Tag Archives: brazil

Targeting 35% Upside For The AES Corporation

Summary We are adding the AES Corporation to our “buy” list. Both the fundamental and technical analyses indicate a potential for a 35% gain over the next few years. The key risk is our assumption that cash flows do not materially deviate from their long-term uptrend. Introduction The AES Corporation (NYSE: AES ) has been exposed to a number of headwinds recently, most notably falling energy prices across the globe, rapidly appreciating U.S. Dollar and weak demand coming from the emerging markets, particularly Brazil, Argentina and Colombia. The most recent negative surprise was the Q3 revenue miss of as much as $1.5bn, which prompted the management to revise down their 2016 earnings guidance below analyst estimates. Cost cutting measures have been put forward to offset the macroeconomic headwinds by 2018 and we see them as a necessary adjustment. It is difficult to judge whether they work out as planned, but it is encouraging to see that the leadership is taking the appropriate steps to keep the business viable. Furthermore, Andres Gluski (the CEO) emphasized their focus on free cash flow as a source of shareholder value, and we believe that this is an appropriate measure for estimation of AES Corporation’s long-term investment value. Valuation Our valuation model for AES is based on the company’s ability to generate cash. The key measure of cash flows that we use is free cash flow, which is the total cash inflow from operations minus the dividends and capital expenditure outlays. This is effectively the amount of “excess” cash that the company is making and therefore accruing to its lenders and shareholders. While we do look at historic cash flows, cash flows projections are of crucial importance because markets are forward looking. Our estimated cash flows for the next 10 years are simply based on the previous trend, as we do not have access to analyst estimates for AES. After 10 years, we assume that the growth rate of cash flows falls back to its previous trend and remains on it for the next 10 years, after which it normalizes towards the sustainable rate of 3.9% per annum, based on the average real GDP growth over the last 15 years and the average inflation rate of 2%. The chart below shows the historic (blue line) and projected free cash flows (red line). (click to enlarge) To calculate the total value of the firm, we discount the projected cash flows and the company’s terminal value by its weighted average cost of capital ( OTC:WACC ). Our estimate of AES’s cost of debt is 7.28%, based on their interest expense and amount of debt outstanding in the last fiscal year. The cost of equity is calculated using the 10 year treasury yield as the “risk-free” proxy plus the implied equity risk premium of 9.13% times the historic beta of 1.1675 for the stock. Some of the other key metrics summarized below: •Beta = 1.17 •ERP = 5.98% •Cost of Debt = 7.28% •Cost of equity = 9.13% •Debt to Assets = 54.45% •WACC = 7.73% •Current Price = $9.9 •Fair Price = $26.52 (167.9% return) After discounting the projected free cash flows and the company’s terminal value in 10 years’ time, we subtract the current value of debt and arrive at the total equity value of 17,887,985, which equates to $26.52 per share. With today’s share price at $9.9, re-pricing towards the estimated fair value would require a return of 167.9%. The green line in the below chart represents the estimated “fair value” per share, with the dashed lines showing the upper and lower bounds of the confidence interval based on stock’s volatility. (click to enlarge) Relative Valuation American Electric Power Company (NYSE: AEP ), Pinnacle West Cap. (NYSE: PNW ), Firstenergy (NYSE: FE ), Nrg Energy (NYSE: NRG ), Consolidated Edison (NYSE: ED ), Cms Energy (NYSE: CMS ), Dte Energy (NYSE: DTE ), Entergy (NYSE: ETR ), Nextera Energy (NYSE: NEE ), Dominion Resources (NYSE: D ), Xcel Energy (NYSE: XEL ), Exelon (NYSE: EXC ), Ppl (PP and), Pg&E (NYSE: PCG ), Pub.ser.enter.gp. (NYSE: PEG ), Edison Intl. (NYSE: EIX ), Southern (NYSE: SO ), Teco Energy (NYSE: TE ), Pepco Holdings (NYSE: POM ), Eversource Energy (NU) are AES’s closest peers within the S&P 500. The table below can help us understand AES’s valuation in relative terms. Table 1: Relative Valuation Table, S&P 500 peers AES AEP PNW … Median Lower Quartile Upper Quartile PE 11.60 15.10 17.20 … 16.90 13.23 20.50 PC 2.48 6.31 6.33 … 6.31 4.81 6.83 PB 1.63 1.58 1.57 … 1.61 1.56 1.75 ROE 17.02 10.13 9.46 … 10.13 9.08 11.51 EPS Growth (5 year) -1.03 2.39 39.79 … 1.03 -1.73 6.80 Beta 1.17 0.58 0.72 … 0.59 0.55 0.69 AES Corporation benefits from very low price multiples, which indicates that the bad news are already in the price. price to earnings ratio of 11.6x is below the lower quartile for the group (13.2x). The same is the case for the price to cash flow and price to book multiples, currently standing at 2.5x and 1.6x, respectively. (click to enlarge) Even more importantly, the price to book ratio of 1.6x looks very attractive in the context of the return on equity of 17.0%. The chart above shows that this makes the company look significantly undervalued relative to peers, given the current industry relationship