Tag Archives: article

Alterra Power’s (MGMXF) CEO John Carson on Q1 2016 Results – Earnings Call Transcript

Alterra Power Corp. ( OTCPK:MGMXF ) Q1 2016 Earnings Conference Call May 11, 2016 11:30 AM ET Executives Ross Beaty – Executive Chairman John Carson – CEO Lynda Freeman – CFO Jay Sutton – VP, Hydro Power Paul Rapp – VP, Wind and Geothermal Power Analysts Jonathan Lo – Raymond James Rupert Mayer – National Bank Operator Good morning, ladies and gentlemen and welcome to the Alterra Power First Quarter Results Conference Call. At this time all lines are in a listen-only mode. Following the presentation we will conduct a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] This call is being recorded on Wednesday May 11, 2016. I would like to turn the conference over to your host Ross Beaty. Please go ahead. Ross Beaty Thank you very much operator and good morning ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to Alterra’s Q1 financial and technical operating results conference call. I would first like to draw your attention to the forward-looking statements in our disclosure materials and note that we have cautionary language there regarding forward-looking statements and we seek Safe Harbor for these. So joining me today around the table are our senior management team. We had our annual meeting yesterday. We had a nice crowd, lots of questions and it was really a pleasure to talk about where we are right now. We had a very good year in 2015 and continue that in 2016 and you’ll see in the financial results here. But there is a lot behind those results a lot of hard work and a lot of great team work here. I’m going to turn the call over right now to John Carson our CEO, who will describe these results in more detail. John? John Carson Thanks, Ross. We had a good quarter this year. Our generation was on target again and again very strong generation at our Toba Montrose asset and look forward to telling you all about these items I now going to start by turning it over to our CFO, who will summarize the financial results. Lynda? Lynda Freeman Thanks John, and good morning, everyone. With only a months ago that we had our year-end results call where we updated the group on the latest development of Alterra. So I’ll keep this first quarter update relatively brief. This is the first quarter that we’ve had all six operating assets in use for the whole period. With Shannon coming online on December 10th, we are now reporting the generation and operating results of this facility for a full quarter. Other than the introduction of Shannon this was a routine quarter. I’ll start my presentation with the discussion on the consolidated results of the company. On slide four for those of you following the presentation. As released yesterday, our consolidated revenue, which reflects 100% of the results HS Orka was $14.9 million in the quarter, a reduction of $1.5 million against the first quarter of 2015. This reduction is due to lower generation and lower aluminum prices with 22% of HS Orka’s revenue linked to the price of aluminum. Generation at HS Orka was marginally up from budget with budget reflecting reduction in generation in 2016 until the reinjection program that is currently underway at Reykjanes [ph] takes effect. The impact of the two new wells in Svartsengi is also projected to take effect later in 2015. So we’re expecting the generation numbers to increase during the year. The reduction in generation directly impacted gross profit because cost of sales remained flat quarter-on-quarter. The company reported a loss before tax for the period of just under $1 million against $17.6 million loss in the same period of 2015. Our consolidated results continue to be affected by large drilling caused by non-cash items such as the embedded derivatives, foreign exchange and the fair value of bonus payable this quarter was no exception. Moving on to slide five and our net interest results for the quarter, generation, revenue and EBITDA are down for HS Orka, Toba and Dokie. Speaking about to Toba, I’d like to remind everyone that back in 2015 Toba had a record first quarter as a result of a particularly mild winter. This resulted in generation of 248% of budget which had a direct impact on revenue and EBITDA. Talking 2016 now, although Toba was down on the prior quarter, I would like to highlight that the generation revenue numbers were again up on budget. As mentioned above, this is the first full quarter results for Shannon. The asset is performing well and generation was in accordance with budget. Revenue of $1.3 million was recorded in the period which is below expectations due to merchant spot prices realized. Shannon will commence selling the majority of its power in the 13 year power hedge on June 1st of this year. Turning your attention to the balance sheet on slide seven, foreign exchange is the largest contributing factors to an increase in assets and liabilities with both the Canadian dollar and the Icelandic kroner strengthening against the U.S. dollar since December. The other thing to highlight is consistent with December 31st the company remains in a negative working capital position, primarily due to the inclusion of the Sweden bond of $123 million which mature in July and December of this year. Refinancing assets for the ISK denominated bonds have been delayed due to unrelated financial complications of the bond holder. The Municipality which holds the bond is seeking resolution with a large group of creditors if it is the unsuccessful it will be placed under state control. Discussions are ongoing to refinance both the ISK and the U.S. dollar bonds. Further disclosure in relation to the bond is included within both our financial statements, our MD&A and is shown on slide eight. Excluding HS Orka and the impact of the bonds, working capital was $4.2 million at March 31st, and the company continues to have a $20 million Canadian dollar revolving line of credit at its disposal, which could be used to fund unbudgeted development spend if necessary. Finally the last slide I’m going to talk to you is net debt. Other than the Swedish bonds, the company had Holdco debt of $67 million and net project debt of $278 million at March 31. The company continues to paydown the debt to each of the operating project location, is up to-date on all interest payments, and is in compliance with all debt covenants. Further information on the paydown of the debt is contained within the Appendix 1 to the presentation. That concludes my presentation. I’ll now hand you back to John. John Carson Thanks, Lynda. And I’d just like to reiterate that though we mentioned EBITDA and revenue decreasing for what we’re terming decrease generation is actually a good new story last year was just an exceptional quarter for generation. We were right on target this year. So that’s really the right way to look at it. With that we’re going to do our review of our assets. And I’m going to turn it over to the leaders of our