Tag Archives: china

Going Shopping: Chicken Vs. Beef

The headlines haven’t been very rosy over the last week, but when is that ever not the case? Simply put, gloom and doom sells. The Chinese stock market is collapsing; the Yuan is plummeting; there are rising tensions in the Middle East; terrorism is rising to the fore; and commodity prices are falling apart at the seams. This is only a partial snapshot of course, and does not paint a complete or accurate picture. Near record-low interest rates; record corporate profits (outside of energy); record-low oil prices; unprecedented accommodative central bank policies; and attractive valuations are but a few of the positive, countervailing factors that rarely surface through the media outlets. At the end of the day, smart long-term investors understand investing in financial markets is a lot like grocery store shopping. Similarly to stocks and bonds, prices at the supermarket fluctuate daily. Whether you’re comparing beef (bonds) and chicken (stocks) prices in the meat department (stock market), or apple (real estate) and orange (commodities) prices in the produce department (global financial markets), ultimately, shrewd shoppers eventually migrate towards purchasing the best values. Since the onset of the 2008-2009 financial crisis, risk aversion has dominated over value-based prudence as evidenced by investors flocking towards the perceived safety of cash, Treasury bonds, and other fixed income securities that are expensively priced near record high prices. As you can see from the chart below, investors poured $1.2 trillion into bonds and effectively $0 into stocks . Consumers may still be eating lots of steaks (bonds) currently priced at $6.08/lb while chicken (stocks) is at $1.48/lb (see U.S. Department of Labor Data – Nov. 2015), but at some point, risk aversion will abate, and consumers will adjust their preferences towards the bargain product. Some Shoppers Still Buying Chicken While the general public may have missed the massive bull market in stocks, astute corporate executives and investment managers took advantage of the equity bargains in recent years, as seen by stock prices tripling from the March 2009 lows. As corporate profits and margins have marched to record levels, CEOs/CFOs put their money where their mouths are by investing trillions of dollars into share buybacks and mergers & acquisitions transactions. Despite the advance in the multi-year bull market, with the recent sell-off in the market, panic has dominated rational thinking. Once again, the rare occurrence (a few times over the last century) the dividend yield of stocks once again exceeds the yield on Treasury bonds (2.2% S&P 500 vs 2.1% 10-Year Treasury). But if we are once again comparing beef vs. chicken prices (bonds vs stocks), the 6% earnings yield on stocks (i.e., Inverse P/E ratio or E/P) now looks even more compelling relative to the 2% yield on bonds. For example, the iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NYSEARCA: AGG ) is currently yielding a meager 2.3%. For a general overview, Scott Grannis at Calafia Beach Pundit summarizes the grocery store flyer of investment options below: While these yield relationships can and will certainly change under various economic scenarios, there are no concrete signs of an impending recession. The recent employment data of 292,000 new jobs added during December (above the 200,000 estimate) is verification that the economy is not falling off a cliff into recession (see chart below). As I’ve written in the past, the positively-sloped yield curve also bolsters the case for an expansionary economy. Source: Calafia Beach Pundit While it’s true the Chinese economy is slowing, its rate is still growing at multiples of the U.S. economy. As a communist country liberalizes currency and stock market capital controls (i.e., adds/removes circuit breakers), and also attempts to migrate the economy from export-driven growth to consumer-driven expansion, periodic bumps and bruises should surprise nobody. With that said, China’s economy is slowly moving in the right direction and the government will continue to implement policies and programs to stimulate growth (see China Leaders Flag More Stimulus ). As we have recently experienced another China-driven correction in the stock market, and the U.S. economic expansion matures, equity investors must realize volatility is the price of admission for earning higher long-term returns. However, rather than panicking from fear-driven headlines, it’s times like these that should remind you to sharpen your shopping list pencil. You want to prudently allocate your investment dollars when deciding whether now’s the time to buy chicken (6% yield) or beef (2% yield). DISCLOSURE: Sidoxia Capital Management (SCM) and some of its clients hold positions in certain exchange traded funds (ETFs) including AGG, but at the time of publishing had no direct position in any other security referenced in this article. No information accessed through the Investing Caffeine (IC) website constitutes investment, financial, legal, tax or other advice nor is to be relied on in making an investment or other decision. Please read disclosure language on IC Contact page.