between this price multiple and underlying profitability. The stock looks attractive from the technical perspective as well. While in the short term the price could fall to as low as 8.6%, a failure to break below this level would confirm the wedge-like formation in play, targeting roughly 35% upside, depending on the timeframe. While a potential break below the support would imply further short term weakness, we see current price as an opportunity to buy due to the 2.5 times greater upside. Of course, if rate hikes in the U.S. push the U.S. dollar higher, investors will need to exercise more patience until the target is reached. (click to enlarge) Conclusion In summary, the company leadership has already taken action to counter the unfavorable impact of macroeconomic developments across the globe. The cost cutting measures that are aiming to support the free cash flow generation through 2018 may or may not work as planned, but investors should focus on risk management and diversification rather than crystal ball gazing. Our discounted cash flow model indicates roughly 35% upside (the lower end of the fair value range, the conservative target), which is also supported by long-term technicals. AES Corporation looks significantly undervalued relative to peers as well, thereby ticking all our boxes. As a result, we are adding this stock to our “buy” list today.

A Juicy 5% Yield From Emerging Markets But Be Aware Of The Risks

Summary The SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF has a yield of over 5% but dividend inconsistency and region exposure make it a risky proposition. The fund has sizeable positions in China and Brazil – two areas that have been hotbeds of political turmoil. The fund has underperformed the broad MSCI Emerging Markets index since its inception and an above average beta suggests a fund that comes with risks. Income-seeking investors often look to familiar sectors like financials and utilities to generate a higher yield from their equities. A place that investors may not consider for dividend income is emerging markets but, believe it or not, there are some significant yields in this space. The SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (NYSEARCA: EDIV ) has been around for over four years and boasts a little over $300M in assets. Since its inception, the fund has trailed the iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (NYSEARCA: EEM ) and one of its larger competitors, the WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income ETF (NYSEARCA: DEM ) on a total return basis. EDIV Total Return Price data by YCharts The 5% yield is no doubt tantalizing but it’s important to recognize how that dividend is achieved and how much risk is involved in obtaining it. Not surprisingly, the fund has performed poorly as emerging markets have been hammered over the last year or more. The fund is down a total of 24% over the past one-year period and 35% since inception. The fund is fairly well diversified across the broad economy. The fund has 5% or higher allocations to eight different sectors with communications and technology stocks accounting for roughly 40% of total fund assets. More conservative areas like financials, industrials and basic materials count 30% of the portfolio bringing overall portfolio risk down although a 3 year beta of 1.16 suggests a more aggressive portfolio when compared to emerging markets overall. While ETF Database indicates this portfolio has one-third of its assets in “developed” markets, a look at the fund’s country and region allocation shows its exposure to primarily less developed and risky markets. China (10% of fund assets) for all of the volatility it has experienced over the past year is actually one of the fund’s better performing regions. Brazil (8%) has been the worst performer among the fund’s larger allocations due to the political unrest resulting from the Dilma Rousseff regime. Other regions like Taiwan (27%), South Africa (14%) and Turkey (9%) are all down double digits in the one-year period. Another risk comes from the quarterly dividend volatility. Income seekers looking for a predictable quarterly dividend should probably look elsewhere. Historically, most of the fund’s annual dividends come in the 2nd and 3rd quarter and trail off to minimal levels in the 1st and 4th quarters. Trailing 12-month dividend yields were down below 4% during the summer of 2014 and have risen to their current level of 5.16% thanks in part to the fund’s share price drop. The fund has paid $1.342 per share in dividends over the past four quarters compared to $1.645 per share in the four quarters prior to that. Conclusion This ETF has been able to consistently deliver annualized yields of over 4% but there’s a great deal of volatility involved to get there. Global economic weakness has hit emerging markets hard over the past year and the dividend is just one piece to consider here. The quarterly dividend payments are very inconsistent and the fund has larger exposures to areas with significant political and economic risks. This ETF has a place in a broader portfolio as a smaller high risk high return position but those looking for a predictable income producing investment should probably look elsewhere.

