Tag Archives: audio

Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo-SABESP (NYSE: SBS ) Q2 2015 Earnings Conference Call August 18, 2015 01:00 PM ET Executives Rui Affonso – CFO and IR Officer Mario Arruda Sampaio – Head of Capital Markets and IR Analysts Carlos Remeika – Covalis Capital Michael Gaugler – Janney Montgomery Scott Operator Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. At this time, we would like to welcome everyone to SABESP’s conference call to discuss its results for the second quarter of 2015. The audio for this conference is being broadcast simultaneously through the Internet in the website, www.sabesp.com.br. In that same address, you can also find the slide show presentation available for download. [Operator Instructions] Before proceeding, let me mention that forward-looking statements are being made under the Safe Harbor of the Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1996. Forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs and assumptions of SABESP’s management and on information currently available to the company. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance. They involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions because they relate to future events and, therefore, depend on circumstances that may or may not occur in the future. Investors should understand that general economic conditions, industry conditions and other operating factors could also affect the future results of SABESP and could cause results to differ materially from those expressed in such forward-looking statements. Today with us, we have Mr. Rui Affonso, Chief Financial Officer and Investor Relations Officer; Mr. Mario Arruda Sampaio, Head of Capital Markets and Investor Relations; and Mr. Marcelo Miyagui, Head of Accounting. Now, I’ll turn the conference over to Mr. Arruda Sampaio. Sir, you may begin your conference. Mario Arruda Sampaio Okay. Thank you and again good afternoon, everybody for one more earnings conference call. We have a nine slide presentation today to discuss the second quarter of 2015 and as already mentioned, after that, we will open for the Q&A session. Let’s start on the slide three. Here, we show the company’s billed water and sewage volume, which fell 7.5% between second quarter last year and second quarter this year. This is due to the decline in water availability and consequently the measures adopted since February 2014 to continue supplying the population in the Metro region of Sao Paulo on an ongoing basis. As a result of the water crisis, there was also a substantial decline in water production. Volume was 14.6% down in the quarter and 18.1% down in the first six months of this year. On the next slide, on four, we will discuss our financial results. Net operating revenue increased 2.5% compared to last year second quarter. Excluding construction revenue, net operating revenue decreased 7.6%. This is due to the granting of bonuses and the 7.5% reduction in total billed volume as we mentioned in the previous slide. The decrease was mitigated by the application of the contingency tariff and the application of the repositioning tariff index of 6.5% since December 2014, which you all are already aware and familiar with and plus the 15.2% tariff increase effective since June and impacting only 1.5% in this quarter. I would like also to remind you that this last tariff increase includes a 6.9% increase due to the extraordinary tariff revision and the balance to the 15.2% is the ordinary annual tariff adjustment to inflation, which happened in April. Cost and selling, administrative and construction expenses increased 1.5% in the period. If we exclude construction costs, there was a decline actually of 11.2%. Adjusted EBITDA increased 14.3% to BRL756.6 million from BRL661.7 million in the same period of 2014. It’s worth noting that in the last 12 months adjusted EBITDA reached BRL3.4 billion. Yet, adjusted EBITDA margin came to 26.8% versus 24% in the second quarter of 2014. In fact, in the last 12 months, the EBITDA margins stood at 30.6%. If we exclude construction revenue and cost, the adjusted EBITDA margin came to 38.4% in the second quarter of 2014 against 31.2% in the second quarter of 2014 and 42.4% in the last 12 months. Net income totaled BRL337.3 million; that is 11.5% higher than in the same period of last year. On slide five we will move on to it and discuss the main variations in costs and expenses in relation to second quarter last year. I mentioned before in comparison with the second quarter cost expenses increased 1.5 and excluding construction cost, there was a decline of 11.2. This quarter all the cost items recorded were below second quarter 2014 except for tax expenses which increased by 0.7%. Depreciation and amortization went up by 27.6% and electric power cost which rose by 44.2%, something we had already anticipated to everybody that would happen last quarter. In the reduction side, it’s worth highlighting the decline of 74.4% in the general expenses, 23.2% in services and 4.1% in the payroll and related charges. The last, these three corresponding to a large share or the bulk share of our total costs. For more detailed information on our cost variation we ask you to refer to our detailed earnings release. Let’s move on to slide six, here we present the main variations in the items that affected our net income which totaled again BRL337 million. Net operating revenue increased by BRL68.8 million or 2.5%. Cost and expenses of gain including construction costs increased BRL35.3 million or 1.5%. Other operating revenues and expenses recorded a positive variation of BRL6.4 million. Net financial expenses, monetary restatement and foreign exchange variations fell BRL177 million in the period. Finally, income tax and social contribution increased BRL182 million when compared