New Year 2016: Looking Back, Moving Forward

The Facts: There were lots of ups and downs in the markets in 2015. Unfortunately, by the time December came to close, there were a few more downs than ups. Although the S&P 500 actually posted a slight gain, it was the index’s softest performance in seven years. We’ll show you what it all means. The Impact: U.S. large caps finished the year up 1.38% (including dividends), while small caps retreated. International stocks fell, with emerging markets dropping almost 15%. Fixed-income markets were relatively flat, though moves by the U.S. Fed triggered unusual volatility. What It Means for Investors: Where some see weakness, there may be opportunity. With a well-diversified portfolio, a simple rebalancing strategy may help investors capture opportunities almost automatically. Read on for what this might mean for each of the major asset classes. A Closer Look As Shakespeare said, “All the world’s a stage,” and a dramatic year for both domestic and international markets may have once again proven him right. It was central banks that took center stage in 2015: The U.S. Federal Reserve (the Fed) made a small but significant step toward tighter interest rates, while looser monetary policy ruled the day in Europe, Japan, China, and elsewhere. The markets were unusually volatile, too, buffeted by several international flashpoints, including financial instability in Greece, a slowdown in China, and terrorist attacks in Paris that grabbed the world’s attention. The end result? Most markets came under pressure in 2015. U.S. stocks ended the year mixed, international markets sagged (especially those in emerging economies), and U.S. bonds ticked slightly higher. Before we take a closer look, let’s quickly review the economic highlights for December. Fed raises rates-finally: The odds makers finally got some rest. On Wednesday, December 16th, the Federal Open Market Committee voted to raise its benchmark interest rate, the federal funds rate, by 0.25%. This was the first interest rate increase in nearly a decade, and the first time in seven years the rate has exceeded the zero to 0.25% range. Projections by Fed governors also suggested that the Fed may increase rates by another 1% through the end of 2016. U.S. economy keeps chugging along: The U.S. showed slow but steady growth throughout 2015. The unemployment rate dropped from 5.6% in December 2014 to 5.0% in November, the most recent month for which we have data, and the workforce expanded by 2.6 million employees. While gross domestic product grew by just 2% through the third quarter, the housing market and other indicators pointed to an economy that continues to expand. Domestic Equities There’s a lot to cover this month, so let’s go straight to the numbers. The large-cap-oriented S&P 500 shed 1.58% in December, but finished the year up 1.38%, the smallest total return for the index since 2008. Without dividends, the S&P actually posted a modest annual decline. The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite performed significantly better for the year, gaining 6.96% (also including dividends). The month and year were much tougher for U.S. small caps. The small-cap-oriented Russell 2000 shed 5.02% in December-and finished 2015 with an annual decline of 4.41%. Among the sectors that make up the U.S. equity markets (based on the S&P 500 sector indexes), consumer staples, utilities, and health care stocks were the biggest gainers in December, while the energy, materials, and consumer discretionary sectors lagged. The top performers for the year were consumer discretionary stocks, perhaps partially due to lower oil prices leaving more money in consumers’ pockets. Health care and consumer staples stocks also outperformed. On the downside, the energy sector was by far the weakest, falling by 21.12%, followed by materials and utilities. It may be helpful to take a quick look at the energy markets, which struggled considerably in 2015. A glut in global oil supplies triggered a decline of 30.05% in the benchmark New York Mercantile Exchange in 2015-for a total loss of 64% over two years. The last time that crude dropped two years in a row was in 1997-1998. During the course of the year, oil plunged from a high of $61 a barrel to a low of $35, and more than 250,000 jobs in the energy sector were lost on a global basis. For the equity styles, both growth and value stocks were lower in December, though growth slightly outperformed. (We track style performance using the Russell 3000 Growth and Value Indexes.) This theme played out through most of 2015, as growth led value by more than nine percentage points for the year. What to Consider for 2016 : In the spirit of New Year’s resolutions, the start of the year can be a great time to consider rebalancing one’s portfolio to its target allocations. Because U.S. small caps performed relatively poorly in 2015, this could mean adding exposure to small caps by redirecting funds from cash or other assets. (Of course, there’s no guarantee you’ll be reallocating assets at an advantageous time-and tax consequences could be triggered if the transactions are made in a taxable account.) As for U.S. sectors, it’s almost impossible to predict how things will play out. It might be tempting, for instance, to call a bottom in energy at these levels, but even more pain could be ahead, as U.S. crude inventories expand, Iran comes online, and Saudi Arabia fulfills its pledge