Tag Archives: action

It Is A Good Time To Invest In The YieldCo ETF

Summary The renewable energy market is growing and yieldcos are gaining traction. The Global X YieldCo ETF remains insulated from the Chinese stock market weakness. Better performance than peers. The Global X YieldCo Index ETF (NASDAQ: YLCO ) is an ETF investing in YieldCos. This ETF provides a good chance of increasing investor returns, since it invests in the high yielding yieldcos as their underlying asset. In addition to investing in yieldcos which are considered a less risky way of earning stable dividends, this ETF also provides the benefit of diversification. The renewable energy market is set to grow at a rapid pace and will account for the lion’s share of electricity capacity going forward. YLCO has been battered recently due to a sharp fall in the overall energy sector. This has led to a jump in their yields as prices have declined. After drawing strong investor interest, the situation has reversed with investors shunning these securities. SunEdison (NYSE: SUNE ) which runs 2 yieldcos has said that it will not drop further projects into its yieldcos, given the sharp price erosion. Other companies such as Trina Solar (NYSE: TSL ) have also halted their plans of listing a yieldco. However, my view is that this is a temporary hiccup due to a combination of high exuberance for yieldcos and an overall selloff in energy prices. YLCO is currently trading down 27% since its listing in May 2015. Given the current slump in yieldco prices, I think it should be a good time to build some position in this safe bet. Why you should invest in this YieldCo ETF Underlying assets are yieldcos, which are growing – YieldCos are considered a safe bet given their low risk profile and ability to generate stable and predictable cash flows. They are also less volatile than renewable energy stocks. Even when the entire energy market is going through a severe downturn, I believe yieldcos are a good bet as they should continue paying their dividends since their cash flows are relatively immune from recessions. The growth story is also strong as the renewable energy industry is set to continue over the long term. No exposure to the Chinese market – The Chinese market turmoil has strongly affected the global commodity industry, with many commodity producers trading at multi year lows. There is a fear that the Chinese economy may face a hard landing leading to global slowdown. The global YieldCo ETF does not have any exposure in the Chinese market. The ETF has its maximum exposure in the U.S. market followed by the U.K. These two economies are performing well relative to other regions, such as Japan and Europe. A better shield to downside risks than individual holdings – YLCO has lost 27% since inception. Given below is the YTD performance of some of its top holdings, suggesting the ETF’s performance was better than most of its constituents. % of Holding YieldCos YTD performance 12.45 Brookfield Renewable Energy Partners (NYSE: BEP ) -10% 8.32 Terraform Power (NASDAQ: TERP ) -38% 7.68 NRG Yield Inc (NYSE: NYLD ) -45% 7.36 Nextera Energy Partners (NYSE: NEP ) -27% 6.53 Abengoa Yield (NASDAQ: ABY ) -27% Data as on 13th October’15 closing The renewable Energy Market is booming – There is an increased awareness about the renewable energy usage and its benefits in reducing the effects of global warming. Countries like India have large power deficits and rely on coal for their energy needs. Now these countries are at the forefront of an energy revolution, shifting largely towards solar, wind and other renewable forms of energy for their power needs. The U.S. has also made its stand clear by passing its recent ‘Climate Action Plan’. All of this speaks of a booming renewable energy demand. It is estimated that renewable energy could account for almost 80% of the world’s energy supply within four decades. The market for yieldcos is growing – YieldCos have proven to be a success amongst the shareholders, primarily due to their stable dividend growth and relatively lower risk profile. With the growing renewable energy market, more yieldcos are coming into existence. After the success of SunEdison’s ( SUNE ) Terraform Power, the company has also listed another yieldco specializing in developing economies – Terraform Global (NASDAQ: GLBL ). There was also a joint yieldco by SunPower (NASDAQ: SPWR ) and First Solar (NASDAQ: FSLR ) called 8point3 Energy Partners (NASDAQ: CAFD ). Likewise, Canadian Solar (NASDAQ: CSIQ ) is also thinking of forming a yieldco before year end. Stock performance & Valuation YLCO gave better returns than some of its top holdings, as shown in the table above. The YTD performance was also better than solar ETFs like the Guggenheim Solar ETF (NYSEARCA: TAN ) and the Market Vectors Solar Energy ETF (NYSEARCA: KWT ). The stock is currently trading at ~$11 which is 26% low than its all-time high price. The ETF was listed in May 2015 with an expense ratio of 0.65%. (click to enlarge) Source: Google Finance What could go wrong The energy stocks have taken quite a beating in recent days and yieldcos have not been immune