Tag Archives: author

Want To Stay Away From Puerto Rico? Bet On These Muni ETFs

The present rocky investing backdrop has made muni bond ETFs winners along with Treasury bonds. Most of the muni bond ETFs are in the green in the year-to-date frame, and many have hit a 52-week high in the last few days. But do these deserve such love given Puerto Rico’s debt crisis? It is widespread news in the muni bonds investing world that Puerto Rico – a big issuer of muni bonds – runs a high risk of default. In early May, Puerto Rico defaulted on $367 million in debt . Buried under recession for years, the island now bears a huge debt load of $72 billion and requires restructuring . A year ago, Charles Schwab’s data revealed that Puerto Rico’s debt obligation reached as high as 95% of its economic output. This was surprisingly higher than 2.4% of the median debt load for the 50 U.S. states. Needless to say, investing in Puerto Rico muni bonds or ETFs that are heavy on these bonds require a strong risk appetite. This does not mean that investors should shy away from entire array of muni bond ETFs. After all, munis are safer bets than corporate bonds and yield better than Treasuries. Notably, the yield on the 10-year Treasury note has slid 48 bps to 1.76%, and the yield on the long-term 30-year bonds has seen a 39 bps plunge to 2.59% this year (as of May 17, 2016). Usually, the interest income from munis is free from federal tax and occasionally even state taxes, making them particularly intriguing to investors falling in the high tax cohort looking to cut their tax burden. With the Fed still having a patient attitude on the rate hike issue this year, the higher yield nature of the munis should quench the thirst for current income. So, risk-averse investors can definitely play muni bond ETFs that are devoid of Puerto Rico exposure. Below, we highlight a few such options. Notably, all the below mentioned ETFs hit a 52-week high on May 17, 2016. iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (NYSEARCA: MUB ) MUB has a trailing 12-month yield of 2.33%. The product provides access to more than 3000 municipal bonds with higher credit quality. It has a Zacks ETF Rank #3 (Hold) with a High risk outlook. SPDR Nuveen Barclays Municipal Bond ETF (NYSEARCA: TFI ) The $1.90 billion ETF holds 882 bonds in its portfolio. The fund charges 23 bps in fees and yields 1.85% annually (as of May 17, 2016). Moreover, this fund houses higher investment-grade bonds. TFI has a Zacks ETF Rank #3 with a Medium risk outlook. VanEck Vectors AMT-Free Long Municipal Index ETF (NYSEARCA: MLN ) Devoid of any meaningful exposure to Puerto Rico, the top priorities of this fund are California (18.8%) and New York (13%). It yields 3.16% annually (as of May 17, 2016). More than half of the portfolio is high-quality in nature. MLN has a Zacks ETF Rank #3 with a High risk outlook. VanEck Vectors AMT-Free Intermediate Municipal Index ETF (NYSEARCA: ITM ) The fund replicates the performance of the medium-duration bonds. New York (16.4%), California (15.5%) and Texas (10.3%) have a double-digit exposure in the fund. ITM yields 2.22% annually (as of May 17, 2016). Investment-grade bonds make up a major share of the fund. It has a Zacks ETF Rank #3 with a High risk outlook. Original Post

Steer Toward Small-Caps With Hands On The Wheel

By James MacGregor, Bruce Aronow, Samantha S. Lau, Shri Singhvi The pullback in smaller US stocks over the past year offers a compelling opportunity for investors who want to restore their exposure to the asset class. But how they go about it matters. Even with a modest recovery this spring, absolute valuations for small-caps remain below their historical average. And after two years of underperforming large-caps, small-caps also look cheap relative to their larger peers. As we detailed in a previous blog post , we think the punishment that small- and mid-cap (SMID-cap) stocks endured during the recent downturn was unwarranted, and we expect a rebound as risk appetite returns. That’s why today’s valuations in much of the small-cap universe look so attractive. For investors who may have lightened up on their holdings, now looks like a good time to reload. Choosing the Right Investment Strategy Still, the strategy investors choose can make all the difference. Investors have lately been putting more money in exchange-traded funds and passive mutual funds that track small-cap indices, such as the Russell 2000 Index. This mirrors the popularity of passive strategies in other asset classes. Here’s the problem: the small-cap market isn’t as efficient as the one for large-caps, and shares are often misunderstood – and mispriced. Over time, a hands-on, active approach has produced better results (Display) . We don’t see that changing, and we suspect passive strategies will benefit less from a small-cap recovery. Click to enlarge Digging Deep and Adding Value Why do active managers have an advantage? To start with, smaller companies get less research coverage than larger ones, so their business models and prospects are not always well understood. Active managers can add value by digging into fundamentals and identifying fast-growing companies that the rest of the market has underestimated or overlooked. Think of it as finding a Netflix (NASDAQ: NFLX ) before video streaming takes off. An active approach works better for value-minded investors, too. Because smaller companies get less attention from analysts, their shares tend to get hit harder than large-cap stocks when markets get volatile. But a bigger price decline means more opportunity for managers to add value. For instance, managers who can distinguish between companies most likely to recover quickly, and those that face steeper challenges stand a good chance of boosting returns and creating value for investors. The Drawbacks of Indexing Of course, not every small-cap stock or sector is cheap today. Investors abandoned most small-cap sectors during the sell-off, but not all. A clutch of “safer” sectors that tend to deliver more stable earnings bucked the trend. These included value-oriented sectors such as utilities and real estate investment trusts (REITs), the so-called “bond proxies.” In the growth space, biotechnology- and Internet-related names also attracted sizable inflows during the multi-year run-up that peaked last summer. These sectors have done very well over the past few years – so well, in fact, that they now look overpriced relative to the rest of the market. But if you’re using a passive, index-tracking strategy to gain access to the market, you’re pouring a lot of money into these sectors, which account for a large share of the broader market. Utilities and REITs, for instance, comprise almost one-quarter of the Russell 2000 Value Index (Display) . Click to enlarge While these sectors have done well during the small-cap pullback, we think they have much less room to rise in the future. The rest of the smaller-cap market, on the other hand, looks attractive, and we think it will outperform in an equity market recovery. A skilled active manager can be choosy and zero in on high-quality, inexpensive stocks that have the most potential to deliver strong returns, while avoiding the pricey ones. Investors who rely on passive vehicles, on the other hand, may miss a good share of any small-cap rebound, because these vehicles, by design, will have large positions in the most overvalued sectors. We think reallocating to a small- or SMID-cap portfolio can boost investors’ return potential. But the key to success, in our view, comes down to strategy. Active managers can structure their portfolios so they benefit only from the risks that are being mispriced. A passive approach can’t match that. The views expressed herein do not constitute research, investment advice or trade recommendations and do not necessarily represent the views of all AB portfolio-management teams. James MacGregor, CFA, is Chief Investment Officer – Small and Mid-Cap Value Equities Bruce K. Aronow, CFA, is Chief Investment Officer – US Small/SMID-Cap Growth