The Global X FTSE Portugal 20 ETF: The Case Of The Double Edged Sword

Portugal may have decided to end its EU support too soon. The domestic corporate structure is too diversified, involving many holding companies. The private banking system has remained weakened by a 2014 default. For Europe’s smaller economies, European Union membership, as well as adopting the Euro has been a double edged sword. The idea was for commerce to have the same ease of access similar to the United States of America. Imagine, if you will, what it would be like if goods in Pennsylvania had to make border stops, use passports or visas and pay tariffs as they crossed the New Jersey, then New York, then Connecticut state’s borders! It’s difficult to imagine, but that’s essentially how European nations conducted cross border business before the EEC. Without those ‘technical, legal and bureaucratic barriers’, smaller European economies, such as Portugal, not only had an unimaginably large market for its products, but now had a new employment opportunities for its citizens as well as the potential to expand its manufacturing and financial services base. The ‘icing on the EU cake’ was being able to do away with unstable legacy currencies and adopt the Euro, further leveling the playing field. Indeed, the EU economy expanded pulling along the smaller economies but at an unsustainable rate. When the global credit market collapsed in 2008, the other edge of the sword cut smaller economies to pieces, causing a deep recession, high unemployment and unsustainable debt to GDP ratios, literally putting many governments on the edge of bankruptcy. Since then, the EU has had a slow, uneven recovery. However, having the support of the larger community, many smaller economies have pulled back from the brink of disaster. This is the point: is this the right time to establish a position in the smaller EU economies, such as Portugal? If the investor wished to, there seems to be one available ETF: the Global X FTSE Portugal 20 ETF (NYSEARCA: PGAL ) . The premise for risking your hard earned savings is based on the old Wall Street premise to ” buy low and sell high .” The question is whether the worst is over for Portugal and what the potential is, versus the risk. If a picture is worth a thousand words, the potential for capital appreciation might be interpreted by the fund’s chart since inception in November of 2013. (click to enlarge) The fund closed its first day of trading at $15.05. Within four months the ETF gained 22.8%. At that time, the entire EU economy was struggling with deflation. At the June meeting, ECB President Draghi imposed negative interest rates. Portugal was experiencing a nascent recovery. Portugal’s sovereigns had also recovered. Now able to finance the government on its own to meet its budget the government passed on a scheduled final EU bailout tranche. German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble noted that: Portugal is now managing without European aid and can stand on its own two feet. That’s a big success. However, within months, a subsidiary of one of Portugal’s major financial institutions missed a debt repayment. Banco Espirito Santo ( OTCPK:BKESY ) , the parent company, had its shares suspended from trading. The Portuguese stock market fell sharply. The default put the entire Portuguese banking system into question. This is an important issue to understand before investing in Portugal through the fund. However, Portugal’s economic stability goes further than the banks. It’s worth examining the fund’s holdings. First, it’s difficult to separate the fund into sectors. For example although classified as a Telecommunications services company, Sonacom (OTC: OTC:SOVTY ) also provides IT services with software and system information services. Sonae Capital (OTC: OTC:SGPMY ) is listed separately as a Consumer Discretionary company and also as a Consumer non-cyclical. Sonae is in the Hospitality and Recreation industry as well as retail food services, superstores, supermarkets, and drug stores. The Sonae brands fall under the management of one holding company. On a larger scale this is not out of the