to second quarter 2014. Let’s move to the next slide, in fact the next two slides, seven and eight. We will update you on rainfall and water inflow into Cantareira Systems reservoirs. The year of 2015 has been recording irregular rainfall and extremely dry winter. In July, of the three main systems we use to supply water to the São Paulo Metro region, that is the Cantareira, Alto Tietê, and the Guarapiranga systems. Of these, Cantareira System was the only one that recorded below average rainfall. We are still operating in fact in the Cantareira with the first portion of the systems technical reserve and the other interesting thing is that today the Guarapiranga System has a relevant role in supplying water to the entire metro region of São Paulo. In fact, today again surpassing the Cantareira System. On slide eight, we can see that the water inflow into the Cantareira System reservoirs to 11.3 cubic meters per second in July which despite being low or below historical leverage, it’s almost the double of the volume recorded in July 2014 when water inflow came to only 6.4 cubic meters per second. In the first two weeks of August, water inflow has been lowering than in August last year. However, the month has not ended yet, we still have 13 days in front of us. It’s also important to note that August is usually a dry month, and reservoir levels are expected to decline in this period. In fact, for this month, SABESP received from the National Water Agency, ANA and the state electric, power and water department, it’s called DAEE an authorization to increase water withdrawal from the Cantareira System from 13.5 cubic meters per second in July to 14.5 cubic meters per second in August. This water withdraw increase by 1 additional cubic meter from the Cantareira System reflects the need to sphere the Alto Tietê System whose water inflow has been lower this year than last year. Well lets’ go through slide 9 and give you an update on the main measures SABESP has been adopting since February last year to continue uninterrupted water supply to the São Paulo metro region population despite relevant reduction in water traction for the reservoirs in the Cantareira System. The start we highlight that water production in the Cantareira System in July, 2015 over February 2014, when we introduced the measures to reduce consumption fell from 31.77 cubic meters per second to 13.51 cubic meters per second, in contraction of 58%. This means 18.3 cubic meters per second less withdraw since we adopted the consumption reduction measures. Specifically, on the measures, there are four main initiatives we adopted to offset this lower water traction and at the same time, maintain water availability to the metro regional São Paulo. They are, first, the reduction in consumption incurred by the Bonus Program responsible for approximately 18.6% of the savings. Second, the water transfers between the São Paulo metro region production systems currently responsible for 40.3% of this reduction. Third, operational maneuvers and investment in reducing water losses accounting for 36.6% of this reduction. And finally, the lower transfer to the cities of Guarulhos and São Caetano do Sul responsible for 4.5%. Specifically regarding the Bonus Program, we point out that the population is maintaining the adherence to the program, and in June and July, the percentage of population that has achieved reduction was 83%. In terms of water production for the entire, and that is, again, the entire metro region not only the Cantareira, in fact, the entire São Paulo metro region, this reduction came to 27% over February last year. In numbers, water production was at 71.4 cubic meters per second at the beginning of 2014 and closed in July this year at 51.9 cubic meters per second. Let’s go to slide 10 and present to you in detail the investments and execution and under development for the period between 2015 and 2017, which are vital to cope with the water crisis and bring more water security to the São Paulo metro region in the short, medium and long terms. The main objective of the investment being executed this year and next year is to increase the reservation capacity of the Guarapiranga and Alto Tietê System enabling the expansion of the production in these systems and the transfer of more water for the areas originally covered by the Cantareira System. In other words, reduce the dependence on the Cantareira System. For 2015, there will be an expansion of 6.5 cubic meters per second led by the interconnection between the Rio Grande and the Alto Tietê System. This investment when completed will transfer 4 cubic meters of water per second from the former to the later. As a result, more areas currently supplied by the Cantareira System will be able to receive water from the Alto Tietê System. The interconnection is the most relevant project we are carrying out in 2015 and approximately 80% of the work is already concluded and it should be delivered by the end of September. All in all, in the periods between 2015 and ’17, water availability and security will increase by up to 21 cubic meters per sec. Let’s move to slide ten, our last slide, where we’ll — we will discuss the Bonus program and the contingency tariffs. As already mentioned, the Bonus has been maintained an average adherence of around 83%, generating savings of 6.5 cubic meters per second in the entire metro region of Sao Paulo. So, this figure is for the entire metro region. Regarding the contingency tariff effective as of February 2015 and which objective is not to increase revenues but to reduce water demand by encouraging the rational use of water, of the total clients, 17% consumed above average in July this year. Considering that 77% [ph] of those — whose consumption was above average are in the minimum consumption range for social category both not