to meet any increases in demand. Among other sectors, consumer stocks could continue to benefit from the spending power generated by oil price weakness, while higher interest rates could lift financials. International Equities Volatility ruled international stocks in 2015-to vastly different results. Developed markets ended the year just fractionally lower, while emerging markets dropped sharply. The MSCI EAFE Index, a widely followed measure of developed market performance, fell 1.35% in December, finishing the year down 0.81%. Among the component regions that make up the index, Japan was the year’s star performer, while stocks in other Pacific countries and the UK fell sharply. Many Pacific economies were weighed down by the ripple effects of slowing growth in China and depressed commodity prices. Emerging markets saw no reprieve in December. The MSCI Emerging Markets Index fell 2.23% for the month, and ended the year with a loss of 14.92%, the worst annual performance of any index we track. (This was also the index’s third consecutive yearly loss.) Latin America was the weakest region in the index, dropping sharply on lower pricing for some of the region’s biggest exports-oil and other natural commodities. What to Consider for 2016 : Given the underperformance of emerging markets over the past three years, many investors might find that their emerging market holdings have grown smaller relative to other asset classes. If this applies in your situation, now might be a good time to consider adding funds to the category to bring it back to desired target allocation. Investors might even want to reconsider the split in your international allocation-specifically, the amount you hold in emerging vs. developed markets. Valuations for emerging markets are now more attractive than they’ve been in quite some time, and emerging economies still offer the world’s highest (albeit declining) growth rates. Fixed Income The U.S. fixed income market had a relatively flat year, as the Fed finally put an end to the question of “when,” and voted to raise its benchmark interest rate. The Barclays U.S. Aggregate Index was down 0.32% in December, to end the year with a gain of just 0.55%. In the U.S. Treasury arena, the yield on the benchmark 10-year note closed the year at 2.27%. This represented a gain of six and 10 basis points for the month and year, respectively. (A basis point is one one-hundredth of a percent.) For the full-year period, while rates increased across most maturities, the shape of the yield curve remained essentially unchanged. Among the various U.S. fixed income sectors, Treasury bills were the strongest performers in December, while high-yield bonds (also known as “junk” bonds) were the weakest. For the full-year period, intermediate-term U.S. Treasuries led the pack, while high-yield bonds, TIPS, and long-term U.S. Treasuries lost the most. For both periods, high-yield bonds were hit by a number of factors, including the category’s overexposure to the energy sector, and new competition for income from bond sectors that are generally considered less risky. What to Consider for 2016 : While more rate increases are expected by the Fed this year, the bond market may have already priced in some of these moves. Short-tem rates may continue to rise, though this could be tempered by surging demand from yield-starved investors. Long-term rates, which are more influenced by inflation and economic growth than by rate policy, could stay at current levels or rise slightly. If this scenario plays out, the expectation would be for longer-term bonds to outperform their shorter-term counterparts. The Bottom Line Like every year before it, 2015 was full of surprises. But what will happen in 2016? Of course, we can’t predict the future, but there’s one thing we know for certain. Because 2016 is an election year (and there’s no incumbent on the ballot), a new American president will be elected. Other themes that may play out in 2016 include: divergent monetary policy across developed economies (some countries loosening, others tightening); the consequences of higher domestic interest rates, whether intended or not; the effect of higher rates on corporations, particularly those that need to seek funding in the volatile high-yield market; and continued conflict in the Middle East. Plus, we’re sure there will be plenty of new surprises, which makes the financial markets so fascinating to watch and participate in. So what can investors do to prepare their portfolio for the changes ahead? As always, our best advice is fairly straightforward: Stay focused on the long term . Stick to a long-term investing plan by maintaining a risk-appropriate, well-diversified portfolio. This may help prepare one’s investments no matter which way the election goes, or whatever the news may bring. Consider rebalancing periodically to maintain target allocations . January can be a great time to review and refine one’s portfolio to stay in line with pre-set target allocations. This may mean selling some holdings that were relatively successful in 2015, and investing in sectors or regions that underperformed, while keeping in mind that there’s no guarantee of future performance. (If making transactions in a taxable account, it also helps to be mindful of any potential tax consequences.) While it may feel uncomfortable selling winners to buy losers, this strategy follows one of the basic tenets of investing for the long term.

