Tag Archives: agreement

17% Annual Return With Niska

Summary Niska trades at a substantial discount to its deal price. The buyers went into this with open eyes. The regulators know that NKA needs this deal. Deal Target Description Niska Gas Storage Partners (NYSE: NKA ) operates North American natural gas storage assets. They have storage facilities in Alberta, California, and Oklahoma. Deal Terms On June 14, 2015, Brookfield Infrastructure announced that it would buy NKA for $4.225 per unit in cash. NKA: (click to enlarge) Brookfield Infrastructure: (click to enlarge) Deal Financing The deal is not conditioned upon financing. NKA worked with both Evercore Partners (NYSE: EVR ) and Greenhill (NYSE: GHL ) on the deal. Deal Conditions The deal closing is expected to occur in the second half of 2016. Specifically, my estimates include the assumption that the deal closes in early December 2016. The deal is conditioned on standard closing conditions and regulatory approvals, including approval by the California Public Utilities Commission/PUC. Riverstone Investment Group, which owns 53% of NKA, supports the deal. No additional unit holder action is needed. The California PUC application was filed in July. That review will probably be the gating item. The HSR application was filed in July. Competition Canada was filed in July. The information statement will be filed with the SEC in early fall. Deal Price The price equaled a 222% premium to the NKA market price. It appears to be reasonable for NKA unit holders in the context of historically comparable transactions. (click to enlarge) (click to enlarge) Merger Agreement Specific Performance: Irreparable damage would occur in the event that any of the provisions of this Agreement (including each Party’s obligations under Article II or Section 6.3) were not performed in accordance with its specific terms or were otherwise breached. In the event of any breach or threatened breach by any Party of any covenant or obligation contained in this Agreement, the non-breaching Party shall be entitled (in addition to any other remedy that may be available to it, including monetary damages) to seek and obtain (on behalf of itself and the third-party beneficiaries of this Agreement) (A) an Order of specific performance to enforce the observance and performance of such covenant, agreement or obligation, and (B) an injunction restraining such breach or threatened breach. No Party or any other Person shall be required to obtain, furnish or post any bond or similar instrument in connection with or as a condition to obtaining any remedy referred to in this Section 13.14, and each Party irrevocably waives any right it may have to require the obtaining, furnishing or posting of any such bond or similar instrument. Material Adverse Effect means any change, event, circumstance, development or occurrence, individually or in the aggregate, with all other changes, events, circumstances, developments and occurrences, which has had, or would reasonably be expected to have, a material adverse effect on the financial condition, business, assets or results of operations of the Company Entities, taken as a whole; provided that with respect to this clause none of the following, and no fact, change, event, circumstance, development, occurrence or effect to the extent arising out of any of the following, shall constitute or be taken into account in determining whether a Material Adverse Effect has occurred, or may, would or could occur: changes in GAAP or changes in the regulatory or accounting requirements or in the interpretation of any of the foregoing, changes in the financial or securities markets or changes in the general economic or political conditions in the United States, Canada or abroad, changes in the price or availability of gas, oil or commodities or changes in currency exchange rates, changes (including changes of Applicable Law) or conditions generally affecting any industry in which any of the Company Entities operates, acts of war, sabotage or terrorism, any decrease in the market price of the Common Units or any delisting of the Common Units due solely to such decrease in the market price of the Common Units, any litigation initiated solely by a Person other than Swan Sponsor or any Affiliate of Swan Sponsor or a Company Entity or any Affiliate of a Company Entity (excluding suits brought in a derivative manner) arising from allegations of a breach of fiduciary duty or other violation of Applicable Law relating to this Agreement or the transactions contemplated by this Agreement (or any public disclosure relating to such litigation), the announcement, pendency or consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement (including any cancellations of or delays in customer orders or other decreases in customer demand, reduction in revenues, work stoppages or loss or threatened loss of employees or other employee disruptions) (provided, that this clause (viii) shall not apply in the determination of a breach or violation of the representations and warranties contained in Section 4.8), changes or announcements of potential changes in a credit or financial rating in respect of any of the Company Entities or any indebtedness of any of the Company Entities, any failure to obtain any consent, approval, waiver or authorization from any third party in connection with the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby (provided, that this clause (X) shall not apply in the determination of a breach or violation of the representations and warranties contained in Section 4.8, any failure of any of the Company Entities to meet any internal or published or third-party budgets, estimates, projections, forecasts or predictions of financial performance (including revenue, earnings, cash flow, cash position, liquidity or other financial measures) for any period, any action taken (or omitted to be taken) at the request of or by or on behalf of Parent, Merger Sub or any of their respective Affiliates, any action taken by Swan Sponsor, ManagementCo, the Company or any of their respective Affiliates that is required or expressly contemplated or permitted pursuant to this Agreement, or any seasonal reduction in the revenues or earnings of any of the Company Entities; provided, however , that the foregoing exclusions in (I), (II), (III), (IV) and (V)shall not apply to the extent such changes or effects have a materially disproportionate adverse effect on the Company Entities, taken as a whole, as compared to other independent natural gas storage businesses in the United States or Canada, and (Y) the underlying cause of any decrease or change referred to in clause (vi), (IX) or (xi) (if not otherwise falling within any of clauses through (XIV) above) may be taken into account in determining whether there is a “Material Adverse Effect” or the ability of Swan Sponsor, ManagementCo or the Company to perform their respective obligations under or arising out of this Agreement. Deal Alternatives No deal alternatives are expected. Event Driven Investing with Equity Options The best way to set this up is with equities; there are no derivative contracts that improve upon the equity’s risk:reward. Conclusion At today’s price, NKA units are yieldy candidates for consideration as a part of a diversified, long-term portfolio. Other master limited partnership opportunities to consider include Williams Partners (NYSE: WPZ ) and the Cushing MLP Total Return Fund (NYSE: SRV ). Disclosure: I am/we are long NKA, SRV. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. Additional disclosure: Chris DeMuth Jr is a portfolio manager at Rangeley Capital. Rangeley invests with a margin of safety by buying securities at deep discounts to their intrinsic value and unlocking that value through corporate events. In order to maximize total returns for our investors, we reserve the right to make investment decisions regarding any security without further notification except where such notification is required by law.