subject to the contingency tariff, only 10% of all consumers actually paid higher tariff than this month, the month of July. As we mentioned in our earnings release, the impact of the Bonus on the Company’s revenue came to BRL231 million in the second quarter of 2015, while that of the contingency tariff totaled BRL123 million. It’s important to comment that the funds collected from the contingency tariffs are being used in the emergency work we mentioned before and expenses directly related to the cracks. Well, those were the remarks and now we are open for questions. Question-and-Answer Session Operator [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Carlos Remeika of Covalis Capital. Please go ahead. Carlos Remeika Hello, thank you for taking my questions. I have a few rather simple ones. I’d like to ask what you expect for tax rate for full-year 2015, given you’re making quite a bit of adjustments on a quarterly basis. And second question, I saw in the second quarter, BRL117 million decrease in provisions for lawsuits. It’s already been better in the Q1 and I was just wondering what would you expect for second half if it’s possible at least directionally to save, if it still continues to be lower year-over-year? Thank you. Mario Arruda Sampaio Okay. Carlos, just a second here. Carlos, Mario. Regarding the tax rate for this year, the only thing we can say without giving more guidance than we usually give is that we will continue working with 34%, okay. And no more detail we will give you because and again, it’s not part of what we do. On the next, on the provisions, what we can say is that there was a big provision of BRL70 million reversal of provision, which impacted specifically non-recurring this quarter. And again, we can’t comment and we are not – I mean, we don’t expect – we are not going to comment for the next quarter. I mean, we can’t say that there was BRL70 million reversal of this only provision of non-recurrence. Carlos Remeika Okay, thank you. Operator Our next question comes from Hujan Yang [ph] of Hummingbird Partners. Please go ahead. Unidentified Analyst Hi, thank you for taking my question. So I have a question about tariff adjustments. I understand there is a back and forth between SABESP and ARSESP on determining adjustments. Could you give us more color on how much leverage that we have had in determining the adjustment? So what usually causes the difference in weighing inputs between the two parties, for example considering the Q1 differences caused by the [indiscernible]. Rui Affonso Just a second, Hujan. Could you repeat the part on the different inputs, just that we can make sure we understand. Unidentified Analyst Sure. I was asking what cause the difference in weighing the input between the two parties, for example and currently I just pulled up the Q1 slides, there is the compensation period. Rui Affonso Okay, let me get that information to see if we can answer. Just a second. Mario Arruda Sampaio Okay, let me jump in. It’s Mario. First off, for the leverage negotiation, let’s put it this way, it’s authority — we have a discuss that is technical. They are very open for the discussions. We open and develop all the discussions on an agenda basis. So the leverage is just as usual, as you can see in the electricity sector. Although, the major company being regulated by the state regulatory agency is SABESP. If I understood the question, I mean, this would be the answer. As for the second point, the difference in input. We understand there are two issues. First, is the deferred implementation of the tariff revision, which should have happened in April last year and we SABESP postponed it to December. So that was deferred, but although deferred, we were granted an adjustment, a capitalized adjustment of that tariff implementation, so ultimately we implemented a 6.5 increase and not a 5.4, which was the original number. That is one. The other was the extraordinary tariff increase, the 15.21. The difference there is that we ask for compensation for the years of ’13, ’14, which were actual years plus expected ’15 and ’16 — forecasted ’15 and ’16 and ultimately what the regulator, he recognized to a great extent, the ‘13 and ‘14 and agreed upon the projections on the ’15 and ’16, but he decided to implement only the ’15 and ’16 and the ’13 and ’14, he will add that as a regulatory asset for the next tariff revision as of April 2017 for the next cycle. Okay? Unidentified Analyst I see. So just a quick question on that point, so does that mean that the 2013 and 2014 compensation period then amounts to the 7.02%? Mario Arruda Sampaio No, no, that’s the point. What happened this April was the ordinary, the normal tariff adjustment to inflation and the number there was something around 7%. I don’t have the — I don’t remember the specific number, we’re going to get it. So that was just inflation. The extraordinary tariff increase that we were granted was 6.9%. What we asked for was ‘13 and we’re getting the — I don’t have in the top of my mind was 13.2, 13.4 [ph] something like that. So the difference between what we ask for the extraordinary and what we got from the extraordinary is the deferred ‘13 and ‘14 revisions. So the ’15 rounding numbers, okay, about 7%, 6.9% is the actual revision, what was granted to us, and the difference to that is the inflation for the period. Okay. So what we did not get, we will get it in the next tariff cycle. So it was deferred to the next tariff cycle. Unidentified Analyst Okay. I got it. Thank you very much. Operator Our next question will come from Michael Gaugler of Janney Montgomery Scott. Please go ahead. Michael Gaugler Hello, everyone. Mario Arruda Sampaio Hi, Michael. Michael Gaugler Just one question, a couple of mine have already been answered. I noticed in the quarter cash fell pretty substantially and