to this fall. The slowdown of the Chinese economy has not only hurt the Chinese energy demand growth, but also the growth in other countries due to secondary indirect effect as their exports to the Chinese economy has declined. As we can see from the graph above, the stock price decline has happened in line and is following the trend in the broader energy market. If conditions get worse, the ETF could also lose more value. The project business is a highly capital intensive business, where developers resort to large amount of debt. Any problems in the sponsor company to honor their debt might lead to a slowdown in the yieldco business. Some of the yieldcos are now adopting a more prudent growth strategy to take into account the market turmoil. Some of the solar companies have also put their plans to do yieldco in cold storage. This might help YLCO as the competition for renewable energy assets will reduce, thereby making existing yieldcos more attractive. Conclusion The current weakness in the energy sector has caused major downturn in the energy sector. I believe this will cause the weaker players to close shop and only good quality stocks would survive. The major advantage of YLCO is that it does not have any exposure in the Chinese market, which is experiencing a major slowdown. Though it will not be totally isolated from the Chinese slowdown effects, it will still not be very drastic. Also the investment case for renewable energy market continues to be strong and YLCO insulates its investors from the volatility of directly investing in this sector. I think this is a good time to build a position in this yieldco ETF. Share this article with a colleague

I Sold McDonald’s And Then Made These Moves

Summary I sold McDonald’s as I felt the future returns would be diminished. I bought Johnson & Johnson. I made a quick trade in Wells Fargo. I then added to my WEC Energy Group. Last week I published this article which detailed my reasons for selling McDonald’s (NYSE: MCD ). As I stated in the article, it was not easy selling MCD as I had held the stock for 8-years. However, I felt future growth was limited and the high dividend payout would limit future dividend growth. I decided that if I could find a stock with better long-term prospects, I would sell MCD. The stock had to pay a dividend in the vicinity of 3% or more, have good prospects for long term dividend growth, have a solid balance sheet, and have a business set for long-term growth. I keep a list of stocks that I believe are solid businesses and keep an eye on the price action so I am aware when they might become reasonably priced. One of those stocks is Johnson and Johnson (NYSE: JNJ ) and fortunately for me, it recently became reasonably priced. For most investors, JNJ needs no introduction, it is the largest health care company in the world, operating in three segments, consumer, pharmaceutical and medical devices. In the second quarter , consumer sales were $3.5 billion, pharmaceutical sales were $7.9 billion and medical devices had sales of $6.4 billion. Let’s take a look at all three of these segments. Consumer – The consumer segment primarily sells personal care products like nonprescription drugs, skin and hair care products, baby care products, oral care products and first aid products. JNJ products, like Tylenol and Listerine, are well known, but consumer is the smallest segment of JNJ. A few years back, JNJ was embarrassed by a rash of consumer product recalls due to poor safety protocols in the manufacturing plants. The recalls became so bad, that JNJ pulled many of its products from store shelves. After rebuilding their production facilities, JNJ products have slowly returned to the shelf and consumer sales have risen. In the second quarter worldwide consumer sales of $3.5 billion increased 2.3%, with U.S. sales up 2.7%, while outside the U.S. sales grew 2.1%. Look for JNJ to try and build their consumer business globally. Many of their products are regional and JNJ would like to expand their distribution. Here is a comment from JNJ management at a recent conference. ” Coupled with the fact that this business can be globalized, many of the brands have been developed regionally, we now think they can be taken on a more global scale .” Medical Devices – The medical devices segment sells a wide-range of products, such as wound care, surgical sports medicine. women’s health care, products for circulatory disease, blood glucose monitoring, orthopedic joint reconstruction, spinal products and disposable contact lenses. The medical device division recently completed a divestiture of Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics which reduced sales for the second quarter. Worldwide medical devices segment sales of $6.4 billion decreased 4.7%. U.S. sales declined 5.8% while sales outside the U.S. declined 3.9%. Excluding the impact of acquisitions and divestitures, underlying operational growth was 1.4% worldwide with the U.S. up 1.6% and growth of 1.4% outside the U.S. JNJ wants to be number one or number two in all their medical device businesses. Going forward, they want to focus on the orthopedic