Tag Archives: cafd

SunPower Blasts Q4 Views; But Q1, 2016 Outlooks Lag Wall Street

No. 2 solar installer SunPower ( SPWR ) smashed Wall Street’s Q4 expectations late Wednesday but guided to Q1 sales that halved analyst views. SunPower stock seesawed in after-hours trading, trending up a fraction, having risen 2.2% in Wednesday’s regular session. Shares closed 2015 up 16% for the year, topping IBD’s 23-company Energy-Solar industry group, which ended the year up 1%. For Q4 ended Jan. 3, SunPower reported $1.36 billion in sales ex items and $1.73 earnings per share minus items, up 124% and 563%, respectively, vs. the year-earlier quarter. The company pulled in $900 million alone after completing its 135-megawatt Quinto commercial project in Merced County, Calif., CFO Chuck Boynton told analysts during the late Wednesday conference call. Power plants accounted for 77% of Q4 sales. Both sales and EPS ex items topped the consensus model of 16 analysts polled by Thomson Reuters for $1.27 billion and $1.52. Three months ago, SunPower guided to $1.25 billion-$1.3 billion in sales. During Q4, SunPower deployed 280 MW, down 10% vs. the year-earlier quarter but in line with its guidance for 275 MW to 305 MW. Among those deployments, SunPower counts a 100-MW project for Nevada’s NV Energy and a 36-MW project for Mexican airport Aeropuertos Del Sureste. And China remains a solar bright spot, SunPower CEO Tom Werner said on the call. Regulations and subsidies have helped China lead the world in terms of solar installations. “Demand in China remains robust,” he said. “We are committed to the Chinese market as a long-term driver of growth.” Q1 Sales Ex Items Guided To Fall 27% SunPower wrapped up the year with $2.6 billion in sales ex items and $2.17 EPS minus items, flat and up 63%, respectively, vs. 2014. That beat respective consensus views for $2.53 billion and $1.97. In November, SunPower guided to $2.5 billion to $2.55 billion in sales ex items. SunPower doesn’t give EPS guidance. The company deployed 1.15 gigawatts in 2015, touching the bottom line of its guidance for 1.15 GW to 1.18 GW. Current-quarter and 2016 views lagged the consensus. For Q1, SunPower guided to $290 million to $340 million in sales ex items, which would be down 27% at the midpoint. Wall Street expected $675.7 million in sales ex items and 33 cents EPS minus items. SunPower expects to deploy 315 MW to 340 MW in Q1, up from 266 MW in the year-earlier quarter. For the year, SunPower guided to $3.2 billion to $3.4 billion in sales minus items, missing the consensus model for $3.42 billion. Analysts expect $1.60 EPS ex items. Guidance for 1.7 GW to 2 GW deployed in 2016 would narrowly top the 2015 metric. Werner credited cost reductions, scaling and innovations, and regulatory support for “a landmark year” for the solar market in 2015. In late December, Congress voted in a five-year extension to the Investment Tax Credit on solar energy. The ITC was originally set to expire Dec. 31, 2016, prompting a 2017 “cliff” in installations. Also in 2015, Obama unveiled his Clean Power Plan with the goal of reducing carbon emissions by power plants, and 196 countries pledged to cut carbon emissions during a Paris climate summit. To capture share, SunPower is planning to heighten investments in the U.S., where solar is expected to account for only 3% of total power generation by 2020, Werner said. “We expect the five-year (ITC) extension should drive acceleration through 2020,” he said. “The scale of demand in the U.S. is huge, and we are planning to increase our spending here in the near term.” Canadian Solar Tops Views First Solar ( FSLR ) leads SunPower as the No. 1 solar company, with a $6.4 billion market cap to SunPower’s $3.2 billion. Together, the two formed yield company 8point3 Energy Partners ( CAFD ) last August. Canadian Solar ‘s ( CSIQ ) late Tuesday preannounced some results, posting Q4 sales and total solar module shipments that busted Wall Street expectations, FBR analyst Carter Driscoll wrote in a research report. Canadian Solar expects to report $1.02 billion to $1.07 billion in Q4 sales vs. analyst forecasts for $930 million to $980 million, Driscoll wrote. The company also upped its Q4 shipments guide to 1.35 GW to 1.4 GW, up 4% at the midpoint vs. earlier views. For 2016, Canadian Solar sees total shipments hitting 4.63 GW to 4.68 GW vs. prior expectations for 4.15 GW to 4.2 GW, and $3.35 billion to $3.4 billion in sales. Earlier views were for $3.28 billion to $3.33 billion. Canadian Solar stock jumped 18% Tuesday on that news, but they fell a fraction Wednesday.

