Category Archives: etf

Best And Worst Q2’16: Telecom Services ETFs, Mutual Funds And Key Holdings

The Telecom Services sector ranks eighth out of the ten sectors as detailed in our Q2’16 Sector Ratings for ETFs and Mutual Funds report. Last quarter , the Telecom Services sector ranked eighth as well. It gets our Dangerous rating, which is based on aggregation of ratings of six ETFs and 15 mutual funds in the Telecom Services sector. See a recap of our Q1’16 Sector Ratings here . Figure 1 ranks from best to worst the five Telecom Services ETFs that meet our liquidity standards and Figure 2 shows the five best and worst rated Telecom Services mutual funds. Not all Telecom Services sector ETFs and mutual funds are created the same. The number of holdings varies widely (from 24 to 59). This variation creates drastically different investment implications and, therefore, ratings. Investors should not buy any Telecom Services ETFs or mutual funds because none get an Attractive-or-better rating. If you must have exposure to this sector, you should buy a basket of Attractive-or-better rated stocks and avoid paying undeserved fund fees. Active management has a long history of not paying off. Figure 1: ETFs with the Best & Worst Ratings – Top 5 Click to enlarge Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings Figure 2: Mutual Funds with the Best & Worst Ratings – Top 5 Click to enlarge * Best mutual funds exclude funds with TNAs less than $100 million for inadequate liquidity. Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings Five funds are excluded from Figure 2 because their total net assets are below $100 million and do not meet our liquidity minimums. State Street SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (NYSEARCA: XTL ) is the top-rated Telecom Services ETF and Fidelity Select Wireless Portfolio (MUTF: FWRLX ) is the top-rated Telecom Services mutual fund. Both earn a Neutral rating. iShares Global Telecom ETF (NYSEARCA: IXP ) is the worst rated Telecom Services ETF and Fidelity Advisor Telecommunications Fund (MUTF: FTUAX ) is the worst rated Telecom Services mutual fund. IXP earns a Dangerous rating and FTUAX earns a Very Dangerous rating. 45 stocks of the 3000+ we cover are classified as Telecom Services stocks, but due to style drift, Telecom Services ETFs and mutual funds hold 59 stocks. Atlantic Tele-Network (NASDAQ: ATNI ) is one of our favorite stocks held by Telecom Services ETFs and mutual funds and earns an Attractive rating. Over the past five years, Atlantic Tele-Network has grown after-tax profit ( NOPAT ) by 13% compounded annually. The company has improved its return on invested capital ( ROIC ) from 5% in 2010 to 10% in 2015 while NOPAT margins have increased from 5% to 17% over the same time period. This impressive fundamental growth could help explain why ATNI is up over 90% over the past five years. However, shares remain undervalued. At its current price of $73/share, ATNI has a price-to-economic book value ( PEBV ) ratio of 1.1. This ratio means that the market expects ATNI’s to grow its NOPAT by only 10% over its remaining life. If Atlantic Tele-Network can grow NOPAT by just 10% compounded annually for the next five years , the stock is worth $98/share today – a 36% upside. CenturyLink (NYSE: CTL ) is one of our least favorite stocks held by FTUAX and earns a Dangerous rating. CenturyLink was placed in the Danger Zone in February 2015 . CTL at one point was down over 40% since the Danger Zone was published, but has since rebounded and has become significantly overvalued again. Over the past decade, CenturyLink’s economic earnings have declined from -$152 million to -$1.2 billion. In fact, the company has never generated positive economic earnings in any year of our model, which dates back to 1998. The company’s ROIC peaked in 2009 at 7% and has since fallen to a bottom-quintile 4%. Despite the deterioration of CenturyLink’s business, the stock is priced for impressive profit growth. To justify its current price of $33/share, CTL must grow NOPAT by 8% compounded annually for the next 11 years . Given the decline in CTL’s operations, this expectation seems overly optimistic. Figures 3 and 4 show the rating landscape of all Telecom Services ETFs and mutual funds. Figure 3: Separating the Best ETFs From the Worst ETFs Click to enlarge Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings Figure 4: Separating the Best Mutual Funds From the Worst Mutual Funds Click to enlarge Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings D isclosure: David Trainer and Kyle Guske II receive no compensation to write about any specific stock, sector or theme. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Matthews Asia: Q&A With Robert Horrocks, PhD

