Tag Archives: america

Tepid Appetite For Risk Implies That Investors Are Still Haunted By Potential Loss

The appetite for risk is decidedly less vibrant than before the August-September meltdown. The notion that investors may still be spooked can be found outside of the bond arena as well. Broader market participation in the October rally is spotty at best. It’s one thing to consider the possibility that we’ve already seen the depths for 2015. It’s another thing to suggest that we will be heading for new heights anytime soon. Is the worst behind us? Maybe. Yet the appetite for risk is decidedly less vibrant than before the August-September meltdown. (Review Market Top? 15 Warning Signs .) Consider high-quality bonds as represented by the Bank of America Merrill Lynch US Corporate A Option-Adjusted Spread. The yield spread between A-rated companies and comparable U.S. treasuries typically falls during periods when investors are feeling confident. This was the case throughout 2014. In contrast, when investors are concerned about their exposure to corporate credit, the spread widens. Indeed, the difference between A-rate corporate bonds and U.S. treasuries steadily rose in the summertime. The Bank of America Merrill Lynch US Corporate A Option-Adjusted Spread spiked above 1.3 during the stock market lows in August and again at the start of October. It has since come down below a high-water mark in 2015, though it remains stubbornly high. Granted, there is nothing magical about this particular yield spread at 1.3 percent. On the other hand, a similar pattern of risk aversion occurred during the summer of 2007, right before the stock market’s bearish collapse (10/07-3/09). Some equity advocates prefer to dismiss warning signs of risk-off behavior in bonds. They have been assigning blame for lack of interest in high-yield “junk” to the ailing energy sector. However, funds like the iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (NYSEARCA: HYG ) and the SPDR Barclays Capital High Yield Bond ETF (NYSEARCA: JNK ) do not hold single A-rated bonds like Kimberly Clark (NYSE: KMB ) and Target (NYSE: TGT ). “Single As” are highly rated because the risk of default is negligible and they are as reliable as rain in Seattle. What’s more, they usually exhibit narrow spreads with comparable treasuries. It follows that a substantial “risk-on” return to stocks from current levels is unlikely to occur without a meaningful retreat below 1.3% in the Bank of America Merrill Lynch US Corporate A Option-Adjusted Spread. The notion that investors may still be spooked can be found outside of the bond arena as well. For instance, when the investment community is adding to its collective risk profile, high beta stocks in the PowerShares S&P 500 High Beta Portfolio ETF (NYSEARCA: SPHB ) tend to outperform less volatile stocks in the iShares MSCI USA Minimum Volatility ETF (NYSEARCA: USMV ). This can be seen in the rising SPHB:USMV price ratio up through May of 2015. Unfortunately, the price ratio begin to decline in earnest during the summer. It hit new lows in August and September respectively. And while SPHB:USMV bounced off the September lows, the ratio is struggling to reaffirm a genuine uptrend. Even the NASDAQ’s Advance-Decline Line (A/D) is sending mixed messages. One would think that if risk were truly back in vogue, advancing issues in the stock benchmark (NASDAQ) would be pummeling the decliners. That’s not happening… at least not yet. In other words, broader market participation in the October rally is spotty at best. It is certainly possible that the worst for 2015 resides in the rear-view mirror. After all, the Federal Reserve’s inability to raise borrowing costs has sparked intrigue with respect to a “re-reflation” of asset prices in our muddle-through economy. On the flip side, with earnings as well as revenue both expected to decline for a second consecutive quarter (a.k.a. “earnings recession” and “sales recession”), some of that reflation may be kept in check. It’s one thing to consider the possibility that we’ve already seen the depths for 2015. It’s another thing to suggest that we will be heading for new heights anytime soon. Disclosure: Gary Gordon, MS, CFP is the president of Pacific Park Financial, Inc., a Registered Investment Adviser with the SEC. Gary Gordon, Pacific Park Financial, Inc, and/or its clients may hold positions in the ETFs, mutual funds, and/or any investment asset mentioned above. The commentary does not constitute individualized investment advice. The opinions offered herein are not personalized recommendations to buy, sell or hold securities. At times, issuers of exchange-traded products compensate Pacific Park Financial, Inc. or its subsidiaries for advertising at the ETF Expert web site. ETF Expert content is created independently of any advertising relationships.