operations. That’s Paul Rapp for Wind and Geothermal and Jay Sutton for Hydro. Jay, let’s start with you. Jay Sutton Thanks, John. Turning to slide 10, TMGP had a successful first quarter 2016 producing 25 gigawatt hours of energy versus our forecast of 24 gigawatt hours. Our April generation of 61 gigawatt hours was 238% of forecast resulting in us currently being at 167% of year-to-date. So although our first quarter of 2016 was behind the record production in the first quarter of 2015 we made up for it in April and have had the best January to April performance since we started operation in 2010. We spent the last three months performing our annual maintenance in preparation for the high inflows that started in April and our plants are running very well. I spoke to the operations crew this morning and the plants are currently generating 115 megawatts and we are at 150% of our forecast month-to-date for May. On the slide you can see one of our operators in grinding one of our runners, performing some maintenance on it that occurred in March of this year. We are continuing to make improvements to reduce outage time, increase the plant efficiency and squeeze out as much generation and revenue from the plants as we can. Snowpack is near the long-term average for this time of year so we’re looking forward to continue the good generation throughout the spring and summer. Finally our crews continue to operate the plants and maintain them safely and within our environmental commitments and we are well over two years without a recordable incident for our employees or our contractors. That’s it for Toba, John. Back over to you. John Carson Thanks, Jay. Appreciate that and I just like to bring one thing to mind for those who are listening in today is that you get a quarterly update as to how these assets are doing. I happen to get a daily update and it’s a real joy to see those updates come through to see just how hard our team works at keeping this asset in excellent condition, it just seems to do better and better each year. 2014 record breaking, 2015 record breaking and now 2016 on track again. So my complements Jay to you and the team and really our whole ops team. Let’s continue with the asset review Paul. Paul Rapp Thanks, John. We’ll start with Shannon, so Shannon we had a great — it’s our first quarter operations and it really worked well, the facility is operating very, very well, we’ve maintained very high wind turbine availability and we’ve had very few of the normal PDing [ph] issues that you would expect to see at a new plant like Shannon. Generation for Q1 was 99% of plant and we did see low wind in April, but we’re seeing very strong generation in May last couple of days have been exceptional. GE is maintaining our balance of plant and the wind turbines and doing a great job in that role. As Lynda mentioned we need to sell our power into the merchant market until the start of our hedge, which is in just a few weeks and we’re looking forward to it. Let’s move on to the next slide so Dokie, Dokie continues to operate very well we have no equipment issues at Dokie. The plant really is running at a very smooth zone right now, we have very few issues, the vested crews are very attuned to the operation, they are doing a very good job of maintaining the turbine and our turbine availability for the quarter has been at 99%, which is exceptional. Production for the first quarter and year-to-date is slightly behind plan and that is strictly due to lower than planned wind. At Dokie we also continue to operate very well with no safety or environmental issues and as I said no significant equipment issues. You may have heard about a number of forest fires in the Fort St. John region. They have been in the order of 80 forest fires burning in the region, but just wanted to note that none of them were anywhere Dokie unlike a couple of years ago. So Dokie is doing well. Okay on to the next slide. Okay you to Iceland for Svartsengi and Reykjanes so both Svartsengi and Reykjanes have had very strong production performance year-to-date and combine generation at the plant is 101% of the plant for both Q1 and year-to-date. Highlights at the Svartsengi plant include the testing of our first of our two new wells that were drilled last year and early this year, Svartsengi 25 has been completed and the results indicate that the well will be a good producer in the 3 to 5 megawatt range which is great news. Work is underway at the plant right now to connect this well to the plant and that should be completed in summer. The second well Svartsengi 26 is still heating up after completion of the drilling and will be tested later this year. However early indications from the drilling and the testing done during drilling are that it’s quite positive making another good addition to production. At the same time we’re completing a new discharge system at Svartsengi, which will allow for more steam utilization and generation at the plant all combined with this the two wells that we’ve drilled. Down at Reykjanes our reinjection program that was mentioned by Lynda is well underway and the pipeline that we’ve been talking about for quite a few weeks calls supply is injected from the plant to our two big injection wells, well 33 and 34 to the north of the plant are in operation and we’re reinjected as we speak. And we’re also very excited about the start of the deep drilling program at Reykjanes in August, which will deepen an existing production well from about 2.5 kilometers to 5 kilometers. This will be a first for Iceland and could result in a very strong production well for the plant as well as providing the consortium that’s participating the project with really valuable information on drilling at these extreme depths and temperatures. So stay tuned very exciting development at Reykjanes. John? John Carson Okay. Thanks, Paul. I do want to point out about those two wells which we’ve drilled at Svartsengi wells 25 and 26. 