Author Archives: Scalper1

SolarCity Risk Called ‘Elevated’ After Dumping MyPower Loan

No. 1 residential installer SolarCity ( SCTY ) abandoned its MyPower loan program after overestimating the number of customers qualified for the Investment Tax Credit on solar, JPMorgan Chase analyst Paul Coster wrote Tuesday. Coster downgraded SolarCity stock to neutral from an overweight rating and slashed his price target to 29 from 44, reflecting the firm’s “elevated” risk in 2016. Intraday on the stock market today , SolarCity stock toppled 5.2%. “We still believe the stock is undervalued,” Coster wrote in a research report. “However, risk is currently elevated, and business model uncertainty will weigh on the stock in 2016.” SolarCity is toeing the line between development company and power company. The tricky combination has played out in “poorly expressed GAAP numbers,” Coster wrote. He ticked off SolarCity’s transgressions. Over the last year, SolarCity launched and then withdrew its MyPower loan program, introduced and then de-emphasized a cash available for distribution (CAFD)-like metric, and amended its methodology for examining megawatts installed vs. deployed. “Mostly, these changes made sense to us, but the complexity and flux make it difficult to bring new money investors into this stock,” he wrote. SolarCity Worse Off Than Peers To that point, SolarCity is already driving off current investors. Since Dec. 17 — the day before Congress extended the ITC — SolarCity stock has fallen 68%, while IBD’s 23-company Energy-Solar industry group has dropped 32% over the same period of time. Ongoing net-metering headlines have only fueled the incineration, Coster wrote. Days after Congress extended the ITC by five years, Nevada regulators cut payments to solar customers for excess energy fed back into the grid. Earlier this month, the Nevada Public Utilities Commission voted against grandfathering existing solar customers under the previous rate scheme. “Encouragingly, California’s PUC has already approved a favorable plan for the solar industry, extended into 2019,” he wrote. But whether that will be enough to mitigate the “headline risk” remains to be seen. And SolarCity’s discontinued MyPower plan prompts further customer base questions, Coster wrote. CEO Lyndon Rive told GreenTechMedia.com on Monday that many customers couldn’t qualify for the ITC. “In hindsight, I definitely underestimated that,” he said. “I underestimated the success we’ve seen, which is fantastic.” Growth Hits Stalling Point SolarCity’s customer base isn’t solely wealthy households typically associated with solar panel investments, Coster wrote. And that could be a problem. “We believe new customers (with) apparently good credit (scores) at the lower end of the income spectrum may be at some risk for slow-pay or default in the event of an economic downturn,” he wrote. Meanwhile, SolarCity’s growth is slowing. During Q4, SolarCity installed 272 MW , which was up 54% vs. the year-earlier quarter but missed earlier guidance for 280 MW to 300 MW. SolarCity blamed its exit from Nevada for the miss. Fellow residential installer Sunrun ( RUN ), too, left Nevada upon the PUC vote in December. Although SolarCity reiterated 2016 guidance for 1.25 gigawatts in installations, up 44% year over year, that implies “re-acceleration and a back-end-loaded year — a risk,” Coster wrote. First Solar ( FSLR ), the largest stock by market cap in IBD’s Energy-Solar industry group, was down 4.5% to near 61 in afternoon trading, ahead of its after-the-close earnings report.

List Of Yahoo Internet Business Suitors Now Includes Time Inc.

Add Time ( TIME ) to the list of companies reportedly interested in exploring a bid to acquire Yahoo ’s ( YHOO ) Internet business, joining  Verizon Communications ( VZ ), AT&T ( T ) and others. Time has been studying the Yahoo bid for several weeks, reaching out to bankers to help finance the deal, according to a report from Reuters , citing a source familiar with the situation. Time is the publisher of Sports Illustrated, People, Fortune and Time magazines. A report from Bloomberg also said that Time is considering a Yahoo deal. Bloomberg said that Time could pursue a deal structure with Yahoo called a Reverse Morris Trust, a tax-free transaction in which one company merges with a spun-off subsidiary. Yahoo has reportedly rebuffed several potential buyers for its core Internet assets, including private equity firms. Verizon, which last June acquired AOL for $4.4 billion, has expressed interest in Yahoo’s core business. In addition to AT&T, other companies interested in exploring a deal for Yahoo include private-equity firms Bain Capital Partners and KKR ( KKR ). On Friday, Yahoo said that it had formed a committee of independent directors to entertain offers for its core Internet business. Also last week, Yahoo said that it will shut down seven digital magazines , following through on its layoffs and reorganization plans aimed once again at trying to rejuvenate growth. Yahoo in December abandoned plans to spin off its stake in Alibaba Group ( BABA ) and announced that it would instead look to possibly spin off its core Internet business and other assets, including its stake in Yahoo Japan, into a new company. Yahoo stock was down more than 1% in afternoon trading in the stock market today .