business as that is where they see the growth. Between 2015 and 2016 they will have 20 new product filings in the medical device business. Pharmaceuticals – The pharmaceutical segment includes products in therapeutics, anti-infective, anti-psychotic, cardiovascular, contraceptive, dermatology, gastrointestinal, hematology, immunology, neurology, oncology, pain management, urology and virology. As you can see, that is a long list and I could list all the drugs they currently have on market and what is about to come to market, but rather than list a bunch of drugs I cannot pronounce, I feel it is more important to share this fact. JNJ believes it will file 10 new drug filings by 2019, each with the potential to achieve $1 billion in annual sales. Here is a quote from JNJ’s second quarter earnings call . ” Our focused R&D strategy and commitment to driving launch excellence to ensure broad access and reimbursement has really come together to make a difference for patients and have this well-positioned to continue to drive above industry compound annual growth rate over the next several years. Fueled by seven of our recently launched products that we expect will each exceed $1 billion in sales this year and the more than 10 new products we plan to file by 2019 that each have $1 billion plus potential of their own based on their transformational potential to treat significant unmet medical needs worldwide .” In the second quarter worldwide sales of $7.9 billion increased 1% with U.S. sales down 1.5% and sales outside the U.S. up 3.8%. New competitors in hepatitis C and a divestiture impacted sales results. Why I am Confident in JNJ Going Forward – All the information I gave you concerning the various segments of JNJ business is interesting, but that is not why I bought the stock. I bought the stock for the following reasons.. The entire world population is getting old and in need of increased medical care. I like to buy stocks that have an overriding theme that will increase their chance for success. In JNJ’s case, their unique broad spectrum of health care products makes them an excellent candidate to benefit from the aging world population. Here are just a few facts highlighting why JNJ is likely to benefit from demographic trends. The United Nations states population aging is unprecedented, without parallel in human history and the 21st century will see even more rapid aging than did the previous century. The global share of older people (aged 60 and over) increased from 9.2 percent in 1990 to 11.7 percent in 2013 and will continue to grow to 21.1% in 2050. In the U.S. the older population-persons 65 years or older-numbered 44.7 million in 2013 (the latest year for which data is available). They represented 14.1% of the U.S. population, about one in every seven Americans. By 2060, there will be about 98 million older persons, more than twice their number in 2013. People 65+ represented 14.1% of the population in the year 2013 but are expected to grow to be 21.7% of the population by 2040. The increased number of persons over 65 years will potentially lead to increased health-care costs. The health-care cost per capita for persons over 65 years in the United States and other developed countries is three to five times greater than the cost for persons under 65 years, and the rapid growth in the number of older persons, coupled with continued advances in medical technology, is expected to create upward pressure on health- and long-term–care spending. One million Americans a year are getting total joint replacement. That figure is expected to grow to four million over the next 20-years. Global annual spending on cancer drugs has hit $100bn for the first time By 2021, annual prescription drug spending will nearly double, to $483.2 billion Health spending growth in the United States is projected to average 5.8 percent for 2014-24, reflecting the Affordable Care Act’s coverage expansions, faster economic growth, and population aging. Those are just a few facts, I could add more, but to me, it is obvious that as the world ages, health care will be a fast growing sector. I am confident, that JNJ, with its over 250 operating companies across the globe, will share in that growth. Why JNJ over McDonald’s – When comparing the two companies it seemed obvious to me, that JNJ was the financially stronger company and the company more likely to grow its business and dividend in the future. Let’s compare the two companies. All numbers are from Yahoo finance. Category JNJ MCD Price to earnings 16.75 23.95 Price to earnings growth 3.10 3.25 Price to book 3.70 9.05 Total cash $33.95B $4B Cash per share $12.26 $4.25 Debt $19.31B $17.9B Debt to equity 27.14 169.51 Yield 3.17 3.36 Dividend payout ratio 50.2% 77.96% Operating cash flow 17.09B 6.55B I think any fair-minded observer would look at those numbers and say JNJ is the more financially sound company and the company more likely to reward shareholders going forward. At a recent Morgan Stanley conference, JNJ CFO Dominic Caruso said this about the large amount of cash that is on the balance sheet. ” So I think it’s safe to say, we have