Tag Archives: apparel

Time Your Buys Like A Pro

By Jonathan Rodriguez For traditional buy-and-hold investors, market timing probably doesn’t mean much. But here’s the thing: It should. Believe it or not, many smart people are investing the wrong way every single day. These investors see a stock on the rise and chase shares when everyone else is buying – and that means they’re often buying too high. And then, when the market sells off, they dump shares along with everyone else – often at too low a price. Professional traders know this and mint fortunes off the herd. But by using one simple indicator, you can time your entries alongside the elite traders. Once you’ve identified a quality stock, the first step is to buy shares at the lowest price you can. You see, stocks never go up or down in a straight line. When a stock trends upward, it ascends the chart in waves. Shares rally under momentum and fall on profit taking. In order to buy the dips and sell the rallies, I use one of my favorite technical indicators: Bollinger Bands. Developed by John Bollinger in the 1980s, Bollinger Bands are volatility bands placed above and below a stock’s moving average. The bands’ values are based on standard deviations from the moving average. You can select any moving average and deviation, but traders typically use the 20-day moving average (DMA) and set the Bollinger Bands at two standard deviations above and below the DMA. I love Bollinger Bands because they combine several technical tools into an easy-to-use trend indicator. And because the bands utilize standard deviations, they adjust automatically for rapid changes in volatility. Once the bands are set, price action bounces between the upper and lower band as momentum swings. The idea is to buy shares as they “tag” the lower band and sell as they tag the upper band. Let’s look at an applied example. Here’s a one-year chart of Under Armour Inc. (NYSE: UA ), one of 2015’s hottest stocks. Over the last year, shares have outperformed the S&P 500 by more than 60%. As you can see, price action is contained between the Bollinger Bands. And by timing your entry on a dip to the lower band, you can increase your profits by several percentage points. On the chart, you’ll notice three distinct buy signals: December 2014-January 2015, May-June 2015, and August 2015. After executing a buy, you can sell on the upper band tag or hold until you’ve hit your profit target. Now, on a pricier large-cap stock, a few percentage points in profit might not mean much. But if you’re an options trader or short-term trader, those points can be the difference between small gains and big money. And the bands become even more valuable when trading volatile small-cap and mid-cap stocks. Bottom line: Don’t chase red-hot stocks at recent highs. Use Bollinger Bands to time the dips and get more bang for your buck. Original Post

Why Lululemon Founder Chip Wilson’s Departure Is Good For The Company

Summary Lululemon Athletica founder Chip Wilson has recently announced his departure from the yoga apparel company he founded and built. Lululemon stock declined over 1% on the news. While Wilson has been a good corporate executive for Lululemon for most of its history, his presence has been more of a liability in recent years. Lululemon is now better able to attempt putting the past behind them, which will be a positive catalyst for the stock. Earnings trends and a reasonable valuation are likely to push the stock upward in the future. Canadian yoga-apparel maker Lululemon Athletica (NASDAQ: LULU ) founder Chip Wilson has recently announced his departure from the company he founded and built. In response to the news, Lululemon stock declined over 1%. Is this decline indicative of a harder future for Lululemon, or should investors view this development as a positive for the company and for shareholders? Wilson’s Accomplishments Chip Wilson’s tenure at Lululemon has been marked with a series of notable achievements. After all, he is the man who started off the whole company from a small location in Vancouver, Canada, in 1998, and has since then expanded the company into a global brand with a loyal customer base, with 250 stores across the world. Wilson’s entrepreneurial spirit and long-term focus are commendable in an era where many are only concerned about the short-term. Lululemon broadened its reach and its customer base under Wilson at impressive rates. Wilson left as executive in 2012 to take some time off from daily management of the firm, but returned in 2013 to help bring back Lululemon from a downturn in sales and a controversy over the quality of its clothes. Unfortunately for Lululemon, this controversy proved to be a devastating event for the company’s PR image and its financial standing, as well as the reputation of the company’s CEO. Wilson’s Stumblings In Recent Years While Wilson did help Lululemon recover from a crisis after he came back, he has had his share of mishaps in recent years that have infuriated customers and had significant negative effects on the company’s financial performance. The most noteworthy of these mishaps is the aforementioned scandal regarding Lululemon’s pants. Wilson has been a lightning rod of controversy after insinuating that quality problems with Lululemon pants were related to customers’ body types, seemingly blaming consumers for the problems with see-through pants. This led to an incredibly awkward and, what many consider a misguided, 50-second apology video that he posted on YouTube – not to the consumers he offended, but to Lululemon workers. So, Why Is Lululemon Better Off Overall? While Lululemon is indeed losing a key figure in its development into a global brand, I believe the team replacing him is more than capable of managing the company without him, as seen in the past couple years when Wilson has taken smaller and smaller roles. After rescuing the company from crisis, Wilson is leaving the company in the competent hands of Lululemon’s core team. This core team has been operating well under a less influential Wilson. The company is being left in pretty good shape, as seen from IAEResearch: Lululemon has revised its fourth quarter earnings guidance upwards – the company now expects its net revenues to be in the range of $595 -600 million as compared to previous range of $570-585 million for the quarter. This increased top line growth is based on the comparable sales increase of around 6-7% on a constant dollar basis as compared to the previous total comparable sales increase of low single digits on a constant dollar basis. The company also expects a rise in its bottom line growth and increased its diluted earnings per share range to 71 – 73 cents for the fourth quarter as compared to previous EPS guidance range of 65 – 69 cents. Wilson’s departure and the subsequent drop in Lululemon’s stock price may be a good entry point for a stock with a niche yoga pants market, increased earnings guidance, high margins, high net operating cash flow that has increased by 79.50% since the same quarter last year, and a reasonable valuation. The stock’s P/E ratio TTM of 40 is a good benchmark for future growth and is right at Lululemon’s historically average P/E ratio TTM. Also, Lululemon’s valuation is less ambitious than Under Armour’s (NYSE: UA ) 86 P/E ratio, meaning that the stock has more room to run without hitting a ceiling of stagnating growth. Lululemon’s operating cash flow is also substantially higher than the industry average growth rate of 56.32%. To be frank, Wilson’s departure can only be good for Lululemon, as his continued presence would have been a continual source of irritation for consumers and shareholders alike. Wilson’s continued presence at the company is only bound to be a sore point with customers who were riled with Wilson’s supposedly insensitive comments. After helping the company get back on its feet, Wilson feels now is the best time for him to leave, and there probably isn’t a better time to do so. Despite Wilson’s accomplishments, the sour taste of the pants scandal remains in some customers’ mouths, and it’s in Lululemon’s best interests for Wilson to leave at this time, as he essentially has done all he can do for the firm. Disclosure: The author has no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More…) The author wrote this article themselves, and it expresses their own opinions. The author is not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). The author has no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.