Will Nevada Net-Metering Vote Cripple Solar Financing?

Key subsidies, Credit Suisse analyst Patrick Jobin says, will make residential rooftop solar economical in 2017 for 49 states. Nevada won’t be among them. In December, the Nevada Public Utilities Commission (PUC) voted unanimously to overhaul its net-metering program — slashing payments for energy fed back into the grid and raising solar customers’ base rates. It was a stark reminder for solar companies, investors and customers that the residential solar market still relies heavily on subsidies and favorable regulation. The decision prompted installers SolarCity ( SCTY ) and Sunrun ( RUN ) to shutter their Nevada operations. SolarCity is chaired by Tesla ( TSLA ) CEO Elon Musk. Tesla is building a massive battery facility in Nevada. Nevada could still grandfather all existing solar customers for 20 years — a vote is scheduled for Feb. 8 — but the damage is done, S&P Capital analyst Angelo Zino says. “Clearly, you’re not going to have the opportunity you’ve had in recent years in that market,” he told IBD. “Given that, in our view, demand is going to hit the floor in Nevada.” He added: “I’d expect greater caution all around.” Banks Continue Financing Solar That greater caution could land on banking shoulders, Zino says. But it’s not likely, Jobin told IBD. On Jan. 19, Sunrun and Investec Bank closed $250 million of senior secured credit facility to fund continued residential solar growth, according to the press release. Less than a week later, SolarCity finalized its fifth securitization of loans — the world’s first securitization of distributed solar loans — for $185 million. Credit Suisse helped finalize the deal, according to the press release. And on Jan. 25, SolarCity closed a $160 million, five-year debt facility with the help of Bank of America Merrill Lynch, KeyBank and Silicon Valley Bank. “These three financings were when Nevada was still retroactively sticking with the new rates,” Jobin said. “I’m not concerned by financing markets taking Nevada’s ruling and suggesting every state will follow through.” He added: “We do not think (Nevada’s decision) sets precedent for elsewhere. And clearly finance providers also do not think it sets precedent.” The problem is, growing the residential solar market takes an enormous amount of capital. Jobin estimates the U.S. industry will need $10 billion in capital to grow the 2016 residential market. Financing the volatile solar market is risky, Barclays analyst Jon Windham says. “You’re betting on incremental projects and long-term growth with these companies, not their 20-year contracts with customers,” he said. On the bright side, SolarCity’s need for internal financing to build its infrastructure continues to plunge as the company grows, while Sunrun doesn’t have the same fixed costs, he told IBD. But “these are fragile business models that do require continuous access to capital,” he said. “Capital markets do freeze, and these companies can’t grow without access to capital.” A Credit Problem, Not Solar Nevada accounts for about 3% of the U.S. solar market vs. California, which comprises half of all installed bases, Jobin estimates. California’s rules are especially solar-friendly. In a 3-2 decision, California regulators recently upheld net-metering payments for solar customers — a decision that SolarCity, SunPower ( SPWR ), Sunrun and the Solar Energy Industries Association loudly applauded. Utilities complain that residential solar customers don’t pay for the full cost of operating and maintaining the electricity grid. But in Nevada, solar-friendly regulations were in nascent stages in December when the PUC voted to overhaul its net-metering program. The decision came days after Congress voted to extend the Investment Tax Credit on solar. Analysts say that without the ITC, which underpins the industry, solar demand would have hit a cliff in 2017, following its expiration on Dec. 31, 2016. Leasing also helped the industry grow. According to Utility Dive, third-party-ownership — a model used by Sunrun outside California — “changed residential solar by bringing billions in institutional money into the sector to drive out the high-upfront-cost adoption barrier.” Zino saw leasing programs fill out the solar market in 2011-2013. “Solar was murky from 