Tag Archives: api

No-Load Funds Excel In Q1: 5 Top Performers

After a dream run last year, no-load mutual funds continued to offer healthy returns in the first quarter of 2016. While U.S.-based mutual funds registered significant outflows for most of the quarter primarily led by a massive slump in the major benchmarks, healthy returns indicate that no-load mutual funds attracted enough investor attention. Despite the early slump, the markets made a remarkable rebound during the latter half of the first quarter, which helped no-load mutual funds to eventually come up with solid returns. The lower expense advantage of no-load funds over load funds played an important role in boosting their demand. It will be interesting to find out the top performers from this category during the first quarter. But before that, let’s take a look at the performance of the no-load fund category during the period. Q1 Performance The top 100 funds out of the 10,714 no-load funds we studied, registered an average return of 25.9% last quarter compared to the top 100 load funds’ average return of 16.2%. Meanwhile, top no-load fund ProFunds Precious Metals UltraSector Investor’s (MUTF: PMPIX ) gains of 82.1% also came significantly higher than the return of 49.9% from Rydex Precious Metals A’s (MUTF: RYMNX ), which was the top performing mutual fund among those that carry sales load. The top performing no-load fund list for the first quarter is dominated by precious metal and utility funds. A massive crash witnessed earlier this year following weak global growth and a plunge in oil prices, boosted demand for securities related to the safe-haven sectors like gold and utilities. Separately, the strong average return of the top 100 no-load funds came in higher than most of the top performing mutual fund categories in the first quarter. Apart from the equity precious metals category, which gained 40.7% in the quarter, strong returns of the top 100 no-load funds easily beat all the broader mutual fund categories. The second-best utility category of the quarter gained 11.4%. While no-load mutual funds succeeded in providing healthy returns during the first quarter, the category also outperformed its load counterparts last year. The top performing 100 no-load mutual funds posted an average return of 16.74% in 2015 compared with the top 100 load funds’ average return of 11.05%. Also, the category managed to finish in the positive territory in the third quarter of 2015, which was the worst quarter in four years. Top Performing No-Load Mutual Funds In this segment, we have highlighted five top performing no-load mutual funds of the first quarter that carry either a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #1 (Strong Buy) or #2 (Buy). These funds also have minimum initial investment within $5000, expense ratios below 1% and net assets over $50 million. Banking on these fundamentals, we expect these funds to outperform their peers in the future. Remember, the goal of the Zacks Mutual Fund Rank is to guide investors to identify potential winners and losers. Unlike most of the fund-rating systems, the Zacks Mutual Fund Rank is not just focused on past performance, but also on the likely future success of the fund. Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Advisor (MUTF: FGADX ) invests the lion’s share of its assets in securities of companies involved in operations related to gold and precious metals. The fund carries a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #2 and returned 45.5% during the first quarter. Annual expense ratio of 0.84% is lower than the category average of 1.44%. American Century Global Gold Investor (MUTF: BGEIX ) invests in securities of global companies whose operations are related to gold or other precious metals. The product carries a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #2 and returned 43.5% during the first quarter. Annual expense ratio of 0.67% is lower than the category average of 1.44%. Fidelity Select Gold (MUTF: FSAGX ) invests heavily in companies whose principal operations are related to gold as well as in bullion or coins. The fund carries a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #1 and returned 41% during the first quarter. Annual expense ratio of 0.90% is lower than the category average of 1.44%. Oppenheimer Gold & Special Minerals Y (MUTF: OGMYX ) invests mainly in common stocks of companies that are involved in mining, processing or dealing with gold. The product carries a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #2 and returned 36% during the first quarter. Annual expense ratio of 0.92% is lower than the category average of 1.44%. American Century Utilities Investor (MUTF: BULIX ) uses qualitative and quantitative management techniques to invest a major portion of its assets in equities related to the utility industry. The fund carries a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #1 and returned 16.7% during the first quarter. Annual expense ratio of 0.67% is lower than the category average of 1.25%. Original Post

