Scalper1 News
Summary Many employees hold stock in the company that employs them. Taking advantage of plans that offer a discount on stock makes sense, but don’t let it overwhelm your portfolio. By not rebalancing frequently enough, employees may find themselves with diversifiable risk. The excess risk provides no excess (expected) return, and the risk isn’t just having too much of one company in your portfolio. I’m suggesting investors take a better look at replacing their employer’s stock with VTI whenever the option is available. The last week I’ve been doing a great deal of research on behavioral finance. There are several potential pitfalls for investors to avoid, but most investors are not familiar with behavior finance. I’ll be highlighting several of those pitfalls so readers can watch out for them. My focus in this article is why the Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (NYSEARCA: VTI ) is a better investment than your employer. I can’t say that VTI will provide better returns, but I am confident that the expected return for the level of risk will be superior. Two problems with owning your employer: Problem #1 The first problem should be fairly clear to most investors. Holding individual companies is a fine way to invest, but it creates a substantial amount of diversifiable risk if individual companies are a large part of the portfolio or if multiple companies within the same industry are being selected. When the position in the employer reaches higher levels, say 10 or 15%, it becomes a substantial risk factor for the portfolio. Two problems with owning your employer: Problem #2 The second problem is one that many intelligent people manage to completely overlook. The second risk factor is that you are exposing the value of your portfolio to the same risk factors that are impacting the value of your lifetime earnings. Let’s start with an extreme example: Enron Long-term employees had ample opportunity to build up substantial positions in the company stock. When a company goes out of business, the employees are facing unemployment. If they also held the stock, they risk seeing the value of their portfolio decline substantially. If the firm employs a substantial number of people with their skill set within the geographic area, several former employees may be faced with needing to move in order to find new work. The concentration of that skill set exceeding the number of available positions makes it an unfortunate situation that is even more significant for employees that own their home and will be facing transaction costs on selling the house. Industry risk On top of the company-specific risk, there is also a level of industry risk. If the company is closing locations because the industry is less profitable, finding a job with a competitor will be more difficult. It would be preferable for the employee to have less than normal exposure to his industry within his portfolio. Whether the firm is in biotech or car manufacturing, the price that the employee’s skill set can command in the free market is still dependent upon supply and demand within the industry. Solving the problem There are two ways to solve this problem. An investor can either attempt to build a diversified portfolio that intentionally has less than normal allocation to their industry. However, I think it is much simpler and more cost efficient, due to trading commissions, to simply buy the Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF. I’ve heard people lately talking about how the stock market is being valued too highly. I think some of those analysts raise very legitimate concerns. However, I also believe that market timing has a negative expected value. Attempting to find the right time to jump in may be viable for individual companies, but trying to find the right time for buying the entire market is another challenge entirely. When was the right time to buy? In my opinion, several decades ago would have been great. Since that isn’t an option, I favor investing in the total market at the present time. Is this the perfect moment? I doubt the timing is perfect. Whichever day you buy into the market, there may well be a day in the future that offers a lower price. Buying into the market and having the value never dip under the entry price has more to do with being lucky than good. How I’m doing it Over the next couple months, I’ll be overhauling my positions. The vast majority of my positions are in tax advantaged accounts, so I’m not concerned about the ramifications of capital gains. I’ll do the rebalancing as soon as I finish with filing taxes for 2014. I need to know how I’m going to split up my contributions to Traditional and Roth IRA accounts. I don’t know if the market will move up or down during that time, but I expect VTI to be trading right about NAV due to the enormous trading volume. For investors not familiar with VTI, the average is over 3 million shares per day. I’ll buy at whatever the price happens to be at the time, and I’ll be investing over half of my total investment portfolio. Why VTI? When I started looking at ETFs for my portfolio, I started looking at SPDR S&P 500 Trust ETF (NYSEARCA: SPY ). I started running historical numbers comparing the volatility of portfolios that included ETFs with exposure to several investing factors. I included emerging markets, precious metals, bonds, and bonds in other currencies. What I found was that it was possible (historically) for an investor to find better returns and lower risk through a global portfolio. However, the returns did not take into account any trading costs and the difference was not very substantial. After seeing how well SPY was able to do against the much more complicated portfolios, I decided it would be better to try to replicate it. VTI offers extremely high correlation to SPY, which isn’t surprising given how many of the same equities are being held. However, VTI is offering exposure to smaller cap companies without having such a large position that it would substantially alter the returns. The result is an ETF that offers extremely similar performance to SPY with a slightly lower expense ratio. For VTI it is .05%, for SPY it is .09%. Conclusion If an investor is holding stock in their employer, it would be prudent to consider swapping the position for VTI or SPY. If the position is required as part of a program that allows employees to buy the company stock at a discount to the market price, it may be reasonable to retain the amount of stock required by the program. For any excess cash being invested, VTI or SPY offers dramatically lower risk for the investor’s life. The risk is not simply the standard deviation of the portfolio value. Investors need to be aware that holding their employer exposes their portfolio to precisely the same risks that their career is facing. That is a risk that all investors should seek to diversify. Disclosure: The author has no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More…) The author wrote this article themselves, and it expresses their own opinions. The author is not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). The author has no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. Additional disclosure: Information in this article represents the opinion of the analyst. All statements are represented as opinions, rather than facts, and should not be construed as advice to buy or sell a security. Ratings of “outperform” and “underperform” reflect the analyst’s estimation of a divergence between the market value for a security and the price that would be appropriate given the potential for risks and returns relative to other securities. The analyst does not know your particular objectives for returns or constraints upon investing. All investors are encouraged to do their own research before making any investment decision. Information is regularly obtained from Yahoo Finance, Google Finance, and SEC Database. If Yahoo, Google, or the SEC database contained faulty or old information it could be incorporated into my analysis. The analyst holds a diversified portfolio including mutual funds or index funds which may include a small long exposure to the stock. Scalper1 News
Scalper1 News