25 is on the Southern extreme of our field, 26 is on the Eastern extreme. Both of these were further up than any other wells in those directions that we’ve drilled and it’s very comprehending to see that they have likewise strong results. We don’t know how big the Svartsengi field is, but it’s been generally strongly for about 40 years now. So it’s very large. We don’t know how large and we are very happy with it and these are great results from this drilling. Jay, let’s turn to the construction side of the business and talk about Jimmie Creek. Jay Sutton Alright. So I’m on slide 14 now. Contractors looking at Jimmie Creek made great progress in the first quarter of 2016 and the construction of the project is essentially complete. The photo on the slide shows the completed intake structure at the upper end of the project where the water is diverted into the Penstock. Civil contractors have demobilized from site and the environmental remediation has been completed on all the sites that were disturbed during the construction. At the end of February Jimmie Creek was connected into the TMGP transmission line and all the electrical work to interconnect the facility to the BC hydro system has been completed and tested. The installation of the turbines and generators will be completed next week and we are well into commissioning of the plant systems. In two weeks we’ll start running water through the plant as part of what is called wet commissioning, which will be followed by online testing and finally our marketable power test. We are under budget ahead of schedule and expect to complete all the commissioning and start generating by the end of June. I would really like to thank the Alterra team and all the contractors who worked so hard over the past two years to build this another high quality asset in the Toba valley. We are very excited to be bringing this asset online and can’t wait to start producing electricity. John Carson Thanks, Jay. And I echo your comments to the team and we’ll be excited to announce the first generation at this plant hopefully next month. Now let’s flip to slide 15 and this will be the last slide of the presentation looking ahead. So first I’d like to reemphasize, we have a strong development focus in the USA, as we publicize and has really publicized by the industry last year got a two year extension to the production tax and investment tax credit programs. This really helps give a kick start to renewable power projects, which are the ones that we specialized in, of course. I also cite here that we received further positive guidance just last week. It appears that the credits are going to be good for four years instead of formally two years once construction has commenced. This is another unexpected boom and another display of the USA’s intent to really displace carbon generating power with clean power and we happen to be in the right place at the right time. Next, we are doing Greenfield development. Greenfield means that it’s an uncharted areas an area where nothing has ever been done before for both wind and solar sites. We have signed leases for multiple sites and we are actively working in several different power markets. We’ve included a photograph which you might not find very exciting, but a wind developer loves this photograph. It’s very flat and easy to build on terrain and you can imagine that the wind is quite strong and steady at a site like this. So this is one of our sites for which we’ve signed leases in Texas. Next we are analyzing several acquisitions of opportunities that are at development stage. Some of them are early stage, some of them are later stage and I would expect to see some deals, some transactions completed by us as the year goes on. Next turning our attention to Iceland and by the way for questions-and-answers we’ve included our CEO of the Iceland business Asgeir Margeirsson with us. Our team there is advancing several projects. The two I’ll just mentioned today are the first ones in line which are Reykjanes 4 plant, which really will adjoin our existing Reykjanes 1 and 2 plant. We’ve emphasized before that this new plant 30 megawatts is what we are targeting would require no further drilling. It will only use the steam that’s currently being released after generation at the current units. So it’s really within the respect of geothermal projects. One of the easiest projects you could build and very low risk. Secondly I mentioned the 9.3 megawatt Brúarvirkjun project. It’s a small but high capacity factor hydro project. About an hour and half away from our exisiting operations in the Reykjanes Peninsula. So these are just two assets, we’ll be talking about in the future, there is more behind them as well, and our Iceland has done a fantastic job, we’re very excited about where we’re headed there. I would also mentioned, our small hydro program in BC, taking advantage of the standing upper program at BC Hydro the local utility has, we’ve talked about our Tahumming project several times and we also mentioned the South Toba projects before on these calls, these projects would be suitable for that program, so stay tuned there as we continue to develop those projects. And finally, we’ve mentioned our Mariposa Geothermal project in Chile with whom we partner with EDC, the Philippine Geothermal operator, we are still thinking together with them about when we will start drilling, they visit us here in our offices last month. We considered things strongly and we’ll have to just wait and see as we look at market factors and other factors that would affect the timing for our drilling program, still holding out hope for this year, but we’ll update that as we go. With that Ross, that completes our formal presentation, I turn it back to you. Ross Beaty Thanks very much, John. And I think, I have no further comments, it was an orderly quarter and we look forward to some further news on acquisition particularly in the next quarter. So with that operator, I will turn it over to questions. Thank you all. Question-and-Answer Session Operator Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, we’ll now begin the question-and-answer session [Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from Jonathan Lo, Raymond James. Jonathan, please go ahead. Jonathan Lo Hi, thanks for taking the questions. Just on the guidance, you didn’t mention it this quarter, is it still the same for 2016-2017? Lynda Freeman Yeah. Hi, Steven, yes it is, at this stage we look to the actuals against budget look at full cost and we believe still that we’re on track for the numbers that we put in the MD&A back in December, it was based on December ones. Jonathan Lo Great. And were there any further discussions on the dividend expectation for this year or going forward? John Carson There is no further discussion we have this — we bring this up actually every Board Meeting, we have the obvious balance between issuing return of capital to shareholders and deploying the capital in our business for growth. And at the current time, we’re still doing the later, but we do have as an objective to kick out a dividend, as soon as possible and so watch this space literally on a quarterly basis. Jonathan Lo And for Shannon, how should we look at the pricing, the merchant pricing for 2Q, should it be about the same as the first quarter or is it — has it improved? John Carson Yeah. I don’t have that crystal ball, unfortunate to tell you, where it will move, I can easily tell you where it has moved, we were very disappointed with how low the prices were in the first quarter, it’s — it moves at all times, and the reason it moved so low was if you look at where the natural gas was pricing, Henry Hub or whatever node you choose to look at, it was at a historic low, we’re talking decades low point that directly affects the power prices realized in Texas, and that’s why we saw low prices. I’m happy to report over the just the last few days that we have had combined not only of high power