Scalper1 News
Summary Paladin could be breaking even this year, as it will be able to reduce its production costs per pound of uranium at Langer Heinrich. However, the main unknowns here are the overhead costs and the expenses to keep its Kaleyekera mine on care and maintenance. Paladin bought more time with its debt restructuring, but the clock is ticking and a higher uranium price would be very welcome. Introduction As the current glut in the uranium market will have to end sooner rather than later, I am keeping my fingers on the pulse of some uranium companies to make sure I’m making an informed decision when I’m ready to sharply increase my exposure to this commodity. Paladin Energy (OTCPK: PALAF ) has released its full-year financial results and has updated its outlook for the current financial year, so it could be a very interesting moment to check up on how the company is doing. Source: annual report Paladin Energy has more liquid listings on both the Toronto Stock Exchange and the Australian Stock Exchange, and I’d recommend to trade on the ASX. The ticker symbol there is PDN and the average daily volume is a pretty decent 9 million shares. The current market capitalization is approximately $230M, so its market cap is almost twice as high as the information page on Seeking Alpha would want to make you believe. The full-year financial results are showing the impact of selling uranium at the spot price Paladin has produced 5.04 million pounds of uranium and has sold almost 5.4 million pounds as it had some uranium in inventory which it sold during the financial year. Unfortunately, Paladin has not entered into any long-term contracts and it was definitely feeling the pain of the low uranium price on the spot market as the average received price was just $37/lbs for a total revenue of $199M . Source: financial statements This resulted in a gross profit of just $1.8M as Paladin also had to record an $8M impairment charge on the value of its inventory as the uranium price continued to decrease. The after-tax net loss was a stunning $300M and this was predominantly caused by a $240M impairment charge (of which $1M was attributed to an aircraft). I’m a little bit relieved the net loss was mainly caused by an impairment charge as that’s a non-cash charge and shouldn’t have an impact on the cash flow numbers. Source: financial statements So, let’s have a look at those cash flow statements; unfortunately, the situation doesn’t look much better here as the operating cash flow was negative, resulting in a total negative free cash flow of $40M. Keep in mind the cash flow statements exclude the impact of an impairment charge so there are no excuses at all here. What will Paladin do different this year? The company has now just one mine which is still in production, Langer Heinrich in Namibia. The mine will produce approximately 5-5.4 million pounds of uranium in the current financial year so there might be a small production increase, but the impact will be minimal. However, there will be an impact on the total production rate attributable to Paladin Energy, as the company sold a 25% stake in Langer Heinrich to a Chinese consortium for $190M last year. This cash infusion was be very welcome, but it also means Paladin is giving up on a lot of future potential cash flow. Langer Heinrich has a total resource estimate of 150 million pounds, so the company has sold 37.5 million pounds for $190M, or just $5 per pound. This decision is understandable, as it needed to improve the balance sheet, but should the received price per pound of uranium increase to $50+ again, Paladin might regret the sale. Paladin expects the production cost per pound to decrease by 7-14% to $26/lbs, but despite an uranium price of $35/lbs, this doesn’t mean the company will be free cash flow positive. There still is an ongoing cost of approximately $12-15M per year, which equals approximately $4 per attributable pound of uranium produced at Langer Heinrich. Throw in an additional $20M for exploration and administration (another $5/lbs) and you clearly see Paladin needs an uranium price of approximately $35-38/lbs to be able to even start thinking about breaking even. And that will be a difficult task in FY2016. Don’t get me wrong, it is possible as Paladin expects to receive a premium of $4/lbs over the spot price, but you surely shouldn’t expect any miracles from Paladin this year. Investment thesis Paladin’s re-financing activities in the past financial year have reduced the pressure on the balance sheet, but Paladin has just bought some more time, as it doesn’t look like the company will be able to generate a substantial amount of free cash flow in the current financial year, which could have been used to reduce the net debt. Paladin is a leveraged play on the uranium price and there will be a huge difference between a uranium price of $35/lbs and $50/lbs as, at the latter price, Paladin should be generating a pretty decent amount of free cash flow. Editor’s Note: This article covers one or more stocks trading at less than $1 per share and/or with less than a $100 million market cap. Please be aware of the risks associated with these stocks. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. Scalper1 News
Scalper1 News