sufficient capital to put to use, we’re going to put it to use. It’s going to be in a value creating acquisition, or in share buybacks ” So we have two companies. MCD which may be cash challenged, or JNJ which is sitting on a pile of cash. We have JNJ selling at a P/E under 17 and MCD selling for over 23. We have JNJ which has raised it’s dividend 6% and 7% the last two years and we have MCD which has raised it’s dividend 5% the last two years. We have JNJ which saw earnings per share grow from $3.49 in 2011 to $5.70 in 2014 and we have MCD which saw earnings fall from $5.27 in 2011 to $4.82 in 2014. After considering all that information, on September 28th, I sold MCD for $97.57 and bought a full position in JNJ for $90.41. I expect to hold forever, or until the business deteriorates. I expect JNJ to grow slowly, benefiting from the demographic trends and JNJ’s diverse health care related products. I also expect the dividend to grow steadily. Next Move McDonald’s was the second biggest position in my portfolio, so selling it freed up a large sum of cash. Even though I bought a full position in JNJ, I still had cash left over from the sale, in addition to cash that had built up in my account from the recent quarterly dividends. As I sat on the cash contemplating what to do with it, I saw a short term situation develop which I took advantage of. On Friday, October 2nd, the Labor Department announced a very disappointing jobs number. When I saw the jobs number, I knew the number was very disappointing and I knew traders would determine any Federal Reserve rate increase, which many thought was coming soon, would be delayed. Based on that, I had a hunch the banks would take a pounding at the open, as investors would determine the banks interest rate spreads, which everyone thought would be improving with a rate increase, would now be further in the future. As I expected, the market opened down big and the banks were the worse performers. I thought this was very short-sighted and an overreaction. Banks were in no worse shape on October 2nd than they were on October 1st. So I took the cash funds in my account and bought Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC ) for $49.60 shortly after the open. This was a short-term trade, not an investment. I have sworn off banks as an investment as it seems every five years or so, they have some sort of crisis. Fortunately for me, before the day was over, WFC was back above $51.00 and closed at $51.26. I sold WFC on October 7th for $52.56, a quick gain of approximately 6%. The 6% gain added a little more funds to my account, so on October 7th, after selling the Wells Fargo shares, I bought shares in WEC Energy Group (NYSE: WEC ), formerly Wisconsin Energy. I paid $51.88 per share. I began building a position in WEC in July, when I made two purchases, one for $45.10 and another for $46.34. Those two purchases amounted to a little bit more than a half position. With the latest purchase, I now have about an 85% position at a cost basis of $47.63. I imagine I will complete the position before the end of the year. The company, formerly known as Wisconsin Energy, recently purchased Intergys Energy another Midwest utility. The combined company is now known as WECEnergyGroup. WEC is deserving of its own article as there is a lot I would like to say, but briefly let me mention this. WEC provides electricity and natural gas service to 4.4 million customers across four states, Wisconsin, Illinois, Michigan and Minnesota. They are the eighth largest natural gas distribution company in the country and among the 15 largest investor owned utilities in the country. WEC currently yields 3.5% and investors can expect dividend growth of 6-8% a year, in-line with earnings growth. I think WEC is an excellent, financially sound, utility which has several unique characteristics that differentiates it from other utilities. I will expand on WEC in a future article, but suffice to say, I intend to hold WEC forever, or until the business deteriorates. The End Result When all was said and done, I had sold McDonald’s, a long time holding and purchased Johnson and Johnson, a dividend stalwart, that had become attractively priced. I then made a quick purchase and sell of Wells Fargo that resulted in a small profit. Subsequently, I purchased additional shares in WEC Energy Group. So I now own a stock, JNJ, that, in-my-opinion, is a better value and has better long term prospects than MCD, which I previously owned. I also was able to purchase additional shares in WEC Energy Group a stock I am currently building a position in. In addition, the dividends I get from the shares I bought in JNJ and WEC will be slightly more than the dividends I was getting from MCD. Investing is about maximizing your investable cash. I believe in long-term investing, however, at times, there may be a company that offers better value, better growth, and/or better dividend growth, than the stock you own. In that case, selling a stock that you have owned for a long time makes sense. That is the situation I recently saw and that is the action I took. Only time will tell how it works out.

