Scalper1 News
Summary What is the Risk Rotation portfolio? How to construct and manage a Risk Rotation portfolio inside a 401K type of account. How does a Risk Rotation portfolio perform compared to the broad market? What is the Risk Rotation Portfolio? The Risk Rotation (or Asset Rotation) portfolio is not something new. One can find many variations for such a portfolio on the Internet. In the SA community, you can find several articles and contributions on similar and other Asset Allocation strategies by Frank Grossmann , Varan , Joseph Porter and others. In brief, the core principle in a Risk (or Asset) Rotation portfolio is to periodically move (or rotate) assets out of an asset with a higher downside risk to an asset that has lower downside risk and higher upward momentum. Such a portfolio aims to provide much lower volatility and drawdowns while capturing similar (or better) returns as the broader market. Though such a portfolio can be constructed inside any brokerage account, I personally find them more appropriate for retirement accounts. Risk Rotation portfolio for retirement accounts Investing successfully has never been easy. Even for the most disciplined investors, the market’s volatility sometimes takes its toll. The past few months have been an emotional rollercoaster for many folks, especially for those closer to retirement. If your horizon is very long term, this is simply market noise and best be ignored. However, for anyone who is already retired or close to retirement, any sharp correction has the potential to derail their near and medium-term planning. The big question is how do you protect yourself from a market downturn or an outright crisis like the one we had in 2008? Furthermore, most retirement accounts like 401K accounts do not provide the flexibility to buy individual stocks or even ETFs (Exchange Traded Funds). A vast majority of them provide just a handful of funds to invest. So, you cannot select your own dividend paying stocks and follow a DGI strategy. In my opinion, one good option is to construct a Risk Rotation portfolio. In my own experience, and also based on back testing, such a portfolio will provide market-beating returns in most situations while providing a high degree of risk protection. A disclaimer: I am also a believer in DGI strategy, and personally invest the majority of my investible funds in individual stocks that pay and grow their dividends. However, for accounts where I cannot invest in individual stocks, I follow the Risk Rotation strategy for about 50% of such assets. If you are interested in my other portfolio strategies, I publish a ” Passive DGI Portfolio ” and another portfolio that is Income-centric named ” The 8% Income Portfolio ” on SA. How to construct a Risk Rotation portfolio: I believe in keeping things simple so they can be easily followed long term. As an example in this article, I will use two securities (a pair of two securities). This pair can be easily implemented inside a 401k type account with moderate risk. There can be more aggressive pairs or strategies that promise higher returns (with higher risk obviously), but they cannot be easily implemented inside a retirement account. Moderate Risk strategy: SPY and TLT pair SPDR S&P 500 ETF (NYSEARCA: SPY ) is an ETF that corresponds to the price and yield performance of the S&P 500 Index. Almost all of the 401K or retirement accounts would offer something that is equivalent of S&P500 index. SPY is taken as an example to illustrate, but any similar fund or ETF can be used in place of SPY. iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond (NYSEARCA: TLT ) is a 20+ year Treasury fund and oftentimes provides the inverse co-relation with stocks. One can find something similar to TLT inside a retirement account. If nothing similar is available, it could be replaced by cash or cash-like money-market funds. However, the back-testing results by using cash are not as impressive as with TLT. One reason is that TLT provides some yield and at times meaningful appreciation, but cash provides neither (though money market funds do provide some minimal yield). On the first of every month, compare the performance of each of the two funds with a 3-month (or 65 trading days) look-back period. – Invest 70% of the allocated amount in the fund that has better performance over the last 3 months – Invest 30% of the allocated amount in the fund that has worse performance over the last 3 months – If the look-back period performance has been the same or nearly same, invest 50% in each of the two securities. – Repeat every month, on a fixed date of the month. It can be 1st of the month or any other date. Low Risk strategy: SPY, TLT and Cash For more conservative investors, a strategy that involves adding cash to the basket (SPY and TLT) will work a little better. This will also work better during