Top 10 Drivers Of Valuation

Business Valuation Framework Over the years I’ve spent a lot of time thinking about and working on business valuations across a broad range of transactions. Given that I’m a visual learner, I thought it would be helpful to illustrate my thoughts in a diagram. Click to enlarge Source: CFI Top Down vs. Bottom Up As I look at the diagram it logically flows from top to bottom, however, when building a financial model to value a business I usually think about it bottom up, and in an iterative way. I start in the bottom left corner of the diagram with historical financials, working my way up to the top, then back down again to build the forecast financials (and repeat the process again). 1. Historical Financials The first place to start when valuing a business is usually with historical financial statements. The past matters a lot when performing a valuation as it informs a view of the future and what’s realistically possible. The future, of course, is heavily influenced by what the company’s assets, management team, competition and markets will do going forward. 2. Assets Examining the asset base in conjunction with the historical income statement will paint a picture of the business’ ability to generate a return on those assets (“ROA” net income divided by total assets), and most importantly, generate free cash flow (operating cash flow less capital expenditures). When evaluating a business’ assets it’s important to look at both tangible (property, plant, equipment, etc.) and intangible assets (brands, customer lists, intellectual property, etc.). 3. Management Track-record Assessing management can be quite challenging, especially if you don’t have the opportunity to meet them in person (which is the case for most retail investors). An easy way to evaluate their performance is to look back at historical guidance (if a public company) and measure it against results achieved. Do you see a consistent trend of missing, meeting, or beating guidance? Measuring the track-record combined with in-person meetings to assess integrity, honesty, work ethic, etc. will be the best way to decide whether you assign a “management premium” or “management discount” to the business. 4. Competition What is the current state of competition in this industry? Are barriers to entry high or low, and how much pricing power does the company have? Answers to these types questions (and others listed in the diagram above) will help shape your view of risk and the company’s ability to protect profits (which will be reflected in the forecast financials). 5. “Moat” Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger are notorious for buying business that have wide moats around them, or more literally, have durable competitive advantages. Examples of companies with big moats around them include Google (NASDAQ: GOOG ) (NASDAQ: GOOGL ) (Alphabet), railroad companies (infrastructure), Coca Cola (NYSE: KO ) (its brand), and business with network effects like Facebook (NASDAQ: FB ) and Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN ). The wider the moat, the longer the company will be able to earn above average profits, and the lower the risk of the investment. The inverse it true for companies with little to no moat. 6. Culture & Strategy I group these two together because they are two of the main objectives of the CEO. Culture is critical as it drives the “Why” of an organization (see Simon Sinek) and motivates people to create a business that can change the world (even if in some small way). Culture is also critical for driving company behavior such as honesty and integrity, which lowers the risk of the business. Next in importance is strategy (i.e. “strategy eats culture for breakfast” ?) as this will be critical in maintaining any durable competitive advantage that a company has, or is attempting to gain/increase. 7. Future Assets Based on the strategy of the business, what will the assets look like in the future? Will the company have to significantly invest to grow the asset base, and if so, what types of ROA will they earn? It’s important to think carefully about how much capital is required to sustain and grow the assets (based on the strategy) and how those assets will create value in the form of free cash flow generation. The details/inputs behind these assets will generate the “principles” or drivers of the financial model. 8. Forecast Financials With a deep understanding of the industry, management (culture & strategy), and the business’ assets it’s now possible to forecast future financial statements. A good model will dis-aggregate the various drivers of revenues, expenses, etc. and present them as inputs that can easily be changed. Depending on the industry or maturity of the business you may forecast out anywhere from 5 years to the end of an asset’s life. 9. Discount Rate Once the financial forecast is in place, setting up the discounted cash flow (“DCF”) model is just simple mechanics in Excel. The most challenging and subjective part of the DCF model is determining what discount rate to use. There are specific formulas you can use based on interest rates and relative volatility, but the essence of the discount rate is captured in most of the qualitative issues discussed above: stability of assets, durability of a moat, competence of management, risk of changes in competitive dynamics, and risk of changes in markets (i.e. government regulation). Taking all of these into account will determine what discount rate you think is appropriate to account for the riskiness of the investment. To the extent you have risk-adjusted the cash flows directly in the model (for the risks discussed above), you don’t need to include those risks in the discount rate (i.e. a perfectly risk adjusted cash flow forecast would be discounted at only the appropriate risk free government treasury rate). 10. Price The net present value (“NPV”) of future cash flows gives you the value of the business, but how much are you willing to pay for it? Value investors will typically want to build in a margin of safety (say 20-30%) by paying less than the intrinsic value. Other investors pay full value if they are willing to accept the discount rate as their internal rate of return (“IRR”). Investors typically look at comparable companies or past transaction (acquisitions) to see what other people are willing to pay for similar business (this adds an element of game theory or “greater fool theory” and moves away from intrinsic value). Conclusion This is how I think about valuation when building a financial model and I hope you found it insightful. I’m a visual learner and find it useful to organize mental models, like valuation, on paper. The key takeaway for me is that valuation is an iterative process — you really have to cycle through things like markets, competition, management, and assets multiple times before you can build a reliable financial forecast and discount it back to today. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.