Tag Archives: beauty

How To Fly In Turbulent Emerging Markets

By Sammy Suzuki Emerging markets may be stormier these days, but they’re still brimming with opportunities. You just need to know how to find them. That’s going to take some skillful piloting – and highly sensitive downside-risk radar. The developing world’s economic growth engine is losing steam. Commodity prices have collapsed, and some of the largest nations are facing structural and political struggles. Demand in the developed world has been persistently weak, and the prospect of rising US interest rates is adding uncertainty to the outlook. In this environment, simply buying an index isn’t likely to generate the easy outsized returns it had for most of the past decade. Investors may be tempted to bail. But writing off the developing world altogether means missing out on many of the world’s most dynamic, fast-growing economies and companies. The secret to success, then, is being able to identify pockets of strength – even in weak economies – and to catch nascent trends before they become obvious to others. In our view, that means investing actively, taking the long view and adopting preemptive tactics for riding out stormy times. It Pays to Deviate Generally speaking, we are indifferent to the benchmark. The reasons for this are clear: it pays to deviate liberally from the crowd. Emerging equity markets are less transparent than developed ones, and news tends to travel more slowly than it does in the developed world. As a result, developing-market stocks are more prone to overreactions and mispricings – but also far richer in opportunities for attentive stock pickers to exploit. That’s the beauty of emerging-market investing. Being active means leaning into reliable, long-term sources of equity outperformance. In other words, simply follow the basic tenets of good stock-picking: Buy stocks when they are cheap, when they are delivering stronger-than-average and/or more consistent profitability, or are more likely to score positive earnings surprises. Because emerging-market indices are so inefficient, the payback potential from such a back-to-basics strategy is high. Buffett’s Rule #1: Don’t Lose Money In storm-prone emerging markets, defense counts more than offense. So we’re especially vigilant about avoiding excess volatility. For years, the conventional thinking was that volatility was part and parcel of being an emerging-market investor. Since those risks were fully understood and accepted, active emerging-market managers didn’t have to control for it. Many professional investors merely track the ups and downs of a benchmark and call that risk control. We see things differently. In our view, the key to success in emerging stocks is to hold onto as much of your gains as possible over a full market cycle. That means being proactive and thoughtful about absolute – not relative – risk. One way to do that is by maintaining a consistent tilt toward companies with stable cash flows, good capital stewardship and/or lower sensitivity to the business cycle. Another way is to be ever watchful for looming macro risks. We rely more heavily on our country-specific economic insights for avoiding risk than for selecting stocks or return potential. This risk-aware approach is akin to constantly buying downside protection, in our view. Hunt for Durable Trends In times of increased economic turbulence, earnings quality and consistency become paramount. Some examples of companies with these attributes include South Korean biopharmaceutical company Medytox, which is getting a lift from the surging demand for an improved, next-generation botulinum toxin (commonly known as botox), an affordable form of eternal youth. When they travel abroad, Chinese vacation-goers are snapping up expensive skincare products from South Korean luxury cosmetics company Amorepacific. And emerging-Asian yarn spinners, fabric mills and sneaker makers are riding the phenomenal growth of “athleisure” sportswear. All of these companies are beneficiaries of enduring lifestyle trends. While generally shunning commodity-centric countries, we see further growth potential for many of the low-cost manufacturing centers. For example, Mexico, Vietnam, Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic should all continue to gain from China’s waning status as a source for low-cost labor. Winning investments can be found even in sectors with uncertain or dismal outlooks. For example, global demand for electronic devices appears to have reached saturation, from personal computers to laptops to tablets and smartphones. Yet certain niche players in the sector, such as camera lens makers and flexible printed circuit-board makers in South Korea and Taiwan, look headed for strong revenue growth as smartphone makers rush to add desirable features and slimmer designs. In the face of the likely economic squalls ahead, we believe that combining active, high-conviction investing with a greater sensitivity to risk is the best strategy. To get the most out of emerging-market equities, there’s no contradiction between finding returns and reducing risk. The views expressed herein do not constitute research, investment advice or trade recommendations and do not necessarily represent the views of all AB portfolio-management teams. Sammy Suzuki – Portfolio Manager – Strategic Core Equities

Should You Be Weary Of Inverse Commodity ETFs?