generation, high wind, is been accompanied by higher power prices. So we have had some very good revenue day’s right here in May. We hope that that continues, but in any event the very good news is that our hedge will kick in next month provided by an affiliate of Citigroup, that hedge last for 13 years I will remind you and it’s certainly priced higher than anything we’re seeing in the power market at the moment. Jonathan Lo And that hedge starts on June 1st? John Carson I believe, yes. It is the first. Jonathan Lo Okay. Great. That’s all the questions I have today, thanks. John Carson Thanks, Jon. Operator [Operator Instructions] Your next question comes from Robert Kelly, Private. Robert, please go ahead. Unidentified Analyst Hi, this question is for Ross or John. I’m just wondering about the share price. Is it where you expect it to be, are you disappointing with the share price? And where do you expect that to be over the next-year? Ross Beaty Okay. Robert, well, expect and realize are big things, we certainly expected to go higher, we had a very good year, last year, as you know, we were actually top performing energy stock in Canada last year. That’s nothing to write home about our stock went up about 50% in the oil and gas sector particularly cratered because of the decline in oil and gas prices. So relatively speaking, we had a great year last year. But we actually do expect that to continue to rise this year. And one of the things we’re going to do that we didn’t do last year is we’re going to start talking about our story. We wanted to really wait until we had a story that we felt would be very compelling to new shareholders, institutional investors particularly. We haven’t been on the road for some time. We’re going to start getting on the road and talking about it on a monthly basis. We have a program to do that and we hope that that will only result in our stock going to a more I guess a price that reflects the reality of our assets whether you look at our stock on a net asset value basis or at a multiple basis — multiples of EBITDA or revenue or generation. You should see that we are trading at a discount and it’s our job to try to get that discount to become a premium. We certainly feel we deserve a premium for the quality of our management team for the execution of our most recent projects and for the growth we’ve had in our company. The other thing we’re going to try to do is layer on some new growth that investors can see we’ll continue the successful we’ve had with Shannon and Jimmie Creek in particular in the last couple of years. And with that, really get on the road and tell the story and hopefully it has some benefit from the standpoint of share price improvement. Unidentified Analyst Thank you very much. Ross Beaty Hey, Robert. Operator Thank you. Your next question comes from Rupert Mayer, National Bank. Rupert, please go ahead. Rupert Mayer Hey, good morning everyone thanks for all of the color. Just have a quick question on your comment about development stage acquisition opportunities. Can you give us anymore color on the sorts of opportunities you’re looking at, the scale of project maybe the type of project in terms of say generation source, winds, geothermal, solar? And what sort of target returns you would be looking at? What would be your hurdles on those potential acquisitions? John Carson All great questions. We are looking at as I pointed out in the USA primarily and at wind primarily and then solar just after wind. We do seek for the opportunistic Hydro project now and again. But those are tougher to come by for sure. With respect to the scope of the projects, we definitely aim for large ones. You’ll notice that the smallest project we have in our whole portfolio is a 62 megawatt project. So definitely we seek to do large projects, the same amount of work large and small, we’d always prefer a larger project. Then also with respect to the stage of development projects, some of these already have revenue contracts and are late in the stage of development needing financing and maybe a few other late stage items. And some of them are early stage groups of assets with promising futures with interesting locations and resources. So it really spans the breadth of size and stages of development activity. And with respect to the rate of return question, for sure we try to make every project that we have to be well into double-digit returns. That has become more difficult in the industry; A, because of competition; B, because of how offtake pricing has been negatively affected by the aforementioned gas prices. So there are challenges to achieving those returns and a lot of investors though are take comfort in the fact that these are very reliable projects. So in the end, while returns may have notch down a turn or two we’re still seeing double-digit returns in all the projects we’re looking at. Ross Beaty And I’d just add to what John said. The growth we have right in front of us in Iceland, which will be geothermal based and hydro based. Rupert Mayer Excellent, thanks very much. Operator Thank you. And there are no further questions at this time, at this time. Please proceed. John Carson Very good. Well if there is no further question we’ll end the call. And thank everyone for joining us today. Thank you, operator. Operator Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen this concludes your conference call for today. We thank you for participating and ask that you please disconnect your lines. Copyright policy: All transcripts on this site are the copyright of Seeking Alpha. However, we view them as an important resource for bloggers and journalists, and are excited to contribute to the democratization of financial information on the Internet. (Until now investors have had to pay thousands of dollars in subscription fees for transcripts.) So our reproduction policy is as follows: You may quote up to 400 words of any transcript on the condition that you attribute the transcript to Seeking Alpha and either link to the original transcript or to www.SeekingAlpha.com. All other use is prohibited. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HERE IS A TEXTUAL REPRESENTATION OF THE APPLICABLE COMPANY’S CONFERENCE CALL, CONFERENCE PRESENTATION OR OTHER AUDIO PRESENTATION, AND WHILE EFFORTS ARE MADE TO PROVIDE AN ACCURATE TRANSCRIPTION, THERE MAY BE MATERIAL ERRORS, OMISSIONS, OR INACCURACIES IN THE REPORTING OF THE SUBSTANCE OF THE AUDIO PRESENTATIONS. IN NO WAY DOES SEEKING ALPHA ASSUME ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY INVESTMENT OR OTHER DECISIONS MADE BASED UPON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WEB SITE OR IN ANY TRANSCRIPT. USERS ARE ADVISED TO REVIEW THE APPLICABLE COMPANY’S AUDIO PRESENTATION ITSELF AND THE APPLICABLE COMPANY’S SEC FILINGS BEFORE MAKING ANY INVESTMENT OR OTHER DECISIONS. If you have any additional questions about our online transcripts, please contact us at: transcripts@seekingalpha.com . Thank you!