times when both stocks and Treasuries are headed down. This strategy will provide much lower drawdowns, however, at the cost of some performance or overall returns. – On the first of every month, compare the performance returns of each of the three funds with a 3-month (or 65 trading days) look-back period. Performance of cash being taken as 0%. – Invest 60% of the allocated amount in the fund that has better performance over the last 3 months – Invest 30% of the allocated amount in the fund that has second worse performance over the last 3 months – Invest 10% of the allocated amount in the fund that has worst performance of three funds over the last 3 months – Repeat every month, on a fixed date of the month. It can be 1st of the month or any other date. Performance comparison: RRP Strategies vs. S&P 500: (click to enlarge) Image1: Performance/Returns – RRP Strategies vs. S&P 500 The table above shows the performance/returns of the Risk Rotation portfolio (RRP) starting with the year 2006. Row 12: Shows how the portfolio would have performed versus S&P 500 if we had invested $100,000 on January 1, 2006 and remained invested until 10/30/2015. Row 11: Shows how the portfolio would have performed versus S&P 500 if we had invested $100,000 as of January 1, 2007 and remained invested until 10/30/2015. And so on… Notice, except for two starting years (2012 and 2013), the RRP either matches or handily beats S&P 500 with much lower drawdown. The main benefit that stands out is that it moves the portfolio away from the risk in a crisis situation that we witnessed in 2008. I did not go back to the year 2001-2002, but I expect similar behavior. (click to enlarge) Image2: Growth of $100,000 starting on 1/1/2006 – RRP strategy vs. S&P 500. (click to enlarge) Image3: Monthly drawdowns since year 2006 – RRP strategy vs. S&P 500. (click to enlarge) Image4: Maximum drawdown since year 2006 – RRP strategy vs. S&P 500. Risks from this strategy: Let’s consider some potential risks: The first risk comes from the fact that we are seeing the performance comparison based on back-testing results. As the adage goes, past performance is no guarantee of future results. TLT or any other equivalent fund would invest in a treasury based bond fund. In a rising interest rate environment, TLT may have inferior performance compared to past. However, this risk should be mitigated by the fact that we are checking the performance of the two securities every month and switching if necessary. Lack of Diversification: For the stocks component, we are investing in SPY (equivalent of S&P 500), so there is not much exposure to any of the international markets or other asset types like gold or commodities. However, this is partially mitigated by the fact that the companies inside S&P 500 earn a lot of their revenue from outside of the US. Another risk comes from the fact that oftentimes, the performance of this portfolio will be different than the broader market. If it happens to be negative compared to the broader market for a couple of years, the investor may lose conviction and the discipline and may abandon the plan mid-course. This probably is the biggest risk. Concluding Remarks: As they say, hindsight is 20:20. It is hard to predict with any certainty that such a strategy will work as well as it has worked in the past. That’s why it is important to not keep all of your eggs in one basket and depend too much on any one strategy. In my opinion, for the long haul, this strategy should at least match S&P 500 performance with much lower drawdowns, and hence should allow much better sleep at night. I am starting out a sample portfolio with $100,000 initial capital allocated as of November 3, 2015 and will provide regular updates. I plan to publish the performance comparison of the two securities (SPY and TLT) with the previous 3 months’ look-back period on or after the first trading day of every month. This will indicate if a switch of assets is required for the strategy. Here is the relative performance of SPY and TLT as of November 2nd with 3-month look-back period: Price (adj. close) on 11/02/2015 Price (adj. close) on 7/31/2015 Performance/Return Over last 3 months TLT 121.95 121.75 0.16% SPY 210.33 209.36 0.46% Source: Yahoo Finance Since the performance is nearly the same for both, the strategy will invest 50% of $100,000 in each of the two securities. Full Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for information purpose only and in no way should be construed as financial advice or recommendation to buy or sell any stock. Every effort has been made to present the data/information accurately; however, the author does not claim for 100% accuracy. The portfolio or other investments presented here are for illustration purpose only. The author is not a financial advisor, please do your own due diligence. Scalper1 News
Scalper1 News