5 Best Performing High Yield Mutual Funds Of 2015

Investors were lured to invest in high yield bond mutual funds following the financial crisis. And why not, as these funds were a better investment destination since there weren’t enough opportunities elsewhere to seek high yields. These funds provided better returns than those investing in securities with higher ratings, including government and corporate bonds. Also, due to their higher yield feature, these funds were less susceptible to interest rate fluctuations. High yield bond mutual funds provide the best choice for those looking to invest in below investment-grade bonds, also known as junk bonds. Talking of junk bonds, it surged an incredible 85% in 2011 since its Great Recession low and continued its winning run. However, in 2015, U.S. junk bonds registered their worst performance since 2008. Rate hike apprehensions throughout the year and finally the lift-off in December dealt a severe blow to these funds. Meanwhile, the weak Chinese economy raised concerns about future demand for oil, eventually dragging global oil prices down. This decline in oil prices also adversely affected junk bond funds. Activist shareholder, Carl Ichan, has tweeted: “Unfortunately I believe the meltdown in High Yield is just beginning.” Under such circumstances, investors may choose to stay away from high-yield mutual funds. Granted that the outlook is bleak, but still if you are a junk bond investor, we have presented those funds that have turned out to be the best gainers in 2015 despite several bottlenecks. These funds also possess a favorable Zacks Rank that should help these funds to continue gaining in 2016 as well. What Went Wrong for High-Yield Mutual Funds? In 2015, the high yield funds category lost an average 4.1%. Anticipation of a rate hike for the first time in nearly a decade and finally the Fed hiking its benchmark interest rates in December had a negative impact on the junk bond market. The Federal Reserve’s easy monetary policy for the last several years, which kept interest rates at record low, had been a boon for the junk bond market. Investors had flocked to this market in search of bigger payoffs. Following the Fed rate hike, net outflows from high-yield bond funds were $3.8 billion in the week ending Dec 16. It marked the third largest outflow on record and the largest since 2014, according to Lipper. During December, net outflows totaled $6.29 billion, higher than November’s net outflow of $3.3 billion. With this outflow, total outflow of high yield bond funds for 2015 came to $13.88 billion, with high-yield funds posting a negative flow in 7 out of 12 months of 2015. The adverse effect could easily be spotted when New York-based Third Avenue Management blocked investors from redeeming money from the near $1 billion Third Avenue Focused Credit Fund (MUTF: TFCVX ) last December. The failure and the embargo on investors on withdrawals also highlighted the concerns related to liquidity in corporate bond markets. The continuous slide in commodity prices also affected junk bond funds. Decline in commodity prices means that energy and material companies may soon have trouble repaying their debts, as they constitute a major portion of the high-yield bond market. Fears about economic slowdown and market volatility in China were instrumental in the plunge in commodity prices. Fed Rate Hike Through 2015, Fed rate hike expectation kept high-yield funds under pressure. Ultimately, on Dec 16, the Fed raised its key interest rate for the first time in nearly a decade. The Fed increased its short-term borrowing rate to a range of 0.25% to 0.50%. Meanwhile, the Fed stressed that the pace of rate hikes will be ‘gradual’ in nature. The junk bond market had been a strong beneficiary of low interest rate and capital had flowed strongly into the debt sector. However, the lift-off spooked investors and they started exiting junk bond positions. Weak Chinese Economy and Oil Price Slump China’s economy and financial