One Size Fits All… If It’s Customized

Portfolio design comes in many flavors, but so do investors. Finding a sensible balance is job one in the pursuit of prudent financial advice. Yet for some folks the idea of keeping an open mind for customizing strategy to match an investor’s goals, risk tolerance and other factors reeks of treachery. There can only be one solution for everyone – all else is deceit. Or so some would have you believe. This biased worldview comes up a lot with the discussion of buy and hold, but the one-size-fits-all argument knows no bounds. The danger is that pre-emptively deciding how to manage assets for all investors is the equivalent of diagnosing illness and recommending treatment before meeting with the patient. Sound financial advice requires more nuance, of course, for two primary reasons: the future’s uncertain and the human species is afflicted with behavioral biases. In other words, a given investment strategy can be appropriate – or not – for different individuals. Consider the concept of buy and hold. By some accounts, it’s all you need to know. Stick your money in, say, the stock market and let the magic of time do the heavy lifting. Sensible? Perhaps. But it may be hazardous. The determining factor is the particulars of the investor for whom the advice is dispensed. Buy and hold – perhaps by focusing heavily if not exclusively on stocks via a handful of equity funds – may be eminently appropriate for a 25-year-old with a budding career, a saver’s mentality, and the behavioral discipline to focus on the long-run future. The same solution can be toxic, however for anyone with a time horizon of 10 years or less. Even for someone who’ll be investing for much longer, may run into trouble with buy and hold if he has a tendency to over-react to short-term events. In that case, buy and hold can be wildly inappropriate for an investor without the discipline to look through market crashes and bear markets. Ah, but that’s where a good financial advisor can help by keeping the client on the straight and narrow: Ignore the short-term volatility and stay focused on the long term. Fair enough, but it doesn’t always work. Some investors will bail at exactly the wrong time no matter how much hand-holding they receive. Deciding who’s vulnerable on that score can be tricky, but not impossible. Perhaps, then, a portfolio strategy with less risk – asset allocation – or the capacity to de-risk at times – some form of tactical – is more appropriate for certain individuals. The flip side of this equation is no less relevant. Forcing every client into a tactical asset allocation strategy simply because that’s your specialty (and/or it pays better for the advisor) is also misguided. Higher trading costs, taxable consequences and the inevitability of timing mistakes can and probably will take a bit out of total return over the long haul relative to buy and hold. The “price” of tactical can still be worthwhile for some folks, if the portfolio has a tamer risk profile. The point is that there’s no way to decide what’s appropriate without first understanding the client. Granted, a 25-year-old investor is more likely to benefit from buy and hold vs. a newly retired 65-year-old client. But there are exceptions and it’s essential to identify where those exceptions arise. The good news is that there’s an appropriate strategy for every client. The great strides in financial research and portfolio design capabilities via computers over the last several decades provide the raw material for building and maintaining portfolios that are suitable for any given client. Buy and hold may still be appropriate, but maybe not. The greatest strategy in the world is worthless if a client jump ships mid-way through the process. As such, the goal for managing money on behalf of individuals isn’t about identifying the strategy with the highest expected return or even the strongest risk-adjusted performance. Rather, the objective is to build a portfolio that’s likely to work for the client. That may or may not lead to a buy-and-hold strategy – or some variation thereof. Such talk is heresy in some corners. But matching portfolio design and management particulars to each client’s time horizon, goals, etc. – and behavioral traits – is the worst way to manage money… except when compared with the alternatives.

