Scalper1 News
Apple ’s ( AAPL ) fight with the federal government over the encryption software on its iPhones only took a short pause after the Justice Department backed down in the San Bernardino, Calif., shooter case. Apple is facing renewed challenges on the issue from several fronts. The Justice Department on Friday said it will continue to seek a court order to require Apple to help it access data from a locked iPhone seized in a New York drug investigation, the Wall Street Journal reported . A judge in the Brooklyn drug case had previously refused to force Apple to help open the iPhone. That case had been overshadowed by the San Bernardino terrorist probe. On March 28, federal prosecutors withdrew their demand that Apple help it hack an iPhone 5C belonging to deceased killer Syed Farook, saying it had found a way to unlock the phone using a third party. But that solution only works on older iPhones, FBI Director James Comey said Wednesday, NBC News reported . Federal law enforcement officials reportedly have at least a dozen criminal investigations in which they are trying to get Apple to unlock iPhones. Apple CEO Tim Cook has maintained that government demands for it to hack its iPhone software would set a dangerous precedent. If Apple is forced to write software to get around its security, it would be creating a back door that criminals, hackers and spies could exploit, he said. That would jeopardize the privacy and security of the personal and financial data on millions of iPhones, Cook said. Meanwhile, Sens. Richard Burr, R-N.C., and Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., are preparing legislation titled the “Compliance With Court Orders Act of 2016.” As drafted, the legislation would require any individual or company to comply with any U.S. court order and hand over data to authorities, including data that is encrypted or made “unintelligible” by other means. Gaurav Laroia, policy counsel with the Free Press Action Fund, called the proposed bill a “massive overreach” by the government. It “would undermine any technology that helps secure people’s private communications,” he said in a statement. Burr and Feinstein “have forgotten the rights guaranteed to Americans under the Constitution,” Laroia said. Daniel Castro, vice president of the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, also slammed the proposed bill. He said the bill would force companies to create workarounds for their software, even when it is the customer who controls the encryption keys. Scalper1 News
Scalper1 News