Tag Archives: applicationtime

Duplicating The All-Weather Fund Using Low-Cost ETFs

Summary Tony Robbins’ newest book reveals the asset allocation of Ray Dalio’s All-Weather Fund. The allocation is designed to balance the percentage of risk rather than the percentage of money to each asset. This strategy can be replicated using low-cost ETFs, but the biggest challenge is in sticking with the allocation as the years go by and each asset performs differently. Everyone in the business knows Ray Dalio is the manager of the world’s largest hedge fund, but his portfolio strategy has not always been very accessible by the public. Dalio has not added any clients in ten years, and even then, the only way to get access to the fund was with a net worth of at least four billion dollars and a minimum investment of 100 million dollars. Luckily, when Tony Robbins sat down with Dalio to interview him for his latest book , Ray shared the specifics of how he allocates the All-Weather fund. So this article will look at how to replicate that portfolio using a series of low-cost ETFs. Keep in mind that the fund does use leverage to increase the returns, and this allocation does not include any of the hedging activities. The large percentage allocated to bonds is a surprise to most, but the reasoning behind it is based on balancing the percentage of risk rather than the percentage of money put into each asset. Stocks are three times more volatile than bonds, so putting a higher percentage into bonds balances the risk in a way that putting 50/50 stocks and bonds wouldn’t. So the 15% in gold and commodities works the same way, as these are more volatile than both stocks and bonds. This approach is not all that different from Harry Browne’s permanent portfolio concept, which is a little more simple with 25% stocks, 25% bonds, 25% cash, and 25% gold. Swiss investor Marc Faber also recommends a similar allocation , 25% stocks, 25% bonds/fixed income, 25% real estate, and 25% gold. Dr. Faber’s portfolio is more suited towards very wealthy individuals, and it is closer to the “one third, one third, one third” concept that Jim Rickards talks about in regards to how wealthy families keep their wealth intact over many generations. The allocation is one third in land, one third in gold, and one third in fine art. This particular strategy takes a VERY long-term point of view and looks to protect and preserve wealth against any and all crises from depressions, wars, to hyperinflation. Dalio’s All-Weather fund is not centered around hedging against inflation/hyperinflation as much as the portfolios mentioned above, but the 15% in gold and commodities shows that he does have some concerns about inflation even though he might not think severe inflation is inevitable and imminent. In fact, it was the historic event in 1971 of President Nixon taking the US off the gold standard for good that greatly shaped Ray’s “all weather” strategy and realization that no one can really predict which investments will do best in the future. So here are the best choices of ETFs for replicating the All-Weather portfolio: 40% Long-Term Bonds Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (NYSEARCA: BLV ) With assets totaling 1.2 billion dollars, this fund invests in both government and investment-grade corporate long-term bonds. The mix of corporate bonds helps to give the yield a boost that one would not get by going only with government bonds. Of course, when you go with any Vanguard ETF, you are usually getting the lowest expense ratio in the industry, and with this particular ETF, the ER is only .10%. The yield is 4.05%. 15% Intermediate-Term Bonds Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond ETF (NYSEARCA: BIV ) This popular fund is even bigger with total assets of 5.95 billion dollars. There are not too many differences between this fund and BLV, except that this fund of course holds only shorter-term bonds. The yield is 2.73%, and the expense ratio is also a very low .10%. For this 15% portion, you could also split it into two, with BIV on one side and a TIPS ETF on the other. 30% Stocks Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (NYSEARCA: VOO ) Only 30% in stocks seems very low compared to conventional wisdom. Again though, Dalio’s strategy puts the assets with the most volatility as a lower percentage of the portfolio. VOO is a large fund with 34.41 billion in assets . The expense ratio is .05%, which is very important for the long-term investor and the highlight of this ETF. The yield for VOO is 2.01%. In some of my recent articles, I have been highlighting ETFs that can provide income that would be cushioned from a major crash in the US, which I anticipate, although I won’t put a time on it. So, in that vein, I would add to this by splitting the equities portion of this strategy into two parts; one, domestic equities, and the other, international equities. For the international exposure, I think the Vanguard FTSE All-World Ex-US ETF (NYSEARCA: VEU ) is the best choice within this strategy. This ETF has 14.82 billion in assets , an expense ratio of .14%, and the yield is 2.81%. 