Category Archives: stocks

Inside Guggenheim’s U.S. Large Cap Optimized Volatility ETF

Low volatility exchange-traded products are in vogue this year due to global growth worries. Be it in China or in several developed economies, fears of a slowdown are widespread. The U.S. earnings picture is also in shambles with a moderation in GDP growth. Oil price, though recoiled from the pit of crisis, is nowhere near full-fledged recovery (read: Low Volatility ETFs Still in Play ). With no definite clues of sustained recovery in the market, edgy investors may want to invest in safe or low volatile products. The current low volatility ETF suite is performing well and probably this is why Guggenheim recently added a new one to the low volatility investing list. The name of the product is the U.S. Large Cap Optimized Volatility ETF (NYSEARCA: OVLC ) . Let’s dig a little deeper. OVLC in Focus The fund looks to track the Guggenheim U.S. Large Cap Optimized Volatility Index, which gives exposure to the advantages of low-volatility investing while “attempting to outperform these strategies during market rallies .” In short, the fund has been launched to act as a defense for most of the time but be more ‘aggressive when the market is rewarding risk characteristics’, per the issuer. This strategy results in the fund holding a basket of 93 stocks with Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL ), AT&T (NYSE: T ) and Procter & Gamble (NYSE: PG ) as the top three holdings with a total allocation of 7.28%. Sector-wise, the fund has double digit weight in Consumer Staples (19.97%), Health Care (18.02%), Financials (13.23%), Utilities (12.76%), Information Technology (12.20%) and Consumer Discretionary (11.69%). The fund charges 30 bps in fees. The underlying index is rebalanced on a quarterly basis. How Does It Fit in the Portfolio? The fund is a good choice for investors looking to play a volatile market. As per the issuer, it uses the S&P 500 index as its selection universe and then applies a proprietary formula to compute the risk-to-reward returns for the trailing 12-month period and figure out each stock’s volatility and correlation to the other stocks in the basket. The strategy is mainly ‘risk- controlled ‘ in nature but reacts to varying market conditions. Unlike low volatility products that normally underperform in bull markets, OVLC may play an aggressive role when risk-on sentiments are prevailing. Needless to say, if the proposed model works out, this ETF can be a great choice for risk-averse investors. ETF Competition Given that the fund seeks to lower portfolio volatility, it might face competition from other low volatility products in the space. The PowerShares S&P 500 Low Volatility Portfolio ETF (NYSEARCA: SPLV ) has an asset base of $7.17 billion. The fund charges 25 basis points as fees. The iShares MSCI USA Minimum Volatility ETF (NYSEARCA: USMV ) is another fund in the space with an AUM of $12.9 billion and a fee of 15 basis points. But the real competition is likely to come from the SPDR SSgA Risk Aware ETF (NYSEARCA: RORO ) that looks to offer capital gains and competitive returns with respect to the broad U.S. equity market (read: Beyond Miners, 5 ETFs Crushing the Market to Start Q2 ). Link to the original post on Zacks.com

Fitbit’s New Bands Could Double As Mobile Wallets

Fitbit ( FIT ) signaled it might add mobile wallet capability to upcoming fitness trackers, as it announced Wednesday that it had bought the assets of financial technology firm Coin. San Francisco-based Fitbit said the transaction closed on May 12. Financial terms were not disclosed. The deal includes key personnel and intellectual property specific to Coin’s wearables payment platform. The acquisition excluded smart payment devices, such as Coin 2.0. “While there are no plans to integrate Coin’s wearable payments technology into the 2016 Fitbit product roadmap, the acquisition accelerates Fitbit’s ability to develop an active NFC (near field communication) payment solution that could be embedded into future Fitbit devices, broadening its smart capabilities,” Fitbit said in a press release . Inclusion of payment technology into future Fitbit bands and watches would further the company’s strategy of making its products an indispensable part of people’s lives, CEO James Park said in a statement. Mobile payment technology lets consumers pay for items at tech-equipped retailers with the wave of a smartphone, smartwatch or other device using NFC technology. Examples include  Apple ‘s ( AAPL ) Apple Watch and newer iPhones carrying the Apple Pay mobile payments service. Fitbit stock was down close to 1%, near 14, in late-afternoon trading on the stock market today . RELATED: Fitbit, Apple Lead In Wearables, But Other Brands Gaining Fast .

Apple Bull Sees Path To $1 Trillion Market Cap

Ever since Apple ( AAPL ) stock peaked last summer, few on Wall Street have talked about the iPhone maker potentially reaching a market capitalization of $1 trillion, as they once did. But on Wednesday, Bernstein analyst Toni Sacconaghi resurrected the possibility. In a research report, Sacconaghi said the company’s “recipe for a $1 trillion market cap” could be a shift from being a hardware company to a service provider. Today, Apple is valued as a computer hardware company, making it vulnerable to replacement cycles and falling average selling prices and margins, Sacconaghi said. Apple would be valued more highly if it offered its devices on a service plan, he said. Apple stock was up nearly 1%, above 94, in afternoon trading on the stock market today , giving it a market cap of $516 billion. Sacconaghi rates Apple stock as outperform, with a price target of 135. “Consumers have become accustomed to paying monthly bills for various services, such as internet, cable, Netflix ( NFLX ), and Spotify, to name a few,” Sacconaghi said. “Even among the quantitatively-minded investment community, many find it easier to justify a $30 monthly charge (for an iPhone) than a $720 purchase every 2 years … even though they’re essentially the same.” Apple’s Slowing Upgrades Argues For Recurring Model By offering Apple products as a service, the company could switch to a recurring business model, which would likely get customers to spend more over time. In return, Apple customers could avoid hefty upfront payments for hardware and get the latest devices sooner, he said. Apple’s main business problem today is getting users to upgrade to newer devices when their current iPhones, iPads and Macs are working just fine. Apple isn’t like other makers of PCs and smartphones because it has a much stronger brand attachment. People love their iPhones, he said. “The challenge and opportunity for Apple is whether it can migrate from a transactional monetization model to a subscription model,” Sacconaghi said. Companies that have successfully shifted their business models to subscriptions include Adobe Systems ( ADBE ), Microsoft ( MSFT ) and Amazon.com ( AMZN ), he said. “We see the monthly cost of a family plan of Apple products amounting to similar or less than what U.S. consumers spend for cable television and wireless service,” Sacconaghi said. “We estimate that an Apple package needed for our family (3 iPad Minis, 1 iPad Air – each with a three-year replacement cycle; and 3 iPhones, each with a 2-year replacement cycle) would cost ‘only’ about $140 per month — well below the price of our current monthly cable bill and wireless bill. “Even if we included additional Apple services (Apple Music for $15 per month; iCloud storage for $10 per month; and a speculated but yet to be released over-the-top television offering for $40 per month), our hypothetical Apple monthly would be an estimated $207 per month.” If Apple were to pursue such a strategy, it would face resistance from its wireless carrier partners and would have to educate consumers of its benefits, Sacconaghi said. Apple already offers a smartphone subscription plan called the iPhone Upgrade Program. That program charges a monthly fee for iPhone hardware and handset upgrades every year. RELATED: Apple To Double iPhone Memory With Next Handset: Report Apple Has Reportedly Started Production On iPhone 7 Apple Should Be Valued Like Internet, Not Hardware, Company