Tag Archives: barack-obama

Closed-End Fund Craziness

By Alan Gula, CFA Last week, Barack Obama became the first U.S. president to visit Cuba in nearly nine decades. As you may recall, President Obama announced that the United States would re-establish diplomatic relations with Cuba in December of 2014. Of course, investors immediately began searching for ways to profit from the re-opening of trade and travel with Cuba. Some investors thought they had uncovered a gem called The Herzfeld Caribbean Basin Fund (NASDAQ: CUBA ), a closed-end fund (CEF). After all, the ticker seemingly told you all you had to know. From December 16, 2014 to December 23, 2014, CUBA rose 107%. The fund went from a discount of over 10% of its underlying net asset value (NAV) to a massive 70% premium . Except there was one big problem: CUBA had little direct exposure to Cuba. Close, but no cigar. By mid-January 2016, the fund had lost over 60% of its value and was once again trading at a discount to its NAV. CEFs, like CUBA, have a set number of shares outstanding. Therefore, supply and demand forces determine whether the shares trade at a premium or discount to NAV. CEFs tend to be relatively small and illiquid, so their holders are predominantly individual investors. As a result, CEF share prices are heavily influenced by the herding of retail investors – perfectly illustrated by the CUBA episode. However, CUBA is an especially small CEF. Such pricing anomalies would never occur with the larger funds run by prominent financial institutions, right? High-Yield CEFs In June of 2014, near the height of the “reach for yield” mania, I recommended selling two high-yielding PIMCO closed-end funds . At the time, the PIMCO High Income Fund (NYSE: PHK ) and the PIMCO Global StocksPLUS & Income Fund (NYSE: PGP ) were trading at absurd 57% and 66% premiums to their NAVs, respectively. Over the next 15 months, PHK and PGP both lost roughly 40% of their values (distributions included but not reinvested). The premium for PHK evaporated and the premium for PGP hit a more reasonable but still elevated 18%. But wait… The herd is back for more! The premiums have since re-inflated for both funds. In fact, the premium on PGP recently reached an unprecedented 103%. It seems as though many folks are using the snapback rally in the credit market as an excuse to bid up several closed-end funds with impunity. The following table is a list of several CEFs trading at high premiums: The premiums on Eagle Point Credit Company Inc. (NYSE: ECC ) and the DoubleLine Opportunistic Credit Fund (NYSE: DBL ) have recently surged to their highest levels ever. The Babson Capital Corporate Investors (NYSE: MCI ) is rated five stars by Morningstar and has a great track record, but no fund is worth a 20%-plus premium. The PIMCO Municipal Income Fund (NYSE: PMF ), PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund II (NYSE: PCK ), PIMCO New York Municipal Income Fund II (NYSE: PNI ), and PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund III (NYSE: PZC ) are all trading at very high premiums. No matter how bullish you are on muni-bonds, there’s no reason to pay up this much for exposure. The financial markets may not make sense all of the time, but, as you can tell, craziness is the norm in CEF land. When a CEF you own trades at a small premium to its NAV, you should at least consider selling it. When that premium exceeds 15%… hit the bid and get out as if you’re fleeing a communist dictatorship.

Fight Global Warming With These ETFs

Establishing a terror-free world may be the foremost agenda at the international level now, but the global warming issue is equally heated. While so long it was presumed that global warming leads to climate change, causing rising sea levels, drought in one region and flood in other, the latest theory is that this monster can ” cause job losses, recessions and even a tumbling stock market”, according to economists. So, one can easily understand the urgency of controlling pollution and cooling down the globe. In that vein, global leaders assembled in Paris at the COP 21 meet – which is the 21st annual conference of parties – to chalk out an elaborate and comprehensive plan for lowering carbon emissions and moderating the warming of the planet. Efforts to arrest global warming have been constant across individual countries. Now, not only developed economies, but the emerging ones too are pushing themselves to attain this goal. China intends to build a pollution-free environment. As part of this mission, the president of China and U.S. president Barack Obama have recently struck a deal to lessen carbon emissions. The agreement calls for carbon emission reductions by 26% to 28% in the U.S. by 2025. It also includes the first-ever commitment by China to stop emissions from growing by 2030. Notably, China and America are two largest emitters of greenhouse gases . President Obama has always been active in the cause of cleaning up carbon pollution. A proposed Environmental Protection Agency rule seeks to reduce 30% carbon emission from power plants by 2030 from the levels emitted in 2005. At the conference, the Russian president noted that his country has not only averted the rise of greenhouse emissions, but has actually slowed it. Russia targets to curb 70% of greenhouse emissions by 2030 from the levels seen in 1990. At the Paris meet that is under way, global superpowers will also decide on supporting underprivileged countries like Bangladesh and Indonesia to finance the needed reforms they can’t pay for. Investors can also make outsized profits from this awareness on global warming. Several clean energy and low-carbon ETFs have been rolled out to capitalize on the growing need for environment protection and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Below, we highlight a few ETF options that investors can go “green” with. SPDR MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF (NYSEARCA: LOWC ) This has become an $87.6 million ETF within just a year of its launch. The 1,277-stock ETF looks to track the stocks from developed and emerging markets that discharge lower carbons. The fund charges only 20 bps in fees. Here too, Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL ) (1.9%) takes the top spot, followed by Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT ) (1.17%) and General Electric (NYSE: GE ) (0.85%). The fund is heavy on the U.S., which has half of its total exposure, while Japan (7.9%) and the U.K. (7.1%) take the next two spots. LOWC is down about 0.9% so far this year (as of November 30, 2015). iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF (NYSEARCA: CRBN ) The 931-stock fund also charges 20 bps in fees a year from investors. The fund has amassed over $217 million in assets since its debut in December 2014. Its exposure is quite similar to LOWC, as Apple (1.92%), Microsoft (1.17%) and General Electric (0.82%) are the top three holdings. The fund’s geographic exposure is also pretty much like that of LOWC. Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF (NYSEARCA: ETHO ) This new ETF has a 400-stock portfolio having a carbon emissions profile that is 50-70% lower per dollar invested than a conventional broad-based benchmark. The index studies total greenhouse gas emissions from over 5,000 equities to choose “climate leaders” in each industry. No stock accounts for more than 0.56% of the basket. Netflix (NASDAQ: NFLX ), M&T Bank Corp. (NYSE: MTB ) and Energy Recovery Inc. (NASDAQ: ERII ) are the top three holdings of the fund, which charges 75 bps in fees. Original Post