High Income ETFs Worth Their High Costs

With negative interest rates dominating international headlines and the benchmark 10-year U.S. Treasury yields slipping to below 2%, there is huge demand for income ETFs. Yield-hungry investors have rushed to high-dividend securities and ETFs in search of steady current income. Global growth continues to flounder, and the Fed is in no mood to hike rates frequently this year, suggesting continued outperformance by dividend ETFs. That being said, we would like to note that current income turns futile if you end up paying high expenses for a high-dividend or high income ETF. After all, everybody wants value for money. Also, cheaper funds have the potential to outperform the pricey choices. Keeping capital gains or losses constant and considering an expense ratio of 1%, a fund of $10,000 invested at 8% annual dividend will grow to $19,672 in 10 years, while the same fund invested at an expense ratio of 0.1% will grow to a higher amount of $21,390. But there are a few high income ETFs that can be intriguing picks despite the high costs associated with them. These ETFs have given decent performances so far this year (as of April 15, 2016), overruling the heightened volatility in the market. Also, since these have offered solid yields, their high costs do not hurt investors. Below, we highlight a few of such high dividend ETFs that are worth their high expense ratios. YieldShares High Income ETF (NYSEARCA: YYY ) The fund seeks to provide the performance of the ISE High Income Index. This $81.5 million fund definitely has a high expense ratio of 1.82%, but yields a stupendous 10.71% annually. The fund holds 30 closed-end funds ranked the highest overall by the ISE on the basis of three criteria, namely fund yield, discount to net asset value and liquidity. Around 66% of the fund is targeted at debt securities, while the rest are in equities. The fund is up 2.5% so far this year (as of April 15, 2016). Though the capital gains here are not solid, a 10.71% yield makes up for feeble market performance. AdvisorShares Athena High Dividend ETF (NYSEARCA: DIVI ) This $7.4 million actively managed ETF offers dividend yield of about 4.05% and has an expense ratio of 1.30%. The fund is heavy on North America (55%), followed by emerging Asia (16%) and developing Asia (6%). None of the stocks accounts for more than 4.36% of the portfolio. The fund is up 10.7% so far this year (as of April 15, 2016) – a sturdy performance which makes its dividend-adjusted return sturdier. Guggenheim S&P Global Dividend Opportunities Index ETF (NYSEARCA: LVL ) This ETF follows the S&P Global Dividend Opportunities Index, which focuses on high-yielding securities worldwide. As many as 109 securities are chosen from around the world for inclusion, with heavy exposure going toward finance (26.36%), utilities (22.21%), telecom (16.3%) and energy (12.88%) securities. Australian, American and British stocks account for about 20.6%, 17.1% and 15%, respectively, of total assets. This $52 million fund charges 65 bps in fees. It yields 6.06% annually (as of April 15, 2016) and is up 8.3% so far this year (as of April 15, 2016). First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index ETF (NYSEARCA: FGD ) This $352 million fund provides exposure to the 100 high-yielding stocks. None of the securities accounts for more than 1.73% of the assets. From a sector look, financials takes the top spot at 34.33%, while energy, telecom, industrials, consumer discretionary and utilities round off the next five spots with double-digit exposure each. About half of the portfolio is tilted toward large- cap stocks, while mid caps and small caps take the remainder. In terms of country profile, Australia, U.S., Canada and United Kingdom occupy the top four positions. The fund yields 5.16% annually, while its expense ratio comes in at 0.58%. Agreed, an expense ratio of 0.58% is not too steep, but it is way higher than many high dividend ETFs like Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (NYSEARCA: VYM ), which charge just 10 bps in fees. The fund is up 5.3% so far this year (as of April 15, 2016). SPDR Income Allocation ETF (NYSEARCA: INKM ) INKM is an actively managed fund of funds that seeks to provide total return by focusing on investment in income and yield-generating assets. The ETF primarily invests in SPDR ETFs, but also includes other exchange-traded products. Investment-grade bonds (31.5%) and equity (27.6%) occupy the top two spots in the portfolio. The expense ratio is 70 basis points, while it yields about 4.13% annually. The fund is up 3.3% so far this year (as of April 15, 2016). Original Post

Interview: Chris Abraham On Mixing Value Investing And Options