Clean Energy Fuels – 2 Reasons And 4 Charts Show Why It’s A ‘Buy On The Dip’ Opportunity

Summary CLNE will benefit from the increasing usage of natural gas in electricity generation in the long run as this will push up the price of the commodity. Though natural gas trucks cost $50,000 more than diesel trucks, they can deliver annual fuel savings of around $25,000, creating a tailwind for CLNE as this will increase NGV adoption. The drop in diesel prices hasn’t discouraged fleet operators from buying more natural gas trucks, and this will allow CLNE to maintain its volumes even in adverse circumstances. CLNE is gradually building up fueling infrastructure that will help it increase its addressable market and land more customers for fueling services in the long run. Clean Energy Fuels (NASDAQ: CLNE ) has appreciated over 50% in 2015, but the stock has lost momentum ever since it posted weak Q1 results around a month ago. In the past one month, Clean Energy shares have dropped over 13% since the company missed consensus estimates owing to slower adoption of natural gas vehicles and the decline in natural gas prices. As a result, despite an increase in volumes of natural gas delivered, Clean Energy’s financial performance contracted and its revenue was affected to the tune of $3.7 million due to weak natural gas pricing. But, in my opinion, the drop in Clean Energy’s stock price over the past one month has given investors an opportunity to buy the stock on the dip. If we look at the long run, Clean Energy will benefit from two key factors — an increase in natural gas prices and the increasing adoption of natural gas fleets. In this article, we will take a closer look at these points and see why Clean Energy is a good buy-on-the-dip opportunity. Natural gas prices have started recovering Natural gas prices have recovered slightly since the end of April as shown in the chart below: Henry Hub Natural Gas Spot Price data by YCharts The recent recovery in natural gas prices is being driven by the injection season, as demand for the fuel has increased due to low pricing and the hot weather. In fact, the latest injection season has seen strong refill activity that has exceeded the five-year average injections by a comfortable margin, according to the EIA. Additionally, the hot summer season has led to an increase in the usage of air conditioners, which has again pushed up demand for natural gas. Now, it should be noted that natural gas is increasingly replacing coal as a source of electricity generation as shown below: The basic point that I am trying to put across over here is that demand for natural gas is increasing, and this will help decrease the oversupply in the U.S. natural gas market. In fact, over the long run, usage of natural gas in electric generation will continue increasing at a steady pace as more power plants switch from coal to gas. This is because the conversion rate of natural gas into electricity stands at 90% as compared to only 30% in case of conventional fuels. Thus, as the demand-supply situation in the natural gas market improves, prices will get better. This will act as a tailwind for Clean Energy as the company suffered last quarter due to a drop in prices. In fact, over the long run the EIA expects natural gas prices to recover strongly as pointed out in its latest Annual Energy Outlook as shown below: (click to enlarge) Source Thus, investors should not worry much regarding the short-term concern around natural gas prices as the future of the commodity looks robust in the long run. Corporations are switching to natural gas vehicles despite the decline in oil prices The massive decline in oil prices over the past year has made diesel cheaper. As a result, there is not much incentive for fleet operators to convert to natural gas, as each natural gas truck costs around $50,000 more than a diesel truck. However, fleet operators are still buying natural gas-powered trucks. This is not surprising as natural gas engines can deliver identical power and acceleration as compared to diesel engines, but at the same time, natural gas is around 50% cheaper than gasoline or diesel. This will help fleet operators record major savings in the long run. For instance, a class 8 truck in the U.S. runs around 67,000 miles a year as per the Federal Highway Administration , and has a mileage of 5.2 miles per gallon of gasoline. Now, considering a conversion cost of around $50,000 per truck, a fleet operator will be a able to record strong savings as shown below: (click to enlarge) Source Hence, fleet owners will continue converting into natural gas, and this will be a tailwind for Clean Energy. As a result, it is not surprising to see that the company has signed new agreements with Potelco and Dean Foods (NYSE: DF ) to refuel their natural gas fleets. The Potelco agreement will enable Clean Energy to fuel 75 heavy-duty LNG trucks. In fact, the company has opened two truck-friendly fuel stations in Arizona and Kansas City that will support 58 CNG trucks for seaboard transport. On the other hand, the agreement with Dean Foods will allow Clean Energy to build a private CNG fueling station to fuel 64 trucks at Dean Foods’ Oak Farms Dairy plant in Houston, Texas. More importantly, Clean Energy is investing in infrastructure in order to improve the adoption of natural gas vehicles. It has opened 16 fueling stations since the beginning of the year as a part of its plan to build around 35 stations for its customers this year. As a result, Clean Energy will benefit from investments by truck makers, engine manufacturers, and other component OEMs that are increasingly focusing on natural gas vehicles. Conclusion The two key points discussed in the article clearly indicate that Clean Energy Fuels’ weak performance is temporary. The advantages of natural gas over diesel will help it get better going forward, and the increase in pricing will be another key catalyst. Thus, it makes sense for investors to buy the drop in Clean Energy’s stock price as it can be a good long-term investment. Disclosure: The author has no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More…) The author wrote this article themselves, and it expresses their own opinions. The author is not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). The author has no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.