markets suffered for a large part of 2015. Economic data remained weak through the year though markets soared during the first half of 2015. Ultimately, markets crashed over a two and a half month period, erasing nearly $5 trillion in value terms. A bubble had built up steadily and valuations had hit levels which were difficult to justify. Weak Chinese economic data raised concerns about decelerating growth in the world’s second largest consumer of oil, which eventually dragged oil prices down. Additionally, persistent supply glut and a stronger dollar also adversely affected oil prices. Price of a barrel of U.S. crude was down more than 30% in 2015 from year-ago levels. Meanwhile, the U.S. economy hardly helped high yield funds in 2015. For the first three months, it expanded at an annual rate of 0.6%. The growth was mostly affected by harsh winter weather and disruptions in West Coast ports. However, the economy picked up pace in the second quarter, gaining 3.9%, but slowed down to a gain of 2% in the third quarter. Best Performing High-Yield Mutual Funds in 2015 In 2015, the junk bond market had a torrid ride due to decreasing liquidity within and rising borrowing costs. Moreover, concerns about junk-rated energy and material companies’ ability to repay debts due to fall in commodity prices continued to weigh on junk bonds. As declines outweighed gains, the funds finishing in the green could post only modest gains. Below we present the best-performing high yield mutual funds of 2015, which are under Zacks Mutual Fund coverage. We have considered those funds that have a minimum initial investment of $5000 and net assets over $50 million. From the above list, we present the top five best-performing high yield mutual funds of last year. These funds also possess a relatively low expense ratio and boast a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #1 (Strong Buy). The Aquila Three Peaks High Income Y (MUTF: ATPYX ) seeks high current income. ATPYX invests a large portion of its assets in income-producing securities. Its portfolio includes high-yield/high-risk securities rated below investment grade. ATPYX currently carries a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #1. ATPYX’s 3-year and 5-year annualized returns are 3.6% and 4.8%, respectively. Annual expense ratio of 0.94% is lower than the category average of 1.06%. The Buffalo High-Yield Fund (MUTF: BUFHX ) invests a major portion of its net assets in higher yielding, higher-risk fixed income securities. BUFHX currently carries a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #1. BUFHX’s 3-year and 5-year annualized returns are 4.1% and 5.2%, respectively. Annual expense ratio of 1.02% is lower than the category average of 1.06%. The Credit Suisse Floating Rate High Income Fund (MUTF: CHIAX ) seeks high current income. CHIAX invests in a diversified portfolio of high yield and high risk fixed income securities (junk bonds). CHIAX currently carries a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #1. CHIAX’s 3-year and 5-year annualized returns are 2.3% and 4%, respectively. Annual expense ratio of 0.95% is lower than the category average of 1.07%. The Wells Fargo Short-Term High Yield Bond Fund (MUTF: SSTHX ) seeks total return and invests primarily in medium and lower quality corporate debt obligations. SSTHX currently carries a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #1. SSTHX’s 3-year and 5-year annualized returns are 1.9% and 3.1%, respectively. Annual expense ratio of 0.81% is lower than the category average of 1.06%. The MassMutual Premier High Yield Fund (MUTF: MPHZX ) seeks to achieve a high level of total return and mostly invests in high yield debt and related securities. MPHZX currently carries a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #1. MPHZX’s 3-year and 5-year annualized returns are 3.8% and 10.1%, respectively. Annual expense ratio of 0.55% is lower than the category average of 1.06%. Link to the original post on Zacks.com