By Rupert Hargreaves Rupert Hargreaves: You run a unique, value-based options strategy, which is designed to take advantage of price inefficiencies in the market. Could you give our readers a brief description of the strategy and why you decided to use it? Chris Abraham: It is basically a concentrated, long-term, all-cap value-oriented strategy primarily focused on the equities and options of high-quality companies. Ideally, I look for companies with a competitive advantage that trade at a margin of safety. I typically have around 10 to 20 equity holdings in my portfolio, preferably closer to 10. Regarding option positions, the way I look at the strategy is kind of like running an insurance book along with existing equity holdings – similar to Buffett’s concept at Berkshire (NYSE: BRK.A ) (NYSE: BRK.B ). Buffett has been able to create permanent capital for investing by using Berkshire’s insurance subsidiaries’ float. And that’s the kind of business model that I’ve tried to create, except with options. RH: So you write options to generate income and grow the float? CA: Exactly. The vast majority of options trading is on ETFs, and most of that is short-term trading, for hedging and speculating. Because most traders concentrate on these limited markets, there’s very little attention focused on longer-term options of individual companies. A lot of institutional investors just can’t invest in this sector, because their investment mandates won’t allow it and hedge funds are only interested in the short-term use of options to hedge positions. The great thing is you can find some options with significant mispricing across the entire market. A couple of weeks ago, I found options on a company with a $100 million market cap! So, there are definitely opportunities out there to take advantage of with these derivatives, but structural reasons prevent many investors from making the most of the opportunities available to them. There’s also a general lack of interest in this area. If you find a security that is undervalued and has a margin of safety, generally speaking there will be an even bigger mispricing in the options. To profit from this, you can sell put spreads or buy call spreads – the former eliminates the tail risk. If you feel comfortable just selling naked puts that will help you generate even more float, but you have to be comfortable buying the stock at the set price if it comes to it RH: One of the key caveats of value investing is minimising risk. Options trading is known for its high level of risk… CA: I think options trading is perceived as higher risk but it all comes down to the underlying stock. I think the real risk stems from a lack of knowledge about option pricing and stock valuation. As we know, a stock price will fluctuate much more than the underlying business. This stock volatility leads to some extreme volatility in options pricing, which translates into more opportunities for the options investor. If you are buying into a higher quality business, this is a great way for greater returns and a higher margin of safety. The high quality nature of the business helps mitigate risk. Call spreads and put spreads also help mitigate risk as well. RH: Do you buy the underlying equity as well or do you just concentrate on the options? CA: I have an equity portfolio, but each situation really depends on several factors. This is more of an art than a science. Sometimes it depends on the liquidity of the options or the stock, and other times it depends how expensive the options are. For instance, if I have say 14 equity positions in my portfolio already, I might just buy the option to add to my options book rather than the stock. It really depends. Another example I can give is if I’ve owned a stock for a while, and the options suddenly become really expensive, then there’s a situation where I might be inclined to add on the options side. RH: What’s your investment time frame? CA: Generally, I invest on a one to two-year time frame with regard to options since those are the longest term options widely available on the market. The reason why I’ve chosen this time frame is because those are the options that are generally the most mispriced. If I could get options longer than that I would, sometimes I can get options for two-and-a-half years. Options are priced more or less on a bell curve with some skew around the current stock price. They are not valuation based, which leads to tremendous opportunities. For instance, volatility, which is one of the primary factors in options pricing, is extrapolated for the term of the option. This leads to increased mispricing for options as the option term increases. For example, back in January and February, the market was extremely volatile and options were pricing this elevated volatility to last continuously for the next couple of years, which gave me the opportunity to sell options on strong, competitively advantaged companies at exceptionally high prices. RH: Could you guide us through your investment process? CA: Sure, let’s say a stock is trading at $100 and under my valuation, I believe it’s worth $130 to $150. If I can sell puts at $85 and collect $8 in premium, a premium that expires in one year, to me that would be very attractive. In