Consolidated Water’s (CWCO) CEO Rick McTaggart on Q1 2016 Results – Earnings Call Transcript

Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (NASDAQ: CWCO ) Q1 2016 Earnings Conference Call May 11, 2016, 11:00 am ET Executives Rick McTaggart – CEO & President David Sasnett – CFO Analysts Michael Gaugler – Janney Montgomery Scott Gerry Sweeney – ROTH Capital Blake Todd – Two Oaks Management John Bair – Ascend Wealth Advisors Operator Good morning, and welcome to the Consolidated Water Company’s First Quarter 2016 Earnings Conference Call. All participants will be in a listen-only mode. [Operator Instructions]. After today’s presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. [Operator Instructions]. Please note this event is being recorded. The information that will be provided in this conference call includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Including but not limited to statements regarding the company’s future revenues, future plans, objectives, expectations, and events, assumptions, and estimates. Forward-looking statements can be identified by use of the word or phrases well, likely result, are expected to, will continue, estimate, project, potential, belief, plan, anticipate, expect, intend, or similar expressions and variations of such words. Statements that are not historical facts are based on the company’s current expectations, beliefs, assumptions, estimates, forecasts, and projections for its business and the industry and markets related to its business. Any forward-looking statements made during this conference call are not guarantees of future performance and involves certain risks, uncertainties, and assumptions which are difficult to predict. Actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed in such forward-looking statements. Important factors which may affect these actual outcomes and results include without limitation tourism and weather conditions in the areas the company serves, the economies of the U.S. and other countries in which the company conducts business, the company’s relationships with the government it serves, regulatory matters including resolution of the negotiations for the renewal of the company’s retail license on Grand Cayman. The company’s ability to successfully enter new markets including Mexico, Asia and the United States and other factors including those Risk Factors set forth under Part one item 1a Risk Factors in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K. Any forward-looking statements made during this conference call speak as of today’s date. The company expressly disclaims any obligation or undertaking to update or revise any forward-looking statements made during this conference call to reflect any change in its expectations with regard there to or any change in events. Conditions or circumstances on which any forward looking statement is based except as it may be required by law. I would now like to turn the conference over to Rick McTaggart, CEO and President. Please go ahead. Rick McTaggart Thank you, Gail. Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Thank you for joining us today on this call, our CFO, David Sasnett is also joining me on the call from our Florida offices. Net income of the company this past quarter increased to approximately $2.05 million compared to $1.92 million during the first quarter of 2015. Consolidated gross profit during this past quarter was consistent with the first quarter of last year at approximately $6.1 million in spite of a decline of consolidated revenues of approximately $600,000 due to lower energy pass-through charges in January 2016 4.4% downward base rate adjustment in our retail business. This decline was partially offset by the addition of approximately six weeks in revenues from our newly acquired subsidiary Aerex Industries, Inc. which was purchased in mid-February. Other factors that impacted net income this past quarter were firstly an increase in general and administrative expenses of approximately $550,000. This was due primarily to legal costs related to the EWG litigation in Mexico and the United States and costs related to the acquisition of our 51% interest in Aerex. So just to keep in mind the cost of acquiring doing due-diligence that sort of thing were expensed this past quarter in relation to Aerex. And secondly, the impairment charge we recorded for our investment in our BBI affiliate as result of winding down of its Bar Bay contract decreased by $260,000 as compared to the first quarter of 2015. Our retail segment gross profit this past quarter remained consistent with first quarter of last year at approximately $3.35 million in spite of lower revenues due to lower energy pass-through charges and a base rate reduction noted earlier. These base rate reductions were partially offset by an increase in volume sales in our retail segment of approximately 5% during this past quarter compared to last year. Typically lower rainfall and higher tourism arrivals have tended in the past to increase our water volume sales in Grand Cayman. And according to the National Weather Service Data for this past quarter, rainfall was only about 60% of the rainfall that was recorded in the first quarter of 2015. Other tourist arrivals during the first quarter this year were down slightly by 2.45% compared to the first quarter of last year. So we tend to indicate that rainfall was the underlying cause of our — lower rainfalls the underlying cause of our retail segment performance. Earlier this year we noticed that our — sorry we received notice that our Cayman retail license have been extended to June 30 of this year to facilitate ongoing negotiations for a new license and we are currently waiting to receive the fully executed license amendment from the government. These ongoing negotiations continue to be productive and cordial. Gross profit generated by our bulk segment declined by $200,000 this past quarter compared to the first quarter of 2015 due to lower revenues of approximately $1.1 million. These lower revenues were due in part to a significant decrease in the prices of diesel fuel and electricity from 2015 to 2016 which reduced the energy component of our bulk rates and in addition to that, we noted in earlier filings that our fees that we charge for delivering water to the Water Authority from the North Sound plant in Grand Cayman decreased in the second quarter of last year due to contract extension that we received. This bulk segment gross profit decline was mainly attributable as I mentioned to our Bahamas and Grand Cayman bulk operations. While our belief is bulk operation gross profit this past quarter remain consistent with the first quarter of last year at approximately $315,000. Our service segment generated a gross profit of approximately $181,000 this past quarter compared to a loss of a $137,000 in the first quarter of 2015, and this is on higher revenues of approximately $650,000 due to our 51% acquisition of Aerex in mid-February of this year. On February 11, as we have noted we acquired a 51% interest in Aerex for approximately $7.7 million in cash. On April 28, we filed an amended Form 8-K which included the 2015 audited financial statements of Aerex as well as unaudited consolidated pro forma results of the company in Aerex for 2015. We are very excited about this acquisition