Biotech In A Bear Market. First Move? Don’t Panic!

It was a putrid week for biotech, partially triggered by a tweet from presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. The main biotech indices fell some 13% in five trading sessions. This sort of volatility is nothing new for this sector of the market. In fact, this is the fifth bear market for small cap biotech stocks since 2009. However, this too shall pass for this lucrative area of the market and brighter skies will return. Here are my time worn strategies for navigating the current turmoil in biotech. It doesn’t matter how one describes the action in the biotech sector this week, it was just plain ugly. The main biotech indices sold off ~13% including an almost five percent plunge on Friday even as the S&P 500 managed to end flat on the day. Investors in biotech have not been treated this much like rented mules by the market during one week in quite some time. (click to enlarge) Part of the deep pullback was triggered Monday by presidential candidate Hillary Clinton who tweeted her outrage about drug price “gouging” . She then made it part of her campaign as she tacks even further left for the upcoming primaries as a self-avowed socialist continues to gain against her in the polls for the contest for the Democratic Party nomination for president. It should be kept in mind that this type of electioneering is par for the course. Even if Mrs. Clinton is elected president and wanted to follow through on these primary promises, they have absolutely little to no chance of passing. The Republicans will still be charge of the House of Representatives and quite possibly the Senate. There are also no guarantees that Mrs. Clinton will be elected president or even secure the Democratic nomination for that matter. Who knows either her and/or Republican front runner Donald Trump might even develop a sense of shame at some point and withdraw from the race. In addition, this sort of turmoil is nothing new to this lucrative but volatile sector of the market. This is now the fifth time since 2009 that the small cap biotech sector has declined by at least 20% and entered an official bear market. The last time started in early March of last year. During that decline that lasted 6-8 weeks, large cap growth names in the sector like Gilead Sciences (NASDAQ: GILD ) fell back 20% to 30% before bottoming. Many small cap names plunged 50% to 70% before all was said and done. Given that I run the Biotech Forum on SeekingAlpha and approximately 40% of my articles here, on Real Money Pro and Investors Alley are centered on biotech investing; I have been inundated from questions from readers and subscribers this week. The quick downturn has caused a significant amount of anxiety. This is understandable but also part of investing in the biotech industry. I have been warning since the early summer that the overall market was overdue for at least a 10% pull back and that the biotech sector was quite possibly in a bubble as well. The weakness in the market should be no surprise and is also affecting other high beta sectors of equities with small cap stocks being down 3.6% this week as well. My first piece of advice is the same as the core theme of the cult classic “The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy”. This is simply “Don’t Panic!”. This too shall pass. Thanks to algorithmic computerized generated trading now accounting for more than 50% of trading in the equity markets; these declines are getting deeper and quicker than they used to be as these programs decide to abandon momentum driven and high beta sectors of the market in nano-seconds. I have been successfully investing in biotech for over two decades. I have seen many such bouts of turmoil and I plan to see many, many more before I hang up my investing spurs. Over these periods I have developed several core principles to manage a well-diversified biotech portfolio that helps position these holdings to outperform the overall market over time while to help mitigate risk and lessen the overall volatility of the portfolio as well. My hope is that they can help readers manage through the current carnage in the biotech sector until sentiment once again turns positive on this part of the market. April 14th Article on Biotech Forum: The biotech & biopharma space is one of the most volatile of any of the sectors of the market. This is especially true as it relates to the small caps that make up a good portion of the companies that occupied the biotech & biopharma arena. It is not unusual to see a small biotech equity be listed as the top gainer of the day in the market with another small play in the space taking biggest loser of the day honors. Volatility is a fact of life for investors who want to invest in these high beta sectors of the markets. One does so because few if any areas of the market