this scenario, my net buy price, if I were forced to buy, would be $77, otherwise, the options will expire and I get to keep the float. In this specific case, assuming I’m buying this competitively advantaged company at a 40-60% discount, I would be okay selling the puts outright and not put spreads because I would be happy to own the stock at $77. By looking at it this way, time becomes your friend because every day that goes by, the options are worth less, even if the stock doesn’t move. RH: Do you keep a lot of cash on hand to implement this strategy? CA: Yes, I typically keep around 15% to 20% cash, in case of negative surprises, but it generally depends on the underlying environment. If the implied volatility has come down quite a bit and there’s nothing attractive out there, I tend to stay away. I need to make it clear that valuation of the underlying business is not enough for me to be buying or selling options. The risk/reward is clearly more favourable when implied volatility is higher. RH: You’re not selling right now? CA: No, I’m not selling right now because the payoffs available are not significant enough. I forget the statistics but the VIX has collapsed by something like 50% to 60% over the past month and we are at levels we were at pre-August last year. I’ve actually been buying a little bit of tail risk insurance one year out as it’s fairly cheap here. So you need to work with what the market is giving you. Click to enlarge RH: Could you give us an example of something you are looking at or have looked at in the past? CA: Sure, one of the most attractive options plays in the recent past has been Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL ) in my opinion. This is a company that I’ve gotten to know well over the years and when the stock got down into the $90s, it was trading at a mid-teens free cash flow yield. The market was pricing in a massive decline in iPhone sales and profitability, which I felt was a fairly low probability event in the immediate future. Every couple of years, it seems Mr. Market reflects this paranoia in the stock. At that level, you could sell puts at a strike price of $90 and collect $15 to $16 in premium, for options expiring in two years. And if you wanted to be more conservative, you could’ve bought some further out of the money puts, take a really nice spread on that, collect the premium and have a really nice float for a year. That was probably one of the best risk/reward and liquid opportunities I’ve seen in a while. RH: When you’re looking at plays like this, do you tend to stick to defensive sectors or branch out into the more cyclical sectors, which may offer a greater return but a higher level of risk? CA: I tend to stick with defensives because with cyclicals, the volatility can be quite aggressive and you can really get hurt there. But I would be inclined to buy cyclicals if they were cheap enough and they had a competitive advantage over peers. Although if I did go down that route, I would buy long-term LEAPs to cap my downside, while leaving me exposed to a long-term cyclical recovery. My priority is limiting my losses, so I tend to get to know a few competitively advantaged businesses very well, and then when the market throws up the opportunity, look at the stocks and the options and pick the securities that give you the best risk reward. There isn’t really much to add to the process in terms of investing, the options just give you another avenue with which to profit from the underlying investment, another tool in the kit so to speak. I think by selectively writing options, at times when the market is offering the best risk reward ratio, over the long term, the strategy should generate significant returns. RH: I think one of the factors that would scare most investors away from using this strategy, are the potential drawdowns that are generally associated with using options, rather than the traditional buy-and-forget style of value investors. CA: Well, first and foremost I’m a value investor. If I find a competitively advantaged business that I like, I’m more than happy to hold forever. When it comes to the drawdowns, that is a problem, but it’s a problem that can be mitigated through strategies like using put and call spreads as well as buying tail risk insurance. Sure, the performance may be a little bumpier than most investors are used to, but I think that if you’re disciplined with your underwriting, it will work out very well over time. I think psychology is important here. Mark-to-market returns, like we saw in January and February of this year can be very violent. Although, at the same time plenty of new opportunities arise, so any new insurance you’re writing will be very profitable. There is also position sizing to consider, you need to make sure your options portfolio won’t drag you down. If you’re doing cyclical recovery stories, turnarounds, reversion to the mean plays, I don’t think this strategy will work as well. You just don’t have the margin of safety that