7.5% Gold and 7.5% Commodities iShares Gold Trust ETF (NYSEARCA: IAU ) and PowerShares DB Commodity Index Tracking ETF (NYSEARCA: DBC ) This allocation to gold and commodities again goes against conventional wisdom. Considering the most recent downturn in gold, it would be even more difficult for most people to consider gold and commodities in their portfolio. It is easily the most hated commodity in world today, or at least it is the most hated in the financial mainstream media. Gold and the whole natural resource sector have been in a deflation since 2011, but that does not change the fact that since the late 90s, gold has outperformed the Dow, the S&P 500, as well as Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK.A ) (NYSE: BRK.B ). (click to enlarge) So, for this portion of the portfolio, IAU works best for the gold portion, because it has the lowest expense ratio of any gold ETF at .25%, as well as plenty of liquidity. For the commodities, DBC is a good choice. It tracks the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return™ which has exposure to 14 of the most heavily traded commodities. While the expense ratio is higher than I would like at .85%, the fund offers exposure to the futures market without going through the actual trading process yourself. SA contributor Dan Bortolotti points out that this allocation did not provide mind-blowing returns over the past three decades (9.7% annualized returns) and that most people could not stomach any one asset going through turmoil while another asset is rising. The problem lies in the emotions of individual investors though, not in the actual portfolio. However you slice it up, it is going to be very difficult for most people to sit by while any part of their portfolio is not performing very well. The natural instinct is to sell the portion that is underperforming and be overweight the portion that is doing good. How many of the people who were 90% stocks and 10% bonds stuck with that strategy in 2008 when the crisis was going on? What about putting all your eggs in one basket, would that not cause tremendous pain when that one asset inevitably goes through a bear market? All that most people will need is basic asset allocation of their assets and the ability to stick with the allocation over a period of decades. Even for the person who is not a financial expert, the better option is to keep a core portfolio of low-cost and commission-free ETFs instead of letting a mutual fund do the same thing but with extra fees attached. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

An Extraordinary Edge You Have As A Small Investor

It goes without saying that capital allocation is a CEO’s most important job. How he allocates capital over the long run is what determines the value he creates for the business and its shareholders. But the reason many CEOs fail in profitably allocating capital is their incentives, which are aligned to what they can do in the next 1-2 years than what they must do in the next 7-10 years. This is also how most investors and money managers work – especially after a period of good performance, they would rather go for the kill in the next few months or maybe 1-2 years, than build portfolios that would do well over a 10+ year period. “Who wants to get rich in old age?” goes the thought process. “Why not gun for a 30-40% return and retire rich in the next 10 years?” After all, this is what simple math suggests. If you can invest Rs 5,000 per month and do that every month for 25 straight years, and at an annual rate of return of 30%, you will have almost Rs 34 crores after 25 years. On the other hand, if you earn just 20% annually, and everything else remains same, the amount in your bank after 25 years would be just Rs 4 crores. That’s a difference of a huge Rs 30 crores. Now most people would wonder, “Who would want to earn 20% and be left with just Rs 4 crores when you can go for the kill (read, 30%) and end with Rs 30 crores extra before you get old?” This is perfect reasoning, my dear friend. But, if you are not a full-time investor with a great knack of pulling out winner after winner, aiming for 30% annual return from the stock market is akin to starting your climb up Mt. Everest with a dash. Especially when you start in a bull market – and a lot of the 30-percenters of the last 4-5 years have started in the bull market – and consider that you may after all be a distant cousin of Usain Bolt, it’s easy to fall for the ‘go for the kill’ mindset. I’m sure a lot of stock market pros reading this would want to shut me up here, because they do believe they have the capabilities to earn such great returns, and sustainably. I have nothing to offer them here, but best wishes. But if you aren’t a pro, and if you are not very old, I would suggest you to take note of the only thing you can control in your investment journey – which also happens to be your biggest advantage as an individual investor in your pursuit of creating wealth from the stock market. And what’s that? It’s surely not the amount of return