2012-2013, as we saw significant reductions in incentives across the globe,” he said. “It was around that point that financing vehicles started to become more popular across the globe.” Could banks hesitate to underwrite solar leasing programs? Windham says no. “You essentially have a portfolio of consumer loans with 750-plus FICA score customers, and it’s attached to your house as collateral,” he said. “If, as a market, we can’t do that level of customer finance, we have a real problem in the credit market.” Going The Way Of Arizona, Hawaii Wall Street slammed solar stocks under the pall of the Nevada net-metering decision. On Dec. 22, as the PUC debated, IBD’s 22-company Energy-Solar industry group fell 4.1%. The group has continued to tumble, though it hit a near-term bottom on Jan. 20, along with the general market. That’s what Nevada’s solar demand is going to look like, say Windham, Jobin and Zino. But SunPower CFO and 8point3 Energy Partners ( CAFD ) CEO Chuck Boynton disagrees. This is the time to innovate, he says. “I think Nevada is going to be an amazing solar market,” he told IBD. “What you’ll see is companies like us developing technology to deal with policy.” Boynton is referring to solar storage, a pie-in-the-sky ideal for the solar industry. Right now, SunPower’s Energy Link lets customers “use our system to control demand to effectively self-consume their energy.” Tesla Motors sells Powerwall batteries for residential power storage, but generous net-metering policies in most states make the batteries uneconomic for most homeowners. Jobin isn’t as sunny on Nevada’s solar future. He expects that the state will likely go the way of Hawaii and Arizona. Hawaii — 14% solar penetrated — just resolved a net-metering battle that preserved retail rates for existing solar customers, but new customers will have to choose between two less lucrative options. “Growth came to a screeching halt while these policies were being debated,” Jobin said. In Arizona, utilities Salt River Project and Arizona Public Service have submitted proposals to gut net-metering policies. The SRP proposal was successful and hiked rates for solar customers who purchased their systems after Dec. 31, 2014. “As a consequence, growth fell off the cliff for that region,” he said. Windham says that some customers in Nevada will be willing to purchase solar systems outright — usually at a $20,000 price tag. “Some people will still do solar, because they want to do it, because they want clean energy,” he said. “But we’re much closer to zero (demand in Nevada) than we were a year ago. You really need net metering for rooftop solar to work. Without that net metering, the economics don’t really work.”

Trading The Solar Earnings Season

In May, when TAN and KWT were near their peaks, we warned investors about the risks of these assets. A large number of these risks have been mitigated and on balance we feel a lot more optimistic about these ETFs. We expect most of the strong solar companies to outperform this earnings season and see TAN as a buy at this level. In May, when the solar ETFs were trading close to their peaks, we have written about Guggenheim Solar ETF (NYSEARCA: TAN ), Market Vectors Solar Energy Index ETF (NYSEARCA: KWT ) and identified the risk factors in these ETFs . At that time, TAN was trading in the $47+ range and KWT was trading in the $86+ range. Since the writing of the article, two of the risk factors materialized when Yingli Green Energy (NYSE: YGE ) and Hanergy Thin Film ( OTC:HNGSF ) collapsed causing a sector wide downdraft and triggering big losses at both the ETFs. Another risk factor in the form of solar assets also seems to have burst leading to a significant compression in the Yieldco space. At the time this article is being written, TAN was trading at $34+ and KWT at $64+. With losses around 30% from the peak, the question is if these ETFs have now reached an acceptable level of risk. To assess the current risk, we look back at the risk factors we identified earlier and review the status of the risk factors. 