Banking Earnings Soft: Buy Financial ETFs On Value?

The financial sector, which accounts for around one-fifth of the S&P 500 index, had a sluggish- to-decent Q3. Weak capital market activities and global growth worries along with a low interest rate environment dealt a blow to the space. However, modest gains in loan growth amid low interest rates, investment banking activities thanks to surge in corporate actions and cost containment efforts helped the space to stay afloat in the quarter. As evident from the big bank earnings, the sector has been an average performer. Per the Zacks Earnings Trend issued on October 14, financial earnings are expected to jump 9.6% this quarter on 3.7% lower revenues. To be more specific, easy comparisons at Bank of America Corporation or BofA (NYSE: BAC ) is leading the sector. Excluding Bank of America, results would have been much more muted than it looks now. Earnings would fall in absence of BofA’s stellar growth (read: Guide to the 7 Most Popular Financial ETFs ). Let’s take a look at the big banks’ earnings which released lately. Big Bank Earnings in Focus JPMorgan (NYSE: JPM ) reported earnings of $1.32 per share missing the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 4.4% and the year-ago earnings by 2.9%. Managed net revenue of $23.5 billion in the quarter was down 6% from the year-ago quarter. It also compared unfavorably with the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $23.8 billion. Goldman (NYSE: GS ) earned $2.90 per share in Q3, falling short of the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $3.08 per share and declining from the year-ago figure of $4.57. The shortfall in earnings reflected a fall in revenues, hurt by lower trading activity in the quarter, be it bonds, currencies or commodities (read: 3 Sector ETFs Hit Hard by the Market Sell-off ). Net revenue dived 18% year over year to $6.9 billion for the quarter. Revenues also lagged the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $7.3 billion. Lower net interest as well as non-interest income weighed on the top line. Citigroup Inc.’s (NYSE: C ) adjusted earnings per share of $1.31 for the quarter outpaced the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $1.29. Further, earnings compared favorably with the year-ago figure of $0.95 per share. Adjusted revenues of Citigroup declined 8% year over year to $18.5 billion. Also, the revenue figure missed the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $18.76 billion. Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC ) earned $1.05/share in 3Q15 beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate by a penny. The reported figure was also above the year-ago number of $1.02 per share. The quarter’s total revenue came in at $21.9 billion, outpacing the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $21.5 billion. Moreover, revenues rose 3.3% year over year. Bank of America Corporation’s third-quarter earnings of $0.37 per share outdid the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $0.34. Further, the bottom line witnessed a significant improvement from net loss of $0.04 incurred in the prior-year quarter. Net revenue of $20.7 billion was down 2% year over year and met the Zacks Consensus Estimate. ETF Impact Despite a run of listless results from banks this week, the concerned ETFs buoyed up on the recent Fed-induced optimism. Most U.S. financial ETFs returned at least 1% since the earnings came out (as of October 15, 2015). All the aforementioned companies have considerable exposure in funds like the i Shares U.S. Financial Services ETF (NYSEARCA: IYG ) , the PowerShares KBW Bank Portfolio ETF (NYSEARCA: KBWB ) , the Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (NYSEARCA: XLF ) , the iShares U.S. Broker-Dealers ETF (NYSEARCA: IAI ) and the Vanguard Financials ETF (NYSEARCA: VFH ) . All the funds are in green post big banks’ results, having returned in the range of 1─1.8% (as of October 15, 2015). It seems that investors are paying more heed to the market rally which could boost the weakling of this quarter – trading activities, going forward. The bond market is also displaying a strong trend on a dovish Fed and a delayed rate hike possibility. This could go in favor banks’ client activity in the fourth quarter. In any case, sooner or later, the U.S. economy is due for a lift-off and U.S. banks are now much more well-balanced than they were at the time of the last recession. All the aforementioned ETFs apart from IAI have a Zacks ETF Rank # 2 (Buy), sport compelling valuation and thus emerge as better plays than an individual stock pick. Link to the original post on Zacks.com