can offer up the five and ten baggers that are the stuff of dreams and can turbocharged the performance of one’s portfolio by just be fortunate enough to occasionally catch one of these “rockets”. Over the years I have identified many of these huge winners in the pages of SeekingAlpha including Lannett Group (LCI ), ZELTIQ Aesthetics (NASDAQ: ZLTQ ), Novavax (NASDAQ: NVAX ) , Avanir Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ: AVNR ) and myriad others. Recently Eagle Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ: EGRX ) has soared over 275% since I listed as a “Best Idea” on Real Money Pro on 12/19/2014. (click to enlarge) (click to enlarge) I have also had my share of disappointments like Regado Biosciences (RGDO) and Synta Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ: SNTA ). It is simply the nature of the game. For every home run they will be at least one strike out. However, if managed right and optimized collection for small and large cap biotech & biopharma stocks can be a key contributor to overall outperformance from one’s portfolio over time. (click to enlarge) (click to enlarge) It is my passion and success in the biotech arena over the past two decades of investing that drove me to create the Biotech Forum which launched on SeekingAlpha early in April. I want to share my thoughts on how to properly manage and optimize a biotech/biopharma portfolio and some tricks of the trade have absorbed over many years of investing in this space. They will be the tenets of the Biotech Forum portfolio which will consist of twenty stocks. Five of these will be from the large cap space. These companies will already have achieve profitability, have solid products & pipelines and are selling at attractive or at least reasonable valuations on a long term investment basis. These will be labeled as “CORE” positions. The remaining 15 stocks will come from the more volatile and speculative small cap sector. These will be tagged with the “SPECULATIVE” moniker. Depending on your risk preferences you will want to weight each large cap selection three to six times heavier than each small cap pick. This will mean 50% to 75% of your portfolio will be made up of these more stable and less volatile large cap equities. The remaining portion of your portfolio we will go hunting for some multi-bag grand slams. This portfolio will be built slowly as I believe in dollar cost averaging in these areas. This sector has outperformed the overall market for five straight years and could be overdue for a pullback if sentiment sours on “risk on” areas of the market. Each month we will add one large cap pick and three small cap equities to the mix. Once we have our twenty stock portfolio we will make adjustments/modifications as we deem prudent over time. I will also offer up some future promising opportunities each month for those who might want to assemble a portfolio in a different or faster way than how we create the Biotech Forum portfolio. Our small cap selections will be focused on different technologies and disease areas to provide diversification. We will also look for concerns with multiple “shots on goal”, partnerships with larger players within the space, strong balance sheets which also could make attractive buyout opportunities. There are three terrible feelings when investing in small biotechs & biopharma stocks. The first is when a trial goes wrong or a company announces other disappointing news resulting in your investment cratering. Unfortunately, there is little one can do avoid these landmines as bringing a compound to market is a very complicated affair and is why one must make myriad small investments across promising opportunities in these sectors to provide diversification. The second thing that go wrong is when one makes an investment that comes at a very opportune time. Your stock doubles or triples in short order and you do not take any profits. Over time, the stock falls back to where you bought it or even lower and the feeling of regret of not taking any gains clouds future investment decisions. Finally, there are instances when your investment doubles or better and you cash out entirely only to see the stock triple or quadruple from there. I have had this happen many times over the decades and there are few worse feelings in investing. I have develop a rule of thumb over the year when it comes to small biotech stocks. It is to sell 10% of your original stake once one achieves a 50% gain, 20% of the original stake after the stock doubles and 20% more if one is fortunate to have your stock triple. The other half of the original stake now rides on the “house’s” money unless something drastically changes on the company’s prospects. That concludes a brief overview of some core themes that will be core drivers behind the formulation of our optimum twenty stock Biotech Forum portfolio.