ordinary. However, this seems typical in Portugal’s small economy. Consumer non-cyclical and Discretionary Symbol Market Cap (USD Billions) Yield Payout Ratio P/E Price to Cash flow Total Debt to Equity Primary Business Jeronimo Martins OTCPK:JRONY $7.520 1.86% NA 26.97 13.38 23.84 Retail food, distribution; supermarkets, drug stores. Portugal and Poland Sonae SGPMY $2.00 3.30% 38.03 11.46 6.04 61.62 Retail food; superstores, supermarkets, franchise outlets; sporting goods, fashion and electronics Sonae Capital SGPMY $0.101 0.00% 0.00% 150 6.49 42.82 Tourism and Hospitality; resorts, marina, catering, fitness and golf courses Second, the quality of the Financial Services metrics indicates the underlying weakness in the sector. It was difficult to determine any metrics of Banif Banco Internacion do Fuchal (Lisbon: Banif) as it is a privately held company. The bank provides a broad range of banking services from retail to corporate, as well as asset management and insurance. Another of the holdings is Banco Espirto Santo ( OTCPK:BKESF ) , the bank which triggered Portugal’s banking crises shortly after the government had successfully restored its credibility in the sovereign debt market. Financial Symbol Market Cap (USD Billions) Yield Payout Ratio P/E Price to Cash flow Total Debt to Equity Primary Business Banco BPI OTCPK:BBSPY $1.46 0.00% 0.00% 82.27 9.54 57.63 Banking Services; corporate, institutional, retail, insurance, credit cards. Subsidiaries in Angola and Mozambique Banco Commercial Portugues OTCPK:BPCGY $2.85 0.00% 0.00% 67.95 11.94 149.69 Privately owned; financial services; asset management, mortgages, consumer credit, insurance Banco Espirito Santo Lisbon: BES $0.613 0.00 0.00 NA NA 237.84 Domestic, corporate and retail banking; credit cards, debit cards, savings accounts, management and insurance One bright spot is the Utilities sector, two of the holdings having respectable yields and one of those has a sustainable payout ratio. Utility Symbol Market Cap (USD Billions) Yield Payout Ratio P/E Price to Cash flow Total Debt to Equity Primary Business Energias de Portugal OTC:ELCPF $9.64 5.39% 17.64% of cash flow 11.69 3.62 225.55 Electric and gas in Portugal and Spain Renovaveis OTC:EDRVF $5.22 0.61% 47.56% 34.57 7.25 81.00 Spain based; renewable energy; hydro, wind, solar, tidal and biomass; EU, Brazil, Canada and US Redes Energeticas Naciona OTC:RENZF $0.810 6.14% 14.6% of cash flow 9.52 2.47 206.08 High voltage transmission; electricity; natural gas transmission and storage Portugal’s Basic Materials is concentrated in cements and cement related products. What is a very interesting feature of Portugal’s industrial Sector is its presence in Africa as well as South America, particularly in Brazil. On one hand this is a ‘plus’ as these companies provide their services in regions with a high growth potential like Egypt and South Africa. On the other had the investments in Brazil presents a problem for the fund as Brazil’s economy has recently been brought to a halt, along with a sharp currency devaluation, because of the collapse of commodity prices as well as a political scandal. Basic Materials Symbol Market Cap (USD Billions) Yield Payout Ratio P/E Price to Cash flow Total Debt to Equity Primary Business Portucel Lisbon: PTI $2.68 11.26% 104.94 14.42 9.26 47.89 Paper pulp, craft pulp Cimpor-Cimentos De Portugal OTC:CDPGY $0.320 0.55% nil 17.10 1.58 503.71 Cement and aggregate (clinker); ready-mix; Portugal, Egypt, Cape Verde, Angola, Mozembique, South Africa, Brazil, Argentina and Paraguay The Telecom Services are run-of-the-mill as far as the Telecom Sectors go. However it does present another example which lends to the confusion of how some holdings should be classified. Pharol (OTC: OTCPK:PTGCY ) is described as a ‘capital management company’ with a 27% holding interest in Brazilian Telecom Oi (Brazil: OIBR4) . Pharol seems to be more of a hedge fund specializing in the Telecommunications Services Sector, while also investing in other holding companies. Telecom Symbol Market Cap (USD Billions) Yield Payout Ratio P/E Price to Cash flow Total Debt to Equity Primary Business NOS SGPS OTCPK:ZONMY $3.53 1.86% 72.07% 45.12 8.81 98.06 Cable, Satellite, movies, series sports and children programming, mobile and landline voice, data Pharol SGPS PTGCY $0.338 24.10% NA NA NA 0.00 Capital management of Brazilian and Portuguese Telecoms Sonacom SOVTY $0.598 2.13% 30% of cash flow 14.15 12.63 0.94 Telecom mobile and landline; voice, data, television; also some IT software and system information Portugal’s industrials are focused on paper-pulp manufacturing. There are three paper-pulp manufactures in the fund, two of which fit into the Industrials Sector and one in Materials. There’s one major construction company, Mota Engil (OTC: OTC:MTELY ) providing engineering and construction including transportation infrastructure and then managing those projects after completion. Industrials Symbol Market Cap (USD Billions) Yield Payout Ratio P/E Price to Cash flow Total Debt to Equity Primary Business Correios de Portugal OTC:CTTPY $1.295 4.89% NA 18.95 14.70 0.57 Courier services, parcel delivery; financial services, transfers, money orders, digital mail Altri SGPS OTC:ASGSY $0.890 1.68% 74% of cash flow 9.87 6.56 192.25 Paper pulp; generates electricity from waste biomass Semapa-Sociedade de Investimento e Gestao OTC:SEMMY $0.967 2.88% 40.50 14.29 3.18 NA Paper pulp, cement, pre-casts, recycling of cooking oil. Tunisia, Angola, Poland, France Mota Engil SGPS OTC:MTELY $0.445 5.02% 12.8% of cash flow 15.26 2.50 485.19 Engineering, Construction; Environment and Transportation construction and management Lastly, there’s one position in the energy sector, a holding company, GALP Energia (OTC: OTC:GLPEF ) . Galp Energia produces, refines and markets gasoline and petroleum products. Another segment provides oil exploration services in 40 countries. Energy Symbol Market Cap (USD Billions) Yield Payout Ratio P/E Price to Cash flow Total Debt to Equity Primary Business GALP Energia GLPEF $7.06 3.78% N/A N/A 12.74 65.61 Holding Company, energy exploration, production As far as the fund metrics, management fees total 0.61% compared to the industry average of 0.44%. It’s a small fund with about $37.5 million in net assets. Since its November 2013 inception its cumulative return is -26.85% and an average annualized return of -14.70%. The price to earnings for 2015 is 15.37 and price to book 1.35. When referring back to the price history chart, it looks like the fund might be a really good opportunity for a capital appreciation investment. However, upon closer inspection, it was really too far out in front of its potential when it reached its all-time high of $18.48. Further, the private banking sector really needed a restructuring before the government ended the EU restructuring program, as Portugal’s domestic banking crises demonstrates. Some events of the banking crisis are noted on the chart. The price earnings ratio of the holdings weren’t all that bad. Excluding from the count any holding for which the data wasn’t available, and any extreme numbers, it averaged out to 26.20 which doesn’t seem too bad. However, many holdings would not be marginable in US equities markets, in particular, being priced below $5.00 per share. This raises another point. The combination of a low P/E and a low stock price may be an indication of ‘fair value’. Hence, the fund may be close to fair value at this level. It’s unlikely that Portugal’s economy can generate enough investment interest in the foreseeable future in order for the fund to work its way back to the 2014 high. On the bright side, this is a situation where the EU benefits the smaller economies, as it’s a potential safety net for the economy, if it’s necessary. In the current situation, Portugal is now attempting to restructure a weak banking system without direct EU support. An analogy may be made here between Portugal’s economy and the Greek economy. They are in similar straits; however the Greek government has (with difficulties) stuck with the EU bailout program. Portugal may have to reestablish its commitment to the EU restructuring plan. This would be a good fund to ‘bookmark’, and follow the news and events; however, it might not be the right time to establish a position.