which gives us access to the U.S. membrane water treatment equipment market and provides a platform to potentially expand our traditional design build operate water treatment business into the U.S. market. We’re already seen one large desalination plant in California completed under a design build operate contract and we are aware of others that are being considered in California and Texas. We believe that the current membrane water filtration market size of approximately $200 million in 2016 provides us with ample opportunity to expand the Aerex business using our more than 40 years of knowledge, designing, building, and operating this type of equipment. And in addition to that, as I mentioned, we see the added value of expanding our traditional build and operate business into the U.S. We’ve historically bought equipment ourselves from Aerex and its competitors and are therefore familiar with the competition from a customer perspective. And as a final comment, investors should keep in mind that due to the nature of Aerex’s business, we expect its revenues will fluctuate more than the revenues that we have historically generated under our long-term water supply contracts and utility license. Just looking at our projects, on April 21 of this year, we reached another significant milestone in the development of our 100 million gallon per day seawater desalination plant in Mexico with the submission to the State of Baja California of our binding tender offer to design, build and operate this plant for 37 years. We believe that our proposal is very competitive and it reflects our deep knowledge of a project that we have been developing for quite some time. The State of Baja California accepted two other proposals, in addition to ours, and intends to announce the results of its technical evaluation next Friday, on May 20, at which time the financial proposals of all the technically compliant bidders will be publically disclosed. So we will keep investors apprised of any developments regarding this very important project. So Gail, with that I would like to just open the call up for questions. Question-and-Answer Session Operator We will now begin the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions]. The first question comes from Michael Gaugler of Janney Montgomery Scott. Please go ahead. Michael Gaugler Good morning everyone. Rick McTaggart Hey Mike how are you? Michael Gaugler Good. Rick you mentioned that California and Texas as really the markets for Aerex on a go-forward basis. I’m just wondering would there be anything to preclude Aerex from befitting from Rosarito if you are ultimately selected as the developer of that project? Rick McTaggart Absolutely not I mean we definitely have that in mind. Michael Gaugler Okay. That was really all I had. Thanks. Rick McTaggart Thanks Mike. Operator Our next question comes from Gerry Sweeney of ROTH Capital. Please go ahead. Gerry Sweeney Hey good morning guys. Thank you for taking my call. Rick McTaggart Sure, Gerry. How are you? Gerry Sweeney Doing well, thanks Rick. A question on the bulk side, the revenue coming down, you talked specifically about just general reduced energy cost flowing through. How — I’m curious as to how volumes have been on that side of the business? Rick McTaggart Actually in Grand Cayman we saw a slight increase in volumes this past quarter in the Bahamas I think it’s been fairly consistent. We’ve mentioned over the last couple of years that the government there in the Bahamas has been — has undertaken a loss reduction program. So they’re staying around the minimum volumes now for that business. David Sasnett Gerry, I just wanted to add that volumes don’t have a huge impacts on our bulk business they are much more relevant to the retail side of our operations because our bulk contracts have minimum take or pay arrangements. So incremental volumes above the minimum probably contribute to gross profit don’t have the huge impact on gross profit. They don’t have the impact on gross profit let’s say an increase in volume has in the retail segment. Gerry Sweeney Got it, it’s a good point. Also I know you talked about I think in the Bahamas at some point they were trending down towards the take or pay level and there potentially could be some opportunity for the Bahamas government to expand some of that bulk business into other areas that may need water. I mean it was a little bit of a corporate ended statement but just curious if there was an opportunity on that front at all for the future? Rick McTaggart Well my understanding is that the government is interested in encouraging more people to connect. The actual connection rate in that side I think is quite low compared to other jurisdictions that we operate in. I don’t remember the exact percentages but I think it’s somewhere less than 50% in the households are connected to the public water supply there so. There is an opportunity to encourage people to connect to the more reliable source and there is a big development there that’s — the Bahamas development that and the government has its sights on supplying them as well but that I think it’s been in the news quite extensively that that project is having some issues itself so. Gerry Sweeney Got it. And then just a couple of quick housekeeping items. I assume energy cost impact stabilize, if not down back a little bit so, is it fair to say that we’re done with some of that energy pass-through declines? Rick McTaggart Well, you tell me, I don’t know how the energy market is going to go over the next year or so but I mean seems to me there is opportunity for it to go up. Gerry Sweeney Yes, I mean on a look back basis over the last quarter it seems to have stabilized so. Rick McTaggart Yes. Gerry Sweeney And then could you just go over that the G&A I think you mentioned it shift around by $550,000 it sounds like there was a couple puts and takes in their little less on the impairment charge but a little bit more on some of the other charges that gets around acquisition and some — wasn’t sure if there was something else. If you could just spend 30 seconds on that just so I think cost might be — David Sasnett You want me to take this Rick? Rick McTaggart Yes, you can do. You go ahead. David Sasnett Well, first of all we have the incremental G&A expenses from the Aerex acquisition for the six week period well they were included in our results. Then we also have the incremental expenses associated with the litigation in Mexico that was raised by EWG. And so, and then we had some acquisition cost and under current GAAP. The legal fees that you incurred and the accounting fees things like that and under previous accounting guidance you could capitalize this cost but years ago they changed the guidance, so all that stuff is expensed by us. So really those things the Aerex G&A increase obviously will be there going forward and they encourage general and administrative expenses that will be incorporated in our results through the rest of this year. With respect to the legal fees, we incurred with the Mexico I don’t know if we could predict how that will go. And then obviously we won’t have incremental expenses associated with the Aerex acquisition now that has been closed. So hopefully that’s helpful to you. Gerry Sweeney Yes and I mean what I was really trying to get out, what is baseline