Last week, we touched on potential markets that might finally be breaking out of the slow moving commodities sell off that’s been going on for around a year. In that post, we do what we do every month, looking at the difference in performance between the commodity futures market (Dec. contract) to its commodity ETF counterpart. This time around, we got to thinking it might be interesting to look at the flipside of that…. How inverse ETFs have performed against those same futures markets. Here’s what we found: (click to enlarge) At first thought, you might think that the ETFs are outperforming the futures counterparts until you realize that those inverse ETFs should all be positive due to the fact that the futures contract they supposedly track are negative. So, technically, if you shorted the December 2015 futures market at the beginning of the year you would have made 22.57%, while the 3x inverse Crude ETN DWTI (NYSEARCA: DWTI ) is down -13.34% YTD. The same can be said about natural gas, but to a lesser extent; the inverse ETF is up 5%, while the futures contract is down -21.02% (Disclaimer: Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results). Part of the reason for the major disparity in returns is because most of these ETFs follow the front month contracts while the ETF prices are affected by the role in contract each month. Here’s etf.com’s description of the inverse crude ETF DWTI . “Since DWTI tracks an excess return version of the S&P GSCI Crude Oil Index, returns will reflect both the changes in the price of WTI crude oil and any returns from rolling futures contracts.” Be careful though to go off of 10 month or even 12 month returns ( Ben Carlson on A Wealth of Common Sense has a great post on this ), because as an investor, if you would have picked the absolute perfect time to get out of the market (Aug. 24th) you would have been up 97.88%, while the futures contract would have been down -33.31% (you would be up that percentage if shorting). (Disclaimer: Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results) Chart Courtesy: Barchart Our point: Unless you’re making a career out of trading these markets, trying to time when to enter and exit a commodity market is dangerous and can be costly. Case in point, the first sentence of the DWTI ETF… Like most geared inverse products, DWTI is designed to be used as a tactical trading tool, not as a buy-and-hold investment. But that doesn’t mean that you shouldn’t have access to strategies that allow you to reap the gains. If you haven’t guessed what’s coming next, we’re about to name drop Managed Futures. These strategies are built to seek return drivers off of rising and falling markets. This is how the industry did as a whole during crude’s collapse. (Disclaimer: Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results) Source: Newedge Data through Jan. 12th, 2015 Our firm is dedicated to searching through the managed futures space in order to find the best strategies out there. Some managers will tell you where they think commodities are going; some will tell you they let the algorithms do the talking. In our experience, we like to know that they have a feel for the market but at the end of the day they leave the emotions out of the decision making. Ultimately, we, nor they, can tell you where commodities are going, but that’s the beauty of Managed Futures strategies; they don’t know, but it doesn’t matter if prices fall or rise, it’s more about capturing the trend as it continues to fall of rise. P.S. – To understand where Alternative Investment return drivers come from, download our whitepaper, ” The Truth and Lies in Alternative Investments. ”

