Scalper1 News
Summary KKR Income Opportunities is a closed end fund that invests in high yield bonds and senior loans. While the 10.6% yield and the 14% discount to NAV may look tempting, some investors are worried about a continuation of the weak trend in this space. In this article I will present a market neutral strategy that can benefit from a compression in NAV discount while hedging a significant portion of the market risk. In a recent post I talked about the KKR Income Opportunities Fund (NYSE: KIO ) and how I found it attractive for income seeking investors. The biggest concern I have on that fund is the risk that weakness in high yield and leveraged loans may persist in 2016. In that case the 10% yield may be partially eroded by a declining NAV or a widening of the discount to NAV. For this reason I decided to dig further into this space and tried to devise a strategy that reduces the market risk while allowing investors to benefit from a reduction in the NAV discount. This strategy may be interesting for sophisticated investors that have access to and are familiar with the pros and cons of shorting. The strategy The strategy I have in mind involves going long KIO and at the same time hedging the position by shorting a combination of two related ETFs: the iShares iBoxx High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (NYSEARCA: HYG ) and the SPDR Blackstone/GSO Senior Loan ETF (NYSEARCA: SRLN ). For more details on KIO I encourage you to read my previous post . Here I am going to give you a quick snapshot on HYG and SRLN before detailing the reason why I believe this strategy could deliver superior risk adjusted returns. HYG is an ETF that gives you exposure to US high yield bonds. It is very well diversified, with more than a thousand securities in the portfolio and a concentration of 4.7% of NAV in the top 10 names. The effective duration of the fund is 4.3 years while the total expense ratio is 0.5%. According to the latest fact sheet the credit rating breakdown is the following: SRLN is an ETF that gives you exposure to leveraged loans. It is less diversified than HYG with a total of 192 securities and has a concentration of 15% of NAV in the top 10 names. The average maturity is a bit less than 5 years but interest rate risk is minimal as loans are generally indexed to Libor. The total expense ratio is 0.7% and the most recent credit breakdown is the following: Analysis of the trade Considering that KIO is a fund that invests in high yield bonds and loans and is trading at approximately 15% discount to NAV I believe one could effectively short a combination of HYG and SRLN at prices close to NAV and go long KIO to take advantage of the mispricing. I would go short $1,500 of HYG + SRLN for each $1,000 in KIO to take into consideration the level of leverage in the KKR fund (a third of the assets are financed through a credit facility). The following analysis shows the NAV performance of $1,000 invested in KIO since the beginning of the year and compares it with the NAV performance of $1,500 invested in HYG +SRLN. The analysis includes the dividends distributed by all the funds. What you can see from the analysis above is that KIO outperformed both HYG and SRLN on a distribution adjusted basis in terms of NAV. I attribute a good part of that outperformance to the significant underweight in the energy sector of the KIO fund. Despite that, the stock performed poorly, down 12% for the year due to an increase in the NAV discount or down 4% after taking into consideration the distributions received. What to expect from the trade As you are short $1.5 for each $1 invested in KIO you are expected to “pay” a dividend cost of approximately 7.5% for your short: 5% is the average yield on HYG and SRLN and that needs to be multiplied by 1.5. This outflow will be more than compensated by a 10.6% dividend in KIO. All things staying the same and excluding tax considerations you net 3% and you are likely left with some spare cash given that you are shorting more than your long investment. In a positive scenario you can expect the NAV discount to reduce over time providing an additional source of profits. In terms of NAV performance you can expect a very similar development for your long and your short: KIO is a bit weaker in terms of average rating but has a lower exposure to the tricky energy sector. Some of you may ask a question: is this a pure arbitrage trade? I want to stress that this is not an arbitrage trade. Underlying securities in the two portfolios are different, sector weightings are different and portfolio concentration is different. However overall performance of the different assets should show a very strong correlation, with the main difference being that you buy a portfolio at a 15% discount and you sell a similar (but not identical) portfolio at par. Your biggest risk exposure lies in the possibility that the discount to NAV widens further in KIO. That should happen only in case of a new sharp drop in the value of the assets. I believe that would represent a great opportunity to cover my short at a profit and double down on KIO at an even cheaper valuation relative to the market value of its underlying assets and I would be more than willing to take that risk. Scalper1 News
Scalper1 News