you need in my opinion. Whereas if you’re talking about companies like Apple or Berkshire Hathaway, that have strong balance sheets and competitive advantages, then you have something that you can base your value and a platform from which to base your option strategy on – you can clearly identify the price and value of the company along with the current call or put premiums to quantify potential returns. Most of the businesses I own right now have net cash balance sheets and double-digit free cash flow yields. Actually, believe it or not, when you write options on these sort of companies, there isn’t much of a market. And that’s where the opportunity is because not many people play in this sandbox. RH: Options aren’t something we cover much here at ValueWalk, and there’s a good chance that some readers will never have used options before. So, could you just give those readers a brief rundown of options investing and how they should approach the market? CA: That’s a good question, I think one of the things that puts people off this market and trips them up is approaching the options market as a purely speculative market, without considering the underlying stock they are buying. One thing I will never understand is how so many traders use options but have no idea about the underlying valuation of the security. That’s the equivalent of buying or selling insurance without knowing what your collateral is! I think if investors want to get into this, they need to understand properly how options work, either by taking a class or reading up on the subject – Buffett himself has been a major user of options and derivatives but this doesn’t get as much attention. There’s so much misinformation out there and people really need to understand how the market works and how to apply that to their own trading strategy, as well as understanding what the actual upside and downside is. A lot of people I’ve spoken to about it will say, “I’ve tried options and I’ve lost all my money” but what they don’t realise is, if you put $1,000 down, you can lose the entire $1,000. It’s even more important when you’re selling naked puts or calls, because you have unlimited downside. To the uninitiated, one of the best and free ways to learn in my opinion is to look at how Buffett has written about the options market in his previous annual letters and then try and understand how Black-Scholes options pricing works, and how it doesn’t work. I started as a value investor, and then through learning about options pricing adapted my strategy to suit me and my investment background. I’m afraid to say there’s no perfect answer to this, you just need to learn as much about the subject as possible and develop your own strategy. RH: So your advice would be to find the stock, calculate the value, buy as a value investment and then look at the options? CA: Exactly. Since your “collateral” is the underlying business, you need to gain a firm foundation in fundamental research to understand what it is worth. Once you have established a valuation range and a margin of safety, you have more flexibility in understanding which options to use. To me, it’s easier if you understand the valuation first and then the derivatives. It’s a much simpler and straightforward approach. RH: Chris, that’s great. Thank you for your time today. CA: You’re welcome. Thank you for the interview. Disclosure: Past performance is not indicative of future returns. This information should not be used as a general guide to investing or as a source of any specific investment recommendations, and makes no implied or expressed recommendations concerning the manner in which an account should or would be handled, as appropriate investment strategies depend upon specific investment guidelines and objectives. Information presented herein is subject to change without notice and should not be considered as a solicitation to buy or sell any security. This document contains general information that is not suitable for everyone. The information contained herein should not be construed as personalized investment advice. The views expressed here are the current opinions of the author and not necessarily those of ValueWalk. The author’s opinions are subject to change without notice. There is no guarantee that the views and opinions expressed in this document will come to pass. Investing in the stock market involves gains and losses and may not be suitable for all investors. No representations, expressed or implied, are made as to the accuracy or completeness of such statements, estimates or projections, or with respect to any other materials herein. Under no circumstances does the information contained within represent a recommendation to buy, hold or sell any security, and it should not be assumed that the securities transactions or holdings discussed were or will prove to be profitable. No part of this material may be copied, photocopied, or duplicated in any form, by any means, or redistributed without ValueWalk’s prior written consent.