Q&A With Robert Horrocks, PhD by Matthews Asia Chief Investment Officer and Lead Manager, Matthews Asia Dividend Fund Matthews Asia: How do you view the market environment for Asian economies? Robert Horrocks: The biggest negative in the short term is the U.S. Federal Reserve raising interest rates, meaning potential currency weakness and capital outflows for Asian markets. The main question is whether growth will pick up in an environment where markets are weak. In the short term, we are also seeing aggressive monetary stimulus across Asia: in China, India, Taiwan and Korea. The long-term outlook is, however, more upbeat. First, current accounts in Asia are generally positive: Asian countries are saving more domestically than they invest and are relatively less reliant on foreign capital. Asia has a higher share of manufacturing as a percentage of GDP and higher productivity growth, compared with the rest of the world. This started from a low base and has improved significantly over the past 20-30 years. Matthews Asia: How do you mitigate volatility? Robert Horrocks: The behavior of a dividend portfolio tends to be less volatile than the market: the security of receiving a dividend yield enables us to pursue a reasonable level of total return without chasing faster-growing, but more volatile investments. That is a double-edged sword, however: if the market goes up, we do not necessarily follow at the same pace. But in down times, we may have an element of protection. Matthews Asia: How is the Matthews Asia Dividend portfolio structured? Robert Horrocks: We take an all-cap approach, meaning we can invest in anything from small to mega caps. What is nice about Asia is that you see companies right down the market cap paying dividends. In small and mid-caps, you tend to find more entrepreneurial companies, family-owned commercial businesses, while large companies in Asia are often less commercially run and connected to governments. The market capitalisation of companies we invest in depends on the liquidity of underlying stocks in a particular market. For some markets, a liquid stock would have to be $1 billion, for others, only a few hundred million. But one thing this Fund will not do is morph into a blue-chip yield portfolio. Matthews Asia: What differentiates the Matthews Asia Dividend Fund from other Asia income funds? Robert Horrocks: We believe it is important to focus on the sustainability of the dividend stream. Many Asian equity income portfolios are built with a lot of emphasis on yield, containing stocks of Chinese and Australian banks and commodities, for example, which can be difficult underlying businesses. In our long-term total return approach, we use dividends as an indicator of core earnings growth and strength of the company. The companies we seek to invest in range from small and mid-caps that may be yielding 2% to solid businesses that may yield 4-5% but potentially growing their dividends at a 15% rate. This balanced approach seeks to create a portfolio that can benefit from an attractive dividend yield without giving up on growth. We have a lot of flexibility: If the market is hot, the natural thing for us is to take a step back and look in the other direction. If everyone is looking for yield, we would look for growth; if they start paying more for growth, we would move the portfolio back towards yield. We have a dedicated team of investment professionals that have 2,500 company meetings every year, looking at all businesses through the Asian dividends framework. We also meet with companies’ competitors and suppliers to gauge their outlook. Matthews Asia: Where are you currently wary of investing? Robert Horrocks: The Fund has currently no allocation in Australia. A lot of the time, the Australian banks or the material sectors are quite cyclical and exposed to shocks, both internally and externally. There are some countries that are more fertile ground than others. In India, for example, it is difficult to find high-quality companies, which are giving you a particularly high current yield. Now the reason for that is capital is quite scarce in India – after you have reinvested it into the business, there is less to pay out. Also, valuations there tend to be a little bit higher than in the rest of the region, so that is where the valuation discipline of the Fund comes in. In places like Korea, there is a lot of capital that can be shared with minority shareholders, but historically, the attitudes of management teams there has been less favorable to shareholders. That is where the corporate governance side of the discipline of our framework comes in. Matthews Asia: What are some of the most prevalent investment themes in Asia? Robert Horrocks: Looking at the past 30 years, inequality across the world has been decreasing (although it could be increasing within certain individual countries). This development has resulted in the rise of the middle class, so an opportunity for us is to find companies that will facilitate that middle-class life. This is an ongoing trend, likely to continue for the next 30 years. According to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development’s estimations, by 2060, Asia will account for two-thirds of middle-class spending in the world. Companies that should gain from that spending include businesses in industries as varied as retail, consumer staples and goods, consumer discretionaries, autos, media, leisure, entertainment, tourism, insurance and wealth management. Consumer and auto loan businesses of banks as well as healthcare are also expected to benefit – whether it is a high-street establishment or a more sophisticated business, such as a healthcare equipment manufacturer, a private hospital or a drugs company. Click to enlarge Robert Horrocks – Image source: Matthews Asia See full PDF below. Disclosure: None