Falling Stock Prices And Share Buyback Programs

Summary The bear market is making share buybacks cheaper for companies. Smart companies will leverage this market and buyback more shares. Buying PKW or a few buyback achievers in this bear market will yield above-market returns for investors with a long-term time horizon. This bear market is causing short-term pain and panic for investors, but it is also making one particular feat of financial engineering even more appealing: share buybacks. The stock buyback idea is simple: companies generate cash flow from operations, and they use that cash to buy stocks on the open market at market prices. In short, companies buy their own stock through profits, which in turn lowers the total amount of shares outstanding. That will then raise the earnings per share ratio since the denominator is being reduced by the buybacks. Share buybacks have become more common since 2008, and they’ve become controversial. This summary of why buybacks are criticized is worth reading. The main concerns are threefold: By buying shares, a company may be overpaying for its own shares, especially if the shares are trading above book value. Companies should invest excess profits into research and development to grow revenues instead of buying back shares. Companies can actually raise the float of the company even as they buy shares, if they issue shares to employees or executives while also engaging in a buyback program. A company’s history of share issuances and buybacks should be analyzed carefully before buying. With these caveats in mind, there are reasons to like share buybacks and the companies that invest in them. Companies with excess profits, like Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL ), have enough cash lying around for buybacks, dividends, and investments. After AAPL began issuing dividends and doing buybacks, it purchased Beats, acquiring a popular and high-margin headphones manufacturer and music streaming service, and cash on hand still rose to over $200 billion . When a company cannot stop accumulating cash and has enough to consider a stock buyback, the pace and amount of a buyback program needs to be planned meticulously with a macroeconomic view in mind. This is where management effectively becomes a macro hedge fund, planning on when to buy its own company’s stock based on how the market will treat the company in the future. Likewise, investors need to consider this as well, for one simple reason: buybacks yield higher returns in bear markets. A hypothetical example of a share buyback problem by a company with a $10 billion market cap and a $5 million share buyback program makes this clear. In a bull market, the company ends up buying less shares than in a bear market – and a faster buyback program buys even more than a longer one. The chart above tells us something interesting: more aggressive share buyback programs and a bear market are good for shareholders. They reduce the total number of shares outstanding by a larger amount for the same amount of money spent; in fact, a more conservative share buyback program that lasts twice as long will result in more than half the amount of shares reduced in a bull market. Bear markets send a clear signal to management: aggressive share buybacks will benefit shareholders, and more aggressive ones can offset selling pressure that is coming from a broader panic. They can also benefit shareholders in the interim if the bear market continues. The Easy Way: PKW Thus, paradoxically, a bear market can benefit the buyback achievers. However, timing the purchase of those achievers and ensuring they will maintain enough free cash flow to continue, or even accelerate, buybacks is the tricky part. An easy way to make this bet is to buy the PowerShares Buyback Achievers Portfolio ETF (NYSEARCA: PKW ), which attempts to hold companies that have reduced outstanding shares by 5% or more in the past 12 months. This simple focus means the company ends up holding a group of great companies across sectors, most of which have strong business fundamentals while also aggressively returning capital to shareholders by buying shares. Part of the beauty of PKW is its low exposure to energy, a beaten up and feared industry due to falling oil prices, and its relatively high exposure to consumer discretionary stocks. If this bear market is unrelated to the fundamentals of the economy, and Americans really are returning to work and will start spending more, this allocation will benefit investors on top of the buyback play. Looking at the fund’s holdings directly, we see some impressive names: PKW isn’t perfect: its holdings include companies that are facing serious headwinds, most notably International Business Machines (NYSE: IBM ), the fund’s second largest holding. IBM is seeing double-digit revenue declines and may struggle to maintain buybacks, let alone profitability, if it cannot stop those declines from worsening. Express Scripts (NASDAQ: ESRX ) has recovered from steep revenue declines in 2014, but its top-line growth has been tepid and below inflation, indicating a real decline in revenues. Stockpickers’ Alternative A better way to outperform in this bear market may be to target companies with a history of strong buybacks, rising revenues, and the potential for higher FCF. What companies fit the bill? Home Depot (NYSE: HD ), Apple, Boeing (NYSE: BA ), Monsanto (NYSE: MON ), and Time Warner (NYSE: TWX ) all have strong revenue growth and a solid track record of large share buybacks. Even excluding the buyback factor, a purchase of these companies yields a portfolio with a P/E about 20% below the P/E of the entire S&P 500. If an investor believes this bear market is likely to continue and has a long-term time horizon, buying large-cap dividend-yielding stocks, which traditionally provide strong positive returns over a long-term time horizon, is a smart decision. But an even smarter decision may be to focus those purchases on buyback achievers, thereby benefiting even more from the bearish hysteria of the current market. Disclosure: I am/we are long BA, HD. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.