1. Hanergy: As we discussed earlier, Hanergy constituted about 12% of TAN and 8% of KWT. With the drop in Hanergy’s valuation prior to the stoppage of trading, and subsequent rebalancing of portfolios, Hanergy has been eliminated out of TAN but still accounts for about 2.5% of KWT holdings. However, we believe that this company is worth close to “0” and, therefore, there is still about 2.5% downside risk for KWT. 2. Solar Asset Bubble: Companies in this category include SolarCity (NASDAQ: SCTY ), Vivint Solar (NYSE: VSLR ), TerraForm Power (NASDAQ: TERP ), 8point3 Energy Partners (NASDAQ: CAFD ), and several other YieldCos. a. SolarCity remains a bubble as the macro environment for the company’s business model continues to deteriorate . In our view, fair valuation of SolarCity is likely around $15 compared to the current $57+ level. In other words, this component may have about 75% downside risk. b. The situation with Vivint Solar has now been mitigated due to its acquisition by SunEdison (NYSE: SUNE ) and TerraForm Power. As such, that acquisition along with other macro factors appears to have destroyed the valuation of SunEdison. c. For TerraForm Power, 8point3 Energy, NRG Yield (NYSE: NYLD ) and similar YieldCos, we believe the yields from these vehicles should be between 8 to 12% depending on the type of assets. These yields are for US-based assets and the actual yields should be adjusted for risk and growth potential. These yields have been increasing lately and, considering the current yields, we believe much of the Yieldco risk has now been mitigated. However, we see potential for another 25% valuation compression in this group of stocks. In spite of this additional downside, we believe this risk is substantially less than what it was at the time of our May missive. 3. Debt-laden companies: Several heavily indebted companies like Yingli Green Energy, China Sunergy (NASDAQ: CSUN ), Renesola (NYSE: SOL ), and GCL Poly ( OTCPK:GCPEF ) are likely to get reorganized, see a dramatic valuation compression, and may cease to exist altogether. While the recent downtrend at these companies have shaved off about 50% of the risk in these equities, we believe that this is just a start. We see the potential valuation compression for this group at near 100%. 4. ITC step-down risk: This risk is difficult to estimate since much depends on political action. We believe that the ITC expiration is likely to affect only a small set of US-centric companies such as SolarCity, Vivint Solar and RGS Energy (NASDAQ: RGSE ). We expect companies with strong IP (ex: First Solar) and companies with international projects to fare well post this event. The flipside of the risk argument, as we have noted before, is that strong solar companies will continue to perform well and grow. These strong companies include: First Solar (NASDAQ: FSLR ), SunEdison, SunPower (NASDAQ: SPWR ), Canadian Solar (NASDAQ: CSIQ ), JinkoSolar (NYSE: JKS ), and Trina Solar (NYSE: TSL ). The appreciation potential for this group of companies is substantial and, in many cases, may be as much as 2 to 4 times their current valuation. Each of these stocks could potentially overcome the headwinds one or more of the equities identified in the risk section above. We expect nearly all strong solar companies that we mention above to do better than guidance in Q2. The positive results could alter the negative sentiment for the sector and quickly build significant momentum in several of the names and potentially drive TAN and KWT through the earnings season. As such, we are believers of the solar growth story and we expect the growth aspects to overcome the risks in the ETF over time. While TAN and KWT are likely to be highly volatile for the 12 to 24 months, in the context of trading opportunities, it appears to us that the solar equities have taken a considerable undeserved beating in Q2 and are due for correction on the upside. Of these two ETFs, we prefer TAN to KWT and see it being a better value ahead of the earnings season. For long-term investors interested in less long-term volatility and a more solid asset growth, a better option would be to pick a basket of strong solar companies instead of investing in TAN or KWT. Our sentiment on TAN: Buy Editor’s Note: This article covers one or more stocks trading at less than $1 per share and/or with less than a $100 million market cap. Please be aware of the risks associated with these stocks. Disclosure: I am/we are long FSLR, SUNE, JKS, TSL, CSIQ, JASO. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.