G&A, I mean what was the litigation cost and what were the acquisition cost provided from that? David Sasnett We disclosed if you’ll take a look in the 10-Q. Gerry Sweeney Yes. David Sasnett There is a discussion of the litigation both in the footnotes to the financials and is disclosed in the MD&A section and the exact amount of legal fees that we incurred for that litigation were disclosed therein. So you can take a look at that. Gerry Sweeney Okay, appreciated. Thank you. That’s all from my end. Rick McTaggart Thanks Gerry. Operator Our next call comes from — question comes from Blake Todd of Two Oaks Management. Please go ahead. Blake Todd Good morning guys. Rick McTaggart Good morning. How are you? Blake Todd Doing great. In your press release you talked about the proposal that you put to Mexico and there is three entities that you say that did it. And could you explain what those three different entities were that did the proposal? Rick McTaggart Yes, it’s public information I mean they ourselves obviously which it was a consortium consisting of NSCR well which is our subsidiary, Newwater which is a Singapore company and Degrémont — Suez Degrémont which is a one of the largest water companies in the world. So the three of us is consortium, the other group is essentially Hyflux out of Singapore and the third group is Aqualia out of Spain. Blake Todd And we know or have you will this be part of the disclosures when we get into the financial as to what percentage ownership each piece will have? Rick McTaggart Well, I mean what we’ve disclosed in the past is that we expect to make our long-term revenues through 15% equity interest in the project and/or less and service fees we’re providing operational services to the plant and the distribution and the pipeline there, so that’s as much as, as we can tell you at this point. I mean all the financials information is still undisclosed by the client or anything like that. So we don’t know what the rates are that the competitors have charged and we’re certainly not going to disclose ours right now. Blake Todd And then one last thing May 20, Mexico comes back and says these particular bids are technically feasible. I’m assuming that they will then ask for proposals from one or three of you for the financing; is that correct? Rick McTaggart That was all submitted on the 21 of April. So it was in two packages and they don’t open the financial package until they determine whether the proposal is technically compliant. Blake Todd Super. Thank you for the color. Rick McTaggart Sure. No problem. Operator [Operator Instructions]. Our next question comes from John Bair of Ascend Wealth Advisors. Please go ahead. John Bair Thank you. One of my questions was just answered; the other one is that you would kindly shed some light on what’s going on in Bali these days for you? Rick McTaggart David, do you want to take on that? David Sasnett Yes, things in Bali haven’t changed. The local economy is surely not doing very well there. And as a result, our sales volumes has actually declined in the first quarter this year as compared to first quarter last year. We’re in the process as we said at the moment, as we said in the Q; we’re trying to find a partner there. We still believe that the price — the markets has got a great potential. But at the moment we’d like to bring in a partner that would help us deal with the ongoing losses that we have and a party that could really market properly to the local hotels and to the government itself. So, I mean ultimately if we don’t find a partner we will have to take some kind of impairment charge against these assets and we’ve talked about that openly both in the Risk Factors of our Q and in the discussion in the retail segment the MD&A. But we think the project itself and the market have a lot of potential when we think it’s — it would be an attractive investment for some party and so we’re marketing it now and we’ll see how that goes. I can’t tell you that the entire Indonesian economy and also they’re approached to their water assets is somewhat confusing to us because when we first entered the Bali market years ago they had a water crisis at that time and it’s only grown worse and they continue to tap into the fresh water aqua for there and with long-term disaster results for them the government there seems almost unable to address the issue. So hopefully they will come around and realize the importance of desal, we have actually talked to the Water Utility there at times and they have been very interested in doing something with us but nothing seems to happen there. It’s always difficult reaching a deal with any government and it seems to be the more so in Bali. But like I said we still believe in the market and we’re hopeful that we could find a partner that would help us not only build out that plant but also grow the business there but we’ll just have to see how it goes. John Bair So if I’m hearing you correctly, you would still retain an interest in the project; is that correct? Rick McTaggart Yes. David Sasnett Yes the ideal situation for us would be to continue to remain a partner but to also use our expertise in the capital of our new partner to build additional plants and the entire Indonesian market needs desal is just getting them to pull the trigger on it, getting them to actually take actions seems to be the impediment there. Operator [Operator Instructions]. As there are no further questions, this concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Rick McTaggart for any closing remarks. Rick McTaggart Yes, thanks Gail. Just wanted to thank everybody again for joining today and look forward to speaking with you again in August to discuss our second quarter results. Thank you. Operator The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today’s presentation. You may now disconnect. Copyright policy: All transcripts on this site are the copyright of Seeking Alpha. However, we view them as an important resource for bloggers and journalists, and are excited to contribute to the democratization of financial information on the Internet. (Until now investors have had to pay thousands of dollars in subscription fees for transcripts.) So our reproduction policy is as follows: You may quote up to 400 words of any transcript on the condition that you attribute the transcript to Seeking Alpha and either link to the original transcript or to www.SeekingAlpha.com. All other use is prohibited. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HERE IS A TEXTUAL REPRESENTATION OF THE APPLICABLE COMPANY’S CONFERENCE CALL, CONFERENCE PRESENTATION OR OTHER AUDIO PRESENTATION, AND WHILE EFFORTS ARE MADE TO PROVIDE AN ACCURATE TRANSCRIPTION, THERE MAY BE MATERIAL ERRORS, OMISSIONS, OR INACCURACIES IN THE REPORTING OF THE SUBSTANCE OF THE AUDIO PRESENTATIONS. IN NO WAY DOES SEEKING ALPHA ASSUME ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY INVESTMENT OR OTHER DECISIONS MADE BASED UPON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WEB SITE OR IN ANY TRANSCRIPT. USERS ARE ADVISED TO REVIEW THE APPLICABLE COMPANY’S AUDIO PRESENTATION ITSELF AND THE APPLICABLE COMPANY’S SEC FILINGS BEFORE MAKING ANY INVESTMENT OR OTHER DECISIONS. If you have any additional questions about our online transcripts, please contact us at: transcripts@seekingalpha.com . Thank you!