you want to earn, however much you try. That’s not in your control. But the only thing you are in complete control of is… Time! As an entrepreneur, here is what I count amongst the best advice I ever received on the concept of how managers can make best profitable capital allocation decisions for significant value creation. This comes from Amazon’s Jeff Bezos – If everything you do needs to work on a three-year time horizon, then you’re competing against a lot of people. But if you’re willing to invest on a seven-year time horizon, you’re now competing against a fraction of those people, because very few companies are willing to do that. Just by lengthening the time horizon, you can engage in endeavors that you could never otherwise pursue. At Amazon we like things to work in five to seven years. Note the big idea here – “Just by lengthening the time horizon, you can engage in endeavors that you could never otherwise pursue.” This is also true when you are investing in the stock market. Just by lengthening the time, you stay with good quality businesses – or businesses that remain good – you can create wealth you could have never thought of, and by the time you need that wealth. Like the CEO of a privately held company who can make decisions for the future without worrying about next quarter’s earnings, you can use time arbitrage to benefit from time-tested investment processes without the worry, and often financial damage that comes from recklessly chasing quick returns. Your Biggest Edge There are three main sources of edge you may have as an investor – Informational – What you can know that others don’t know Analytical – How you can process what is known better than others Behavioural – How sensibly you can behave as compared to others Now, it’s rare to possess all the three edges. It’s not impossible, but rare. In markets that are mostly efficient, having an informational edge is difficult. Many people are doing all they can to talk to customers, suppliers and industry experts to glean further insight into a company or an industry and profit from anomalies. And then, if you claim to possess too much of an informational edge, you run the risk of a face-off with the stock market regulator on the issue of insider information. Then, as far as analytical edge is concerned, it can be obtained through extreme smartness and hard work. Having such an edge means that even if you have the same information as everyone else, you’ll be able to process it better than others and see what the market doesn’t see. But having such an edge is also really hard, because there are a lot of very smart people motivated to analyze things better and faster than you. You will realize this if you are intellectually honest. So the high degree of analytical competition renders this edge a non-edge in the long run. Michael Mauboussin addresses this concept in his book, The Success Equation , where he writes – The key is this idea called the paradox of skill. As people become better at an activity, the difference between the best and the average and the best and the worst becomes much narrower. As people become more skillful, luck becomes more important. That’s precisely what happens in the world of investing. Anyways, that leaves the final source of edge an investor can have i.e., behavioural, or how you behave. So, while many investors may have the same information as others, or have the same analytical rigour, they behave differently. And most of how you behave is determined by how patient you are in real life and whether you have adequate time and staying power available with you. Most people are not patient when it comes to the stock market, and despite knowing the pitfalls of behaving badly. Now, when it comes to staying power, here is how Prof. Sanjay Bakshi defined it in his recent post – From the vantage point of the investor, staying power comes from: 1. Large number of years left to invest. 2. Ability to handle volatility through financial strength – low or no debt and significant disposable income preventing the need to liquidate portfolio during inappropriate times. 3. A frugal nature. 4. Ability to handle volatility through psychological strength. 5. A very long-term view about investing. 6. Structural advantages – investing your own money or other people’s money who will not or cannot withdraw it for a long long time. 7. Family support during tough times. As you can see from the list above, most factors that create staying power for you as an investor are related to how you behave. And the reason this is a great edge you have against the big, institutional investors – who otherwise may have analytical and informational edges – is that your behaviour is completely under your control as against the latter who often behave (frequently irrationally) how their clients want them to behave. If Mr. Market and its other participants are discounting things 12-15 months down the line, and if you can look out 5-10 years, you will have a time arbitrage advantage, which is a structural advantage to have. In short, as an individual, small investor, if