occupying the top spot at 39%, followed by Canada with 28%. YLCO has gathered a meager $3.4 million in assets and charges 65 bps in fees. It trades at an average volume of more than 4,600 shares. The product was down 26% since its inception. The Verdict Both funds charge comparable fees and are a tad expensive. However, TAN is widely diversified as it holds more securities and is less concentrated in its top 10 holdings compared to YLCO. Further, TAN is higher in AUM and relatively more liquid as it trades in a higher volume compared to YLCO. The higher volume of TAN also suggests that bid ask spreads should be relatively tight for this fund and total trading costs shouldn’t be much higher than the explicit 0.70% expense ratio. Notably, TAN has higher yield compared to YLCO. Both the funds have higher exposures to U.S. stocks with TAN lagging behind YLCO. However, the good thing about YLCO is that it has no exposure to Chinese firms, which could be affected by the economic turmoil in the world’s second largest economy. Further, YLCO is expected to be less volatile in nature than TAN as it tracks companies that have spun off their more steady power producing operations as Yieldco. Though YLCO doesn’t look bad, we pick TAN as the winner due its higher exposure to top solar firms, diversified nature, higher liquidity and better yield. Data Point TAN YLCO Expense Ratio 0.70% 0.65% Total Holdings 27 20 Top 10 Holdings 54.9% 66.7% Assets in the U.S. 34% 39% Dividend Yield 2.2% 1.2% AUM $264 Million $3 Million Average Volume 260,000 4,600 Original Post