I’m wondering what was behind that and if you would anticipate that cash levels will remain about where they were at the end of the second quarter going forward? Mario Arruda Sampaio Okay. Michael, the reason that the cash fell this quarter substantially is basically because we anticipated that we paid down in anticipation a BRL500 million debt that was due in November this year. So we took the decision to anticipate, we prepaid, there was no fee for prepayment, it was already agreed to. So to that extent, we reduced our total debt for the quarter, albeit we did reduce the cash. Probably no, we won’t give you a guidance of where we see the cash flow at the end of the year, but we will come to market and we should, to some extent, replenish our cash availability. So can’t give you the number we’re working with, but I can anticipate that we should put our cash availability up from where it is today. Michael Gaugler Okay. Thanks, everyone. Mario Arruda Sampaio Thank you. Operator [Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from Kellyn Cailey of ZENA Investment Management. [ph] Please go ahead. Unidentified Analyst Hello, my question is on debt. Given that we’ve seen some depreciation of the Brazilian real since the quarter end and there are some forecasts out there that we could get to something like BRL4 per dollar by the end of the year. What are the levers that you have to deal with the impact that this will have on your debt balances and therefore your debt covenants to keep you in compliance? Mario Arruda Sampaio Okay, just a second there. Kellyn, first our debt exposure went up to 46.2%. Last quarter it was 45.8 and quarter before that 40, so it’s actually going up because of the exchange rate against the real as we all know. What are we going to do about it is, we’re not going to hedge our debt profile, it makes it inadequate to hedge. In addition to that the hedge would have no effect on our debt covenants. The way they are estimated, they did not take into account any hedging. S, again, in summary, it is very expensive. It doesn’t make sense for the debt profile and the cash flow and it doesn’t affect our debt covenant estimate, but we are obviously doing a lot. We have been in the process of going after receivables. We are going after — we have been able to increase tariff last December. We are just now in the discussion around an extraordinary tariff increase which has – which will be fully implemented, the 15% on the third quarter. So we have also done a lot of improvement in our cost structure. As you can see on the quarter to quarter basis, we’ve been able to reduce costs by 11.2%. So, yes, the covenants will continue fairly stressed, but I think we have many elements in front of us and actions we have taken that we are very well in a position to go over next quarters even if the exchange rate continues stressed as it is right now. Okay? Unidentified Analyst Okay, can I just ask a follow-up on the cost structure, so the cost reductions in the quarter, is that – do you view the run rate be 11% underlying decline as something that is sustainable as we move through the rest of the year? Mario Arruda Sampaio Again, that would be — giving you the specific would be giving you a guidance, but what we can tell you is that there are further actions we have taken that we expect coming in at some time. So again, it is hard to say exactly when, but we cannot tell you how much we expect. Okay? Unidentified Analyst Thank you. Operator Our next question comes from Doug Newton of The Wendakker Partnerships. [ph] Please go ahead. Unidentified Analyst Hi, good afternoon, Mario. The exploration of changes into the tariff structure, what impact might that have on the company’s total revenue. Mario Arruda Sampaio Doug, the effect is neutral. So it’s just how we cut the pie and not the size of the pie. Unidentified Analyst Got it, thank you. Operator [Operator Instructions] At this time, I’m showing no further questions. So, now I’d like to turn the conference back over to SABESP for their final remarks. Rui Affonso Okay everybody, thank you once more for participating of this call and we will obviously be back next quarter and hope to see you then. Thank you, bye, bye. Operator The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today’s presentation, you may now disconnect and have a great day. Copyright policy: All transcripts on this site are the copyright of Seeking Alpha. However, we view them as an important resource for bloggers and journalists, and are excited to contribute to the democratization of financial information on the Internet. (Until now investors have had to pay thousands of dollars in subscription fees for transcripts.) So our reproduction policy is as follows: You may quote up to 400 words of any transcript on the condition that you attribute the transcript to Seeking Alpha and either link to the original transcript or to www.SeekingAlpha.com. All other use is prohibited. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HERE IS A TEXTUAL REPRESENTATION OF THE APPLICABLE COMPANY’S CONFERENCE CALL, CONFERENCE PRESENTATION OR OTHER AUDIO PRESENTATION, AND WHILE EFFORTS ARE MADE TO PROVIDE AN ACCURATE TRANSCRIPTION, THERE MAY BE MATERIAL ERRORS, OMISSIONS, OR INACCURACIES IN THE REPORTING OF THE SUBSTANCE OF THE AUDIO PRESENTATIONS. IN NO WAY DOES SEEKING ALPHA ASSUME ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY INVESTMENT OR OTHER DECISIONS MADE BASED UPON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WEB SITE OR IN ANY TRANSCRIPT. USERS ARE ADVISED TO REVIEW THE APPLICABLE COMPANY’S AUDIO PRESENTATION ITSELF AND THE APPLICABLE COMPANY’S SEC FILINGS BEFORE MAKING ANY INVESTMENT OR OTHER DECISIONS. If you have any additional questions about our online transcripts, please contact us at: transcripts@seekingalpha.com . Thank you!