you are… Not chasing unreasonable returns, and Invest money that you won’t need for the next 8-10 years … you are perfectly placed to benefit from time arbitrage and take opportunities handed to you by others who are… Chasing unreasonable returns and are thus more prone to making serious mistakes (if their expectations are not met), Investing borrowed money that they must return, even if the markets are bad, and Investing under an institutional setup and thus suffer from institutional compulsions like short-term incentives. How bigger and better an edge can you have? To quote Warren Buffett – The stock market is a no-called-strike game. You don’t have to swing at everything – you can wait for your pitch. The problem when you’re a money manager is that your fans keep yelling, “Swing, you bum!” That’s about swinging (buying a good quality business) when the price is right. And then you let time take over. To quote Buffett again… Time is the friend of the wonderful company, the enemy of the mediocre. Time is also your wonderful friend, dear investor. You only need to trust in it, and let its magic work. If you can spot a great value (you can learn to do that), you just need to buy it and then sit still as long as it remains good value (difficult, but very much possible). This is the single-most profitable form of investing in the world. It’s Not Easy, but Very Effective I will be honest here. Time arbitrage is not easy. A few months of a falling market or seeing your stocks going nowhere can feel like years. The impulse to “do something” can be overwhelming. Unfortunately, that impulse, more often than not, would hurt your long-term returns. Time arbitrage, on the other hand, yields tremendous financial and psychological benefits for those with the discipline to hold fast against the noise. This is an edge worth cultivating. It costs nothing but time and can be applied by anyone, including you. I would leave you with this chart of how Buffett compounded during his 50+ years at Berkshire… Note from the chart that his compounding began to show after he crossed 50 years of age, and after investing through Berkshire for 20 years. When you imagine yourself at 85, like Buffett is today, you may not see yourself come even a distant close to what he has achieved over these years. But like he did, if you can start early and keep at it, when you are 40 or 50, you would realize that you did yourself a great deed by giving your wealth time to grow, and a lot of it. If you are not dependent on investing for your living, please don’t try to go for the kill. Be bold at your work so that you earn more, save more, and thus invest more. Don’t try to act bold in the stock market. As Howards Marks said… There are old investors, and there are bold investors, but there are no old bold investors. You got the point, right?

Vanguard Extended Market Index ETF Analysis

We love the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (NYSEARCA: VOO ). We have had this index in our portfolios for decades. The Vanguard Extended Market Index ETF (NYSEARCA: VXF ) is the mate to the Vanguard S&P 500 Index. They are a pair, and we recommend taking them together. The Vanguard Extended Markets ETF follows the S&P Completion Index. To understand this index you must first understand the S&P Total Market Index. This is a comprehensive US market index that includes large, mid, small and micro cap stocks. Take the S&P 500 stocks out of the S&P Total Market Index and you end up with the S&P Completion Index. This is why they are a pair that should not be separated. The S&P Completion Index holds all of the other mid, small and micro cap stocks not included in the S&P 500 Index. Our database of 1,500+ ETFs does not show any ETFs that replicate the S&P Total Market Index. Even if there were a great ETF available, we would still buy the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF combined with the Vanguard Extended Markets ETF. These two ETFs move at different rates, and since we apply Opportunistic Rebalancing to our portfolios, we have found rebalancing benefits from buying these two ETFs. The Vanguard Extended Market ETF has a low internal fee of 0.14 percent. Even better, as discussed in the previous spotlight, the actual total holding costs have been lower at 0.11 percent over the past 12 months. Put these costs into perspective. The average mutual funds charge 1.27 percent and the average ETF charges 0.61 percent. Vanguard is able to achieve the lowest total costs in the business because they are formed like a credit union instead of a bank. Vanguard is owned by the funds themselves and, as a result, is owned by investors in the funds. This is why Vanguard rebates all of the income from lending securities while most companies rebate a much smaller share. There’s a reason turtle doves come in pairs in “The Twelve Days of Christmas.” Much like the turtle dove, if you are going to use the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF, then consider combining this great holding with the Vanguard Extended Market ETF. Share this article with a colleague