Scalper1 News
Summary IBB has corrected from its all time high by up to 30%. Hillary Clinton’s snowball was catched right in the eye of the pharma industry. The scare is partially unjustified. We look on pharma future growth figures and M&A activity that will drive the secular bull market higher. We believe that IBB is a good place to invest in the long term. We mention two recent picks where we expect further share price growth. iShares NASDAQ Biotechnology Index ETF (NASDAQ: IBB ) has corrected 30% from its all time high of around $401. Several investors start to ask if we have been in the bubble territory. We discuss in this article the facts why the pharmaceuticals industry will continue in a secular bull market towards 2020. We do have a correction now, but it is not the start of the bear market in our opinion. Let’s discuss this in more details. Chart Analysis The IBB bull market started a quick acceleration in 2012. Looking on the quick rise, it is normal to have a correction. No bull market runs up without any significant corrections. Now as China spends more money on drugs also IBB is more correlated with Shanghai SSE index as compared to 2007-2008. IBB data by YCharts Now that we have touched the famous 30% correction line, could we go lower to touch 50%? Let’s have a closer look on what drives this bull market. Pharma Revenues Total pharmaceutical industry revenues are expected to increase from $1.23 trillion in 2014 to $1.61 trillion in 2018. This corresponds to a growth rate of 6-8% annually. Such a 30% increase in revenues would drive the secular bull market higher. Some leading economies are also liberating their drug prices. In June 2015 the communist party in China decided to remove the price caps on a majority of the drugs. That serves as a step towards a more liberalized drug market. We wonder if they tweeted this news to Hillary Clinton. Hillary Clinton’s initiatives might cut the healthcare spending in the United States and set some drug price caps or limitations. We hope that her initiative would not be too disruptive for the industry – if it would be implemented one day. Increasing amount of regulations, restrictions and taxes is typically pushing the businesses to delocalize. These drug firms might also allocate differently their risk capital and not always in the benefit of the patients. For this reason we think that Hillary Clinton’s initiative would end up to be a good compromise. Speaking of delocalizations, we will surely see a wave of startups in China. Currently most big drug firms have large R&D centers in China and the pool of talent has been growing up rapidly. Belgium is no worse, there the politicians compete in attracting new pharmaceutical businesses in the country with tax breaks and benefits. Should Hillary read the tweet streams from Belgium? We think so because Belgium has the highest concentration of life science employees in the whole world and the highest number of Phase I to Phase III drugs in development per capita. Consequently, that has a huge impact on the nation’s economy. We talk later of one Belgian biotechnology company in particular where we hold a long position. Pharma Expenses A topic that is rarely covered in the press is pharma industry’s expenses, i.e. operational costs. Cutting cost is an excellent and quick way to improve the P&L. Well managed companies might be busy cutting down the purchasing and inventory costs and rationalizing the working processes to be more lean and efficient. Pharma industry is still far behind the traditional industries in this. Recent study shows that in 2014 only 32% of the pharma companies procurement organizations’ executives had a full leadership of their key spend areas. The savings generated were slumping down by 45% from year 2009. The study investigated some 185 pharma sector companies with an average revenue of $15 billion. 41% of the companies were based in the U.S. So, the investors should better check how the spend dollars are controlled when investing in individual big pharma companies. A good control over the expenses is the key for creating very profitable businesses. This is why we wanted to discuss this largely uncovered reality of non-optimally managed spends in the pharma industry. There is an opportunity of billions of dollars in savings. Such a greater discipline could have a great impact on IBB over the upcoming years through higher net profitabilities. M&A’s Are Booming There have been a triple amount of mergers and acquisitions in H1 2015 as compared to H1 2014. We have already seen $221b worth of pharmaceutical deals in H1 2015. This hasn’t been considered yet in the long term industry forecasts. It is a very recent news. These M&A’s will give a further necessary tailwind for IBB. These deals will increase the industry’s key players’ profitability through operational synergies. Risks & Opportunities There are many risks and opportunities and we want to highlight here just a few: Risks Hillary Clinton’s initiatives to push down the healthcare spending in the U.S. Patents expiry on several blockbuster drugs Changing regulatory requirements Rich industry valuations: IBB is trading at a PE of 25.19 and Price/Sales ratio of 7.72 Opportunities Increased focus on Orphan indications with higher margin opportunities Drug price cap removal in China Emerging digital healthcare applications market (drug administration, patient monitoring, etc.) Faster drug development with more modern technologies available in R&D Increase of aging patient populations We believe that by balancing out the risks and opportunities the overall picture is quite positive for the pharma industry. The digital healthcare applications will become a hot market in our opinion. Speaking of the healthcare industry in the wide sense we have covered prior some surgical robotics companies. This is a good example of how the modern technology can revolutionize the market segments and bring benefits to the patients and payers. The readers may have a look on TransEnterix as one example. How To Invest? Surprisingly, we are not holding IBB in our portfolio. Such index is better suited for a passive investor. We prefer to pick individual names and do lots of due diligence on them, that we partially publish at SA articles. We currently have two promising companies in our radar with an imminent share price catalyst in Q1-16. If you want to learn more you can read our articles on Mast Therapeutics and TiGenix. Wake-Up Calls for Two Hidden Gems TiGenix has run up already over 44% since our exclusive article at SA but its valuation is still at a ridiculous level in our opinion. TiGenix (OTC: TGXSF ) already published on 23rd August 2015 that their Phase III study primary end-point was met with the final and full results coming out in Q1-16 for a treatment of perianal fistulas in Crohn’s disease. Their Cx601 allogeneic expanded stem cells drug seems to be very safe as no difference was observed between the drug and placebo groups. The peak sales potential is estimated at $900m and TiGenix trades currently at a market cap of $182m. We think that is making no sense and the share price might have quite a lot of potential to go up with the final Phase III results coming out in Q1-16. We covered Mast Therapeutics (NYSEMKT: MSTX ) at SA on 28th September 2015. It has went up quite a lot after our article was published. It is again an example of a very misunderstood company with a good pipeline drug MST-188 running in late Phase III to treat sickle cell patients. SCD patients have had no proper drug for the past 17 years and this is the first one we expect to arrive on the markets. Both these micro-cap stocks offer a good example of what we look for when picking individual names across the biotechnology sector. We are having long positions with both. Conclusions We believe that IBB is in a secular bull market. This index could still correct lower than the latest 30% drop from the all time high. Eventually, the increased industry revenues towards 2018, recent tripling in M&A activity and a better control over the spend dollars could send IBB to much higher levels. We believe that active investors might be more successful in hand picking individual companies instead of buying IBB. This would go along with a higher risk. Disclaimer: Please do your own research prior to investing and taking investment decisions. This article is provided for informal purposes only and any information mentioned may change at any time without a notice. Please consult your investment advisor for finding a proper allocation for your portfolio that is adjusted with your risk levels and personal situation. Editor’s Note: This article covers one or more stocks trading at less than $1 per share and/or with less than a $100 million market cap. Please be aware of the risks associated with these stocks. Scalper1 News
Scalper1 News